The Importance of Internal Control on Accounting Information
System’s Quality: Survey on Banking Sector
Ita Salsalina Lingga
a
Department of Accounting, Maranatha Christian University, Jl. Suria Sumantri 65, Bandung, Indonesia
Keywords: Internal Control, Accounting Information System’s Quality.
Abstract: In today’s world that relies more on information technology, all business organizations need accounting
information systems (AIS) to be able to compete and survive. The phenomenon of unqualified AIS occurs in
various organizations including banks. A qualified AIS will have an impact on accounting information’s
quality. Thus, internal control must be developed to ensure proper data entry process, processing techniques,
storage methods and information generated. It is needed to ensure that AIS operates as it should so that the
risk of deviation from predetermined objectives can be avoided. This study aims to analyze the effect of
internal control effectiveness towards AIS’s quality. The research survey was conducted on regional
development banks, located in 27 provincial capitals throughout Indonesia. Data were collected through a
questionnaire. Partial Least Square SEM method was used in data processing and analysis. The results proves
that there is an effect of internal control effectiveness on AIS’s quality. Internal control that was conducted
showed a gap which means that they have not yet been implemented effectively in order to enhance AIS’s
quality. Therefore, internal control effectiveness is very important to enhance AIS’s quality which will have
an impact on accounting information’s quality.
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Accounting Information System’s
Quality
Accounting Information Systems (AIS) is the main
information system for an organization which serves
to provide information for users to complete their
work (Romney & Steinbart, 2015). AIS is designed to
support the business processes and operations of an
organization as well as to help in the decision-making
process (O'Brien & Marakas, 2011). In today's world
which relies more on information technology,
organizations genuinely need AIS in order to survive
(Gelinas & Dull, 2008). Without the support of AIS,
it is impossible for an organization to be able to
compete (Bodnar & Hopwood, 2010). In other words,
all forms of business, both small and multinational,
will not be able to survive without the support of a
qualified AIS (Stair & Reynolds, 2016).
A qualified AIS is needed to produce qualified
information to be useful for users in both internal and
external of the company (Wilkinson et al., 2000). The
a
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1785-5534
criteria for measuring the quality of a system
according to Fortune & Peters (2005) are being able
to meet user needs, able to achieve goals, accordance
with the planned time and budget, able to provide
satisfaction for users, and able to meet quality
standards. In the context of information systems, what
is meant by quality is how well the final results of an
information system are able to meet the goals set by
management (Laudon & Laudon, 2014). Several
experts stated that the quality characteristics of AIS
include flexible, efficient, accessible, timely (Stair &
Reynolds, 2010); availability, security, integrity, and
maintainability (Bagranoff et al., 2010); accuracy,
timelines, and ease of use (Laudon & Laudon, 2014).
The phenomenon related to the quality of AIS is
the problem of AIS that has not been integrated
(integration). For example, the case that occurred at
the Regional Development Banks (Indonesian: Bank
Pembangunan Daerah/BPD). According to the
statement of the Association Chairman of Regional
Development Banks, Budiwiyono (2015), only 15 out
of 26 BPDs had joined the integrated information
system through one online platform (BPD Net
Online). Budiwiyono emphasized that by relying on
Lingga, I.
The Importance of Internal Control on Accounting Information System’s Quality: Survey on Banking Sector.
DOI: 10.5220/0010745200003112
In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Emerging Issues in Humanity Studies and Social Sciences (ICE-HUMS 2021), pages 129-140
ISBN: 978-989-758-604-0
Copyright
c
2022 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
129
an online system, which is a system that is equipped
with several features ranging from cash deposits,
book-entry, transfers to other BPDs and receiving
transfers from other BPDs, banking transactions can
be conducted in real time.
The next problem would be the unreliability of
AIS (reliability). For example, the fictitious credit
case at BSB Bank on behalf of PT CT which involved
BSB employees, through false record keeping which
resulted in PT CT being able to get loan funds of up
to IDR 480 billion (Adil, 2014). According to the
Deputy Commissioner for Banking of Financial
Service Authority, Kristiyana (2015), one of the
programs conducted by BPD is a transformation
program consisting of three phases which in the first
phase it aims to build a supporting process and strong
capital along with a fine quality of human resources,
working culture, and reliable information systems
through synergies of BPD group.
Aside from reliability, the next problem is
regarding the inflexible AIS (flexibility). One of
many examples is the effort made by Panin Islamic
Bank in collaboration with PT Emerio Indonesia in
the context of the application of the Regla RCS
(Banking Regulatory & Compliance Suite) Software,
so that AIS and reporting can be precise and flexible
according to the needs and character of the company
(Sarasidya, 2014). Another example related to
flexibility is what happened to BPD DKI, as stated by
the Governor of DKI Jakarta, Purnama (2016) that the
information system of BPD DKI is considered to be
"out of date". This shows that AIS is not flexible/not
able to adapt to technological changes.
Another problem is regarding AIS that is difficult
to use (usability). For example, the launch of the
MPN-G2 system, which is an online tax payment
acceptance system conducted by BPD Kaltim, with
the aim of making it effortless for taxpayers to pay off
their tax obligations electronically (Hanafiah, 2015).
With this system, deposits could be made more
practically, quickly, and safely through internet
banking, mobile banking, ATMs, or Electronic Data
Capture (EDC) machines, eliminating the need to
queue at teller counters. Another example is the
virtual account system at the BPD DKI which
according to the Governor of DKI Jakarta, Purnama
(2016) was still difficult to use by Jakarta citizens to
conduct financial transactions.
Based on the phenomenon described above, we
could see that there are problems related to the quality
of AIS in the banking sector especially by taking
cases from Regional Development Banks. The
problem of AIS’s quality will eventually have an
impact on the quality of accounting information
produced. We all know that it is important for banks
as a financial institution to be trustworthy. Therefore,
this study aims to analyse the effect of internal control
effectiveness towards AIS's quality. The results will
show how important the internal control effectiveness
in enhancing AIS's quality.
1.2 Internal Control Effectiveness
One of the factors affecting the quality of AIS is the
existence of an effective internal control. Internal
control is basically a process designed to provide
adequate assurance about the achievement of
organizational goals, namely the reliability of
financial reporting, operational effectiveness and
efficiency, and compliance with applicable laws and
regulations (Bodnar & Hopwood, 2010).
In general, internal control is defined as a method
and tool that attempts to ensure the accuracy, validity
and appropriateness of information system activities
(O'Brien & Marakas, 2011). O'Brien & Marakas
further stated that internal control is developed to
ensure that the data entry process (input), processing
techniques (processing), storage methods (storage)
and the information generated (output) were
conducted appropriately so that they could monitor
and maintain the quality, as well as security from
input, process, output and storage activities of any
information system.
Internal control is needed to provide assurance to
management that the implemented system is
functioning as expected and is capable of being
operated in various conditions (Jajodia & Strous,
2004). This is supported by Susanto’s statement
(2013), that internal control is essential to ensure that
AIS operates as it should so that the risk of deviation
from predetermined objectives can be avoided.
According to Boockholdt (1999), internal controls
implemented in AIS are called information systems
controls. This is emphasized by Jones & Rama
(2003), that it is possible to build control in AIS to
help achieve goals. COSO even emphasized the
importance of control procedures for all information
systems related to finance, operations and compliance
(Moeller, 2005).
According to Stair & Reynolds (2010)
effectiveness is a measure of the extent to which a
system meets its objectives or achieves its goals. The
same thing was also stated by Weber (1999) and
Boockholdt (1999). The fact is not all organizations
have an effective internal control (Romney &
Steinbart, 2015).What is meant by the effectiveness
of internal control in the context of this research is the
successful application of methods, policies and
ICE-HUMS 2021 - International Conference on Emerging Issues in Humanity Studies and Social Sciences
130
procedures designed and influenced by the board of
commissioners, management and employees in
providing assurance that AIS functions as expected in
carrying out data entry, processing, storage, and
output activities so that the risk of deviation from the
stated objectives can be avoided.
Basically, internal controls consist of general
controls and application controls (Boczko, 2007;
Laudon & Laudon, 2014). General controls are the
information system controls that affect all
applications of the computer in the organization while
application controls affect an individual application.
An example of an ineffective internal control case
occurred in the Regionally-Owned Enterprises
(BUMD) of East Java Provincial Government. Weak
internal control resulted in the emergence of the
findings of The Audit Board of the Republic of
Indonesia on two Regionally-Owned Enterprises of
East Java Provincial Government, namely PT
Petrogas Jatim Utama and PT BPD Jatim
(Napitupulu, 2014). According to the Chairman of the
Board of Commissioners of Financial Service
Authority (OJK) Hadad (2017), BPD transformation
needed to be supported by the availability of
professional human resources, adequate IT
infrastructure, GCG implementation, risk
management and an effective internal control.
Another example related to the weak internal
control is the account breaching case of 54 customers
of BPD Kalbar (West Kalimantan) with a total loss
value of IDR 1.6 billion (Nugroho, 2015). The same
problem also occurred at Bank Nagari, Solok branch
(West Sumatera), due to a poor bank security system
which resulted in the loss of customer savings of IDR
350 million (Amir, 2015).
1.3 The Effect of Internal Control
Effectiveness on AIS’s Quality
Internal control aims to ensure the successful
implementation of AIS. In other words, internal
control is required to achieve AIS objectives (Nash &
Roberts, 1984). O'Brien & Marakas (2011)
emphasized that internal control is designed to
monitor and maintain the quality and safety of input,
processing, output and storage activities of any
information system including AIS. This is
highlighted by Laudon & Laudon (2014) that internal
control aims to be able to regulate the production and
documentation of information in financial reports.
Therefore, it is necessary to think about the security
of the AIS so that other controls (internal control) are
needed to ensure the integrity, confidentiality and
accuracy of the data.
The effectiveness of internal control is very
important because the poor quality of the AIS will
give an impact in decision-making process (Moeller,
2011). The need for controls over all aspects of AIS
is expressed by Curtis & Cobham (2005) that in all
information systems, data must be managed in a
structured manner so that it could be accessed easily,
processed efficiently, obtained quickly, and managed
effectively.
The theory above is supported by Fardinal's
research (2013), which proves that the internal
control effectiveness affects the quality of AIS. In
addition, research conducted by Hamzah &
Norwahida (2014) proves that the quality of AIS is
affected by the internal control effectiveness.
Likewise, research conducted by Neogy (2014)
proves that effective internal control will increase the
efficiency of AIS. Another empirical evidence is the
research of Anggadini (2015) which proves that
internal control has a significant effect on the quality
of AIS. The same thing is stated in the results of
research by Mulyani & Enggar (2016) that the
internal control effectiveness effects the quality of
accounting information generated by AIS. Likewise,
the research by Hayale & Kadra (2006) proves that
inadequate internal control over AIS could lead to a
potential fraud in the banking sector in Jordan.
Evidence that internal control effectiveness
affects AIS’s quality is also stated in Chen & Sui's
research (2008), that internal control is a fundamental
security tool to ensure the reliability of AIS
operations. According to Danescu et al. (2012)
internal control effectiveness has an impact on the
information generated by AIS.
In line with O'Brien & Marakas (2011) statement
that internal control is designed to monitor and
maintain the quality of any information system, then
effective internal control is required to provide
assurance to management that the implemented AIS
is functioning as expected (qualified AIS). In other
words, ineffective internal control will cause poor
quality of AIS which in turn will have an impact on
the quality of the resulting accounting information
which will be used by stakeholders in decision
making.
Based on the theory that has been stated above,
which is supported by the results of empirical
research, the hypotheses that can be stated here is:
H
1
: The internal control effectiveness has a positive
effect on AIS’s quality.
The results of this study have benefits or
contribution for the development of science, namely
efforts to find general truths based on the knowledge
possessed to produce additional knowledge through
The Importance of Internal Control on Accounting Information System’s Quality: Survey on Banking Sector
131
understanding the phenomena that occur to build
theories. Furthermore, based on the theory built and
existing empirical evidence, the results of this study
produce problem solving to the phenomena that occur
as stated in the research background.
2 METHODS AND MATERIALS
2.1 Research Methods
This research is categorized as a descriptive and an
explanatory research conducted using survey method.
Questionnaires is distributed to respondents in data
collecting. Unit of analysis in this research is the
accounting and operational divisions of Regional
Development Banks (BPD) that are spread across all
provinces in Indonesia. BPD is a local government
bank with a different system from other banks. This
makes the difference between this study and previous
research as the novelty of this research. Furthermore,
the observation unit in this study are users of AIS,
especially those who regularly interact with the
accounting information systems in completing their
work. In this case the head and staff of the accounting
and operational divisions of BPD, approximately 3-5
people. The population in this study were 27 BPD
located throughout Indonesia, including the head
office, main branches and sub-branches. The unit of
research analysis is BPD bank
In the context of this study, the effectiveness of
internal control is assessed from whether the internal
control that is implemented consisting of general
controls including software control, hardware
control, computer operating procedure control, data
security control, implementation control, and
administrative control as well as application control
including input control, process control and output
control. is adequate to maintain the quality of AIS
which is then represented by X (independent
variable).
The dimensions and indicators used in assessing
the effectiveness of internal control are described in
detail below.
1. General control is defined as managing the
design, security, and usability of computer
programs and the security of data files in general
through an information technology infrastructure
with indicators includes:
a. Software control is the level of supervision to
prevent unauthorized access to software
programs, software systems, and computer
programs.
b. Hardware control is the level of control to
ensure that the computer hardware is
physically safe, and functioning properly.
c. Computer operating procedure control is the
level of control to ensure that data storage and
processing procedures are carried out
appropriately and consistently.
d. Data security control is a level of control to
ensure that all files cannot be misused by
unauthorized parties.
e. Implementation control is the level of control
through an information system audit to ensure
that the system is executed properly.
f. Administrative control is the level of control
that is carried out to ensure that general
controls and company applications have been
carried out in accordance with standard
operating procedures (Boockholdt, 1999;
Bodnar & Hopwood, 2010; Laudon & Laudon,
2014; Romney & Steinbart, 2015; Susanto,
2013).
2. Application control consist of manual and
automated procedures to ensure that only
authorized data can be processed completely and
accurately by the application with indicators
includes:
a. Input control is the level of control to ensure
that the data entered is complete and accurate.
b. Process control is the level of control to ensure
that data is complete and accurate during the
updating process.
c. Output control is the level of control to ensure
that computer processing results are truly
accurate, complete and properly distributed
(Boockholdt, 1999; Bodnar & Hopwood,
2010; Susanto, 2013: Laudon & Laudon, 2014;
Romney & Steinbart, 2015).
Furthermore, the quality of AIS is assessed by
whether the system being implemented achieves its
objectives as measured by achieving integration,
reliability, flexibility and usability which is then
represented by Y (dependent variable).
The dimensions and indicators used in assessing
the AIS’s quality are described in detail below:
1. Integration means the relationship and
interdependence (harmoniously) between
components (sub systems) in the system and
between the system and the environment (Wu,
1983; Nash & Roberts, 1984; Leitch & Davis,
1992; Grady, 1994; Whitten & Bentley, 2007;
Boczko, 2007; Heidmann, 2008; Baltzan &
Phillips, 2009; Stair & Reynolds, 2010; Bojic,
2015), includes:
ICE-HUMS 2021 - International Conference on Emerging Issues in Humanity Studies and Social Sciences
132
a. Integration between sub-systems (Grady,
1994; Boczko, 2007; Heidmann, 2008; Stair &
Reynolds, 2010; Bojic, 2015).
b. Integration between system and other systems
(Wu, 1983; Nash & Roberts, 1984; Heidmann,
2008; Bojic, 2015).
2. Reliability means the system functions properly
and securely in producing accurate information
(Nash & Roberts, 1984; Avgerou & Conrnford,
1998; DeLone & McLean, 2003; Boczko, 2007;
Baltzan & Phillips, 2009; Bagranoff et al., 2010;
Baltzan, 2014), includes:
a. Accounting information systems operate
correctly starting from data input, processing
to generating accounting information (Avgerou
& Conrnford, 1998; Boczko, 2007; Baltzan &
Phillips, 2009; Baltzan, 2014).
b. Accounting information systems generate
accurate accounting information (Avgerou &
Conrnford, 1998; Boczko, 2007; Baltzan &
Phillips, 2009; Bagranoff et al., 2010).
3. Flexibility means the system is able to adapt to
various user needs and changing conditions
(Avgerou & Conrnford, 1998; Boczko, 2007;
Heidmann, 2008; Baltzan & Phillips, 2009; Stair
& Reynolds, 2010; Bagranoff, et al., 2010;
Romney & Steinbart, 2015), includes:
a. The system's ability to adapt to changing
conditions/environment (Avgerou &
Conrnford, 1998; Boczko, 2007; Heidmann,
2008; Baltzan & Phillips, 2009; Stair &
Reynolds, 2010; Bagranoff, et al., 2010).
b. The system's ability to adapt to changing needs
or business (Boczko, 2007; Heidmann, 2008;
Baltzan & Phillips, 2009; Bagranoff, et al.,
2010; Stair & Reynolds, 2010).
4. Usability means the system must be easy to use,
easy to learn and directly meet people's needs
(Avgerou & Conrnford, 1998; Laudon &
Laudon, 2014; Baltzan, 2014), includes:
a. Easy to use (Avgerou & Conrnford, 1998;
Laudon & Laudon, 2014:505; Baltzan, 2014).
b. Easy to learn (Avgerou & Conrnford, 1998;
Baltzan, 2014).
The following is a research instrument on the
effectiveness of internal control and accounting
information system’s quality using a 5 point of likert
scale.
Table 1: Research Instrument on The Effectiveness of
Internal Control.
1
The AIS that is used is safe from possible access
or misuse by unauthorized parties because it has
used a password, thereby being able to function
as ex
p
ected.
(
not safe
ver
y
safe
)
2
The AIS that is used is able to run properly because it
is equipped with hardware that is always guaranteed
to be physically safe and to function properly.
(not guaranteed
fully guaranteed.
3
The AIS that is used is able to run well in processing
and storing data because it is always monitored by the
IT department.
(never
always).
4
All important files that have been processed using
AIS are safe from the possibility of theft, damage,
viruses, fire, or misuse of data by unauthorized parties
due to security measures such as the use of
passwords, and data backup to a separate server.
(not safe
ve
r
y safe).
5
The AIS used is capable of running well because it is
always audited to ensure that AIS has been
implemented as intended. (never
always).
6
The AIS used is able to run well because it complies
with the standard operating procedures (SOP) in the
company. (not suitable
very suitable).
7
The AIS used has guaranteed the completeness and
accuracy of the data to be inputted into the system,
because it is equipped with a feature that provides a
warning if the data entered is incomplete and
inaccurate. (not guaranteed
fully guaranteed).
8
The AIS used is able to run properly because the data
to be processed further is always guaranteed to be
complete and accurate.
(not guaranteed
fully guaranteed).
9
The AIS is able to run properly because the
information generated (output) is always guaranteed
to be accurate, complete and in accordance with user
needs. ( not guaranteed
fully guaranteed).
Table 2: Research Instrument on The AIS’s Quality.
1
Applications and data in AIS have been connected in
an integrated manner both between levels in the same
section and with other sections.
(not integrated
fully integrated).
2
Applications and data in AIS are harmoniously
connected between department.
(not integrated
fully integrated).
3
AIS functions correctly starting from inputting data,
processing, to producing accounting information
(not reliable
fully reliable).
4
The AIS is reliable because the information
generated is always accurate according to user needs
(not reliable
fully reliable).
5
The AIS is able to run well because it has the ability
to adapt to changing conditions or environment.
(lacks of capability
very capable).
6
The AIS is able to run well because it has the ability
to adapt to various needs of users.
(lacks of capability
very capable).
7
The AIS is able to run well because it has features
that are easy to operate so that it helps users in
completing work. (not easy - very easy).
8
The AIS is able to run well because it has features
that are easy to learn so that it helps users in
completing work. (not easy - very easy).
The Importance of Internal Control on Accounting Information System’s Quality: Survey on Banking Sector
133
2.2 Data Testing Methods
The validity test used in this study was the Rank-
Spearman correlation technique (Sekaran & Bougie,
2013).


+
=
22
222
.2 yx
dyx
r
i
s
(1)
To determine the validity of an item/statement, a
t-test was conducted, with the following formula:
2
1
2
.
s
s
r
N
rt
=
(2)
With a significance level of 95% (alpha = 0.05),
the t-count obtained is compared with the t
table
, with
degrees of freedom (df = n - 2). The conditions used
are as follows:
If t
count
t
table
, then the questionnaire instrument
is valid.
If t
count
< t
table
, then the questionnaire instrument is
invalid.
Furthermore, the reliability test was conducted
using Cronbach Alpha to test the interim consistency
reliability and split-half reliability (Sekaran &
Bougie, 2013). An instrument is said to be reliable if
the Cronbach Alpha coefficient exceeds 0.6.
=
=
total
k
i
i
S
S
k
k
2
1
2
1
1
α
(3)
Information:
k = the number of parts of the item
S
i
2
= the variance of the i-item
S
2
total
= the total variance of the items
2.3 Data Analysis Methods
Inferential analysis in this study was conducted using
a covariance-based structural equation modelling
method, namely partial least square (PLS) (Hair et al.,
2014). Second order model was used for the
measurement model (outer model) in this study,
where the first factor is the dimension while the
second factor is the variable. The outer model
specifies the relationship between latent variables and
their indicator variables or manifest variables
(measurement model). The first factor measurement
model is a model that connects dimensions with
indicators, while the second measurement model is a
model that connects latent constructs with manifest
variables. The latent construct consists of the internal
control effectiveness and the quality of AIS.
For the Internal Control Effectiveness (ESPI)
variable, the measurement model is formative in the
first order consisting of general control (PGUM) and
application control (PGAP), while in the second order
it is reflective. The following are figure and
measurement equations which state the causal
relationship between indicators and latent variables as
follows:
Figure 1: Internal Control Effectiveness Variable
Measurement Model.
For the AIS’s quality (KSIA) variable, the
measurement model is reflective in the first order
which consists of: integration (INTG), reliability
(RELB), flexibility (FLEX), usability (USAB), the
second order is reflective as well. The measurement
equation which states the causality relationship
between indicators and latent variables is as follows:
Figure 2: AIS’s Quality Variable Measurement Model.
Based on the structural measurement model in
Figure 1 and 2, the statistical hypotheses to be tested
in this study are as follows:
H
o
: γ
1.2 =
0 = Internal control effectiveness has no
effect on AIS’s quality.
Ha : γ
1.2 ≠
0 = Internal control effectiveness has a
positive effect on AIS’s quality.
ICE-HUMS 2021 - International Conference on Emerging Issues in Humanity Studies and Social Sciences
134
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The research survey was conducted on regional
development banks, located in 27 provincial capitals
throughout Indonesia including the head offices,
main branches and sub-branches. Data were collected
through questionnaires. The following is table 3
which state the recapitulation of questionnaires
distributed and returned from respondents.
Table 3: Recapitulation of Questionnaires Distributed and
Returned.
Unit of
Analysis
Total
Questionnaire
Distributed
Total
Questionnaire
Returned
%
Questionnaire
Returned
BPD Resp BPD Resp BPD Resp
Head
Office
27 140 24 120
88,89 85,71
Main
Branches
27 81 8 24
29.63 29.63
Sub-
Branches
27 54 12 32
44.44 59.26
Total 81 275 44 176
54.32 64
Source: data processing results
Based on the data in table 3, it can be seen that the
percentage of questionnaires returned was 65%. It
means that the minimum respond rate of 30% has
been fulfilled (Sekaran & Bougie, 2013).
The following are the results of the validity and
reliability tests:
Table 4: Recapitulation of Validity and Reliability Test
Results.
Variable
Statement
Item
Validity Reliability
Internal
Control
Effectiveness
Item 1
0,635
0,884
Item 2 0,691
Item 3 0,533
Item 4 0,720
Item 5 0,540
Item 6 0,696
Item 7 0,627
Item 8 0,670
Item 9 0,702
AIS’s Quality
Item 10 0,743
0,914
Item 11 0,673
Item 12 0,726
Item 13 0,770
Item 14 0,707
Item 15 0,730
Based on the results of the validity and reliability
test above, it can be seen that all statement items have
met the validity requirements because they have a
correlation value greater than 0.30. Likewise, the
reliability test results have a coefficient greater than
0.60, hence it can be concluded that the questionnaire
used has the reliability to measure each variable and
can be continued for further analysis.
According to Cooper & Schindler (2013) to
make it easier to interpret the variables being studied,
especially for ordinal data, categorization is carried
out using the interquartile range associated with the
median. The first quartile is the 25th percentile, the
second quartile (median) is the 50th percentile and the
third quartile is the 75th percentile. In a questionnaire
using a scale of 1-5, the first quartile (1-<2)
categorized as bad category, the second quartile (2-
<3) categorized as poor category, the third quartile (3-
<4) categorized as adequate category and the fourth
quartile (4-5) categorized as good category.
The internal control effectiveness at Regional
Development Banks in Indonesia in association with
AIS’s quality is measured through two dimensions,
namely general control and application control.
General control dimensions are measured through six
indicators, namely software control, hardware
control, computer operating procedure control, data
security control, implementation control and
administrative control. Furthermore, the application
control dimensions are measured through three
indicators, namely input control, process control and
output control. The following is the recapitulation of
each dimension of the internal control effectiveness
as presented in table 5.
Table 5: Average Score Recapitulation of Respondents
Response for Each Dimension of Internal Control
Effectiveness Variable Related to AIS’s Quality.
Dimension Real
Score
Total
Score
Average
% Real
Score:
Total
%
Gap
Category
G C 586 720 4,07 81,39 18,61 Goo
d
A C 267 360 3,71 74,17 25,83
Ade-
quate
Total
Avera
e
853 1080 3,95 78,98
Adequate
Ga
p
1,05 21,02
Actual
Total
100
Based on table 5 above, it can be seen that the
responses of respondents regarding the internal
control effectiveness are as follows:
1. Responses from BPD employees in Indonesia who
became the research samples on the internal
control effectiveness in relation to the quality of
the AIS have an average score of 3.95, which is
categorized as adequate. This shows that in
general, the internal control implemented by BPD
The Importance of Internal Control on Accounting Information System’s Quality: Survey on Banking Sector
135
in Indonesia is quite effective but not yet fully
effective both general control and application
control in supporting the quality of AIS. There is
still a gap with an average score of 1.05.
2. On average, the real score compared to the total
internal control effectiveness in relation to the
quality of the AIS used is 78.98%. This shows a
gap of 21.02%. This gap shows a form of
quantification of the actual condition that the
implemented internal control is not yet fully
effective in supporting the quality of AIS,
especially with the application control dimension
which has a lower average score (3.71), compared
to general control (4.07).
The following is the description of the respondents'
responses regarding the internal control effectiveness
as seen from the indicators of each dimension.
1. General Control Dimensions
The general control dimensions are measured using
six indicators, namely software control, hardware
control, control of computer operating procedure,
data security control, implementation control and
administrative control. Overall, the six indicators are
operationalized into two statement items.
Based on average score recapitulation of
respondent’s response regarding relationship of each
indicator with AIS’s Quality in General Control
Dimensions, the average respondent's response to the
software control indicators has a score of 3.92, which
is categorized as adequate. From the distribution of
the questionnaire, in general, 29,23% of respondents
stated that generally, the internal control
implemented by BPD in Indonesia had a very good
software control, then 58,3% of respondents stated it
was good, while 12.5% of respondents stated it was
quite good.
Based on the processed data, the average
respondent's response to the hardware control
indicators has a score of 4.25, which is categorized as
good. From the distribution of questionnaires, in
general, 41,7%% of respondents stated that generally,
the internal control implemented by BPD in Indonesia
had a very good hardware control, the remaining
58,3% of respondents stated it was good.
Based on the processed data, the average
respondent's response to the indicators of computer
operating procedures control has a score of 4.33
which is categorized as good. From the distribution of
questionnaires, in general, 70.8% of respondents
stated that generally, the internal control
implemented by BPD in Indonesia had a very good
computer operating procedures control, the remaining
29.2% of respondents stated it was good.
Based on the processed data, the average
respondent's response to the data security control
indicators has a score of 3.96, which is categorized as
adequate. From the distribution of the questionnaire,
in general, 33,3%% of respondents stated that the
internal control implemented by BPD in Indonesia
had a very good data security control, then 54,2% of
respondents stated it was good, while 12.5% of
respondents stated it was quite good.
Based on the processed data, the average
respondent's response to the implementation control
indicators has a score of 4.04, which is categorized as
good. From the distribution of the questionnaire, in
general, 37,5% of respondents stated that the internal
control implemented by BPD in Indonesia had a very
good implementation control, then 54,2% of
respondents stated it was good, while 8.3% of
respondents stated it was quite good.
Likewise, from the processed data, the average
respondent's response to the administrative control
indicator has a score of 3.92, which categorized as
adequate. From the distribution of questionnaires, in
general, 12,5% of respondents stated that the internal
control implemented by BPD in Indonesia had a very
good administrative control, then 79,2% of
respondents stated it was good, while 8.3% of
respondents stated it was quite good.
2. Application Control Dimensions
The dimensions of application control are measured
using three indicators, namely input control, process
control and output control. Overall, the three
indicators are operationalized into two statement
items.
Based on recapitulation of the average score of
respondents' responses regarding the relationship of
each indicator with AIS’s quality in the application
control dimensions, the average respondent's
response on the input control indicator has a score of
3.63, which is categorized as adequate. From the
distribution of the questionnaire, in general, 4,2% of
respondents stated that the internal control
implemented by BPD in Indonesia had a very good
input control, then 66,7% of respondents stated it was
good, while 29,2% of respondents stated it was quite
good.
Based on the processed data, the average
respondent's response to the process control indicator
has a score of 3.71, which is categorized as adequate.
From the distribution of the questionnaire, in general,
8.3% of respondents stated it was very good, then
79.2% of respondents stated it was good, while 12.5%
of respondents stated it was quite good.
ICE-HUMS 2021 - International Conference on Emerging Issues in Humanity Studies and Social Sciences
136
Based on the processed data, the average
respondent's response to the output control indicator
has a score of 3.79, which is categorized as adequate.
From the distribution of questionnaires, in general,
12,5% of respondents stated that the internal control
implemented by BPD in Indonesia had a very good
output control, then 75% of respondents stated it was
good while 12.5% of respondents stated it was quite
good.
Following the explanation of the measurement
model of the internal control effectiveness variable.
The internal control effectiveness is measured using
two dimensions which are operationalized into nine
indicators. Based on the results of data processing
using the second order confirmatory factor analysis,
the measurement model for the latent variable on the
internal control effectiveness was obtained as
presented in the following figure.
Figure 3: Path Diagram of The Measurement Model of
Internal Control Effectiveness Variable.
Following the explanation of the measurement model
of AIS’s quality variable. AIS’s quality is measured
using 4 dimensions which are operationalized into 8
indicators. Based on the results of data processing
using second order confirmatory factor analysis, the
measurement model for the latent variables of the
accounting information system quality was obtained
as presented in the following figure.
Figure 4: Path Diagram of The Measurement Model of
AIS’s Quality Variable.
Furthermore, hypothesis testing was conducted to
determine the effect of the internal control
effectiveness on AIS’s quality as described in the
following table.
Table 6: Test Results of The Effect of Internal Control
Effectiveness on AIS’s Quality.
Path
Coefficient
t
count
t
critical
H
0
0,436 2,548 1,96 Re
j
ecte
d
Based on the data in table 6, it can be seen that the
t
count
value of the internal control effectiveness
variable (2.548) is greater than t
critical
(1.96). Because
the value of t
count
is greater than t
critical
level, then at an
error level of 5%, it was pronounced to reject H
0
. So
based on the test results, it can be concluded that the
internal control effectiveness has a positive effect on
AIS’s quality. The results of this study in line with the
empirical evidence that the more effective internal
control is, then the higher quality of AIS will be.
4 CONCLUSIONS
Based on the results of hypothesis testing, it is known
that the internal control effectiveness has a positive
effect on AIS’s quality. The results of this hypothesis
testing support the theory as stated by Nash & Roberts
(1984); O'Brien & Marakas (2011); Moeller (2011)
who state that internal control is designed to monitor
and maintain the quality and security of input,
processing, output and storage activities of any
information system.
The results of the hypothesis testing are in
accordance with the conclusions of previous studies
which were conducted by Hayale & Kadra (2006);
Fardinal (2013); Hamzah & Norwahida (2014);
Anggadini (2015); Mulyani & Enggar (2016).
Ineffective of internal control over AIS could lead to
potential irregularities.
Internal control effectiveness gave an effect of
37%. It means that 37% of AIS’s quality was caused
or could be explained by the internal control
effectiveness. Insufficient contribution of general
control conducted by BPD in Indonesia in enhancing
the quality of AIS was shown by the fact that there
was a gap of 18.48%, which means that general
control conducted by BPD in Indonesia, through
software control, hardware control, computer
operating procedures control, data security control,
implementation control, and administrative control
have not been fully effective in enhancing the quality
of AIS at each BPD in Indonesia.
The Importance of Internal Control on Accounting Information System’s Quality: Survey on Banking Sector
137
Furthermore, insufficient contribution of
application control conducted by BPD in Indonesia in
enhancing the quality of AIS was shown by the fact
that there was a gap of 25.15%, which means that
application control conducted by BPD in Indonesia
through input control, process control, and output
control have not been fully effective in enhancing the
quality of AIS at each BPD in Indonesia.
Based on the results of research, discussion and
conclusions, the suggestions that can be put forward
are as follows:
1. Increasing the Effectiveness of Internal Control by:
a. Safeguard the AIS (software) by ensuring that the
password used is completely safe from possible
accessibility by unauthorized parties through the
design of the AIS software which automatically
requires AIS’s users to use password when
accessing data files and automatically requests
AIS’s users to change password periodically.
b. Perform regular checks on the hardware used by
employees regarding AIS use to ensure that the
hardware is always in good working condition.
c. Perform regular monitoring by the special unit
that handles information technology issues (IT
department) on AIS software used to ensure that
the application can be run properly in processing
and storing data.
d. Perform regular data backups to a separate server
to ensure that all important files that have been
processed using AIS software are safe from the
possibility of theft, damage, viruses, fires or
misuse of data by unauthorized parties.
e. Conduct periodic audits to ensure that the AIS
has been carried out in accordance with the
objectives, namely with the standard operating
procedures (SOP) at each BPD.
f. Completing the AIS software used with a feature
that automatically gives a warning if the data
entered is incomplete and inaccurate so as to
guarantee the completeness and accuracy of the
data that will be inputted into the system and will
be further processed so that the resulting
accounting information (output) will be
qualified.
2. Improving the Quality of AIS, Including:
a. Creating integration in AIS between hardware,
software, brainware, procedures, databases and
communication networks by:
1) Striving for harmonization between the
communication network technology used
with the brainware's ability by increasing user
competence, harmonizing communication
network technology with the data that will be
distributed using a high-speed data
communication network if the data to be
distributed is large enough, harmonization
between network technologies
communication with procedures, by using
network security systems, data access
systems and others. One way to secure the
system is through the use of a password. In
addition, it is necessary to harmonize the
communication network technology used
with software and hardware. Hardware is
equipped with AIS (software) which is
harmonious with the operating system.
b. Building AIS reliability by:
1) Making internal control effective through
controlling software, hardware, computer
operating procedures, data security,
implementation and administration to ensure
the completeness and accuracy of the data
that will be inputted into the accounting
information system, further processed so as to
produce qualified accounting information.
c. Creating AIS flexibility by:
1) Anticipating rapid changes in both user and
environmental needs, for example the
growing need for banking applications such
as m-banking. Therefore, it is necessary to
think about the development of an up-to-date
accounting information system so that BPD
can compete with other commercial banks.
d. Increasing the ease of use of AIS by completing
the AIS software with features that are easy to
understand and operate so that it helps users in
completing their work.
REFERENCES
Adil, M. (2015). Bank Sumsel Babel digeledah polisi
terkait kredit fiktif PT CT. https://www.
merdeka.com/peristiwa/bank-sumsel-babel-digeledah-
polisi-terkait-kredit-fiktif-pt-ct.html.
Amir, A. (2015). Tabungan Raib Rp 350 Juta, Nasabah
Ragukan Sistem Bank Nagari. http://www.republika.
co.id/berita/nasional/hukum/15/04/15/nmuub6-tabungan
-raib-rp-350-juta-nasabah-ragukan-sistem-bank-nagari.
Anggadini, S. D. (2015). ‘The Effect of Top Management
Support and Internal Control of the Accounting
Information Systems Quality and Its Implications on
the Accounting Information Quality’. Information
Management and Business Review, 7(3), pp. 93-102.
https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v7i3.1157.
Avgerou, C., & Conrnford, T. (1998). Developing
Information Systems: Concepts, Issues and Practice.
2
nd
edition. Palgrave Macmillan.
ICE-HUMS 2021 - International Conference on Emerging Issues in Humanity Studies and Social Sciences
138
Bagranoff, N. A., Simkin, M. G. & Norman, C. S. (2010).
Accounting Information Systems. 11
th
edition. John
Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Baltzan, P. & Phillips, A. (2009). Essentials of Business
Driven Information Systems. McGraw-Hill Irwin.
Baltzan, P. (2014). Business Driven Information Systems.
4
th
edition. McGraw-Hill Irwin.
Boczko, T. (2007). Corporate Accounting Information
Systems. 7
th
edition. Pearson Education Ltd.
Bodnar, G. H. & Hopwood, W. S. (2010). Accounting
Information Systems. 10
th
edition. Pearson Education Inc.
Bojic, P., Greasley, A. & Hickie, S. (2015). Business
Information Systems: Technology, Development and
Management for the E-Business. 5
th
edition. Pearson
Education Ltd.
Boockholdt, J. (1999). Accounting Information Systems:
Transaction Processing and Control. MacGraw-Hill.
Budiwiyono, E. (2015). Baru 15 bank daerah gunakan
sistem online. https://www.merdeka.com/uang/baru-
15-bank-daerah-gunakan-sistem-online.html.
Budiwiyono, E. (2015). Menanti Gebrakan Transformasi
BPD. http://www.republika.co.id/berita/koran/pareto/15/
06/08/npmbo6-menanti-gebrakan-transformasi- bpd.
Chen, W. & Sui, S. (2008). ‘On the Challenge of
Accounting Standards for Enterprise Towards
Enterprise Internal Control’. Journal of Sustainable
Development, Vol 1, No.2, July 2008.
Cooper, D. R. & Schindler, P. S. (2013). Business Research
Methods. 12
th
edition. Mc.Graw-Hill Irwin.
Curtis, G. & Cobham, D. (2005). Business Information
Systems. 5
th
edition. FT Prentice Hall.
Danescu, T., Prozan, M., & Danescu, A.C. (2012). ‘The
Role of The Risk Management and of The Activities of
Internal Control in Supplying Useful Information
Through the Accounting and Fiscal Reports’. Procedia
Economics and Finance, 3 (2012) 1099-1106. DOI:
10.1016/S2212-5671(12)00280-8.
Fardinal. (2013). ‘The Quality of Accounting Information
and The Accounting Information System through The
Internal Control Systems: A Study on Ministry and
State Agencies of The Republic of Indonesia’.
Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, Vol.4,
No.6. ISSN 2222-1697 (Paper) ISSN 2222-2847
(Online).
Fortune, J. & Peters, G. (2005). Information Systems:
Achieving Success By Avoiding Failure. John Wiley &
Sons, Ltd.
Gelinas, U. J. & Dull, R. B. (2008). Accounting Information
Systems. 7
th
edition. Thomson South Western.
Grady, B. (1994). Object-Oriented Analysis and Design
With Applications. 2
nd
edition. The Benjamin
Cummings Publishing Company.
Hadad, M. D. (2017). OJK gaungkan kembali program
transformasi BPD. https://keuangan.kontan.co.id/ news/
ojk-gaungkan-kembali-program-transformasi- bpd.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G., Thomas, M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt,
M. (2014). A Primer on Partial Least Squares
Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE
Publications, Inc.
Hamzah, M. A., & Norwahida, Al_Qudah S. (2014). ‘The
Role of Data Quality and Internal Control in Raising
The Effectiveness of AIS In Jordan Companies’.
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Re-
search, Vol. 3, Issue 8, August 2014. ISSN 2277-8616.
Hanafiah, S. M. (2015). BPD Kaltim Cabang Bontang
Perkenalkan Sistem yang Membuat Bayar Pajak
MakinMudah.http://klikbontang.com/berita-2394-
bpd-kaltim-cabang-bontang-perkenalkan-sistem- yang-
membuat-bayar-pajak-makin-mudah.html.
Hayale, T. H., & Khadra, H. A. (2006). ‘Evaluation of The
Effectiveness of Control Systems in Computerized
Accounting Information Systems: An Empirical
Research Applied on Jordanian Banking Sector’.
Journal of Accounting-Business & Management. 13
(2006) 39-68.
Heidmann, M. (2008). The Role of Management
Accounting Systems in Strategic Sensemaking. 1
st
edition.Germany: Deutscher Universitats-Verlag.
Jajodia S. & Strous, L. (2004). Integrity and Internal
Control in Information Systems VI IFIP TC11/WG11.5
Sixth Working Conference on Integrity and Internal
Control in Information Systems (IICIS) 13–14 November
2003, Lausanne, Switzerland. George Mason University
Fairfax, Virginia, USA. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Jones, F. L. & Rama, D. V. 2003. Accounting Information
Systems: A Business Process Approach. Thomson,
South-Western.
Kristiyana, H. (2015). Baru 15 bank daerah gunakan sistem
online. https://www.merdeka.com/uang/baru- 15-bank -
daerah-gunakan-sistem-online.html.
Kristiyana, H. (2015). Menanti Gebrakan Transformasi BPD.
http://www.republika.co.id/berita/koran/pareto/15/06/08
/npmbo6-menanti-gebrakan-transformasi- bpd.
Laudon, K. C. & Laudon, J. P. (2014). Management
Information Systems: Managing the Digital Firm. Global
Edition. 14
th
edition. Pearson Education Ltd.
Leitch, R. A. & Davis, K. R. (1992). Accounting
Information Systems: Theory and Practice. Prentice-
Hall International, Inc.
Moeller, R. R. (2005). Brink’s Modern Internal Auditing.
6
th
edition. John Wiley & sons, Inc.
Moeller, R. R. (2011). COSO Enterprise Risk Management:
Establishing Effective Governance, Risk, and Com-
pliance Processes. 2
nd
edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Mulyani, S. & Enggar, D.P.A. (2016). ‘The Influence of
Manager Competency and Internal Control
Effectiveness Toward Accounting Information
Quality’. IJABER, Vol. 14(1): 181-190.
Napitupulu, H. (2014). Penyebab Temuan BPK: Lemahnya
GCG dan Pengendalian Intern. http://www.bpkp.go
.id/berita/read/12652/0/Penyebab-Temuan-BPK-Lemah
nya-GCG-dan-Pengendalian-Intern.bpkp.
Nash, J. F. & Roberts, M. B. (1984). Accounting Information
Systems. Macmillan Publishing Company.
Neogy, T.K., (2014). ‘Evaluation of Efficiency of AIS: A
Study on Mobile Telecommunication Companies in
Bangladesh’.Global Disclosure of Economic &
Business. Vol 3(1), 2014, pp. 40-55.
The Importance of Internal Control on Accounting Information System’s Quality: Survey on Banking Sector
139
Nugroho, A. (2015). Cetak Kartu ATM Palsu, Staf Bank
Kalbar Bobol Rekening 54 Orang Nasabah. http://
regional.kompas.com/read/2015/09/04/20120281/Ceta
k.Kartu.ATM.Palsu.Staf.Bank.Kalbar.Bobol.Rekening
.54.Orang.Nasabah.
O’Brien, J. A. & Marakas, G. M. (2011). Management
Information Systems. 10
th
edition. McGraw-Hill
Companies, Inc.
Purnama, B. T. (2016). Basuki Kritik Sistem TI Bank DKI
yang Masih Jadul. http://www.beritasatu.com/
aktualitas/355519-basuki-kritik-sistem-ti-bank-dki-
yang-masih-jadul.html.
Romney, M. B. & Steinbart, P. J.(2015). Accounting
Information Systems. 13
th
edition. Pearson Education Inc.
Sarasidya, M. (2014). Panin Bank Syariah jalin kerjasama
dengan Emerio. http://keuangan.kontan.co.id/news/
panin-bank-syariah-jalin-kerja sama-dengan-emerio.
Sekaran, U. & Bougie, R. (2013). Research Methods for
Business: A Skill-Building Approach. 6
th
edition. John
Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Stair, R. M. & Reynolds, G. W. (2010). Fundamentals of
Information Systems. 5
th
edition. Course Technology,
Cengage Learning.
Stair, R. M. & Reynolds, G. W. (2016). Fundamentals of
Information Systems. 8
th
edition. Cengage Learning.
Susanto, A. (2013). Sistem Informasi Akuntansi: Struktur-
Pengendalian-Resiko-Pengembangan. Lingga Jaya.
Weber, R. (1999). Information Systems Control and
Audit. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Whitten, J. L. & Bentley, L. D. (2007). Systems Analysis
and Design Methods. 7
th
edition. McGraw-Hill.
Wilkinson, J. W., Cerullo, M. J., Raval V., & Wong-On-
Wing, B. (2000). Accounting Information Systems:
Essential Concepts and Applications. John Wiley &
Sons, Inc.
Wu, F. H. (1983). Accounting Information Systems: Theory
and Practice. McGraw-Hill, Inc.
ICE-HUMS 2021 - International Conference on Emerging Issues in Humanity Studies and Social Sciences
140