McClelland, V. Vroom and others; as well as works
of domestic scientists: A. M. Moiseeva, M. M.
Potashnik, S. A. Shapiro, A. P. Egorshin, O. S.
Vikhanskiy, E. P. Ilyin, N. S. Pryazhnikov, M. V.
Kitaeva and many others.
The classical research methods were used in the
research: studying and analyzing literature,
corresponding to the problem, as well as documentary
sources and information resources; interviewing,
questionnaires, methods of motivation diagnostics,
methods of mathematical statistics, summative
assessment.
The purpose of the research was to study the
theoretical and practical aspects of the problem of
motivation of couches-instructors as a factor of
sustainable education in a sports school, to conduct
experimental work on its study, diagnostics and to
develop management recommendations. Research
tasks were to carry out a theoretical analysis of the
problem of the formation and development of
motivation of teachers; to run diagnostics of
motivation of couches-instructors in a sports school;
to develop organizational and pedagogical conditions
for effective management of motivation of sports
school teachers and directions of their
implementation.
The scientific novelty of the research consists in
determining organizational and pedagogical
conditions for effective management of the
motivation of the professional activities of teachers of
a sports school. The theoretical significance of work
is in receiving characteristics of motivation of
couches-instructors of a sports school and in defining
organizational and pedagogical conditions of
management of teachers’ motivation a sports school.
The practical significance is in the fact that the use of
the developed conditions and activities for their
implementation will contribute to increasing the
effectiveness of the activities of couches-instructors,
and therefore the school itself, and can also be used
in the management practice of other educational
organizations.
3 RESEARCH RESULTS
Let us consider the theoretical aspects of the problem
of forming motivation of teachers in educational
institutions.
3.1 Literature Review
Researchers understand the role of labor motivation
in different ways. M. Mescon sees the motivation of
labor as one of the independent functions of
management and believes that it manifests itself in the
desire of a person to satisfy his needs through labor
(Mescon et al., 2017). O. S. Vikhanskiy characterizes
motivation as the encouragement of an employee to
work under the influence of internal and external
factors (Vikhanskiy, 1999). Yegorshin A.P. believes
that if the activity is motivated by internal factors, a
person does not need remuneration. When the
motives of activity arise under the influence of the
outside, there is an external motivation, which is
based on rewards (positive external motivation) or
punishments (negative external dominant)
(Yegorshin, 2013).
Scientists consider content and procedural
theories of motivation. In psychological and
pedagogical literature, content theories of foreign
scientists are discussed in detail. A. Maslow believes
that a person works to satisfy his needs (Maslow,
2019). F. Herzberg identifies factors of labor activity:
external, or hygiene (remuneration, rest, comfortable
conditions) and internal, or content (interesting and
creative work, career growth, success, satisfaction
with work). Hygiene factors, according to the
scientist, do not stimulate the employee, but their
absence negatively affects the activity. However,
content factors are good motivators (Herzberg, 2007).
According to D. McClelland, the motivation of a
person to work is formed under the influence of the
most significant needs for achievement, affiliation,
power, avoidance. For example, if a teacher wants to
achieve something, he will show initiative, autonomy,
responsibility, he seeks to achieve goals in more
effective ways, which encourages him to improve
himself (McClelland, 2007). H. Heckhausen revealed
this trend: when a person seeks success and achieves
it, he explains it with internal reasons, that is, with his
abilities, hard work, determination; and those workers
who do not show much effort, blame external reasons
for their failures: conflict with the boss, colleagues,
lack of funds, time, etc. (Heckhausen, 2003).
Procedural theories explain the reasons for the
formation of motivation. According to Expectancy
theory by V. Vroom, successful motivation of an
employee is possible when the result of his work
satisfies the employer, and remuneration for work
corresponds to the expectations of the performer.
(Musagitova, 2018). According to the theory of S.
Adams, a person expects a fair assessment and
remuneration of his work by an employer. Porter-
Lawler combined the ideas of V. Vroom and S.
Adams, believing that a person’s motivation to work
is formed under the influence of expectancy for fair
remuneration for the work done (Mermann, 2019).