The second finding indicated that
cosmopolitanism did not have a significant effect on
the intention to consume functional foods. This
means people with high cosmopolitanism and low
cosmopolitanism have a similar tendency to consume
(or not to consume) functional foods. The
development of functional foods products can target
consumers with both low and high cosmopolitanism.
The third finding indicated that innovativeness
did not significantly affect the intention to consume
functional foods. This means that consumers with
high and low innovativeness have a similar tendency
to consume functional foods. For companies, it
implies that consumers with both high and low
innovativeness can be targeted.
Simultaneously, the second and the third findings
signified that the market for functional foods would
grow even though the potential target market was
neither consisted of people who are easily exposed to
culture/value/experience beyond their current
environment nor people who like to try new things.
Functional food companies should not be careless in
the investment of product development by focusing
on people who tend to be exposed to new
culture/value/experience or people who like to try
new things.
Even though this study has generated interesting
findings and provided important implications, there
are still unfinished agendas. First, this research found
that cosmopolitanism and innovativeness did not
have significant impacts on the intention to consume
functional foods. However, this research has not
deeply investigated the reasons behind this
insignificancy.
Second, in addition to exploring reasons behind
that finding, this research also raised a question on the
threshold of ‘the innovativeness of functional foods,’
so it can be perceived as new. The insignificancy
might be caused by a perception that functional foods
are not new or innovative. Another question arose.
Would cosmopolitanism and innovativeness pose
significant impacts on the intention to consume if
they were applied to other types of functional food?
This study has not been able to answer this question
since it only dealt with one type of food.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This study is funded through Insentif Riset Sistem
Inovasi Nasional (National Innovation System
Research Incentive) The Ministry of Research and
Higher Education of the Republic of Indonesia. All
authors are the main author of this paper.
REFERENCES
Ajzen, Icek, 1991. The Theory of Planned Behaviour.
Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision
Processes, 50 : 179 – 211.
Adadi, P., Barakova, N. V., Muravyov, K. Y.,
Krivoshapkina, E. F., 2019. Designing selenium
functional foods and beverages: A review. Food
Research International, 120: 708-725.
Bartels, J., Reinders, M., 2011. Consumer innovativeness
and its correlates: A propositional inventory for future
research. Journal of Business Research, 64: 601–609.
Bigliardia, B., Galati, F., 2013. Innovation trends in the
food industry: The case of functional foods. Trend in
Food Science & Technology, 31: 118-129.
Brečić, R., Gorton, M., Barjolle, D., 2014. Understanding
variations in the consumption of functional foods –
evidence from Croatia. British Food Journal, 116(4):
662-675.
Buil, I., Chernatony, L., Martinez, E., 2012.
Methodological issues in cross-cultural research: An
overview and recommendations. Journal of Targeting
Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 20(3-4):
223-234.
Chammas, R., El-Hayek, J., Fatayri, M., Makdissi, R., Bou-
Mitri, C., 2019. Consumer knowledge and attitudes
toward functional foods in Lebanon. Nutrition & Food
Science, 49(4): 762 - 776.
Christidis, N., Tsoulfa, G., Varagunam, M.
Babatzimopoulou, M., 2011. A cross sectional study of