Table 4: Correlation (R
2
) between FITCH (proxy for RNAp numbers) and FSCH, SSCH, and Width (proxies for cell size
and composition) in each medium.
M63 LB TB
R
2
P-value R
2
P-value R
2
P-value
FITCH vs FSCH 0.39 <0.01 0.21 <0.01 0.13 <0.01
FITCH vs SSCH 0.49 <0.01 0.36 <0.01 0.25 <0.01
FITCH vs W 0.47 <0.01 0.34 <0.01 0.24 <0.01
We searched for correlations between single-cell
values of FITCH and the respective values of FSCH,
SSCH and W (Figure 5), by performing fits by linear
regression (least-squares fit method). Also, we
obtained the P-values of statistical significance
(Table 4), by applying F-tests (Methods).
From Figure 5 and Table 4, in all media, the
linear fits are statistically significant, as the P-values
from the least-squares regression fits are smaller
than 0.01 (Table 4). Meanwhile, from the R
2
values,
we find that the goodness of fit decreases for
increasing medium richness.
4 CONCLUSIONS
Our results indicate that the mean and cell-to-cell
variability in RNAp numbers in E. coli cells differs
with parameter values associated to the cell size and
composition, as measured by flow cytometry. In
particular, the mean increases and the variability
decreases as each of these parameter values
increases. At the population level, these changes can
only be detected by classifying cells according to the
values of FSCH, SSCH and Width, respectively.
Analyzing the data at the single-cell level, one also
finds these correlations, being more pronounced in
poor growth medium.
We expect this knowledge to be relevant in
studies of gene expression dynamics in various
media, as the amount of RNAp is a key regulatory
mechanism of transcription dynamics. Namely, our
results suggest that the cell-to-cell variability in gene
expression may differ not only due to intrinsic noise
in gene expression and extrinsic factors, but also due
to the medium-dependence of the mean values of
FSCH, SSCH and Width.
At present, we cannot explain why the cell-to-
cell variability in SSCH, FSCH, and Width are not
correlated to the cell-to-cell variability in RNAp
numbers, while being correlated to the mean RNAp
numbers. An answer to this question may be of
relevance, as the RNAp is a master regulator of gene
expression in bacteria, and the answer may reveal
aspects of how their numbers are regulated. Thus,
the answers should contribute to a better
understanding of the modifications that these
organisms undergo following environmental
changes.
REFERENCES
Arkin, A., Ross, J. and McAdams, H. H. (1998)
‘Stochastic kinetic analysis of developmental pathway
bifurcation in phage λ-infected Escherichia coli cells’,
Genetics, 149(4), pp. 1633–1648. doi: 10.1016/0092-
8674(82)90456-1.
Bratton, B. P., Mooney, R. A. and Weisshaar, J. C. (2011)
‘Spatial distribution and diffusive motion of rna
polymerase in live Escherichia coli’, Journal of
Bacteriology, 193(19), pp. 5138–5146. doi:
10.1128/JB.00198-11.
Browning, D. F. and Busby, S. J. (2016) ‘Local and global
regulation of transcription initiation in bacteria’,
Nature Reviews Microbiology. Nature Publishing
Group, 14(10), pp. 638–650. doi:
10.1038/nrmicro.2016.103.
Cabrera, J. E. and Jin, D. J. (2003) ‘The distribution of
RNA polymerase in Escherichia coli is dynamic and
sensitive to environmental cues’, Molecular
Microbiology, 50(5), pp. 1493–1505. doi:
10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03805.x.
Elowitz, M. B. et al. (2002) ‘Stochastic gene expression in
a single cell: Supporting online material’, Science,
297, pp. 1183–1187.
Gillespie, D. T. (1977) ‘Exact stochastic simulation of
coupled chemical reactions’, Journal of Physical
Chemistry, 81(25), pp. 2340–2361. doi:
10.1021/j100540a008.
Kærn, M. et al. (2005) ‘Stochasticity in gene expression:
From theories to phenotypes’, Nature Reviews
Genetics, 6(6), pp. 451–464. doi: 10.1038/nrg1615.
Mäkelä, J., Kandavalli, V. and Ribeiro, A. S. (2017)
‘Rate-limiting steps in transcription dictate sensitivity
to variability in cellular components’, Scientific
Reports, 7(1), pp. 10588. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-
11257-2.
McClure, W. R. (1980) ‘Rate-limiting steps in RNA chain
initiation.’, Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences, 77(10), pp. 5634–5638. doi:
10.1073/pnas.77.10.5634.
McClure, W. R. (1985) ‘Mechanism and Control of
Transcription Initiation in Prokaryotes’, Annual