Social Perception and Effort of Sport People to Build Fairplay
Character in Football: A Situation Analysis Study in Football Match
in Special Region of Yogyakarta Province Area
Fathan Nurcahyo
1
, Caly Setiawan
1
, Muh. Hamid Anwar
1
1
Physical, Health, and Recreation Education Department, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Keywords: Social Perception of Sport People, Fair Play Character, Football.
Abstract In Special Region of Yogyakarta (DIY), football is very popular for many people. There are many
perceptions and efforts made by sport people in order to create effective and conducive environmental
conditions, one of which is to build fairplay character in football. This research intends to figure out social
perceptions and efforts of sport people to build fairplay character in football. Applying descriptive
quantitative research using survey method, questionnaires were used as the instrument to collect the data in
this research. Sport people/ society including players, coaches, football referees, supporters/ football
spectators, and parents of athletes were involved as the subjects in this research. The subjects were selected
by using random sampling and incidental random sampling in 4 districts (Sleman, Bantul, Kulonprogo,
Gunung Kidul) and 1 Yogyakarta City. To analyze the data, descriptive quantitative statistical analysis was
used. The results showed that social perceptions and efforts of sport people to build fairplay character in
football in DIY province were found as follow: 8 respondents (1.07%) had very low perception, 46
respondents (6.13%) had low perception, 109 respondents (14.53%) had medium perception, 492
respondents (65.60%) had high perception, and 95 respondents (12.67%) had very high perception.
1 INTRODUCTION
Football is not only a mean to exercise the body to
make it strong and healthy. There are many benefits
that could be developed from playing football. For
instance, it could be exploited as a job/ source of
income, as a medium for gathering-socializing-
family, as a medium of entertainment and recreation,
as political / power campaign media, as a medium of
learning and education to build character and dignity
of a nation. Jose Mourinho, a world football coach
said that, "If you want to see the character of citizens
of a nation then look at the football team when
playing football". It inferred that playing football
will also preserve the dignity of the nation in the
world.
Power and endeavours of the government in
fostering, developing, building, correcting services,
and monitoring football game cannot be turned a
blind eye. All of them are apprehended through sub-
organizations such as department of education,
youth and sports services, formal and non-formal
schools (Training Center, Football School), to sport
organization. Several efforts made by these parties
both financially and non-financially include:
providing awards in a form of bonuses and jobs for
international achievers, building international
standard facilities and infrastructures, conducting
championships and competitions between age-
groups, between clubs from various levels,
revitalizing organization and management of parent
organizations and clubs with good quality standards,
conducting various seminars, workshops, training of
trainers (TOT), conducting internships abroad,
conducting team exams abroad, conducting
comparative studies, increasing licenses and
capacities competencies for coaches and referees
(sport officials), improving standards and
implementation of game and match regulations, and
many more.
Nurcahyo, F., Setiawan, C. and Anwar, M.
Social Perception and Effort of Sport People to Build Fairplay Character in Football: A Situation Analysis Study in Football Match in Special Region of Yogyakarta Province Area.
DOI: 10.5220/0009789104850493
In Proceedings of the 3rd Yogyakarta International Seminar on Health, Physical Education, and Sport Science in conjunction with the 2nd Conference on Interdisciplinary Approach in Sports
(YISHPESS and CoIS 2019), pages 485-493
ISBN: 978-989-758-457-2
Copyright
c
2020 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
485
A good development is marked by sustainable
and tiered competition. Development and training
are also based on applicable curriculum and
materials provided. Not only physical methods,
techniques, and ways of playing, but also ethics and
aesthetics in the field based on written and unwritten
rules that make all sportsmen possess and are able to
apply good character as the characteristic of a team,
region or organization. Awards and prestige in every
level of football match have implications for
championship prizes. Ranging from coaching,
bonuses, charters etc. that can encourage ambition of
individuals or groups of people, especially for sport
players to obtain the expected results in various
ways (ambitious).
Some players or coaches often show appaling
characters on and off the field/ pitch, such as:
protesting to referees and toward the arrogance of
committee member, fighting, being involved in
consuming alcohol and drugs, free sex, clubbing,
etc. Characters that would be considered as a good
characteristic for the player and coach should not be
shown only in the pitch, but also outside of the pitch.
Embedding and acquiring character education from
teachers/ coaches, parents, families, surrounding
environment, adults, and direct experience in the
pitch bring a huge impact on a sportsman.
Participating in sport activities can build
character and it does not happen automatically
(Austin, 2010). There must be strategy, effort, and
good planning to make it happen, so that the training
plan is systematic, methodical and appropriate, and
the movement training through sports can be used
for human character development. One character
that could be developed through sports is a fair play
character. Fair play is an awareness and
magnaminity attitudes in sport people to other sport
actors which leads to good, intimate, and warm
human relationship and brotherhood. The
researchers are interested in conducting research on
social perceptions and efforts of sport people to
build fair play characters in football. The problems
mentioned in above discussion will focus on how
high the social perceptions and efforts of sport
people to build fairplay character in football in DIY
(Special Region of Yogyakarta) Province.
2 RESEARCH METHOD
A descriptive quantitative design using survey
method was used in this research. The social
perceptions and efforts of sports people to build
fairplay character in football were examined as the
research objects. A total of 750 sport actors were
involved as the subjects in this research including:
advisors/ coaches, players/ athletes/ sportsmen,
referees/ judges, parents of athletes, spectators/
supporters and the community in DIY Province
area. The subjects in this research were selected by
using incidental random sampling technique, so that
the data obtained could be generalized and applied
largely in the DIY Province.
2.1 Research Instrument
Questionnaires were used as the research instrument,
which was compiled and developed by the research
team through the stages of focus group discussion
(FGD).
YISHPESS and CoIS 2019 - The 3rd Yogyakarta International Seminar on Health, Physical Education, and Sport Science (YISHPESS
2019) in conjunction with The 2nd Conference on Interdisciplinary Approach in Sports (CoIS 2019)
486
Table 1: Lattice of research instruments of social perceptions and efforts of sports people to build fair play characters in
football.
Variable Factor Indicator Question
Number
Total
Question
SOCIAL
P
ERCEPTION AND
E
FFORTS OF
SPORTS PEOPLE
TO DEVELOP
F
AIRPLAY
CHARACTERS IN
F
OOTBALL (A
SITUATION
A
NALYSIS STUDY
I
N FOOTBALL
M
ATCHES IN DIY
ROVINCE AREAS)
Internal Factor
1. Feeling a. Positive Feelings (Feelings of Happy,
Satisfied, Proud, Respectful)
1, 3, 5 3
b. Negative Feelings (Sad Feelings, Concerns) 2*, 4*, 6* 3
2
. Attitude and
Personality
a. Positive Attitudes and Personalities (Monitor,
Praise, Appreciate, Assess, Criticize, Introduce,
Punish)
7, 9, 11 3
b. Negative Attitudes and Personalities
(Blaming, Punishing, Indifferent)
8*, 10*, 12* 3
3. Will and
Expectation
a. Emphasis 13, 18, 19 3
b. Setting Goals 15, 16, 20 3
c. Provoke 14*, 17, 21 3
4
. Learning
Process
a. One Direction (Socializing, Giving Example) 23, 24, 26 3
b. Two Directions (Discussion, Question and
Answer)
22, 25, 27 3
5. Interest and
Motivation
a. Interest 28, 35, 36 3
b. Motivation 30, 32, 33 3
c. Love 29, 31, 34 3
B. External Factor
1. Information a. Source of Info 38, 43, 45 3
b. Manage Info 37, 41, 42 3
c. Apply Info 39, 40, 44 3
2
. Form of
Object and
Stimulus
a. Negative Objects (Protest, Fighting, Stimulus
/ Reaction)
4
6*, 47*, 48* 3
b. Positive Objects (Praise, Value, Good
Stimulus)
4
9, 50, 51 3
3. Family and
Social
Environment
a. Parents 52, 58, 59 3
b
. Other People 53, 54, 55 3
c. Other Environment 56, 57, 60 3
Total Question: 60
Note: (*) : Point of Negative Question
2.2 Data Analysis Technique
The data tabulation was using Likert scale which
have been modified by the research team so it can be
used to measure attitudes, opinions, and perceptions
of a person or group of people about social
phenomena or certain objects. The modification
result of the scores on the Likert scale can be seen in
the Table 2.
The percentage size obtained from the results of
data tabulation in this research was interpreted using
normative number assessment criteria (PAN) which
were classified into 5 categories: Very High (ST),
High (T), Medium (S), Low (R) , and Very Low
(SR) as stated by B. Syarifudin (2010: 113) as seen
in the Table 3.
Table 2: Modification result of the scores on the liert scale
No.
Alternatives
Answer
Scoring of Answer
Type
Positive Negative
1. Never
(
TP
)
5 5
2. Ver
y
rarel
y
(
SJ
)
4 4
3. Sometimes
(
KDG
)
3 3
4. Often (SR) 2 2
5. Very often (SSR) 1 1
Social Perception and Effort of Sport People to Build Fairplay Character in Football: A Situation Analysis Study in Football Match in
Special Region of Yogyakarta Province Area
487
Table 3: Interpretation of Interval Score of Normative
Number Assessment (PAN)
Category Formula of Interval Class
Very High X ≥ M + 1, SD to up
High M + 0,5 SD ≤ X < M + 1,5 SD
Medium M – 0,5 SD ≤ X < M + 0,5 SD
Low M – 1,5 SD ≤ X < M – 0,5 SD
Very Low X ≤ M – 1,5 SD to below
Source: B. Syarifudin (2010: 113)
The next step was to facilitate the calculation of
the number of research samples in each class
category and analyze the data obtained from the
respondents. The data were tabulated according to
the respondent's answer to the questionnaires, then
the percentage was calculated and analyzed. The
calculation of the percentage of respondents in each
category / classification can be calculated using the
following formula:
P = f/n X 100 % (1)
Note:
P : Score Percentage
f : Total of Obtained Answer
n : Total of Respondent
Please remember that all the papers must be in
English and without orthographic errors.
Do not add any text to the headers (do not set
running heads) and footers, not even page numbers,
because text will be added electronically.
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
3.1 Result
The internal and external factors underlying the
social perceptions and efforts of sport people to
build fair play character in football in DIY Province
needed to be described as a whole. Overall, the
maximum score found in this research was 267 and
Based on the responses of the research subjects, it
can be seen that the frequency distribution of social
perceptions and efforts of sport people to build fair
play character in football in DIY Province region as
a the minimum score was 91. The average score
obtained was 213.40, and the standard deviation was
29.35. The median was 220.50 and the mode was
220. Then, they were classified into 5 categories as
seen in Table 4 below.
Table 4: Normative calculations of the categorization of social perceptions and efforts of sports people to build fair play
characters in football (A Situational Analysis Study in Football Matches in DIY Province)
Formula Limitation Ran
g
eCate
g
or
y
X < M
1,5 Under Elementary School X < 72 < 72 Very Low
M
1,5 SD ≤ X < M
0,5 SD 72 ≤ X < 96 72 - 95 Low
M
0,5 SD ≤ X < M + 0,5 SD 96 ≤ X < 120 96 - 119 Mediu
m
M + 0,5 SD ≤ X < M + 1,5 SD 120 ≤ X < 144 120 - 143 Hi
g
h
X ≥ M + 1,5 Above Elementar
y
School X ≥ 144 ≥ 144 Ver
y
Hi
g
h
Note: X = number of subject scores, M = ideal mean = 180, SD = ideal standard of deviation = 40
Table 5: Frequency distribution of social perceptions and efforts of sports people to build fair play characters in football in
the DIY Province
No Range Category Frequency Relative
Frequenc
y
Cumulative
Frequenc
y
1 < 120 Very Low 8 1.07% 8
2 120 - 159 Low 46 6.13% 54
3 160 - 199 Mediu
m
109 14.53% 163
4 200 - 239 Hi
g
h 492 65.60% 655
5 ≥ 240 Ver
y
Hi
g
h 95 12.67% 750
Total 750 100.00%
YISHPESS and CoIS 2019 - The 3rd Yogyakarta International Seminar on Health, Physical Education, and Sport Science (YISHPESS
2019) in conjunction with The 2nd Conference on Interdisciplinary Approach in Sports (CoIS 2019)
488
Considering the Table 5 above, the data on social
perceptions and efforts of sport people to build fair
play character in football in DIY province region
were found as follows: 8 respondents (1.07%) were
found to have very low perception, 46 respondents
(6.13%) with low perception, 109 (14.53%) had
medium perception, 492 respondents (65.60%) held
high perception, and 95 respondents (12.67%)
possessed very high perception. The following
histogram in Figure 1 presents the big picture of the
data.
Figure 1: Histogram of social perceptions and efforts of sport people to build fairplay characters in football in yogyakarta
province region.
In addition, the following discussion will
describe the internal and external factors in details.
3.1.1 Internal Factor
Internal factors consisted of 36 question items. It
was found that the maximum score was 160 and the
minimum score was 55. The mean obtained was
126.00, and the standard deviation was 16.52. The
median was 129, and the mode was 131. Then, the
data were classified into 5 categories as follows.
Table 6: Normative calculation of social perceptions and efforts categorization of sport people to build fair play characters
in football in DIY Province based on internal factors.
Formula Limitation Ran
g
eCate
g
or
y
X < M
1,5 SD to below X < 72 < 72 Very low
M
1,5 SD ≤ X < M
0,5 SD 72 ≤ X < 96 72 - 95 Low
M
0,5 SD ≤ X < M + 0,5 SD 96 ≤ X < 120 96 - 119 Medium
M + 0,5 SD ≤ X < M + 1,5 SD 120 ≤ X < 144 120 - 143 Hi
g
h
X ≥ M + 1,5 SD to above X ≥ 144 ≥ 144 Ver
y
hi
g
h
Note: X = total of subject score, M = ideal mean = 108 SD = ideal standard of deviation = 24
Frequency distribution of social perceptions and
the efforts of sport people to build fairplay character
in football in DIY province based on internal factors
can be seen in the following table.
0
100
200
300
400
500
sangat
rendah
rendah sedang tinggi sangattinggi
8
46
109
492
95
Frequency
Category
ProvinsiDIY
Social Perception and Effort of Sport People to Build Fairplay Character in Football: A Situation Analysis Study in Football Match in
Special Region of Yogyakarta Province Area
489
Table 7: Frequency distribution of social perceptions and efforts of sport people to build fairplay characters in football in
Yogyakarta Province region based on internal factors.
No Range Category Frequency
Relative
Fre
q
uenc
y
Cumulative
Fre
q
uenc
y
1 < 72 Very low 6 0.80% 6
2 72 - 95 Low 51 6.80% 57
3 96 - 119 Medium 107 14.27% 164
4 120 - 143 Hi
g
h 535 71.33% 699
5 ≥ 144 Ver
y
hi
g
h 51 6.80% 750
Total 750 100.00%
From the Table 7 above, it can be seen that the
data obtained on social perceptions and efforts of
sport people to build fairplay character in football in
DIY province were as follows: 6 respondents
(0.80%) were found to have very low perception, 51
respondents (6.80%) with low perception, 107
respondents (14.27%) with medium perception, 535
respondents (71.33%) with high perception, and 51
respondents (6.80%) with very high perception.
Figure 2 below presents the data in a form of
histogram.
Figure 2: Histogram of social perceptions and efforts of sport people to build fair play characters in football in yogyakarta
province region based on internal factors.
3.1.2 External Factor
In this research, 24 question items were designed to
investigate the external factors. The results showed
that the maximum score was 112 and the minimum
score was 30. While the mean obtained was 87.40,
and the standard of deviation was 14.00. The median
was found at 90.00, and the mode at 96.00. Then, the
data were classified according to predetermined
formula into 5 categories, as seen in the following
Table 8.
Table 8: Normative calculations of social perception and efforts categorization of sports people to build fairplay characters
in football in DIY province region based on external factors.
Formula Limitation Ran
g
eCate
g
or
y
X < M
1,5 SD Ke Bawah X < 48 < 48 Ver
y
low
M
1,5 SD ≤ X < M
0,5 SD 48 ≤ X < 64 48 - 63 Low
M
0,5 SD ≤ X < M + 0,5 SD 64 ≤ X < 80 64 - 79 Medium
M + 0,5 SD ≤ X < M + 1,5 SD 80 ≤ X < 96 80 - 95 Hi
g
h
X ≥ M + 1,5 SD Ke Atas X ≥ 96 ≥ 96 Ver
y
hi
g
h
Note: X = total subject score; M = ideal mean = 72; SD = standard of deviation = 16
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
sangat
rendah
rendah sedang tinggi sangattinggi
6
51
107
535
51
Frequency
Category
InternalFactors
YISHPESS and CoIS 2019 - The 3rd Yogyakarta International Seminar on Health, Physical Education, and Sport Science (YISHPESS
2019) in conjunction with The 2nd Conference on Interdisciplinary Approach in Sports (CoIS 2019)
490
Referring to the calculated categorization of
tendencies, the frequency distribution of social
perceptions and efforts of sport people to build
fairplay character in football in DIY province based
on external factors can be seen in the Table 9 below.
Table 9: Frequency distribution of social perceptions and efforts of sports people to build fairplay characters in football in
DIY province based on external factors
No Range Category Frequency
Relative
Fre
q
uenc
y
Cumulative
Fre
q
uenc
y
1 < 48 Ver
y
low 9 1.20% 9
2 48 - 63 Low 51 6.80% 60
3 64 - 79 Medium 110 14.67% 170
4 80 - 95 High 341 45.47% 511
5 ≥ 96 Ver
y
hi
g
h 239 31.87% 750
Total 750 100.00%
Based on the Table 9 above, the data on social
perceptions and efforts of sport people to build
fairplay character in football in DIY province were
found as follow: 9 respondents (1.20%) were
identified to have very low perception, 51
respondents (6.80%) with low perception, 110
(14.67%) with medium perception, 341 respondents
(45.47%) with high perception, and 239 respondents
(31.87%) with very high perception. As seen in the
Figure 3 below, the data were presented in a form of
histogram.
Figure
3: Histogram of social perception and efforts of sports people to build fairplay character in football in
DIY province based on external factors
When the data were examined more thoroughly
based on the type of respondent, then the data
analysis was described as seen in Table 10.
Table 10: Summary of Research Result Based on Type of Respondent in DIY Province
Category Sub
j
ect
Communit
y
Su
pp
orte
r
Parents Coach Referee Athlete
Ver
y
Low 0.00% 0.00% 0.80% 0.80% 4.00% 0.80%
Low 0.00% 0.00% 8.00% 12.80% 6.40% 9.60%
Medium 14.40% 13.60% 16.00% 7.20% 12.80% 23.20%
High 64.00% 72.80% 69.60% 68.00% 58.40% 60.80%
Ver
y
Hi
g
h 21.60% 13.60% 5.60% 11.20% 18.40% 5.60%
Total 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
sangat
rendah
rendah sedang tinggi sangattinggi
9
51
110
341
239
Frequency
Category
ExternalFactor
Social Perception and Effort of Sport People to Build Fairplay Character in Football: A Situation Analysis Study in Football Match in
Special Region of Yogyakarta Province Area
491
3.2 Discussion
The social perceptions and efforts of sports people to
build fairplay character in football in DIY province
were found as follows: 8 respondents (1.07%) were
identified to have very low perceptions, 46
respondents (6.13%) with low perceptions, 109
(14.53%) with medium perception, 492 respondents
(65.60%) with high perceptions, and 95 respondents
(12.67%) with very high perceptions.
The internal factors (from within individual)
consisted of individual feelings, attitudes, and
personalities, prejudices, desires or expectations,
attention (focus), learning processes, physical
conditions, psychiatric disorders, scores and needs,
interests, and motivations. Whereas the external
factors (from outside individual) consisted of family
background, information obtained, knowledge and
needs in the vicinity, intensity, size, resistance,
repetition of movement, new and familiar things or
unfamiliarity with an object.
The highest social perceptions and the efforts of
sports people to build fairplay character in football
in DIY province were found from the supporters,
then followed by community, coaches, referees,
parents, and finally athletes. Apparently, by
providing support to the team was considered as a
method from the supporters in perceiving that
football had a high value. Whereas, athletes were
found to have the lowest social perceptions and
efforts of sports people to build fairplay character in
football in DIY province. It was possible for athletes
to feel harmed/ cheated by referee or
administratively cheated by the opposing team,
management pressure, supporter pressure to internal
conditions within the team which sometimes was
regulated by stakeholders, political managerial and
so on. The quality of infrastructure security,
guarding authorities, excessive media coverage, tight
competiveness and competition, and motivation of
achievement that legalize various methods were
sometimes experienced by players / athletes.
4 CONCLUSION
Social perceptions and efforts of sportspeople to
build fairplay character in football in DIY province
in detail were: 8 respondents (1.07%) perceived very
low perceptions, 46 respondents (6.13%) perceived
low perceptions, 109 respondents (14.53%) with
medium perceptions, 492 respondents (65.60%) with
high perceptions, and 95 respondents (12.67%) with
very high perceptions.
Respecting the results of the present research on
social perceptions and efforts of sportspeople to
build fairplay character in football in DIY province,
the researchers proposed some suggestions as
follow: (1) To sport people, especially football. It is
suggested to help maintain, build and implement
noble scores of sportmanship, character of
sportsmanship and fair play both inside and outside
of the field in order to create conducive and
harmonious atmosphere to achieve the best sport
achievements, especially in football, (2) For future
researcher. An in-depth research should be
conducted about social perceptions and efforts of
sports people to build fairplay character in football
in DIY province by increasing the number and
subjects of sports such as sponsors, team managers,
committee members, event organizers (EO ), match
officials, authorities, etc. or compare them with
other variables not included in this research. (3) To
other parties (academic community). It is suggested
to teach their students both theoretically and
practically about noble scores in sports,
sportmanship, character of sportsmanship and fair
play especially in football.
REFERENCES
Alan W., 1978. Basic fondamentations of soccer. Meds
Corps Office. England.
B . Syarifudin, 2010. panduan analisis data penenlitian
dengan spss. Grafindo Litgramedia. Jakarta.
Bimo Walgito, 1989. Pengantar psikologi umum. Bina
Ilmu. Surabaya.
____________, 1990. Psikologi sosial (Pengantar). Andi
Offset: Yogyakarta.
Dirjen Dikdas Kemendiknas, 2011. Pendidikan karakter
untuk membangun karakter bangsa. Majalah POLICY
BRIEF. Edisi 4 Juli 2011. Dirjen Dikdas
Kemendiknas. Jakarta.
Djemari Mardapi, 2011. Penilaian dalam pendidikan
karakter. UNY Press. Yogyakarta.
Fathan Nurcahyo, 2018. Perilaku pelatih dalam upaya
membina dan mengembangkan karakter
sportsmanship atlet (Studi analisis situasi pada pelatih
sekolah sepakbola yang melatih pemain usia muda di
wilayah Provinsi DIY). Yogyakarta: LPPMP UNY.
Miftah Toha, 2003. Perilaku organisasi konsep dasar dan
aplikasinya. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada Jaya.
Robbins, Stephen P., 1996. Perilaku organisai sosial:
konsep, kontroversi dan aplikasi, (Edisi Terjemahan
Bahasa Indonesia), Jakarta: PT. Prenhalindo.
Rusli Lutan, 2001. Olahraga dan etika fair play. Jakarta:
Direktorat Pemberdayaan Ilmu Pengetahuan dan
Teknologi Olahraga, Direktorat Jendral Olahraga,
Depertemen Pendidikan Nasional.
YISHPESS and CoIS 2019 - The 3rd Yogyakarta International Seminar on Health, Physical Education, and Sport Science (YISHPESS
2019) in conjunction with The 2nd Conference on Interdisciplinary Approach in Sports (CoIS 2019)
492
Sarwono Wirawan, Sarlito, 1976. Pengantar umum
psikologi. Jakarta: PT. Bulan Bintang.
Sutrisno Hadi, 1991. Analisis butir untuk instrumen,
angket, tes dan skala nilai dengan basica. Yogyakarta:
Andi Offset.
Taylor Shelley E., et.al., 2009. Psikologi Sosial (12
nd
Ed.).
Jakarta: Kencana Perkasa Jaya.
Social Perception and Effort of Sport People to Build Fairplay Character in Football: A Situation Analysis Study in Football Match in
Special Region of Yogyakarta Province Area
493