Ability of Writing Report on Observation Results Text in Class X
SMA using Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) Models
Web-based
Indriani Nisja, Lira Hayu Afdetis Mana, Titiek Fujita Yusandra, Sefna Rismen
Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, STKIP PGRI Sumatera Barat, Indonesia
Keywords: report on observation results text, STAD, Web
Abstract: Students have difficulties in writing and understanding the 2013 curriculum especially the writing of report
on observation results text. The difficulties are often found in determining the structure of the text and
linguistic factors. The purpose of this study is to describe the results of learning to write text by using a
web-based Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) model. This type of research is quantitative with
the descriptive method. The population of this study is all students of class X SMAN 12 Padang. The
sampling technique in this study is simple random sampling. The sample was 36 students of grade 1 IPA.
The data in this study was the writing skill of report on observation results text score taken from class X
students of SMAN 12 Padang. The instrument of this research is obtained through performance tests. The
results of the research indicators of the text structure, the general definition of the average value of 94,44 in
the range of 86-95% classified as excellent, description of the average value of 81,48 at the level of mastery
75-85% are well qualified, the definition of the benefits of the average value average 70,37 at the level of
mastery 66-75% qualified more than enough, and the language factors, in this case, the verb with a value of
83,33 is in the range of 78-85% with good quality. Thus the results of the research for the writing skills of
the report on observation results text web-based with use Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD)
model obtained an average score of 82,41 at the mastery level of 76-85% with good quality.
1 INTRODUCTION
Learning Indonesian language in 2013 Curriculum
for all levels (SD, SMP, SMA) emphasizes text-
based learning. Because the text is a vehicle to
express feelings and thoughts aesthetically and
logically. In line with that role, Indonesian language
learning is presented in text-based books, both oral
and written, by placing Indonesian as a vehicle to
express feelings and thoughts (Ramadania, 2016).
There are several texts learned in class X semester 1,
including the report on observation results text,
exposition, anecdotes, and storytelling texts.
According to Kosasih (2014:43), observational
reports are essays that present facts obtained through
observation and produce a clear knowledge or
insight to the reader. According to Darmawati
(2014: 55), the report on observation results text is a
type of text that aims to obtain data about a problem.
The data is proof of information or information
obtained previously. The text of the observation
report contains a general description of something
based on the results of observation activities. This
activity is carried out to obtain information about
behavior, circumstances, conditions, or situations of
the object under study.
The ability to write observational report text
written in the 2013 curriculum in class X Semester I
is at Core Competence (KI) 4. Process, reason, and
present in the realm of the realm and the realm of
religion related to the development of what is
learned in school independently, and able to use
methods according to scientific rules. Basic
Competence 4.2 Construct the text of the
observation report by observing the content and
aspects of language both oral and written. In this
case, the construction will be lowered to the text
writing indicator. Writing is conveying ideas or
ideas and messages using graphic symbols or writing
(Arundati, 2010.). Based on the results of previous
studies, learning is done using the STAD model
manually, but students have difficulty in writing text
reports on observations at SMAN 12 Padang. This is
Nisja, I., Afdetis Mana, L., Fujita Yusandra, T. and Rismen, S.
Ability of Writing Report on Observation Results Text in Class X SMA using Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) Models Web-based.
DOI: 10.5220/0008997102370241
In Proceedings of the International Conference on Education, Language and Society (ICELS 2019), pages 237-241
ISBN: 978-989-758-405-3
Copyright
c
2020 by SCITEPRESS – Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
237
why students find it difficult to determine linguistic
structure and rules from the text of the observation
report. Based on the results of interviewing
Indonesian language teacher, Dra. Eliwati, on
January 28, 2019, obtained information about
several problems in learning to write the report text
of the observation results as follows. First, not all
students are skilled in writing the text of the
observation report. Second, not all students
understand the structure and linguistic characteristics
of the observation report text. Third, the source book
given to students is late. Based on the problems
above, efforts need making to improve the ability of
students to write text reports on observations, among
others, by using the web-based learning model
Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD).
The reason for choosing a web-based Student
Teams-Achievement Division (STAD) model is that
students can study anywhere and anytime without
time constraints. They can read the material through
their respective handsets. The workings of the web-
based Student Teams Achievement Division
(STAD) learning model begins with the teacher
conveying the KD and the objectives of the lesson to
be achieved in learning the observation report text.
The teacher provides motivation for students to
learn. Afterwards the teacher divides students into
groups of 4-5 heterogeneous students. After the
teacher determines the group of students, the teacher
gives the user name and password to each group.
Then the teacher delivers learning material related to
the text of the observation report.
The teacher gives an example of the text of the
observation report. Afterwards the students
determine the structure and the language rules of the
observation report text contained in the web
application. Each group makes a text of the
observation report with the theme "Plants" in
accordance with the structure and the language rules
of the observation report text. The next step Students
open the website and answer the quiz in the web
application. Then, in the end, the teacher gives a
prize to the group that wins or gets the highest score.
The prize is one book.
2 RESEARCH METHOD
This type of research is quantitative research
because in data collection using numbers. According
to Arikunto (2010: 27), quantitative research is a
type of research that uses numbers, starting from
data collection, then interpreting data and finally
showing the results.
The method used in this research is the
descriptive method. According to Sugiyono (2005:
21), the descriptive method is a method used to
describe or analyze a research result but is not used
to make broader conclusions. The population in this
study is all students of class X of SMAN 12 Padang
enrolled in the 2018/2019 school year, the total is
396 consists of 11 classes. The sampling technique
in this study is simple random sampling technique.
According to Sugiyono (2001: 57), simple random
sampling is sampling from members of the
population that are carried out randomly without
regard to strata that exist in that population.
The class sampled is class XI IPA 1 as an
experimental class of 36 students. This class have
been selected for a class normally distributed and
had homogeneous variances. The instrument used in
this study is a performance test, with pretest and
posttest that is a writing skill test of report on
observation results text. The performance test used
to measure the level of skill in writing a report on
observation results text by using a web-based
Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD)
model; students learn to use web applications. The
indicators that will be assessed in the writing of
students are (1) general definition (2) description of
part (3) description of benefits (4) material verb.
3 FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION
3.1 Findings
The purpose of this research was to find out the
Writing Skills report on observation results text by
Using Web-Based Student Teams Achievement
Division (STAD) Model in Class X SMAN 12
Padang.
1. The Ability of report on observation results text
by Using Student Teams Achievement Division
(STAD) Model Web-Based in Class X SMAN
12 Padang
a. Indicator 1 (General Definition)
Based on the results of the test report writing
skills, the results of the observation of class X
students of SMAN 12 Padang by using the web-
based Student Teams Achievement Division
(STAD) model for indicator 1 (general definition)
obtained values ranging from 33.33 to 6 people
(16.67%) and the value of 100 is 30 people
(83.33%).
ICELS 2019 - International Conference on Education, Language, and Society
238
Table 1. Frequency Distribution of Text Writing Skills
Reports of Observation Results by Using Web-Based
Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) Model
No
X
F
FX
1
33,33
0
0
2
66,67
6
400,02
3
100
30
3000
Total
∑F= 36
∑FX= 3400,02
Classifying the Text Writing Skills of the Report
on Observation Results by Using a Web-Based
Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD)
Model in Class X SMAN 12 Padang for Indicator 1
(General Definition)
No
Mastery
Level
Qualification
Percentage
100
1
96-100
Perfect
83,33
2
86-95
Very good
0
3
76-85
good
0
4
66-75
More than
enough
16,67
5
56-65
Enough
0
6
46-55
Almost
enough
0
7
36-45
Less
0
8
26-35
Less than
0
9
16-25
Bad
0
10
1-15
Very bad
0
Total
36
100
b. Indicator 2 (Description Section)
Based on the results of the test report writing
skills the results of the observation text of class X
SMAN 12 Padang by using the web-based Student
Teams Achievement Division (STAD) model for
indicator 2 (the description section contains
explaining certain aspects of the observed object)
values ranging from 33,33- 100. First, students who
get score of 33.33 are obtained by 6 students with a
percentage (16.67%). Second, students who get
score 66.67 are obtained by 8 students with a
percentage (22.22%). Third, students who getscore
100 are obtained by 22 students with a percentage
(61.11%).
Table 2: Frequency Distribution of Text Writing Skills
Reports of Observation Results by Using the Web-Based
Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) Model
Class X Students of SMAN 12 Padang for Indicator 2
(Section Description)
No
X
F
FX
1
33,33
6
199,98
2
66,67
8
533,36
3
100
22
2200
Total
∑F= 36
∑FX = 2933,34
Table 3: Grouping Text Writing Skills Report Observation
Results by Using Student Teams Achievement Division
(STAD) Model Web-Based Students of Class X SMAN 12
Padang for Indicator 2 (Description Section)
No
Mastery
Level
Qualification
Frequency
Percentag
e 100
1
96-100
Perfect
22
61,11
2
86-95
Very good
0
0
3
76-85
good
0
0
4
66-75
More than
enough
8
22,22
5
56-65
Enough
0
0
6
46-55
Almost
enough
0
0
7
36-45
Less
0
0
8
26-35
Less than
6
16,67
9
16-25
Bad
0
0
10
1-15
Very bad
0
0
Total
36
100
c. Indicator 3 (Description of Benefits)
Based on the results of the test report writing
skills the results of the text observation class X
students of SMAN 12 Padang using the web-based
Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD)
model for indicator 3 (description of the benefits of
the section that explains the usefulness of the
exposure to the theme of previous description)
values range from 33,33 -100. First, students who
get score of 33.33 were obtained by 11 students with
a percentage (30.55%). Second, students who get
score 66.67 were obtained by 10 students with a
percentage (27.78%). Third, students who get score
100 are obtained by 15 students with a percentage
(41.67%).
Table 4: Frequency Distribution of Text Writing Skills
Reports of Observation Results Using the Student Teams
Achievement Division (STAD) Model Web-Based
Students of Class X SMAN 12 Padang for Indicator 3
(Description of Benefits)
No
X
F
FX
1
33,33
11
366,63
2
66,67
10
666,7
3
100
15
1500
Total
∑F= 36
∑FX = 2533,33
Table 5: Grouping Text Writing Skills Reports on
Observation Results Using Web-Based Student Teams
Achievement Division (STAD) Model Class X SMAN 12
Padang for Indicator 3 (Benefit Description)
No
Mastery
Level
Qualification
Frequency
Percenta
ge 100
1
96-100
Perfect
15
41,67
2
86-95
Very good
0
0
3
76-85
good
0
0
4
66-75
More than
enough
10
27,78
5
56-65
Enough
0
0
Ability of Writing Report on Observation Results Text in Class X SMA using Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) Models
Web-based
239
6
46-55
Almost
enough
0
0
7
36-45
Less
0
0
8
26-35
Less than
11
30,55
9
16-25
Bad
0
0
10
1-15
Very bad
0
0
Total
36
100
d. Indicator 4 (Material Verb)
Based on the results of the test report writing
skills the results of the text observation of class X
students of SMAN 12 Padang using a web-based
Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD)
model for indicator 4 (material verb) values ranging
from 33.33-100. First, students who got a score of
33.33 were obtained by 6 students with a percentage
(16.67%). Second, students who scored 66.67 were
obtained by 6 students with a percentage (16.67%).
Third, students who got a score of 100 were
obtained by 24 students with a percentage (66.66%).
Table 6: Frequency Distribution of Text Writing Skills
Reports of Observation Results Using a Web-Based
Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) Model
Class X Students of SMAN 12 Padang for Indicator 4
(Material Verbs)
No
X
F
FX
1
33,33
6
199,98
2
66,67
6
400,02
3
100
24
2400
Total
∑F= 36
∑FX = 3000
Table 7: Grouping the Text Writing Skills of the Report on
Observation Results Using a Web-Based Student Teams
Achievement Division (STAD) Model in Class X SMAN
12 Padang for Indicator 4 (Material Verbs)
No
Mastery
Level
Qualification
Frequency
Percentage
100
1
96-100
Perfect
24
66,66
2
86-95
Very good
0
0
3
76-85
good
0
0
4
66-75
More than
enough
6
16,67
5
56-65
Enough
0
0
6
46-55
Almost
enough
0
0
7
36-45
Less
0
0
8
26-35
Less than
6
16,67
9
16-25
Bad
0
0
10
1-15
Very bad
0
0
Total
36
100
4 DISCUSSION
Text Writing Skills Report on Observation Results
Using Web-Based Student Teams Achievement
Division (STAD) Model lass X SMAN 12 Padang
(Experimental Class).
Based on the results of data analysis, it is known
that the level of mastery of the report writing text
skills of observation results using a web-based
Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD)
model of class X SMAN 12 Padang with an average
of 82.41 is good, because the M is in mastery 76 -
85% on scale 10. The theory used in writing the text
of the observation report is Kosasih (2014) which is
divided into 4 indicators in writing the report text of
the observation as follows: (1) general definition, (2)
part description, (3) description benefits, and (4)
material verbs. According to Nataliasari (2014), the
skill of writing a report text after using a cooperative
learning model of the Group Investigation (GI) type
VII grade student at Lubuk Alung State Junior High
School 2 in the qualification of more than enough
with an average value of 75,36. Below, the score
obtained from the observation report writing skills
using the web-based Student Teams Achievement
Division (STAD) model of class X SMAN 12
Padang indicators can be described as follows.
Based on the analysis of carried out using a web-
based Student Teams Achievement Division
(STAD) model that received a perfect score of 5
people, very good 9 people, good 10 people, more
than enough 8 people, and enough 4 people. The
ability of the observation report text by using a web-
based Student Teams Achievement Division
(STAD) model for indicator 1 is a general definition
that is the part that describes the observed object in
characteristics, existence, habits, groupings and
various other aspects. Samples that obtained more
than enough qualifications are 6 students. Samples
that get perfect qualifications are 30 students.
According to Kosasih (2014: 47), a general
definition is a part of describes the object being
observed, both about (characteristics, existence,
habits, grouping and various other aspects).
The ability of the observation report text by
using a web-based Student Teams Achievement
Division (STAD) model for indicators 2 the
description section contains explaining certain
aspects of the object being observed. The sample
that received the qualifications is less than 6
students. Samples that obtained more than enough
qualifications were 8 students. Samples that received
perfect qualifications were 22 students. According to
Kosasih (2014: 47), the description of the section
contains certain aspects of the object being
observed.
The skill of writing report text by using a web-
based Student Teams Achievement Division
ICELS 2019 - International Conference on Education, Language, and Society
240
(STAD) model for indicators 3 descriptions of the
benefits of the section that explains the usefulness of
the exposure to the theme described earlier. Samples
that get the once less qualification are 11 students.
Samples that get more than enough qualifications are
10 students. Samples that get perfect qualifications
are 15 students. According to Kosasih (2014: 47), a
description of the benefits of the section that
explains the usefulness of the exposure to the theme
described earlier.The skill of writing report text by
using a web-based Student Teams Achievement
Division (STAD) model is for indicators of 4
material verbs. Samples that get the Once Failed
qualification are 6 students. Samples that get more
than enough qualifications are 6 students. Samples
that get perfect qualifications are 24 students.
According to Kosasih (2014: 49), the linguistic
elements of the observation report text use material
verbs or verbs that indicate the actions of an object,
animal, human, or event.
At the time of conducting the test using the web-
based Student Teams Achievement Division
(STAD) model students looked more energetic and
more active, using the web-based Student Teams
Achievement Division (STAD) model, as for the
steps of the Student Teams Achievement Division
(STAD) based model type web as follows. First,
convey the purpose and motivate students. Second,
present information. Third, organize students into
cooperative groups. Fourth, guide the groups to
work and study. Fifth, evaluate. Sixth, give awards
(Rifai, 2017: 159).
According to Wijaya (2008: 22), E-learning is a
learning process that is carried out through a
network (network). This means that with e-learning
it is possible to convey teaching materials to
students using information and communication
technology media in the form of computers and
internet or intranet networks. With e-learning,
learning can be done anytime, anywhere, through
any route and with any access speed. The learning
process takes place efficiently and effectively.
According to (Hanum, 2018: 92) E-learning is one
form of learning model that is facilitated and
supported by the use of information and
communication technology.
Wijaya, (2008: 22) suggested that e-learning
learning has advantages, namely as follows. (1)
Increasing enhance interactivity, (2) Facilitating
learning interactions from where and at any time
(time and place flexibility), (3) Having wider reach
(potential to reach a global audience), (4) Facilitates
the improvement and storage of learning materials
(easy updating of contents as well as achievable
capabilities).
5 CONCLUSIONS
Based on the results of the analysis and discussion, it
is known that; the skill of writing report text as a
result of classroom observation.
REFERENCES
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian suatu
Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Arundati. (2010). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Siswa
dalam Menulis Karangan Melalui Media Foto
Aktifitas Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Penabur.
Hanum, N. S. 2018. Keefetifan e-learning sebagai media
pembelajaran (studi evaluasi model pembelajaran e-
learning SMK Telkom Sandhy Putra Purwokerto).
Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 3(1), 90-102.
https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v3i1.1584
Nataliasari, I. (2014). Penggunaan model pembelajaran
kooperatif teknik. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Keguruan,
1(1), 1–12.
Ramadania, F. (2016). Konsep Bahasa Berbasis Teks pada
Buku Ajar Kurikulum 2013. STILISTIKA: Jurnal
Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 1(2), 224–236.
https://doi.org/10.33654/sti.v1i2.372
Ramadania, F. (2016). Konsep Bahasa Berbasis Teks pada
Buku Ajar Kurikulum 2013. STILISTIKA: Jurnal
Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 1(2), 224–236.
https://doi.org/10.33654/sti.v1i2.372
Rifai, M. 2017. Meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar Siswa
dengan Pembelajaran STAD pada Pembelajaran IPS
Siswa Kelas IV Min Manisrejo Kota Madiun.
Premiere Educandum : Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Dan
Pembelajaran. https://doi.org/10.25273/pe.v4i02.315
Rusman. 2011. Model-Model Pembelajaran
Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Jakarta: PT.
Raja Grasindo Persada.
Sugiyono. 2005. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif
dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Wijaya, M. 2008. Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran E-
Learning Berbasis Web dengan Prinsip E-Pedagogy
dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar. Jurnal Pendidikan
Penabur,5(10), 84–94.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Ability of Writing Report on Observation Results Text in Class X SMA using Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) Models
Web-based
241