in energy consumption for its compression, and also
to a deterioration in the state of the gas pipeline. The
relevance of the use of gas compression increases
with the time of well operation, as the reservoir
pressure decreases and the need to increase the degree
of compression (Kichatov, 2012).
Figure 1: Diagram of AVO application (1).
The level of gas cooling utilization depends on the
climatic features of the location of the gas pipelines.
In hot and dry climates, the cooling efficiency is
reduced and water spray is used to equalize
temperatures. In (Alhazmy, 2004), the results of a
study of the application of water atomization and air
cooling of gas are presented, studies have shown that
water atomization increases the efficiency of gas
cooling.
For cold conditions, taking into account the fact
that the routes pass in the zone of frozen soils,
lowering the gas temperature to the soil temperature
allows maintaining the stability of the linear part of
the gas pipeline and increasing its reliability
(Sidyagin, 2009).
In the general case, for enterprises using AVO, the
efficiency of the final technological process is
reduced to the management of integral economic
efficiency (Chekardovsky, 2015). The task of
managing the integral economic efficiency, in turn, is
decomposed into the tasks of managing the structural
efficiency of the air cooling system, the thermal
efficiency and the efficiency of automated control.
The quantitative indicator of thermal efficiency is
the heat transfer coefficient of the air cooling system,
and the optimization task is its maximization. The
search for a solution to the problem of maximizing
thermal efficiency is directed towards the
development of new designs of apparatus
(Balchugov, 2019), the modernization of air cooling
elements, for example, finned tubes (Kalinin, 2018),
optimization of the fan control (Pashkin, 2019).
The quantitative indicator of the structural
efficiency is the material costs for the manufacture of
AVO, and the optimization task is its minimization.
The solution of the problems of optimization of
apparatus designs has now led to block AVO
(Sidyagin, 2009), which allows consumers to form
designs according to the needs of the technological
process.
The tasks to be solved when assessing thermal
efficiency are reduced to the calculation:
the actual thermal characteristics of AVO;
the actual hydraulic characteristics of the AVO;
the actual aerodynamic characteristics of AVO
Tasks to be solved in the automation of AVO
control:
operational calculation of characteristics
(thermal, hydraulic, aerodynamic) depending
on the operating conditions (changing the
characteristics of the AVO and taking into
account changes in the environment).
(Wanchin, 2014).
Thus, the analysis of the research carried out in
the field of cooling chemical processes using ABO
showed the exhaustion of traditional approaches to
increasing the integral economic efficiency and the
need to develop new tools based on the principles of
Industry 4.0.
2 MATERIALS AND METHODS
To develop conceptual approaches to the
implementation of calculation procedures for the
integral economic efficiency of air coolers on cloud
platforms, it is necessary to consider various model
representations of a given physical object.
When constructing conceptual approaches and
analyzing model representations, methods of
information technology, case technologies, methods
of database design, methods of comparative analysis,
programming in php, using the markup language
html, css tables were used.
Physical model of AVO. An air cooler is a special
type of heat exchanger, which includes the following
main components and assemblies: sections of finned
heat exchange tubes of various lengths (from 3 to 12
m), electric fans, diffusers and louvers for adjusting
the air capacity, supporting structures, control
mechanisms, etc. control automation tools
(Migachev, 2015).
AVO mathematical models. Mathematical models
of heat exchange processes in air coolers in the
general case (Hartman, 2006) are represented by
nonlinear differential equations, the solutions of
which, under various assumptions, are analytical
expressions for calculating thermal efficiency.
Another approach to constructing mathematical
models is to construct empirical expressions based on
experimental data using procedures for identifying
the parameters of these models (Kryukov, 2017).
The use of adequate mathematical models for the
verification calculation of AVO is especially
important in the development of energy and resource-
saving measures, since the overestimation of the