Self-esteem and Coping Strategy among Adolescents as Victims of
Parental Divorce
Dahlia, Noerrisa Tartilla
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Indonesia
Keywords: Divorce, Adolescents, Self-Esteem, Coping Strategies
Abstract: A family has important functions and meanings for life sustainability in finding the meaning and purpose of
children's life. An unharmonious family can cause psychological impacts of each children's age, especially
for adolescents. Adolescents whose parents divorced have different responses. In general, the decision to
choose aspects of coping strategies and responses used by adolescents is in accordance with the pressure
situation they face. Aspects of coping strategies can be used in part or all for problem-solving. This study
aimed to determine the relationship between self-esteem and coping strategies, including aspects of which
coping strategies are used by adolescents as victims of parental divorce. This quantitative study was
conducted on 60 adolescents in Banda Aceh district, aged 13-19 years with duration of their parents’
divorce were about 1-6 years, through incidental sampling. Data of self-esteem were collected by using
adaptations of the Revised Self-Liking Self-Competence Scale (SLCS-R) and data of coping strategies were
collected by using The Brief Cope Scale. Parametric data were analyzed by using Pearson Product Moment
correlation, while non-parametric data analyzed by Spearman Brown-Formula. The results of the analysis
showed there was a relationship between self-esteem and coping strategies. Adolescents in this study used 7
coping aspects (active coping, planning, religion, using emotional support, using instrumental support,
denial and self -blame) significantly (p <0.05), but on denial and self-blame coping aspects showed negative
relations.
1 INTRODUCTION
Family has an important meaning and function for a
child’s life sustainability and for children finding the
meaning and the purpose of life, because the family
is a place to form each of family members especially
children who are still in parents’ guidance and
responsibility (Nisfiannoor & Yulianti, 2005).
Family often faces some demands or problems and
conflicts which could cause disequilibrium,
consequently the family must respond the demands
by making some changes in order to return the stable
equilibrium (homeostasis) (Sholichah, 2007). An
adolescent experiencing a conflict of parents or
experiencing family’s problems like divorce, broken
home, and economic difficulties (Ruswahyuningsih
& Afiatin, 2015) would be related to the
development of some internal problems such as
anxiety, depression, fear, helpless, low social
behavior, and low self-esteem (Sholichah, 2007).
Tafarodi and Swann (2001) define self-esteem as
a value of oneself through self-competence and self-
liking. Wangge and Hartini (2013) say that an
adolescent whose parents get divorced experiences a
difficulty to form one’s self-esteem because one’s
inconsistent feelings, therefore the feelings become
fluctuated between accepting oneself as a superior or
inferior one. Ilahi and Hartini (2015) explain that an
adolescent whose parents has divorced for one to
four years has lower self-esteem than one whose
parents has divorced for five to six years, it is
because a child’s self-esteem decreases during the
beginning of divorce moment, however it will
gradually increase because one starts to be able to
adapt with the condition.
Adolescence, a transition phase between
childhood and adulthood, generally starts from 12 or
13-year-old and ends at teens or early tens (Papalia,
Olds, & Fieldman, 2008). This phase is a susceptible
developmental phase because its characteristic is
seeking identity, therefore parents’ role is required
during this phase as a reference for an adolescent
when one seeks identity, one will be confused and
feel alone when facing parental divorce so that one
Dahlia, . and Tartilla, N.
Self-esteem and Coping Strategy among Adolescents as Victims of Parental Divorce.
DOI: 10.5220/0009436900190028
In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Psychology (ICPsy 2019), pages 19-28
ISBN: 978-989-758-448-0
Copyright
c
 2020 by SCITEPRESS – Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
19

would be susceptive to suffer from identity
confusion (Dewi & Hendriani, 2014).
Sarbini and Wulandari (2014) state that some
things that would be suffered by a child when
parents’ divorce as follows: a child would feel
insecure after being left due to parental divorce
because one still needs protection from parents
either material or non-material, a child also
perceives a rejection of family because parents’
attitude has changed due to a new spouse, a child
often becomes angry and one’s emotion becomes
uncontrolled because one frequently sees his parents
fight, a child also feels lonely, blames oneself, and
feels disgrace and even sad because being different
from one’s friends, this could lead to destroy one’s
self-concept which is often followed by depression,
aggressiveness against social and becomes
inferiority or has low self-esteem. However, Amato
(2000) says that when conflict between parents is
frequent, chronic, and open, divorce could be a way
to make a child spared from unpleased and
unfunctioned house condition, it also could reduce
pain suffered by the child because of parents’
quarrel, moreover it gives an opportunity for parents
to find another happiness.
Problems caused by divorce could become
stressors for a child (Yárnoz & Garmendia, 2016).
Disharmonious family’s problems are not just new
problems, but main problems from the root of an
adolescent’s life (Nisfiannoor & Yulianti, 2005).
Kelly and Emery (2003) state that separation of
parent makes children stressful, a factor could
increase stress condition among adolescents whose
parents get divorce is lack support from family and
social neighborhood (Hakim & Rahmawati, 2015).
A child suffers from stress because unexpectedly
one must accept a decision made by one’s parents
without previously knowing or imagining that one’s
life would change (Sarbini & Wulandari, 2014). The
situation causing stress and being very discomfort
requires one to cope it, a process to cope the stress-
caused situation is called coping (Deniz, 2006).
Lazarus and Folkman (1984) say that coping
strategy is a process to overcome various demands
either internal or external which are more than self-
capacity. Carver, Scheier, and Weintraub (1989)
classify coping strategy into two forms i.e. problem-
focused coping strategy and emotion-focused coping
strategy. Asriandari (2015) states that every
adolescent whose parents get divorced either during
a childhood or during adolescence has different
response to problem caused by parental divorce.
Some teenagers respond to the problems by positive
ways like becoming more motivated to achieve
something, or expressing emotion by doing some
positive hobbies, meanwhile others would respond
parental divorce by negative ways such as being
naughty, truculent, or other negative things.
Kammeyer-Mueller, Judge, and Scott (2009)
explain that an individual with high self-confidence
and high self-esteem believes that one could manage
problems than those with low self-confidence and
self-esteem who believes the situation is outreached.
Jerusalem and Schwarzer (1989) indicate that an
adolescent with high self-esteem could well survive
in overcoming one’s problem while an adolescent
with low self-esteem could not.
Generally, an adolescent who uses active coping
or problem-focused coping has a good relationship
with one’s parents (Frydenberg, 1997). An
adolescent with low self-esteem, increasing stress,
and lack social support tends to use avoidant coping
strategy (Krenke-Seiffge, Aunola & Nurmi, 2009).
A decision in selecting a coping strategy and a
response which would be employed to face a
stressful situation depends on external factor namely
memory about experience of various situations and
social support, as well as all pressures from various
memorable situations in life. On the other hand,
internal factor is a coping usually used in daily life
and one’s personality. An individual will select
coping strategy to solve a problem depending on
situation and stress one faces. According to Carver,
et al (1989), coping strategy aspects include Active
coping, Planning, Positive Reframing, Acceptance,
Humor, Religion, using emotional Support, Using
instrumental support, Self Destruction, Denial,
Venting, Substance use, Behavioral Disengagement
and Self-Blame.
Based on the phenomenon above, the researchers
are interested in researching whether there is a
relationship between self-esteem and all aspects of
coping strategy or only some aspects are used by
adolescents as victims of parental divorce.
2 LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Self-esteem
James (1983) first introduces self-esteem as a
component of success or competence. James (1983)
says that self-esteem fully depends on individual’s
desire to be “what” or to do “what”. Self-esteem
depends on two things namely hope or desire and
ability to realize it, on the other words self-esteem is
a function of the gap between ideal self and real self.
ICPsy 2019 - International Conference on Psychology
20

The larger gaps between ideal self and real self, the
lower one’s self-esteem.
Coopersmith (1967) defines self-esteem as a self-
evaluation conducted by an individual and the
evaluation is an interaction result between the
individual and his/her neighborhood as well as
others’ attitude toward him/her. The evaluation is
expressed with agreement or disagreement, as well
as with level of self-confidence as a competent,
important, successful and valuable person or not.
An individual with high self-esteem believes that
oneself is precious, and respects oneself (Rosenberg,
1965). According to Mruk (2006), self-esteem is an
individual’s attitude to cognitively, emotionally and
behaviorally evaluate oneself completely which
consists of positive or negative characteristics. An
individual with high self-esteem will welcome a new
experience, feel being accepted and being easily
accepted, as well as passionate to be successful in
life, while an individual with low self-esteem will be
afraid, unable to be initiative, avoid conflict, feel
insecure, anxious and depressed (Mruk, 2006a).
Tafarodi and Swann (2001) define self-esteem as
self-evaluation through self-competence and self-
liking. Self-competence is evaluating oneself either
positively or negatively related to capabilities one
owns and strongly related to one’s power as a source
of one’s success, while self-liking is self-assesment.
This aspect is rather about self-acceptance, whether
one could accept oneself after others’ judgement,
like or does not like oneself.
Based on some self-esteem theories above, this
research is based on self-esteem theories by Tafarodi
and Swann (2001) because the theory is later and
more specific than the others. Tafarodi and Swann
(2001) have developed self-esteem theory through
two related aspects namely self-competence and
self-liking or is called two factor theory, this theory
is different from the others such as theory by james
(1983) which only emphasizes self-esteem in term of
cognition, in individual’s competence and ability, so
does Rosenberg’s theory (1965) which only
emphasizes self-esteem in term of affective or
feeling on oneself.
According to Tafarodi and Swann (2001),
instrument of self-esteem was created by Rosenberg
called Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) which
actually consists of two aspects and later on is
developed by Tafarodi and Swann, therefore the
researcher believes self-esteem theory by Tafarodi
and Swann (2001) is better to employ in this
research.
2.2 Coping Strategy
Carver, Scheier, and Weintraub (1989) divide
coping strategy into two forms by referring to the
theory of Lazarus and Folkman (1984) which is
about problem-focused and emotion-focused coping
strategy. Problem-focused coping strategy involves
an effort undergone to change some things that
cause stress (stressor). The purpose of it is to reduce
demands of a situation and to increase an
individual’s effort in facing the situation, while
emotion-focused coping strategy more focuses on
emotional matters. Emotional-focused coping
strategy involves thinking and action that are
expressed to cope stress as the result of certain
situation, the action is such as avoiding oneself to
directly face stressor.
Kertamuda and Herdiansyah (2009) explain that
coping strategy is a way or method of every
individual to overcome and control situations and
problems which are recognized as painful obstacles
or challenges, and harmful threat. Wardani (2009)
defines coping strategy as an effort to have self-
adaption or to adapt with problems and pressures
that afflict oneself.
Based on several theories about coping strategy
explained above, this research refers to coping
strategy theory by Carver, Scheier, and Weintraub
(1989), it is because their theory adapt with the
pioneer theory of coping strategy, Lazarus and
Folkman (1984). Coping strategy theory by Lazarus
and Folkman (1984) only has 8 kinds of coping
namely confronted coping, distancing, self-
controlling, seeking social support, accepting
responsibility, escape avoidance, planful problem
solving, positive reappraisal, while coping strategy
by Carver, Scheier, and Weintraub (1989) has been
expanded into 14 kinds of more specific coping, so
that the researchers prefer the theory of coping
strategy by Carver, Scheier, and Weintraub (1989).
2.3 Aspects of Coping Stress
According to Carver, et al (1989) aspects of coping
strategy are classified into two, as follows:
a. Problem-focused coping strategy. Carver et al
(1989) explain that aspects of problem-focused
coping strategy as follows:
1) Active coping, a process of taking active
steps to eliminate, avoid pressure and to fix
its effect. The active behaviors consist of
initiating direct action and enforcing an
effort.
Self-esteem and Coping Strategy among Adolescents as Victims of Parental Divorce
21

2) Planning, planning or thinking about how to
overcome pressures, thinking about actions
and determining the best way to solve
problems.
3) Suppression of competing activities, putting
away other activities and prioritizing on
overcoming stressors. An individual conducts
this to enhance one’s concentration in solving
the problem one faces.
4) Restraint coping, a response by holding
oneself until an action is possible to take
5) Seeking social support for instrumental
reasons, an effort to get supporting
information, such as seeking for advice and
guidance from others.
6) Seeking social support for emotional reasons,
an effort to seek social support like obtaining
moral support, sympathy and understanding.
b. Emotion-focused coping strategy. Carver, et al.,
(1989) explained that aspects of emotion-focused
coping strategy as follows:
1) Positive reinterpretation and growth,
attempting to manage emotion rather than
facing the pressure.
2) Acceptance, an individual accepts a reality
that a problem is happening.
3) Turning to religion, an effort to turn to
religion is done by an individual by
undergoing religion-related activities like
praying, asking for God’s help when
suffering from a pressure.
4) Focus on and venting of emotions, an effort
done by an individual by revealing or
expressing one’s feeling.
5) Denial, an individual’s response by denying
believing that a problem exists and thinking
that the problem does not exist or denying
that reality.
6) Behavioral disengagement, a tendency to
reduce the effort of overcoming a pressure,
and even give up or stop the effort because
one considers that the possibility of coping to
be successful is small.
7) Mental disengagement, a variant activity
done to distract an individual from thinking
about dimension of behavior and purpose
related to stressor. Doing alternative activity
to forget problems, like daydreaming,
sleeping or addressing oneself to watch TV.
8) Alcohol-drug disengagement, an effort to
eliminate pressure by consuming drugs or
drinking alcohol.
2.4 Self-development of An Adolescent
Adolescence is a transition phase between childhood
and adulthood generally starting from 12 or 13-year-
old and ends at late teens or early twenties (Papalia,
Olds, & Fieldman, 2008). Hurlock (2009) explains
that range of adolescent’s age is 13 to 21-year-old
divided into two phases namely early adolescence
from 13 or 14 to 17-year-old and late adolescence
from 17 to 21-year-old.
Adolescence is defined as a period in which an
individual develops from the first time one shows
secondary sexual signs to reaching sexual maturity,
an individual experiences psychological
development and identification pattern from
childhood to adulthood, one also experiences
transition from social-economy dependence to a
more independent condition (Nisfiannoor &
Yulianti, 2005).
Adolescence phase is known as inevitable storm
and stress, hormonal changes always cause difficulty
or the presence of negative gap between adolescent
and parents, physiological change, cognitive and
identity development, an adolescent is demanded to
meet social role with peers and opposite gender,
finish school, make decision about career, some
adolescents go through this period without any
difficulties, however most adolescents suffer from
stress and worry (Frydenberg, 1997).
According to Kamila and Mukhlis (2013),
adolescence is the most essential period for self-
esteem development, because in this period an
adolescent will recognize and develop all aspects in
oneself so that it determines whether one will have
positive or negative self-esteem. Mattanah, Lopez,
and Govern (2011) state that important source of
increasing self-esteem on adolescents is the close
relationship with parents.
Self-esteem of an adolescent is obtained from
self-esteem of parents, so that self-esteem
development on an adolescent, especially an
adolescent whose parents get divorced, will not be
fluent, it is because an adolescent experiencing hard
and serious problems will experience the changing
behavior and one’s feeling will not be consistent,
consequently the feeling will fluctuate from
accepting oneself as superior individual to inferior
individual, therefore an adolescent needs support
from neighborhood (Wangge & Hartini, 2013).
The research done by Ilahi and Hartini (2015)
about the relationship between self-esteem and
coping strategy on late adolescents experiencing
parental divorce conducted in Surabaya to 33
adolescents from 18 to 21 year-old found that
ICPsy 2019 - International Conference on Psychology
22

adolescents whose parents had divorced for one to
four years had lower self-esteem than those whose
parents had divorced for five to six years. It is
because child’s self-esteem will decrease at the
beginning of parental divorce, the self-esteem then
increases over time because the individual has
adapted with the condition.
3 RESEARCH METHOD
This research is a correlational research. Sample was
taken by incidental sampling technique. Total
samples were 60 adolescents as a victim of parental
divorce in Banda Aceh city and surrounding area,
they were 12-20-year-old and had been experiencing
parental divorce for 1 to 6 years.
This research employed two scale as instrument
namely adaptation scale to measure self-esteem, the
scale was The Self-Liking and Self-Competence
Scale Revised (SLCS-R) from Tafarodi and Swann
(2001), the other was The Brief Cope scale by
Carver (1997) to measure coping strategy.
Furthermore, try out process was conducted to 51
subjects. Based on tryout result, some items in The
Self-Liking and Self-Competence Scale Revised
(SLCS-R) and The Brief Cope had item
discrimination index of ≤0.20. Item discrimination
index of each item is satisfying if reaching 0.20
(Thorndike, Cunningham, Thorndike, & Hagen,
1991). Data collection in this research was done by
validity and reliability test, moreover assumption
test and hypothesis test.
4 RESULT
The oldest subjects who were 19-year-old was for
31.7%. Majority were female for 73.3%. In addition,
in term of education, subjects as university students
were for 80%. Parents’ occupation were mostly civil
servant for 43.3%. Most respondents lived with
mother for 58.3%, and the length of parental divorce
was mostly 3 years for 26.7%.
4.1 Normality Test
Statistical normality test, Exploratory Data Analysis
(EDA), is looking at kurtosis and skewness score.
Normal data have kurtosis and skewness score not
more than ±1.96 with significance level of 5%.
Kurtosis and skewness score in normality test can be
seen in table 1. Based on the table, it can be
concluded that variables or aspects with kurtosis and
skewness score not more than ±1,96 are self-esteem,
aspects of active coping, planning, positive
reframing, acceptance, humor, religion, using
emotional support, Using Instrumental Support,
denial, venting, behavior disengagement, and self-
blame. It can be interpreted that the data of this
study were normally distributed and significant.
Meanwhile, self-destruction and substance use
aspects were not distributed normally.
Table 1: Kurtosis and Skewness score in normality test
Variables/ Aspects
Kurtosis
Score
Skewness
Score
Self-Esteem 0.06 0.04
Active coping 0.18 -0.56
Planning -0.48 -0.45
Possitve reframming -0.31 -0.51
Acceptance -0.48 -0.57
Humor -0.85 -0.16
Religion -0.03 -1.01
Using Emotional Support -0.06 -0.55
Using Instrumental
Support
0.79 -0.66
Self distruction 3.09 -1.19
Denial -1.19 0.02
Venting -0.41 0.13
Subtance Use 7.39 2.87
Behavior Disengagement -0.60 0.64
Self-Blame -1.22 -0.04
4.2 Liniarity Test
Linearity test is conducted to know whether two
variables are related or not. The result or linearity
test can be seen in table 2. The table shows that
seven aspects of coping strategy (active coping,
planning, religion, using emotiomal support, using
instrumental support, denial and self-blame) were
significantly linier because the scores were less than
0.05 (p<0.05). Meanwhile, the other aspects
(Positive reframing, Acceptance, Humor, Self-
destruction, Venting, Substance Use, Behavior
Disengagement) were not linear or not related
because having significance score more than 0.05
(p>0.05).
Self-esteem and Coping Strategy among Adolescents as Victims of Parental Divorce
23

Table 2: Significance score in linearity test.
Variables/ Aspects Sig. Variables/ Aspects Sig.
Self-Esteem*Active coping 0.01
Self-Esteem *Using
Instrumental Support
0.00
Self-Esteem *Planning 0.01 Self-Esteem *Self destruction 0.23
Self-Esteem *Positive reframing 0.09 Self-Esteem *Denial 0.00
Self-Esteem *Acceptance 0.07 Self-Esteem *Venting 0.97
Self-Esteem *Humor 0.33 Self-Esteem *Substance Use 0.81
Self-Esteem *Religion 0.04
Self-Esteem *Behavior
Disengagement
0.12
Self-Esteem*Using Emotional
Support
0.00 Self-Esteem*Self-blame 0.03
4.3 Result of Hypothesis Test
Result of Assumption test on research variables
shows that research data from several aspects of
research variables were linear and normally
distributed, while some other aspects were not
normal or linear. Therefore, hypothesis test was
done by two methods, parametric with Pearson
technique and non-parametric, Spearman-Brown
Formula. If assumption test is met, parametric
method will be employed, while if assumption test is
not met, non-parametric method will be employed.
The methods were used to analyze the relationship
between self-esteem and coping strategy among
adolescents as victims of parental divorce. Both
variables show coefficient correlation and score
which can be seen in table 3 below
Table 3: Significance score and coefficient correlation in hypothesis test.
Variables/ Aspects (r) Sig. Methods/Technique
s
1 Active coping 0.310 0.016*
Parametric/ Pearson
2 Planning 0.311 0.015*
3 Religion 0.288 0.026*
4 Using Emotional Support 0.395 0.002**
5 Using Instrumental Support 0.472 0.000**
6 Denial -0.283 0.029*
7 Self-Blame -0.256 0.049*
8 Positive reframing 0.234 0.072
Non-parametric/
Spearman Brown-
Formula
9 Acceptance 0.177 -0.177
10 Humor 0.093 0.478
11 Self destruction 0.095 0.471
12 Venting -0.008 0.951
13 Substance Use 0.020 0.882
14 Behavior Disengagement -0.174 0.183
*p<0.05; **p<0
ICPsy 2019 - International Conference on Psychology
24

Based on the table above, there are seven aspects
of coping strategy used by adolescents as parental
divorce victims and those aspects are related to self-
esteem. It shows that hypothesis 1 to 7 (H
1
, H
2
, H
3
,
H
4
, H
5
, H
6
, H
7
) are accepted, the research hypothesis
will be accepted if significance score less than 0.05
(p <0.05), while the other hypotheses (H
8
, H
9
, H
10
,
H
11
, H
12
, H
13
dan H
14
) are rejected because the
significance scores are more than 0.05 (p >0.05).
5 DISCUSSION
This research was conducted to know the
relationship between self-esteem and coping strategy
aspects as well as to know which aspects were used
by adolescents as parental divorce victims. The
result shows that there is the relationship between
self-esteem and coping strategy, moreover there are
seven aspects employed namely Active coping,
Planning, Religion, Using emotional Support, Using
instrumental support, Denial, and Self-blame.
Divorce that occurs in the family is a form of
negative relationships. According to Dagun (2002),
divorce will strongly affect on every family member.
Arisandari (2015) says that every adolescent whose
parents get divorced either when they are in
childhood or in adolescence has different response in
responding problems caused by parental divorce.
Some of them respond positively, while others
respond negatively. Hurlock, 1991 quoted by
Asriandani, 2015, says that if parents and child have
positive and adaptive relationship, it will help an
adolescent in achieving developmental tasks
optimally. Meanwhile, disharmonious relationship
between child and parents could negatively affect on
an adolescent’s life. Frydenberg (1977) also explains
that an adolescent with good self-esteem and good
relationship with parents will use active coping
(problem focused coping). Mullis and Chapman
(2000); Krenke-Seiffge, Aunola and Nurmi, (2009)
state an adolescent with low self-esteem tends to
employ emotion-focused coping. The impact of
divorce could be a stressor for a child (Yarmos and
Garmendia, 2016), so that an adolescent could use
every aspect of coping strategy as classified by
Carver, Scheier and Wintraoub (1989), those are
shown previously.
Those theories support the result of this research
that adolescents as parental divorce victims have
aspects of coping strategy (14 aspects), 7 aspects
employed by the adolescents are active coping,
planning, using emotional support and using
instrumental support, religion, denial and self-blame.
The other 7 aspects not employed by the adolescents
of parental divorce victims are positive reframing,
acceptance, humor, self-destruction, venting,
substance use, and behavior disengagement.
On emotion-focused aspects such as denial and
self-blame found in this study, r value is -0,283 and -
0,256 respectfully. Negative (-) r value shows weak
relationship. It means that denial and self-blame as
part of emotion-focused problem solving are not
related. The adolescents in this study would rather
solve problems by using coping strategy as follows
active coping, planning, using emotional support and
using instrumental support. Those aspects show
positive r value.
It is interesting that religion as one of coping
strategy aspects is positively related to self-esteem
of the adolescents as parental divorce victims.
Carver, et al (1989) classify religion as part of
emotion-focused coping strategy. According Shortz
& Worthington (1994) in Plooy (2013), another
important aspect of overcoming parental divorce is
involving religion, because many people in this
world depend on religion that they believe to
overcome common pressure and difficult situation in
their lives. Significantly, religion influences the way
to solve problems caused by divorce. Subandi,
(1995), Hadisuprapto, (1994), Dayakisni, (1994) in
Indirawati, (2006), prove that there is positive
relationship between variable of religious maturity
and coping strategy tendency among university
students. The higher religious maturity is obtained,
the higher tendency of coping strategy to problem
focused coping is.
The influence of religious maturity on tendency
of coping strategy shows that one with high religious
maturity tends to employ problem focused coping
(PFC) when one is in trouble, meanwhile those with
low religious maturity tend to use emotional focused
coping (EFC) to solve their problem. It means that
the level of the religious maturity is one of
predictors of the level of coping strategy tendency.
In Jawa and Aceh, religiosity grows willingness,
reduces sadness and psychological stress, helps the
adolescents in Jawa and Aceh perceive an
experience and life positively, have self-acceptance,
and strengthen the development of hope and faith
(Afiatin, 2009; Ruswahyuningsih and Afiatin, 2015).
Another coping strategy aspect used by the
adolescents as parental divorce victims in this
research is planning. This aspect is an individual’s
effort to eliminate stressor by thinking how to
overcome the stressor itself. The result of this
research is in accordance with the research by Zahra
and Kawuryan, 2016 who studied about “Stress
Self-esteem and Coping Strategy among Adolescents as Victims of Parental Divorce
25

coping among broken home adolescents”. The
adolescents use planning to overcome stressor by
achieving something as an effort to reconcile their
parents or by suggesting their fathers to be a good
father.
Another coping aspect used by the adolescents in
this study is the using emotional support and the
using instrument support. The result of this study is
in accordance with the research by Prayascitta
(2010) and Nurjannah, et al (2018). It is known that
a divorce could lead to stress for adolescents
(Yamos and Garmendia, 2016). Therefore, the way
to reduce stress is by conducting stress copings, one
of which is having social support. Emotional and
instrumental supports are both necessary.
Instrumental Action is an action taken by an
individual directed to direct problem solving and
preparing steps that should be done.
Social support affects on health by protecting an
individual from negative effect of acute stress. A
person with high social support tends to ignore stress
because one knows that he/she will get help from
others (Sarafino, 1994 in Prayascitta, 2010). Social
support is beneficial for health and well-being
without concerning to stress level, either low or
high, social support provides same effect. Social
support improves one’s way to face or solve
problem by focusing on reducing stress reaction
through an understanding, information and feedback
needed to cope stress. Moreover, social support
could improve motivation hence reducing the impact
of stress and improving productivity (Johnson in
Ruwaida 2006 in Prayasciita, 2010).
According Sarason, et al (1983), support is
defined as the existence or willingness of other
people that can be relied on, it shows affection and
care to the value believed by an individual. Social
support gained by an individual is from family and
peers. Social support makes big difference in life
during stressing moment. By the presence of social
support, an adolescent could be encouraged to see an
event more positively and help that adolescent
identify a way to solve it.
In this research, one of 7 aspects of coping
strategy used by the adolescents as the victims of
parental divorce in Banda Aceh and surrounding
area in solving the problems is acceptance. The
result of this study is different from result of
research by Wangge and Hartini (2013) which found
that male and female adolescents in SMAK
(vocational high school) in Surabaya. The result
showed that there was positive correlation between
self-esteem and acceptance aspect of coping strategy
after parental divorce. In United States, aspects of
acceptance, reframing, and humor are employed to
solve problem caused by parental divorce.
According to Haley (1967), reframing is seeing
an event or a problem in different perspective, it is
like a picture put a new frame, it would look
different. It makes an individual independently think
and behave toward a new context which offers a new
alternative that is unseen previously. Example of
reframing employed by samples in this research is
freeing up themselves from guilt, utilizing humor,
forgiving their parents and developing empathy for
their parents during after divorce. It also happens to
distraction aspect. The presence of disturbance and
avoidance in form of avoiding a situation and
distracting them by any ways such as by spending
time away from home or focusing on academics
stuff, sport and/or painting mural etc., it also
contributes for samples in the research to effectively
overcome problem caused by parental divorce
(Plooy, 2013).
The aspect of coping strategy in this research
which does not correlate with self-esteem of the
adolescents as parental divorce victims is focusing
on and venting of emotional, it focuses on the
difficulty or any disturbance and forgetting the
feeling. According to Rime (2009), venting process
is two sides from the one who reveals and the one
who listens. However, positive venting process
could reduce stress, while negative venting stress
increases stress and causes problem in physical
health. Research by Bodie et al (2015); Goldsmith,
(2004), involving 149 students showed that venting
aspect made the students worse. The more students
employ this strategy to overcome, the less
satisfaction they receive. On contrary, the more
students employ reframing, acceptance, and positive
humor, the better the feeling they experience. It is in
accordance with explanation by Carver, Schaver and
Wentraub quoted by Harika, 2000, venting as a
coping strategy is less effective in solving a
problem.
6 CONCLUSIONS
This study was aimed to know the relationship
between self-esteem and aspects of coping strategy
among adolescents as victims of parental divorce.
There are 14 aspects of coping strategy. The result
shows that there is relationship between self-esteem
and coping strategy, moreover those adolescents
employ 7 aspects as follows Active coping,
Planning, Religion, Using emotional Support, Using
instrumental support, Denial, and Self-Blame. It is
ICPsy 2019 - International Conference on Psychology
26

positive correlation except Denial and Self-blame.
The decision to choose coping strategies and
responses that individuals use to deal with stressful
situations depends on external factors, namely the
memory of experiences from various situations and
social support, as well as all the pressures from
various situations that are important in life. While
internal factors, are coping styles that are commonly
used by someone in daily life and one's personality.
Individuals will choose coping strategies that are
appropriate to the pressure situation they face to
solve problems.
This study has implications for practice. The first
major practical contribution is that it provides
information about self-esteem and coping strategy
aspects experienced by adolescents as victims of
parental divorce. This information is important for
the development of psychology theories in enriching
insights and knowledge about the relationship of
self-esteem and coping strategies among adolescents
as victims of parental divorce, especially in clinical
psychology, developmental psychology, and mental
health. A second important implication of this study
is to educate adolescents as victims of parental
divorce can better recognize the changes that occur
as a result of divorce and problems that arise as a
result of these conditions. It is expected they can use
problem focused coping as a way to solve their
problems rather than emotion focused coping.
REFERENCES
Afiatin, T. ( 2010). Subjective Well-Being of Aceh
Adolescents after Tsunami: The Meaning of Disaster
and Adolescent Happiness. Anima, Indonesian
Psychological Journal, Vol. 25, No. 1, 11-29
Amato, P. R. (2000). The consequences of divorce for
adults and children. Journal of Marriage and Family,
23(1), 1269–1287.Download pada tanggal 1 Oktober
2017 dari https://doi.org/10.5559/di.23.1.01
Asriandari, E. (2015). Resiliensi remaja korban perceraian
orang tua. Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling. Edisi 9
Tahun ke-4.
Coopersmith, S. (1967). The antecedents of self esteem.
San fransisco: WH. Freeman. Company.
Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989).
Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based
approach. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 56(2), 267–283. Download pada tanggal 2
mei 2017 dari https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-
3514.56.2.267
Dagun, S.M.(2002). Psikologi Keluarga. Jakarta: Rineka
Cipta.
Dewi, N. R., & Hendriani, W. (2014). Faktor Protektif
untuk mencapai resiliensi pada remaja setelah
perceraian orang tua. Jurnal Psikologi Klinis Dan
Kesehatan Mental, 3(3), 37–43. Diakses dari
journal.unair.ac.id/filerPDF/jpksf91c9bc581full.pdf
Deniz, M. E. (2006). The relationship among coping with
stress, life satisfaction, decision-making styles and
decision self-esteem: an investigation with turkish
university students. Social Behavior and Personality,
34(9), 1161–1170.
Frydenberg, E. (1997). Adolescent Coping. Routledge
London and New York. Download pada tanggal 12
Oktober 2017 dari
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203938706
Hakim, S. N., & Rahmawati, B. A. (2015). Strategi coping
dalam menghadapi permasalahan akademik pada
remaja yang orang tuanya mengalami perceraian.
Psychology Forum UMM,
Hurlock, E. B. (2009). Psikologi perkembangan : suatu
pendekatan sepanjang rentang kehidupan. Ed Kelima.
Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.
Ilahi, F. R., & Hartini, N. (2015). Hubungan antara self-
esteem dengan strategi koping pada remaja akhir yang
mengalami perceraian orang tua. Jurnal Psikologi
Klinis Dan Kesehatan Mental, 4(3).
Jerusalem, M. & Schwarzer, R. (1989) ‘Anxiety and self-
concept as antecedents of stress and coping: a
longitudinal study with German and Turkish
adolescents’,. Personality and Individual Differences.
10 (7), 785– 92.
James, W. (1983). The principles of psychology.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original
work published 1890).
Kamila, I. I., & Mukhlis. (2013). Perbedaan harga diri
(self esteem) remaja ditinjau dari keberadaan ayah.
Jurnal Psikologi UIN Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, 9,
100–112.
Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D., Judge, T. A., & Scott, B. A.
(2009). The role of core self- evaluations in the coping
process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 177–195.
Kelly, J.B., and Emery, R.E. (2003). Children’s
adjustment following divorce: risk and resilience
perspectives. Family Relations, 52. 352-362.
Krenke-Seiffge, I., Aunola, K., & Nurmi, Jari-Erik.
(2009). Changes in stress perception and coping
during adolescence: The role of situational and
personal factors. Child Development, 80(1), 259–279.
Download pada tanggal dari 20 April 2017
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01258.x
Lazarus, R., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and
coping. Springer Publishing Company: New York.
Mruk, C. J. (2006). Self-esteem research, theory, and
practice (3rd ed.). New York: Springer.
Mattanah, J. F., Lopez, F. G., & Govern, J. M. (2011). The
contributions of parental attachment bonds to college
student development and adjustment: A meta-analytic
review. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 58(4),
565–596. doi:10.1037/a0024635.
Muniriyanto., & Suharnan. (2014). Keharmonisan
keluarga , konsep diri dan kenakalan remaja. Jurnal
Psikologi Indonesia, 3(2), 156–164.
Self-esteem and Coping Strategy among Adolescents as Victims of Parental Divorce
27

Nisfiannoor, M., & Yulianti, E. (2005). Perbandingan
perilaku agresif antara remaja yang berasal dari
keluarga bercerai dengan keluarga utuh. Jurnal
Psikologi Indonesia, 3(1), 1–18.
Plooy, JCD. 2013. Adults' experience of coping with
parental divorce during childhood: A
phenomenological perspective. Thesis. Psychology at
the Potchefstroom Campus of the North-West
University.
Papalia, D. E., Olds, S. W., & Feldman, R. D. (2008).
Human development, (Edisi 9). New York: The Mc
Graw-Hill Companies.
Prayascitta. P. 2010. Hubungan antara coping stress dan
dukungan sosial dengan motivasi belajar remaja yang
orangtuanya bercerai. Skripsi. Tidak diterbitkan.
Program Studi Psikologi Fakultas Kedokteran
Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta
Ruswahyuningsih, MC dan Afiatin. T. 2015. Resiliensi
pada Remaja Jawa. Gadjah Mada journal of
psychology 1 (2) 5: 96 – 105
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-
image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Sholichah, M. (2007). Pengaruh persepsi remaja tentang
konflik antar orang tua dan resiliensi terhadap depresi
dan kecemasan. Humanitas, 13(1), 22–36. ISSN 1693-
7236.
Sarbini, W., & Wulandari, K. (2014). Kondisi psikologi
anak dari keluarga yang bercerai (the conditions of
child psychology toward family divorced). Artikel
Ilmiah Hasil Penelitian Mahasiswa, 2. Diakses 20
April 2017 dari
http://repository.unej.ac.id/bitstream/handle/12345678
9/58954/Wasil Sarbini.pdf?sequence=1
Tafarodi, R. W., & Swann, W. B., Jr. (2001). Two-
dimensional self-esteem: theory and measurement.
Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 653–673.
Wangge, B. D. R., & Hartini, N. (2013). Hubungan antara
penerimaan diri dengan harga diri pada remaja pasca
perceraian orang tua. Jurnal Psikologi Kepribadian
Dan Sosial, 2(1), 1–6.
Wardani, D. S. (2009). Strategi koping orang tua
menghadapi anak autis. Indigenous, Jurnal Ilmiah
Berkala Psikologi, 11(1), 26–35.
Yárnoz-Yaben, S., & Garmendia, A. (2016). Parental
divorce and emerging adults’ subjective well-being:
the role of “carrying messages.” Journal of Child and
Family Studies, 25(2), 638–646. Download pada
tanggal 25 Maret 2017 dari
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-015-0229-0.
ICPsy 2019 - International Conference on Psychology
28