MON (2019b). Pro zatverdzhennia typovykh osvitnikh
prohram dlia 1-2 klasiv zakladiv zahalnoi sered-
noi osvity (On approval of typical educational pro-
grams for 1-2 classes of general secondary schools).
https://tinyurl.com/3pvyhzsx.
Motschnig-Pitrik, R. (2005). Person-centered e-learning
in action: Can technology help to manifest person-
centered values in academic environments? Journal
of Humanistic Psychology, 45(4):503–530.
Motschnig-Pitrik, R. (2013a). Characteristics and ef-
fects of person-centered technology enhanced learn-
ing. Springer New York.
Motschnig-Pitrik, R. (2013b). Effectiveness of person-
centered learning in the age of the Internet. Com-
munications in Computer and Information Science,
278:494–499.
Motschnig-Pitrik, R. and Derntl, M. (2008). Can person-
centered technology enhanced learning contribute to
develop project management soft skills in an academic
context? In Technology Enhanced Learning: Best
Practices, pages 284–303. IGI Global.
Motschnig-Pitrik, R., Derntl, M., Figl, K., and Kabicher,
S. (2008). Towards learner-centered learning goals
based on the person-centered approach. In Proceed-
ings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, pages
F3A9–F3A14.
Motschnig-Pitrik, R. and Figl, K. (2007). Developing
team competence as part of a person centered learn-
ing course on communication and soft skills in project
management. In Proceedings - Frontiers in Education
Conference, FIE, pages F2G15–F2G21.
Motschnig-Pitrik, R., Kabicher, S., Figl, K., and Santos, A.
(2007). Person centered, technology enhanced learn-
ing in action: Action research in a course on organi-
zational development. In Proceedings - Frontiers in
Education Conference, FIE, pages S2A6–S2A11.
Motschnig-Pitrik, R. and Rohl
´
ıkov
´
a, L. (2013). Construc-
tivist and person-centered learning in higher education
- using indicators and case examples for comparing
good practice. Communications in Computer and In-
formation Science, 278:44–57.
Motschnig-Pitrik, R. and Standl, B. (2013). Person-
centered technology enhanced learning: Dimensions
of added value. Computers in Human Behavior,
29(2):401–409.
Niyazova, A. Y. and Muratova, A. (2017). The develop-
ment of creative thinking of primary school students
at the English lessons in Kazakhstan. In Hursen, C,
editor, Selected papers of 5th Cyprus international
conference on educational research (CYICER-2016),
volume 3 of New Trends and Issues Proceedings on
Humanities and Social Sciences, pages 282–290.
Peetsma, T. and van der Veen, I. (2013). Avoidance-oriented
students’ development in motivation for maths, self-
regulated learning behaviour and achievement: a
person-centred study in the lowest level of secondary
education. Educational Psychology, 33(7):828–848.
Pelz, M. (1978). Linguistics and teaching of foreign-
language, 1964-1977 - German - Hausmann, FJ. IRAL
- International Review of Applied Linguistics in Lan-
guage Teaching, 16(4):353–354.
Pokorna, L. (2015). Shliakhy pidvyshchennia efektyvnosti
uroku anhliiskoi movy v pochatkovii shkoli (Ways to
increase the effectiveness of English lessons in pri-
mary school). Pedagogical sciences, 17:128–131.
Reid, E. (2013). An insight into teaching culture within
English language lessons in Slovak primary schools.
In Janikova, V and Seebauer, R, editor, Bildung
und Sprachen in Europa, volume 17 of Austria
Forschung und Wissenschaft-Erziehungswissenschaft,
pages 409–418.
Rowley, C. and Lester, C. (2016). Carl Rogers: Person-
centred learning in coaching. Taylor and Francis Inc.
Savchenko, O. (2015). Meta i rezultat uroku v kontek-
sti kompetentnisnoho pidkhodu (Purpose and result
of the lesson in the context of competence approach).
Pochatkova shkola, (3):10–15.
Schmid-Sch
¨
onbein, G. and Fr
¨
ohlich-Ward, L. (1983). En-
glish as a foreign language for 5–8 year olds. World
Englishes, 2(3):195–199.
Shokaliuk, S., Bohunenko, Y., Lovianova, I., and Shyshk-
ina, M. (2020). Technologies of distance learning for
programming basics on the principles of integrated de-
velopment of key competences. CEUR Workshop Pro-
ceedings, 2643:548–562.
Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (1984). Why aren’t all children in the
Nordic countries bilingual? Journal of Multilingual
and Multicultural Development, 5(3-4):301–315.
Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (1986). Readers’ responses: Finns in
Finnish-medium education in Sweden become bilin-
gual. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural De-
velopment, 7(4):329–335.
Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (1996). The colonial legacy in ed-
ucational language planning in Scandinavia: From
migrant labor to a national ethnic minority? In-
ternational Journal of the Sociology of Language,
(118):81–106.
Skutnabb-Kangas, T. and Toukomaa, P. (1987). The ed-
ucation of the Finnish minority in Sweden. Jour-
nal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development,
8(3):294–295.
Striuk, M. I., Semerikov, S. O., and Striuk, A. M. (2015).
Mobility: A systems approach. Information Technolo-
gies and Learning Tools, 49(5):37–70.
Tallroth, P. (2012). Strategy for the National Languages
of Finland. Prime Minister’s Office Publications,
Helsinki. https://tinyurl.com/at25zyw.
Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2017). Zakon Ukrainy
“Pro osvitu” (Law of Ukraine On Education).
https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2145-19.
Vitsenets, T. (2012). Teaching in Blackboard LMS as one
of the methods for improving efficiency of person-
centered learning. World Applied Sciences Journal,
20(SPL.ISS.):98–102.
Vuchic, R. and Robb, B. (2006). An integrative approach
to fles teacher training: The delaware model. Foreign
Language Annals, 39(2):334–346.
www.julkari.fi (2003). National Curriculum Guidelines
on Early Childhood Education and Care in Finland.
https://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/75535/
267671cb-0ec0-4039-b97b-7ac6ce6b9c10.pdf.
Development of Professional Competence of Primary School Teachers of the New Ukrainian School in the Aspect of Foreign Language
Teaching
181