perspective, the research subject is quite limited to
analyzing the moral value of the story (Supriadi,
2012; Sofa, 2020), while some analyses in the
linguistic perspective include the analysis of affixes
(Pauzan, 2016) and lexical error in translation (Andre
& Jurianto, 2015). When the characters are discussed,
Sangkuriang—the main male character—seemed to
be the focus of attention. There are even articles about
him from the perspective of visual communications
(e.g., Iskandar & Nurusholih, 2019; Woelandhary,
2019).
On the other hand, there is rarely any mention of
the main female character, Dayang Sumbi, in any
published scholarly articles in spite of her importance
in driving the plot of the story. It is believed that
without this character, most of the events in the story
would not have unfolded at all. This being said,
nonetheless, a study by Rosliana (2013) has
attempted to examine the archetype of the main
female characters in three Indonesian folklores,
namely Legenda Tangkuban Perahu, Nawang Wulan,
and Bawang Merah dan Bawang Putih. The research
leans towards the psychological approach of literary
interpretation, basing the portrayal of the female
characters on Jung’s five classifications of female
archetypes in a narrative. The result of this study
shows that compared to the female characters in
Western folklores, the three female characters
analyzed here (i.e., Dayang Sumbi, Nawang Wulan
and Bawang Putih) are shown to have more agency
and are more assertive.
In this present study, our aim is to examine
whether one of the female characters used in
Rosliana’s study is truly portrayed as more assertive
and active by focusing only on its representation in its
original culture without comparing it with different
cultures as we believe that it may have a different
result.
Hall (1997) suggests that representation is not
absolute; it depends on the way the producer of the
text creates meaning for them through language. This
creation of meaning can be observed through the
participant’s involvement with experiences around
them (Halliday & Matthiessen, 2004). There are two
types of experience; the ‘outer’ and ‘inner’. Outer
experiences include processes like: (1) material
process, the process of physically doing something;
(2) mental process, which involves the participant’s
feeling, thought, and perception; (3) behavioral
process, the combination between material and
mental processes; and (4) verbal process, which
involves the use of language to symbolically signing.
On the other hand, inner experience is realized
through the existential process, which simply states
the (non-)existence of something, and the relational
process—the process of assigning a quality and/or
identity to the participant(s).
Aside from observing the processes, Toolan
(1998) mentions that the role of the participant(s) in
the clauses can also reveal how they are represented
in a text; especially the participants in the material
processes. For this purpose, he creates a further
classification of the doer and done-to participants
(termed ‘actor’ and ‘goal’ in Halliday’s (1990)
categorization). A human actor can be classified into
an ‘agent’—a human participant who intentionally
does an action—and a ‘medium-initiator’ (medium-
i), a human participant who initiate the process
volitionally. Meanwhile, a human ‘goal’ may be the
‘recipient’ of an action or the ‘medium-target’
(medium-t), the human target of the process. By
nature, the agent is considered the most powerful in
the human participant category, and the medium-t is
the least powerful.
2 METHODS
In order to obtain the most comprehensive
representation of the female character, this research
uses the mixed method research design, a method
combining into a single study the techniques and
methods of both qualitative and quantitative research
(Creswell, 2014). This type of methodology has been
widely used nowadays in linguistics research—
especially in the field of Corpus Linguistics. Corpus
linguistics is usually associated with the quantitative
analysis of a large number of data, and it generally
uses a computer software as a tool for data collection
(Biber & Repen, 2015; Yuliawati, 2018). In this
research, the quantitative analysis has the role of
providing more comprehensive and accurate data
before they are interpreted further using other
linguistic tools, which is the qualitative analysis part
of the research. This method of analysis is in
accordance to McEnery and Hardie’s (2012) opinion
about the nature of corpus-based approach which sees
the corpus as a source of empirical data to give model
of language through the application of other
linguistics theory.
The source of data, the Legend of Tangkuban
Perahu story, is taken from a public domain on the
internet, with the size of a total of 993 token—the
total words in a corpus (Cheng, 2012). This corpus is
considered a specialized corpus (Cheng, 2012) as it is
only aimed to represent a particular kind of language
and thus is homogeneous and smaller in size. The
collection of data uses the help of the corpus software