struction it is possible to achieve strong performance
in choosing the optimal routes.
During the experiment to verify the effectiveness
of the use of visualization in achieving academic com-
petencies, it was noted that about 40% of students
consider it necessary to change the curriculum in the
direction of using visualization of teaching methods.
After classes, a comparison of the results of the ex-
perimental and control groups showed that skills and
abilities to solve creative problems were higher by
40–50%. Students’ satisfaction with the quality of
teaching and the number of solved practical problems
also increased by 20–30%, which indicates the pos-
itive impact of this interactive method on the edu-
cational process. So, to conclude, we can say that
the symbiosis of collective work on the study of sci-
entific problems and the introduction of development
results into the educational process of the specialties
“Accounting and Taxation” and “Software Engineer-
ing” made it possible to improve the quality of teach-
ing disciplines. Thus, the use of active and interac-
tive methods in the process of teaching engineering
and economic specialties helps to optimize the edu-
cational process, increases the informative capacity
of the material studied, as well as improves the ef-
ficiency of learning.
REFERENCES
Aulin, V., Hrynkiv, A., Lyashuk, O., Vovk, Y., Lysenko, S.,
Holub, D., Zamota, T., Pankov, A., Sokol, M., Ratyn-
skyi, V., and Lavrentieva, O. (2020). Increasing the
functioning efficiency of the working warehouse of
the “UVK Ukraine” company transport and logistics
center. Communications - Scientific Letters of the Uni-
versity of Zilina, 22(2):3–14.
Blum, C. (2005). Ant colony optimization: Introduction and
recent trends. Physics of Life Reviews, 2(4):353–373.
Bowersox, D., Kloss, D., and B., C. M. (2019). Supply
Chain Logistics Management. McGraw-Hill Higher
Education, 5th edition.
Cantor, D. and Jones, B. (2012). WebGL Beginner’s Guide.
Packt Publishing.
Dorigo, M. (1992). Optimization, Learning, and Natural
Algorithms. PhD thesis, Politecnico di Milano.
Dorigo, M. and St
¨
utzle, T. (2004). Ant Colony Optimiza-
tion. The MIT Press.
Eppler, M. J. and Aeschimann, M. (2009). A systematic
framework for risk visualization in risk management
and communication. Risk Management, 11(2):67–89.
Eppler, M. J. and Platts, K. W. (2009). Visual strategizing:
the systematic use of visualization in the strategic-
planning process. Long Range Planning, 42(1):42–
74.
Fırat, E. E. and Laramee, R. S. (2018). Towards
a survey of interactive visualization for education.
In Tam, G. and Vidal, F., editors, Proc. EG UK
Computer Graphics & Visual Computing, pages
91–101. https://cs.swan.ac.uk/
∼
csbob/research/star/
education/firat18towards.pdf.
Frain, B. (2020). Responsive Web Design with HTML5 and
CSS3: Develop future-proof responsive websites us-
ing the latest HTML5 and CSS techniques. PACKT
publishing, third edition.
Gordeev, D. S. (2018). A survey of visualization tech-
niques of algorithms on graphs. Scientific Visualiza-
tion, 10(1):18–48.
Hauswirth, M. (2012). Moving from visualization for teach-
ing to visualization for learning. In Workshop on Vi-
sualization in University Level Computer Science Ed-
ucation @ CSERC’12.
Ivanova, H. I., Lavrentieva, O. O., Eivas, L. F., Zenkovych,
I. O., and Uchitel, A. D. (2020). The students’ brain-
work intensification via the computer visualization
of study materials. CEUR Workshop Proceedings,
2643:185–209.
Kazhan, Y. M., Hamaniuk, V. A., Amelina, S. M.,
Tarasenko, R. O., and Tolmachev, S. T. (2020). The
use of mobile applications and Web 2.0 interactive
tools for students’ german-language lexical compe-
tence improvement. CEUR Workshop Proceedings,
2643:392–415.
Kiv, A., Soloviev, V., Tarasova, E., Koycheva, T., and
Kolesnykova, K. (2020). Semantic knowledge net-
works in education. E3S Web of Conferences,
166:10022.
Klerkx, J., Verbert, K., and Duval, E. (2014). Enhancing
learning with visualization techniques. In Spector,
J. M., Merrill, M. D., Elen, J., and Bishop, M. J., ed-
itors, Handbook of Research on Educational Commu-
nications and Technology, pages 791–807. Springer
New York, New York, NY.
Kolomeychenko, M. and Chepovskiy, A. (2014). Huge
graph visualization and analysis. Business Informat-
ics, (4 (30)):7–16. https://bijournal.hse.ru/en/2014–4
(30)/143005206.html.
Malchenko, S. L., Mykoliuk, D., and Kiv, A. E. (2020). Us-
ing interactive technologies to study the evolution of
stars in astronomy classes. CEUR Workshop Proceed-
ings, 2547:145–155.
Mazorchuk, M. S., Vakulenko, T. S., Bychko, A. O.,
Kuzminska, O. H., and Prokhorov, O. V. (2020).
Cloud technologies and learning analytics: Web ap-
plication for PISA results analysis and visualization.
CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2879:484–494.
Moglan, V. D. (2019). Didactic potential of using systems
for visualization of algorithms in the process of teach-
ing programming. Open Education, 23(2):31–41.
Mukhametzhanova, A. O., Aydarbekova, K. A., and
Mukhametzhanova, B. O. (2016). Interaktivnye
metody obucheniya v vuze (interactive teaching meth-
ods in high school). Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal prik-
ladnykh i fundamental’nykh issledovaniy, (2-1):84–
88.
Okopna, Y., Morska, N., Stakhova, O., Voinalovych, L.,
Protas, O., and Kravchenko, O. (2020). Analogy of
AET 2020 - Symposium on Advances in Educational Technology
370