Culturally disadvantaged students may not receive an adequate education due to
limited experiences with what the teacher is saying. These school experiances that
reinforce inadequacy hinder self-esteen and provide little motivation as to what real
world provides (Bakken, 2002:5). Furthermore, Bakken(2002:7) added that:
“Many students who do not have easy access to better learning situation believe
learning English is mostly memorizing subject which adds to their low
achievement. However, students move away from this belief as they study more
and deeper. The longer they remain in school, the farther below the avarage
grade level they fall, finally drop out, become delinquent, and perhaps join the
mass of unemployed youth”.
The children at the bottom of the socio-economic scale generally achive far below
the normal levels. Several factors are suggested as factors why students fail to meet the
standard requirements. At times, young people see no relationship between the day-to-
day activities of the school and the opportunities are open to them in the future.
Lubienski (2006:71) said, “by providing fair learning opportunities to different
population will help narrow the achievement gap. Existing economic power in the
comunity showed srong influance”. Furthermore, he found that nearly 50% of the
variance in test passing rates was determined by the demographic opportunity sructure
such as financial capital, human capital (level of parents’ education), cultural capital
(status and expectacy), and geographic capital (level of urban influance), rather than
the oppotunity sructure provide d within schools (economic opportunity sructure). As
English (2002:34) wrote that, demographic opportunity sructure is largely influanced
by economic opportunity sructure and other capitals, and it has srong impact on
students’ achievement rate.
5 Social Class Classifications
According to Adler (1993:45) social economic status is traditionally measured by
eduaction, income, and occupation. By using these criteria, the social classification is
grouped.
Numerous designations have been developed to categorize different levels of social
class continuum. The three most popular designations are:
1. Three subgroups: upper class, middle class, and lower class
2. Five subgroups: upper class, upper-middle class, lower-middle class, upper-
working class, and lower-working class.
3. Six subgroups: upper-upper class, lower upper class, upper middle class, lower-
middle class, uper-lower class and lower-lower class.
These subgroups are considered only as abroad label. They cannot account for
variety of pattert to be found within each class level or do justice to an individual who
is catagorized as being at specific class level. They suffice only to point out main group
differences in life styles as they relate to such factors as home background, race,
education, income, and occupational status.
The calculation of a social has been controversy. According to Anderson(1995:26),
the eventual classification is devided into three different social groups namely labeled
as ‘high’, middle’ and low’,. The indicators of social class are residcupatential area and