Glycemic Index and Glycemic Load of Gluten-free Brownies Made
from Combination of Mocaf and Black Glutinous Rice Flour
Yannie Asrie Widanti, Eko Adi Putro and Puspa Ayuningtyas
Universitas Slamet Riyadi, Jl. Sumpah Pemuda No.18, Surakarta, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia
Keywords: Brownies, Glycemic Index, Glycemic Load, Gluten Free.
Abstract: Brownies are generally seen as foods that are high in sugar, then so many people are reluctant to consume
them. Mocaf is gluten-free flour known to have a low to moderate glycemic index. Meanwhile, black
glutinous rice is a carbohydrate source rich in amylopectin so that it can contribute to the formation of a good
texture in brownies. The aim of this study is to analyze the glycemic index (GI) and the glycemic load (GL)
of brownies made from a mixture of mocaf flour and black glutinous rice flour with a ratio of 1:1, 1:2, and
2:1. The research method used was a completely randomized one factor design. The chemical component test
data were analyzed by One Way ANOVA test continued by Tukey test. The glycemic index of the three
treatments was included in the low GI category, which was 37.66 in the ratio of flour 1:1, 41.12 in the ratio
1:2, and 31.28 in the brownies with a ratio of flour 2:1. The glycemic load obtained was also in the low
category, i.e. 9.2, 9.3, and 8.2.
1 INTRODUCTION
Brownie is one of the cakes originally coming from
America that has been widely produced in Indonesia.
It is a featured product in several cities, not to
mention one of the people’s preference. However,
despite its popularity, people usually hesitate to
consume the cake due to its high glucose level.
Besides, it also uses flour as the main ingredient.
Papandreou (2017) argues that gluten in flour is one
of the nutritional components in food avoided by
some people, especially Celiac Disease (CD) and
Non-celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS) patients.
Meanwhile, healthier brownies have been produced
using substituted ingredients. Nevertheless, diabetic
patients and other people intending to reduce their
carbohydrate or sugar level rarely find brownies that
may not increase their blood glucose level or cause
obesity.
Mocaf (modified cassava flour) is one of the
processed product of cassava that may substitute
flour. In addition to that, it is the main ingredient in
gluten-free food products. Kalukiningrum (2012)
examined several cookie and cake products made
from mocaf. The research figured out that the
acceptance level of fruit cake 70%, cheese cake 83%,
and chocolate cake combined with bread rolls 77%
was accepted by panelists. Firdaus (2013)
investigated glycemic index of analog rice made from
mocaf combined with corn starch, purple sweet
potato flour, and carrot resulted analog rice with GI
ranging from 59 to 64. The range was categorized into
moderate IG. Furthermore, Suryaningrum (2016)
produced flakes made from yellow pumpkin mocaf
(40:50) with GI 54.36 and glycemic load 8.55.
Previous research indicates that brownies made
from mocaf and black glutinous rice flour with a ratio
1:2 were a censor and preferred product with total
sugar level 1.32% (Widanti and Mustofa, 2015).
Black glutinous rice is one of the grains rich in
antioxidant due to its anthocyanin color pigment.
Anthocyanin has functional properties that serve as
antioxidant for body, protect stomach from damage,
inhibit tumor cells, increase eyesight ability, served
as anti-inflammatory compound that protect brain
from potential damage, and prevent obesity and
diabetes. Apriani (2015) concluded that green bean
porridge added with black glutinous rice contained
lower GI than green bean porridge without black
glutinous rice. Food with high fiber level usually
contains lower IG; while higher amylose proportion
in food reduces the food GI index (Arif et al., 2013).
Brownie made from the combination of mocaf
and black glutinous rice may result in gluten-free
brownie that is healthier to consume. Therefore,
Widanti, Y., Putro, E. and Ayuningtyas, P.
Glycemic Index and Glycemic Load of Gluten-free Brownies Made from Combination of Mocaf and Black Glutinous Rice Flour.
DOI: 10.5220/0009979500002833
In Proceedings of the 2nd SEAFAST International Seminar (2nd SIS 2019) - Facing Future Challenges: Sustainable Food Safety, Quality and Nutrition, pages 139-145
ISBN: 978-989-758-466-4
Copyright
c
2022 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
139
glycemic index of brownies made from mocaf and
black glutinous rice should be identified to know if
the brownies can be safely consumed by all people
including diabetic patients.
2 MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1 Research Design
The research design was referred to Handayani and
Ayustaningwarno (2014) method using a one-factor
completely randomized design in the form of three
ratios of mocaf to black glutinous rice i.e. 1:1, 1:2,
and 2:1. We analysed total glucose and starch level,
examined the glycemic index, and measured the
glycemic load.
2.2 Materials
The research materials were mocaf, black glutinous
rice flour, and other brownie ingredients that were
dark compound chocolate, butter, sugar, egg,
chocolate powder, and baking powder. Furthermore,
chemical ingredients used in analysis process were
aquades, anhydrite glucose, nelson, arsenomolybdate,
Cu2O, and others.
2.3 Instruments
The research instruments included a mixer,
microwave, digital scale, 10cm×15cm×8cm brownie
pan, laboratory analytical instruments, blood glucose
measurement kit One Touch UltraTM, and others.
2.4 Research Stages
2.4.1 Formula and Procedure
The research was initiated by making a basic baked
brownies with ratios of mocaf to black glutinous rice
flour 1:1, 1:2, and 2:1; while the making method was
referred to that in the previous research (Widanti and
Mustofa, 2015).
2.4.2 Chemical Analyses
The second stage involved chemical analyses on
Total sugar content (Gustiar, 2009), Protein content
applying Kjehldahl method (AOAC, 1995), Lipid
content (AOAC, 1995), and Fibre content (AOAC,
1995).
2.4.3 Screening the Research Volunteer
Candidates
The third stage was screening the research volunteer
candidates consisting of male/female students of
Faculty of Food Technology and Industry UNISRI
meeting these following criteria: 18-25 years old,
having normal pre-prandial blood glucose (PBG) (60-
120mg/dl), having normal body mass index (BMI)
(18.5-24.9kg/m2), healthy, having no DM history,
having no indigestion history, not undergoing any
medical treatment, not taking any psychoactive drugs,
not drinking any alcoholic beverages, and willing to
be a volunteer.
2.4.4 Glycaemic Index Test and Glycaemic
Load Measurement
Glycaemic Index Test (Noviasari et al., 2016). In a
glycaemic index test, we required at least six
volunteers selected based on the criteria. In this
research, we requested ten volunteers, avoiding any
drop out. One day before given the treatment, they
had to fast for ten hours (drinking plain water was
allowed) started from 10 p.m. until 8 a.m. In the next
morning, we collected ±5µl of their blood by touching
the blood drop on the finger prick and measured the
blood glucose using a glucometer One Touch
UltraTM (finger prick capillary blood sample
method). Volunteers ate the tested food (25g of pure
glucose) for three subsequent days. After that, they
ate the tested brownies with ratios of mocaf to black
glutinous rice flour 1:1, 1:2, and 2:1 equal to 25g
available carbohydrate. Sample of volunteers’ blood
was collected in every 30 minutes (30th, 60th, 90th,
and 120th minutes). Each treatment was given in
every three days to avoid any bias of each tested food.
The balance of the amount of carbohydrate was
obtained from brownie proximate analysis. The
number of brownies consumed was calculated using
this following formula:
weigth o
f
brownies
25g o
f
carbohydrate 100g
Carbohydratelevelo
f
brownies
(1)
IG was measured using Incremental Area under
the Blood Glucose Response Curve (IAUC) method
by dividing the area under the glycaemic response
curve of sample by the area under the standard
glycaemic response of glucose multiplied by 100%.
2nd SIS 2019 - SEAFAST International Seminar
140
Glycaemic Load (GL) Measurement. Glycemic
load was measured by multiplying GI by available
carbohydrate level of brownies made from mocaf and
black glutinous rice flour obtained from the test on
total starch and sugar.
GL
IGxtheamoun
t
o
f
available carbohydrateforeachportion
100
(2)
2.4.5 Data Analysis
IG and BG data collected were analyzed using One
Way ANOVA test with the 95% confidence interval.
If a significant difference was found, we proceeded
with Tukey test.
3 RESULT AND DISCUSSION
3.1 Subject Characteristics
The research used seven subjects consisting of three
males and four females aged 18-20 years old with a
normal nutrition status (BMI 18.4-23.8kg/m2) and
normal pre-prandial blood glucose level
(<110mg/dL). All subjects had signed the informed
consent. Subject characteristics are listed in Table
1.Section, subsection and sub subsection first
paragraph should not have the first line indent, other
paragraphs should have a first line indent of 0,5-
centimeter.
Table 1: Characteristics of Research Subjects.
Subject
Age
(Year)
BW
(kg)
BH
(m)
BMI
(kg/m
2
)
PBG
(mg/dL)
1 19 58 1.60 22.65 99
2 20 53 1.64 19.70 82
3 18 60 1.63 22.58 94
4 19 49 1.45 23.30 101
5 18 53 1.49 23.87 89
6 20 45 1.56 18.49 104
7 20 52 1.57 21.09 76
Mean
19.14±
0.899
52.86±
5.08
1.56±
0.07
21.67±
1.98
92.14±
10.35
According to Table 1, the mean of subjects’ age
and IMT was 19.14 and 21.67 respectively. The
subjects’ IMT was categorized into normal and in
accordance with our subject inclusion criteria.
Furthermore, PBG was also categorized into normal
(<110mg/dL) despite its moderate variance level
(Standard Deviation = 10.35). The whole
characteristics of sample did not indicate any
deviation from the inclusion criteria determined.
3.2 Determination of Sample’s Weight
Gluten-free brownies made from mocaf-black
glutinous rice flour used as the tested food was given
three treatments that were different ratios of mocaf to
black glutinous rice flour 1:1, 1:2, and 2:1. The
amount of sample given to subjects was determined
based on sugar and starch level of each sample. It was
equal to 50g of available carbohydrate. Moreover,
available carbohydrate and the amount of sample
were determined using this following formulae
(Handayani and Ayustaningwarno, 2014).
Standard food material used was 25 of pure glucose.
The result of the calculation of the number of
brownies made from mocaf-black glutinous rice flour
given to subjects is presented in Table 2.
Table 2: The Amount of Brownies as the Tested Food Made
from Mocaf-Black Glutinous Rice Flour Equal to 25 g of
Available Carbohydrate.
Ratio
of The
Flours
Starch
Content
(%)
Total
Sugar
Content
(%)
Available
Carbohydrate
(%)
Mass of
Brownies
Sample
(g/subject)
1:1 4.79 16.47 21.74 229.99
1:2 4.15 14.05 18.61 268.66
2:1 5.52 12.71 18.78 266.18
3.3 Result of Chemical Analysis
Chemical analysis on brownies made from mocaf-
black glutinous rice flour involved analyses on total
sugar, starch, protein, lipid, and fiber levels. The
results of analyses on total sugar and starch levels are
listed in Table 2; while the results of analyses on total
protein, lipid, and fiber contents are presented in
Table 3.
Table 3: Protein, Lipid, and Fibre Content (%).
Ratio of
The
Flours
Protein
Content
(%)
Lipid
Content
(%)
Food Fiber
Content
(%)
1:1 6.50±0.0005 34.34±0.0018 10.46±0.0010
1:2 6.44±0.0004 33.13±0.0009 13.23±0.0017
2:1 5.17±0.0005 32.53±0.0022 14.30±0.0025
Available carbohydrate =
total glucose level + (1.1 × starch content)
Amount of sample = ________25 g ___ × 100
Available carbohydrate
Glycemic Index and Glycemic Load of Gluten-free Brownies Made from Combination of Mocaf and Black Glutinous Rice Flour
141
3.4 Glycemic Response, Glycemic
Index, and Glycemic Load
Glycemic index indicated the blood glucose response
of subjects consuming food containing carbohydrate
compared to that of subjects consuming standard food
that was in the form of glucose or bread (Venn and
Green, 2007). High GI rapidly increased blood
glucose; while low GI slowly increased blood
glucose. The high GI was affected by various factors,
among them were the comparison of amylose and
amylopectin, monosaccharide sugar level, starch
digestibility, fiber level, protein and lipid levels,
processing method, and anti-nutrition compound
presence (Arif et al., 2013).
Blood glucose response to standard glucose food
and brownies made from mocaf-black glutinous rice
flour with the ratios of mocaf to black glutinous rice
flour 1:1, 1:2, and 2:1 is presented in Figure 1.
Figure 1: Blood glucose Response to Standard Food
(Glucose) and Tested Food (Brownies Made from Mocaf-
Black Glutinous Rice Flour).
Physiological condition of sugar blood level of
someone after food consumption was called glycemic
response. Meanwhile, food with low GI and that with
high GI were different on the basis of their glucose
digestion and adsorption rates and glucose level
fluctuation in blood. Food with low GI had a slow
digestion process slowing the rate of gastric emptying
and causing food suspension (chime) to be slowly
proceeded to the small intestine. It caused a relatively
small fluctuation of blood glucose level indicated by
sloping glycemic response curve. Contrastively, food
with high GI indicated a rapid rate of carbohydrate
digestion, glucose adsorption, and gastric emptying,
so that the fluctuation of blood glucose level was also
relatively high. It was because most glucose
adsorption occurred on the upper part of small
intestine only. Moreover, glycemic response curve of
food with high GI indicated fluctuation in the forms
of more prominent peak and sharper decline curves
(Arif et al., 2013).
Glycemic index of gluten-free brownies made
from mocaf-black glutinous rice flour was measured
using Incremental Area under the Blood Glucose
Response Curve (IAUC) method. We compared the
area under the blood glucose response curve of
standard food with the area under the blood glucose
response curve of the tested food.
Formulae to measure the area under the curve by
Suryaningrum (2016) was as follows:
L = Δ30t/2 + Δ30t + (Δ60 – Δ30)t/2 + Δ60 + (Δ90
Δ60)t/2+ Δ90 + (Δ120 – Δ90)t/2
Description:
L = area under the curve
t = time interval of blood taking (30 minutes)
Δ30 = difference of blood glucose level 30
minutes among after consume the sample
and after fasting
Δ60 = difference of blood glucose level 60
minutes among after consume the sample
and after fasting
Δ90 = difference of blood glucose level 90
minutes among after consume the sample
and after fasting
Δ120 = difference of blood glucose level 120
minutes among after consume the sample
and after fasting
Result of glycemic index measurement (Table 4)
indicated that all treatments in the form of different
ratios of mocaf to black glutinous rice flour generated
brownies with low-IG.
Table 4: Glycemic Index of Gluten-free Made from Mocaf-
Black Glutinous Rice (BGR) Flour.
Tested Food
Glycemic
Index
Category
Brownies mocaf-BGR
flour 1:1
37.66 Low
Brownies mocaf-BGR
flour 1:2
41.12 Low
Brownies mocaf-BGR
flour 2:1
31.28 Low
Low GI (< 55), moderate GI (55-70), high GI (> 70) (Venn
and Green, 2007).
0
50
100
150
200
0 50 100 150
BloodGlucoseLevel(mg/dl)
Time(second)
Glucose 1:1 1:2 2:1
2nd SIS 2019 - SEAFAST International Seminar
142
The more the mocaf used, the less the brownie IG.
Mocaf was cassava flour modified through a
fermentation process. One of the starch modification
products in cassava flour was the formation of
resistant starch that would elevate the functional
value of the flour (Onyango et al., 2006). Resistant
starch was a starch fraction or starch degradation
product that was not absorbed by a healthy
individual’s small intestine because the starch was
formed after perfectly passing an enzyme degradation
process. The higher the resistant starch in food, the
lessened the starch digestibility. It indicated the
lessened amount of starch that would be hydrolyzed
into glucose and absorbed in digestion, reducing its
effects on the increase of blood glucose.
In addition to the resistant starch, another factor
influencing brownie GI was amylose and
amylopectin levels in mocaf or black glutinous rice
flour. Higher amylose level lowered the digestion
rate, as amylose was a glucose polymer with
unbranched structures (more crystalized structures
with more extensive hydrogen bond). Furthermore, it
had a stronger hydrogen bond than amylopectin,
making digestion enzymes difficult to hydrolyze it.
Such unbranched structure made amylose more
tightly bound, making it difficult to be gelatinized and
digested. Besides, amylose easily joined and
crystalized, so it easily experienced retrogradation,
making it difficult to be digested (Arif, 2013).
Amylose and amylopectin levels in mocaf were
34.75% and 39.55% respectively. Amylose level in
black glutinous rice flour was lower that was 1-2%;
while the amylopectin level was 98-99%. Therefore,
the more the black glutinous rice flour used in
brownies, the higher the GI.
Moreover, amylopectin was easier to be
gelatinized and digested by human body, because a
simple branched glucose polymer and having larger
and more open molecules. Research indicated that
food with more amylose proportion would have lower
GI (Behall et al., 1998).
In addition to resistant starch and amylose-
amylopectin levels, GI was also influenced by fiber
level (Arif, 2013). The more the mocaf, the higher the
fiber level of brownies made from mocaf-black
glutinous rice flour. Fiber levels of mocaf and black
glutinous rice flour were 1.9-3.4% and 6.09% (Azis
et al., 2015) respectively. Both ingredients gave a
contribution to the fiber level of brownies made from
mocaf-black glutinous rice flour. However, higher
fiber level of black glutinous rice flour than that of
mocaf gave the main fiber to brownies.
Arif (2013) believed that high fiber level in food
contributed to a low IG. The whole fiber food served
as a physical inhibitor in food digestion and enzyme
activities, slowing the starch digestion process and
lowering the blood glucose level.
Arif (2013) also clarified that lipid and protein
levels were two factors affecting GI. High-fat in food
inhibited the rate of gastric emptying, slowing the rate
of food digestion in the small intestine. Meanwhile,
high protein level stimulated insulin secretion,
controlling the glucose level. Therefore, food with
high fat and protein levels tended to have lower GI
than similar food with low fat and protein levels.
Glycemic load was the value of blood glucose
response of someone after the consumption of one
food portion with a certain carbohydrate level. It was
measured by multiplying food GI by the amount of
carbohydrate in the food and dividing it by 100. GL
might provide a more thorough description of food
impacts on blood glucose level.
Table 5: Glycemic Load of Gluten-free Brownies Made
from Mocaf-Black Glutinous Rice (BGR) Flour.
Tested Food
Glycemic
Load
Category
Browniesmocaf-BGR
flour 1:1
9.21 Low
Brownies mocaf-BGR
flour 1:2
9.30 Low
Brownies mocaf-BGR
flour 2:1
8.25 Low
Low GL (< 10), moderate GL (11-19), high GL (> 20)
(Venn and Green, 2007).
Venn and Green (2007) concluded that higher GI
in food might result in low GL if the food was
consumed in a small amount; while low GI might
result in high GL when consumed in an excessive
amount.
Glycemic load might give a complete description
of the impact of carbohydrate food portion consumed.
In this research, the tested food given to respondents
contained available carbohydrate equal to 25 gr. Low
GL found in the three brownie products would give
them low blood sugar response.
4 CONCLUSIONS
Gluten-free brownies made from mocaf-black
glutinous rice flour had low glycemic index (GI) and
glycemic load (GL). GI of brownies with the ratios of
mocaf to black glutinous rice flour 1:1, 1:2, and 2:1
were 37.66, 41.12, and 31.28, respectively; while GL
of that was 9.21, 9.30, and 8.25 respectively.
Glycemic Index and Glycemic Load of Gluten-free Brownies Made from Combination of Mocaf and Black Glutinous Rice Flour
143
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors would like to thank the Ministry of
Research, Technology, and Higher Education that has
funded this research through Hibah Penelitian Dosen
Pemula Tahun Pendanaan 2019 program. The authors
would also like to thank the Institute of Research and
Community Service of Universitas Slamet Riyadi that
had given an opportunity to propose a research
proposal and research performance, the rector of
UNISRI, and the head and staffs of the laboratory of
Faculty of Food Technology and Industry UNISRI
Surakarta that had provided laboratory facilities and
assistance to complete the research.
REFERENCES
Amanu, Febri Nuron, and Susanto, Wahono Hadi, 2014.
Pembuatan Tepung Mocaf di Madura (Kajian Varietas
dan Lokasi Penanaman) terhadap Mutu dan Rendemen.
Jurnal Pangan dan Agroindustri Vol. 2 No 3 p.161-169.
DOI
AOAC, 1995. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC
International. 16th edition. AOAC 53 International,
Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.
AOAC, 2012. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC
International. 19th edition. AOAC 53 International,
Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.
Apriani, S., 2015. Perbandingan Indeks Glikemik dan
Beban Glikemik antara Bubur Kacang Hijau dan Bubur
Kacang Hijau yang Disertai Ketan Hitam.
Undergraduate Thesis. Jakarta: Program of Study of
Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Medical
Sciences, Universitas Islam Negri Syarif Hidayatullah.
Arif,A.B., A. Budiyanto, and Hoerudin, 2013. Nilai Indeks
Glikemik Produk Pangan dan Faktor-faktor yang
Mempengaruhinya. J. Litbang Pert. Vol. 32 No. 3
September 2013: 91- 99.
Azis, A., M. Izzati, and S.Haryanti, 2015. Aktivitas
Antioksidan dan Nilai Gizi dari Beberapa Jenis Beras
dan Millet sebagai Bahan Pangan Fungsional
Indonesia. Jurnal Biologi, Volume 4 No. 1, January
2015 pp. 45-61.
Behall,K M D J Scholfield, and J Canary, 1998. Effect of
starch structure on glucose and insulin responses in
adults, The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition,
Volume 47, Issue 3, March 1988, Pages 428–432,
https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/47.3.428, retrieved on
August 29th, 2019.
Cauvain, Stanley P and Linda S Young. 2006. Baked
Products: Science, Technology, and Practice.
Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Garsington Road.
Firdaus, L., 2013. Indeks Glikemik Beras Cerdas Berbasis
Mocaf dengan Subsitusi Jagung, Ubi Jalar, dan Wortel.
http://repository.unej.ac.id/handle/123456789/12380.
Retrieved on August 27th, 2018.
Frei, M., 2003. Studies on the in vitro starch digestibility
and the glycemic index of six different indigenous rice
cultivars from the Philippines,
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/223302390/d
ownload. Retrieved on August 27th, 2018.
Gustiar, 2009. Sifat Fisiko-kimia dan Indeks Glikemik
Produk Cookies Berbahan Baku Pati Garut (Maranta
arundinacea L.) Termodifikasi. Bogor: IPB.
Handayani, L. and Ayustaningwarno, F., 2014. Indeks
Glikemik dan Beban Glikemik Vegetable Leather
Brokoli (Brassica oleracea var. Italica) dengan
Substitusi Inulin. Journal of Nutrition College, Volume
3, Number 4, Year 2014. pp. 783-790.
Kalukiningrum, Sarwinda, 2012. Pengembangan Produk
Cake dengan Substitusi Tepung Mocaf. Undergraduate
Thesis. Yogyakarta: Faculty of Engineering Universitas
Negeri.
Kurniati, Lina Ika, Nur Aida, Setiyo Gunawan, and Tri
Widjaja. 2012. Pembuatan Mocaf (Modified Cassava
Flour) dengan Proses Fermentasi Menggunakan
Lactobacillus plantarum, Saccharomyces cereviseae,
and Rhizopus oryzae. Jurnal Teknik POMITS Vol. 1,
No. 1, (2012) 1-6.
Nailufar, Aini Amalia, Basito, and Choirul Anam, 2012.
Kajian Karakteristik Ketan Hitam (Oryza sativa
glutinosa) pada Beberapa Jenis Pengemas Selama
Penyimpanan. Jurnal Teknosains Pangan Vol 1 No 1
October 2012. Surakarta: Department of Food Science
and Technology Universitas Sebelas Maret.
Noviasari, S., F. Kusnandar, A. Setiyono, and S. Budijanto,
2015. Beras Analog sebagai Pangan Fungsional dengan
Indeks Glikemik Rendah. J. Gizi Pangan, Volume 10,
Number 3, November 2015. ISSN 1978-1059, pp. 225-
232.
Nugraheni, Mutiara, Titin Hera Widi Handayani, and
Agung Utama, 2015. Pengembangan Mocaf (Modified
Cassava Flour) untuk Peningkatan Diversifikasi Pangan
dan Ekonomi Pasca Erupsi Merapi. Inotek, Volume 19,
Number 1, February 2015. pp. 52-69.
Onyango, C., Bley, T., Jacob, A., Henle, T. and Rohm, H.
(2006). Influence of incubation temperature and time
on resistant starch type III formation from autoclaved
and acid-hydrolyzed cassava starch. Carbohydrate
Polymers, 66, 494-499.
Papandreou, D., 2017. Celiac Disease or Gluten
Sensitivity? A Mini Update Review. Arab Journal of
Nutrition and Exercise, vol. 2, issue no. 2, 58–61. DOI
10.18502/ajne.v2i2.1245.
Persagi, 2009. Tabel Komposisi Pangan Indonesia (TKPI).
Jakarta: Gramedia.
Ratnasari, Yulia, and L.T. Pangesthi, 2014. Pengaruh
Substitusi Mocaf (Modified Cassava Flour) dan Jumlah
Air terhadap Hasil Jadi Choux Paste. E-journal Boga,
Volume 03, Number 1, yudisium edition, February
2014, pp. 141-148.
https://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jurnal-
tata-boga/article/view/6530/7295. Retrieved on April
19th, 2019.
Salim, E., 2011. Mengolah Singkong Menjadi Tepung
Mocaf. Yogyakarta: Lily Publisher.
2nd SIS 2019 - SEAFAST International Seminar
144
Sudarmadji, S., Suhardi, and Bambang Haryono, 1984.
Prosedur Analisis untuk Bahan Makanan dan Pertanian.
Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Suryaningrum, T., 2016. Pengaruh Perbandingan Tepung
Labu Kuning (Cucurbita moschata) dan Tepung Mocaf
terhadap Kadar Pati, Nilai Indeks Glikemik (IG), Beban
Glikemik (BG), dan Tingkat Kesukaan pada Flakes
“KUMO”. Undergraduate Thesis. Semarang: Program
of Study of Nutrition Science Faculty of Medicine
Universitas Diponegoro.
Venn, B.J. and Green, T.J., 2007. Glycemic Index and
Glycemic Load: Measurement Issues and Their Effect
on Diet-Disease Relationships. European Journal of
Clinical Nutrition (2007) 61 (Suppl 1), S122–S131.
Widanti, Y.A., and A. Mustofa, 2015. Karakteristik
Organoleptik Brownies dengan Campuran Tepung
Mocaf dan Tepung Ketan Hitam dengan Variasi Lama
Pemanggangan. Joglo Vol. 27 No. 2 Year 2015.
Zulaidah, Agustien, 2011. Modifikasi Ubi Kayu Secara
Biologi Menggunakan Starter Bimo-CF Menjadi
Tepung Termodifikasi Pengganti Gandum. Thesis.
Semarang: Postgraduate program, Universitas
Diponegoro.
Glycemic Index and Glycemic Load of Gluten-free Brownies Made from Combination of Mocaf and Black Glutinous Rice Flour
145