A PERT chart allows managers to evaluate the
time and resources necessary to manage project. It
needs information about Earliest Start Time (ES),
Earliest Finish Time(EF), Latest Start Time(LS) and
Latest Finish Time (LF) as set like this:
Table 3. Optimizing time using PERT method
There are three activities which contain of slack
activity (with nominal slack is zero). The three
activities are B, D and E. Those activities cannot be
delayed in production system.
The PERT analysis can be performed further
using CPM. By doing so, itcan find out which
activities are going through the critical path. Based
on the PERT table, this shows that the activity is a
critical activity so it can be concluded that the
critical path in the book production activities is on
the B-D-E.
t
0.6
.
.
.
.
3.1
.
.
.
.
6.6
.
.
.
.
12.6
.
.
.
.
Figure 7. Optimizing Using PERT/CPM
4 CONCLUSIONS
This research reveals that the actual total production
time needed is 45.2 hour or 2708 minutes,
meanwhile after applying PERT/CPM method need
2700 minutes or 41.5 hours. Applying the PERT
method shows there are five activities sequences i.e.
sheet prepress (A), web prepress (B), sheet press
(C), web press (D) and finishing (E). slack time
showed in B, D and E activity. Meanwhile, applying
CPM method obtained the sequence of production
processes path is the B (pre press web activity) – D
(press web activity – E (post press activity) path.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to thank the following institutions for
helping us complete this research. To Politeknik
Negeri Jakarta (PNJ) specially Pusat Penelitian dan
Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (P3M) who fund
this research under the Dosen Pemula research
scheme and to Jurusan Teknik Grafika Penerbitan
for providing technical and support staff. We also
wish to show our appreciation to CV Arya Duta
Jakarta for providing the comprehensive data.
REFERENCES
Agyei, W., 2015. Project Planning and Scheduling Using
PERT and CPM Techniques with Linear
Programming: Case Study, International Journal of
Scientific & Technology Research, 4(8), hal. 222–
227.
Burge, Stuart, 2006. The Systems Thingking Tool Box.
Miline: A.A
Bishnoi, Nisha, 2018. Critical Path Method (CPM): A
Coordinating Tool. International Research Journal of
Management Science & Technology: Vol 9 Issue 1,
ISSN 2348-9367
Caesaron, Dina dan Andrey Thio, 2015. Analisa
Penjadwalan Waktu Dengan Metode Jalur Kritis dan
PERT Pada Proyek Pembangunan Ruko (Jl. Pasar
Lama No.20, Glodok). Journal of Industrial
Engineering & Management Systems: Vol 8 No. 2
Ekanugraha, Arif Rakhmat, 2016. Evaluasi Pelaksanan
Proyek dengan Metode CPM dan PERT (Studi Kasus
Pembangunan Terminal Binuang Baru Kec.
Binuang). Artkel Ilmiah Mahasiswa: Universitas
Islam Indonesia Yogyakarta.
Fadli, M., Syarif SS., 2010. Model Teori Manajemen
Proyek. Politeknik Caltex Riau.
Haque, Farhana, Raisa Tabassum dan Md Mohibul Islam.,
2017. Project Scheduling Problem, Quality Loss and
Time-Cost Trade off. World Review of Business
Research: Vol 7 No. 2 Issue. Pp. 68-87
Jain, Susmit, 2013. Application of PERT Technique in
Health Programme Monitoring and Control.
International Journal of Research in Commerce,
IT&Management.Vol. 3 No.04, ISSN 2231-5756
Kim, J, Kang, CW & Hwang, IK., 2012. A practical
approach to project scheduling: considering the
potential quality loss cost in the time–cost tradeoff
problem, International Journal of Project
Management, Vol. 30, pp. 264–272
N
o
Eve
nt
Time
(hour
s)
Schedule Slack
(LS-
ES)
Early Late
ES EF LS LF
1 A 0.6 0.0 0.6 15.5 16.1 15.5
2 B 6.6 0.0 6.6 0.0 6.6 0.0
3 C 3.1 0.6 3.7 16.1 19.2 15.5
4 D 12.6 6.6 19.
2
6.6 19.2 0.0
5 E 22.3 19.2 41.
5
19.2 41.5 0.0
Start
A
B
C
D
E