2.3 Occupational Health and Safety
Management Systems
The main standard in this series is ISO 45001:2018
‘Occupational health and safety management systems
— Requirements with guidance’. It supports 7 SDGs:
SDG3, SDG 5, SDG 8, SDG 9, SDG 10, SGD 11 and
SDG 16. The ISO 45000 series also includes:
ISO 45003:2021 ‘Occupational health and
safety management — Psychological health
and safety at work — Guidelines for managing
psychosocial risks’- covering identical SDGs
as ISO 45001;
ISO/PAS 45005:2020 ‘Occupational health
and safety management — General guidelines
for safe working during the COVID-19
pandemic’.
ISO/PAS 45005 was developed and published in
record-breaking time. The project for this standard was
approved on 15 September 2020, it became a draft
international standard on 2 December 2020, and on 7
December- a final draft international standard. Only 3
months after the initiation of the standard’s lifecycle it
was officially published on 15 December 2020.
Without any exaggeration, the urgency of
developing a guideline against the COVID-19
pandemic, turned the UN SDGs and Agenda 2030
into reality. For comparison, ISO 9001:2015 took
nearly 3 years (from 5 October 2012 to 22 September
2015) to complete the same steps.
Two additional standards that contribute to the
UN SDGs are in preparation by ISO/TC 283
Occupational health and safety management:
ISO/CD 45002 ‘Occupational health and safety
management — General guidelines for the
implementation of ISO 45001:2018’- SDG 3,
SDG 5, SDG 8 and SDG 10;
ISO/AWI 45004 ‘Occupational health and
safety management — Guidelines on
performance evaluation’- SDG 3 and SDG 8.
2.4 Energy Management Systems
The ISO 50000 series is based on ISO 50001:2018
‘Energy management systems — Requirements with
guidance for use’. The main focus is on: SDG 7
‘Affordable and clean energy’, SDG 11‘Sustainable
cities and communities’, SDG 12 ‘Responsible
consumption and production’, and SDG 13 ‘Climate
Action’.
12 additional international standards for energy
management systems support ISO 50001 and its set
of SDGs. 8 of them are active, and 4 are still under
development.
The richest palette of SDGs is in ISO/AWI 50010
‘Energy management and energy savings - Guidance
for zero net energy in operation’. It expands the
contribution of ISO 50001 with SDG 1 ‘No poverty’,
SDG 8 and SDG 9 and is well presented in the work
of Dimitrov (Dimitrov, Venelinova, 2019).
2.5 Food Safety Management Systems
The ISO 22000 series is said to support not only the
UN SDGs but also the EU Strategy ‘Farm to Fork’
which is at the heart of the European Green Deal (EU,
2020).
Three SDGs are in the spotlight of ISO
22000:2018 ‘Food safety management systems —
Requirements for any organization in the food chain’
and its 10 supporting standards:
SDG 2 ‘Zero hunger’;
SDG 3 ‘Good health and well-being’;
SDG 12 ‘Responsible consumption and
production’.
2.6 Other Management Systems
It may seem surprising but the ISO/IEC series of
standards for information security which rank third in
the ISO survey are not well aligned with the UN
SDGs. The exception is the recently published
ISO/IEC TS 27006-2:2021 ‘Requirements for bodies
providing audit and certification of information
security management systems — Part 2: Privacy
information management systems’. It is considered a
contributor to SDG 9, SDG 12 and SDG 16. This
instils optimism that future standards and new
revisions of current standards for information security
will take UN SDGs into consideration.
ISO 13485:2016 ‘Medical devices — Quality
management systems — Requirements for regulatory
purposes’ covers two important SDGs: SDG 3 ‘Good
health and well-being’ and SDG 10 ‘Reduced
inequalities’.
Even though ISO 26000:2010 ‘Guidance on
social responsibility’ is not a management system
standard and is not intended for certification purposes
since it does not contain requirements, this standard
is an example for SDG contribution. 16 of the 17 UN
SDGs are covered with the only exception of SDG 17
‘Partnership for the goals’.
This ‘gap’, also seen in Figure 1, has an
explanation. This is the way that the International
Organization for Standardization justifies the
misalignment: ‘At ISO, we recognize the importance
of global partnerships because the whole ISO system
depends on it. An ISO International Standard is