School Literacy Program: Perception of Primary School Physical
Education Teacher in Yogyakarta
Banu Setyo Adi
1
1
Yogyakarta State University, Colombo st, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Keywords: School Literacy Movement, PE Teacher, Literacy, PE
Abstract: Physical Education (PE) is one of the subjects being taught at elementary school. School literacy programs
must be applied in all subjects. To carry out the program, the PE teacher must know the meaning of literacy.
Literary learning will involve the students and the teachers. This study explored information about
perceptions of primary school PE teachers about literacy. By extracting information about the perceptions of
PE teachers, the readiness in implementation in PE learning can be seen. The literacy model of the
government was outlined in the observation sheet. The data were analyzed with standard statistics. The
analysis was determined on the perception of PE teachers on literacy program. The survey results show that
the teacher's perception of literacy was limited to reading and writing, while the teacher's attitude towards
literacy supported the programs in the learning process. This means that PE teachers needed to understand
the meaning of literacy extensively.
1 INTRODUCTION
Education is a conscious effort to influence someone to be
willing to voluntarily follow what others want. Many
educational philosophers regard education as the
development of each individual to be rationally
autonomous learner (Mike McNamee, 2005). Education
will affect the progress of a nation. As a country,
Indonesia continues to strive to organize education in
order to be able to compete with other countries. To be
able to compete, one of the government's efforts is to
adjust the needs in the world of education through
development and adjustment. Ideally with these efforts,
the quality of education in Indonesia can be established
according to what the government expects. However, the
culture of the people who are still not accustomed to
literacy is considered as one of the causes of not being
able to compete with other nations.
Ibrahim (2016) said that the results of the Program for
International Student Assessment (PISA) research were
the second worst Indonesian literacy culture in 2012 from
65 countries in the world. Indonesia ranks 64
th
out of 65
countries. The 2012 UNESCO statistics show that the
reading interest index in Indonesia has only reached 0.001.
It means that for every 1,000 residents, only one person
has an interest in reading.
The Indonesian education and culture minister issued a
regulation on the Minister of Education and Culture
Number 23 of 2015 concerning the growth of character.
The regulation gave rise to one of the flagship programs
called National Literacy Movement (GLB). Literacy was
carried out in schools through extracurricular activities or
intra-curricular. Literacy was carried out in schools
through extracurricular activities or in the intra-curricular.
Literacy in extracurricular activities was done out by
reading for several minutes, literacy months, literacy
competitions, and so on. Besides, literacy in intra-
curricular was administered during the learning. Literacy
is defined through an analysis of what literate children
should be able to do (David Wray and Jane Medwell,
2002).
Physical Education Sport and Health (PES) is one of
the subjects integrated in thematic learning in the 2013
curriculum especially in the early classes. In each learning,
literacy activities were expected to occur. Physical literacy
has been referred to, in metaphorical sense, as developing
literacy within a physical setting, synonymous to reading
and writing, and specific to the culture in which
individuals live (Delaney B, Donnelly P, News J, et al,
2008). Physical education teachers realize that they teach
thinking (cognitive) skills. It is important to note that
governing cognitive development is the same in all fields
(Muska Mosston and Sara Ashworth, 2008). David, et al
(2002) reveal that one of the factors that influence the
effectiveness of literacy learning is the series of activities.
PE is a type of learning that uses motion activity as a
means of achieving educational goals. Therefore, the
Adi, B.
School Literacy Program: Perception of Primary School Physical Education Teacher in Yogyakarta.
DOI: 10.5220/0009309702370240
In Proceedings of the 3rd Yogyakarta International Seminar on Health, Physical Education, and Sport Science in conjunction with the 2nd Conference on Interdisciplinary Approach in Sports
(YISHPESS and CoIS 2019), pages 237-240
ISBN: 978-989-758-457-2
Copyright
c
2020 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
237
physical education teacher must understand and apreciate
the meaning of literacy.
2 THEORETICAL REVIEW
2.1 PES and Academic Achievement
Research in the faculty of education in California in 2001
showed that there was a positive relationship between
physical fitness and the achievement of reading and math.
Besides, aerobic capacity had a relationship with academic
achievement (Castelli, Darla M;Hillman, Charles H,
2007). Dishman, et all (Tomporowsky Philip D, et all.
2008) find that physical activity will produce a biological
response to the human body, including muscles and
organs. That causes a response to the brain system. Kohl
and Cook (2013) argue that doing physical activity will be
affect the brain. Susan A. Carlson, et all (2008) state that
there is a significant relationship between academic
achievement in mathematics and reading which is
influenced by physical activity for 70-300 minutes per
week. Sardinha et all (2014) in his research conclude that
cardiorespiratory fitness and body weight are associated
with academic achievement. François Trudeau and Roy J.
Shephard (2008) state that there is a positive relationship
between physical activity and academic performance,
especially in terms of concentration, memory and behavior
in the classroom. Active children will not experience
fatigue easily when they follow the learning process in
class. This is also explained by Voss in Heather D Cook
(2013) that physical activity shows an increase in
prefrontal cortex activation and it decreases activation of
the posterior pariental cortex. Lopinzi et all (Cardinal,
2017) explain that physical activity is very good for the
brain and learning barriers that support mathematics and
reading.
2.2 School Literacy Program
According toYuan Sang (2017), literacy is viewed as a
participation in collaborative activities to acquire
distributed knowledge and skills. Literacy ability has a
definition that includes 1) the ability to understand
information, both oral and written, 2) the ability to
communicate what is known through speaking and
writing, 3) the ability to speak clearly, precisely and
logically, 4) the ability to write smoothly, communicating
key ideas or important ideas, and 5) having the purpose of
communicating (Klein, Peterson, & Simington, 1991).
Clay and Ferguson Brian (Pangesti Wiedarti, et all., 2016)
describe that the component of information literacy
consists of early literacy, basic literacy, library literacy,
media literacy, technology literacy, and visual literacy.
They further explain that basic literacy skills are the
ability to listen, speak, read, write, and count with regard
to analytical skills to account for, perceive information,
communicate, and describe information based on personal
understanding and conclusions.
School literacy program in primary schools is carried out
in three stages: the stages of habituation, development, and
learning. Each stage has details of different activities.
Firstly, habituation consists of literacy skills, focus and
principles of activities, the principles of reading activities,
reading activities in structuring the environment rich in
literacy, activities steps, indicators of achievement, and the
literate school ecosystems that make teachers literate by
showing performance characteristics. Secondly,
development consists of providing a variety of reading
experiences, love reading environment for the school
residents, love writing environment for the school
residents, choosing books on fiction and non-fiction
enrichment, activity steps, and achievement indicators.
The last, learning consists of providing integrated learning
based on literacy, classroom management based on
literacy, organizing material, implementing integrated
literacy in accordance with themes and subjects, making
schedules, assessment and evaluation, literacy conference
of school citizens (Faizah, Dewi Utami dkk, 2016).
2.3 Physical Literacy
The meaning of literacy in PE expressed by Whitehead
(Dozan and Bae, 2016) was related to motivation,
confidence, physical competence, understanding, and
knowledge to maintain individual physical activity in the
best level of life. Canadian Sport Center (Mandigo, et all.,
2009) defines physical literacy not only as the
development of fundamental movements and basic
movements in sports that permanently provide self-
confidence and control children to move in the breadth of
movement and sports activities, but also as abilities to read
and what will be done in children's activities. The concept
of physical literacy describes embodied experiences that
are aimed to enhance or improve physical performance
aspects of movements that enable a particular goal to be
achieved or elements of movement that need attention
(Suzanne Lundvall, 2015).
3 METHOD
The data were collected from PE teachers of primary
schools in Yogyakarta Indonesia. There were 240 primary
schools in Yogyakarta province. In testing the validity of
the data, expert judgement was involved. Data collection
instrument used was interviews. The interview involved
seven indicator in order to find information about PE
teacher perception on literacy program. Ijn the data
analysis, percentages were administered.
YISHPESS and CoIS 2019 - The 3rd Yogyakarta International Seminar on Health, Physical Education, and Sport Science (YISHPESS
2019) in conjunction with The 2nd Conference on Interdisciplinary Approach in Sports (CoIS 2019)
238
4 RESULT
The results of the study were presented in two ways. They
are the perception and the attitudes of physical education
teachers about the school literacy movement. The
complete results can be seen in Table 1.
Learning Indicator
Percentage of Perception
Providing integrated learning based
on literacy,
80% of physical education teachers
consider it impossible to integrate
literacy-based physical education
learning.
20% of physical education teachers
assume that they can integrate
literacy-based physical education
learning.
Classroom management based on
literacy,
20% of physical education teachers
assume that they cannot manage
classes to carry out literacy in
physical education learning.
80% of physical education teachers
assume that they can manage classes
to carry out literacy in physical
education learning.
Organizing material,
40% of physical education teachers
assume that physical education
subject matter cannot be organized
with literacy.
60% of physical education teachers
assume that physical education
subject matter can be organized with
literacy.
Assessment and evaluation,
80% of physical education teachers
understand that literacy evaluation is
only used in theoretical material so
that it cannot be applied in physical
education learning.
20% of physical education teachers
understand that literacy evaluation is
used to measure student
understanding.
Based on Table 1, it shows that most physical education
teachers assumed that physical education and sports
subjects could be organized with literacy programs. This
could be seen from the percentage of the class
management indicators based on literacy and organizing
the material with literacy programs.
On the other hand, most physical education teachers
assumed that it was too difficult to integrate literacy
programs in learning physical education especially in
integrating learning and evaluation.
Physical education teachers assumed that literacy was
only an activity of reading and writing. Thus, it was
considered not too related to physical activity in physical
education learning.
5 CONCLUSION
The wide and growing definition of literacy was not
totally understood by the PE teachers. The teachers still
considered literacy as an activity of reading and writing.
Therefore, the PE learning process did not maximize the
potential of the existing resources and the funding
sources.
REFERENCES
Cardinal BJ., 2016. Physical activity education's
contributions to public health and interdisciplinary
studies: documenting more than individual health
benefits. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation,
and Dance, Apr 2016; 87; 4; Proquest page 3.
https://search.proquest.com/docview/1795622953/ful
ltextPDF/D3E05A407D9E4ED7PQ/22?accountid=3
1324
Carlson Susan A., et all., 2008. Physical education and
academic achievement in lementary school: data
from the early childhood longitudinal study.
American Journal of Public Health April 2008, Vol
98, No. 4
https://search.proquest.com/docview/215090458/full
textPDF/D3E05A407D9E4ED7PQ/1?accountid=313
24
Castelli, Darla M;Hillman, Charles H., 2007. Physical
education performance outcomes and cognitive
function. Strategies; Sep/Oct 2007; 21, 1; Education
Database pg 26.
https://search.proquest.com/docview/214547161/full
textPDF/DF9AD0F016BF4094PQ/10?accountid=31
324
Wray, David and Jane Medwell., 2002. Teaching
literacy effectively in the primary school. Routledge
Falmer. London.
Delaney B, Donnelly P, News J, et al., 2008. Improving
physical literacy. Sport Northern Ireland. Belfast.
Doozan B dan Bae M., 2016. Teaching physical literacy
to promote healthy lives: tgfu and related
approaches. The Physical Education Vol 73
https://search.proquest.com/docview/1841105887/ful
ltextPDF/D3E05A407D9E4ED7PQ/15?accountid=3
1324
Faizah, Dewi Utami dkk., 2016. Panduan gerakan
literasi sekolah di sekolah dasar. Direktorat Jenderal
School Literacy Program: Perception of Primary School Physical Education Teacher in Yogyakarta
239
Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Kemdikbud RI.
Jakarta.
Klein, M.L., Peterson,S., & Simington, L., 1991.
Teaching reading in the elementary grades. Allyn
and Bacon. USA.
Kohl, et al., 2013. Educating the student body, taking
physical activity and physical education to school.
The National Academic Press. Washington.
Lundvall, Suzanne. 2015. Physical literacy in the field of
physical education e A challenge and a possibility.
Journal of Sport and Health Science 4 (2015) 113
e118.
Mandigo, James, et all., 2009. Physical literacy for
educators. Physical & Health Education Journal;
Autumn 2009; 75, 3; Education Database. Pg 27.
https://search.proquest.com/docview/214320588/full
textPDF/481852703A97410FPQ/7?accountid=3132
4
Mike McNamee., 2005. The nature and values of
physical education. physical education: essential
issues. SAGE Publications. London.
Minister of Education and Culture Regulation number 23
of 2015 tentang penumbuhan budi pekerti (about
growing character)
Mosston Muska and Sara Ashworth. 2008. Teaching
physical education. First Online Edition
Pangesti Wiedarti, dkk., 2016. Desain induk gerakan
literasi sekolah (master design of the school literacy
movement). Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar
dan Menenngah. Kementerian Pendidikan dan
Kebudayaan (Directorate General of Primary and
Secondary Education. Ministry of Education and
Culture). Jakarta.
Prioletta J dan Pyle A., 2017. Play and gender in Ontario
kindergarten classrooms: implications for literacy
learning. International Journal of Early Years
Aducation: Abingdon Vol 25 ISS 4(Dec 2017): 393-
408
retrehttps://search.proquest.com/docview/195773696
2/B794DDBB88A9453EPQ/2?accountid=31324#
diakses tanggal 13 des 17 pukul 14.15
Sardinha et all., 2014. Fitness, fatness, and academic
performance in seventh grade elementary school
student. BMC Pediatric 14: 176
Tomporowsky, Philip D, et al., 2008. Exercise and
Childrens’s Intelligence, Cognition, and Academic
Achievement. Educ Psychol Rev 20:111-131.
https://search.proquest.com/docview/234321654/DF
9AD0F016BF4094PQ/9?accountid=31324
Trudeau François and Roy J. Shephard., 2008. Physical
education, school physical activity, chool sports and
academic performance. International Journal of
Behavioral Nutrition and hysical Activity
Wray David and Jane Medwell., 2002. Teaching literacy
effectively in the primary school. Routledge Falmer.
London.
Yuan sang., 2017. Expanded territories of “literacy”:
new literacies and multiliteracies. Journal of
Education and Practice Vol 8 No 8 2017
YISHPESS and CoIS 2019 - The 3rd Yogyakarta International Seminar on Health, Physical Education, and Sport Science (YISHPESS
2019) in conjunction with The 2nd Conference on Interdisciplinary Approach in Sports (CoIS 2019)
240