namely the education and training which had the 
same goal, that was to improve one's competency 
in  doing his  job.  The  education  and  training  of 
the extensions could be seen from the indicators 
used,  namely,  the  ability  of  the  education  and 
training  providers,  the  suitability  of  the 
curriculum  with  the  implementation  of  training 
and the evaluation of training. The results of the 
study were in line with the concept put forward 
by  Blanchard  and  Huszeza  (Gomes,  2002),  an 
effective training should include planning based 
on  needs,  learning  experiences,  and  planned 
activities.  Slamet  (2003),  stated  that  to  improve 
the  competence  of  the  extensions  through 
training,  it  was  necessary  to  organize  and 
improve  the  training  institutions  which  handle 
the extensions. The extension workers should be 
trained  and  practiced  regularly  through  the 
education  and  training  and  specific  materials 
about locations needed by farmers in agritourism 
area.  The  competence  could  be  improved 
through  training  and  education  programs 
(Bangun, 2012).    
i.   Achievement motivation (X
9
) had an influence on 
the  competence  with  a  regression  coefficient  of 
0.055. It means that the achievement motivation 
variable  had  an  influence  on  the  competence  if 
the  achievement  motivation  variable  increased 
by  1  unit,  the  extension’s  competency  would 
increase by 0.055 and vice versa. Partial test by 
comparing  t-count  and  t-table  was  obtained  for 
the achievement motivation t-count = 2.815 > t-
table = 2.036 with a significant value of 0.008 < 
0.05.  It  showed  that  partially  the  achievement 
motivation  had  a  significant  effect  on  the 
competence.  The  motivation  for  this  research 
was  the  intrinsic  and  extrinsic.  The  intrinsic 
motivation was the motives that became active or 
did  not  need  to  be  stimulated  from  the  outside, 
because within each individual there was an urge 
to  do  something.  The  intrinsic  motivation  were 
responsibility  and  career  while  extrinsic 
indicators  were  wages,  working  conditions  and 
status.  The  extrinsic  motivation  was  the  active 
motives  and  it  functioned  because  of  external 
stimuli.  The  Extrinsic  motivation  consisted  of 
working  conditions,  wages,  and  status.  Good 
working  conditions,  wages,  and  status  would 
affect  the  competence.  The  results of  this  study 
were strengthened by Sterr (1996) and Gibson et. 
al.,  (1989)  which  stated  that  there  were  two 
conclusions,  namely  (1)  the  condition  of 
extrinsic, the condition of job  which resulted in 
discontent among employees if the condition did 
not  exist,  those conditions  such  as  wages, work 
guarantee,  working  conditions  and  working 
status;  (2)  the  intrinsic  conditions,  work  would 
drive  strong  motivation  such  as  achievement, 
recognition  and  job  responsibility.  The 
environment  had  a  big  role  in  motivating  a 
person, which was the place where one’s lived or 
where  one’s  worked,  higher  status  such  as 
promotions,  wages  which  were  payments  for 
physical  services  provided  by  employers  to 
workers. With rewards, one’s could be motivated 
by  the  provision  of  rewards  after  one’s 
performed  an  activity  or  a  certain  activity 
(Suhardi, 2013). The greater the motivation that 
an extension had towards his/her responsibilities 
and  career,  the  greater  the  effect  on  the 
competence.  The  strength  and  weakness  work 
motivation  had  by  a  worker's  would  determine 
the  size  of  his  or  her  achievements  (Anoraga, 
2011).  According  to  Ma'ruf  et al.,  (2011), 
motivation had  a significant effect in  increasing 
competence.   
j.  Technology  (X
10
)  had  an  influence  on  the 
competence  with  a  regression  coefficient  of 
0.753.  It  means  that  the  variable  of  technology 
had  an  influence  on  the  competence  if  the 
variable  of  technology  increased  by  1  unit,  the 
competency  would  increase  by  0.753  and  vice 
versa.  Partial  test  by  comparing  t-count  with  t-
table  was  obtained  for  technology  t-count  = 
8.274 >  t-table = 2.036 with a significant value 
of 0.00 <0.05. It showed that partially technology 
had  a  significant  effect  on  the  competence. 
Limited  resources  and  learning  facilities  for  the 
extensions  like  books/  magazines,  computer  to 
access information was limited and even did not 
exist,  lack  of  interaction  with  the  learning 
resources such discussed with related researchers 
associated  with  the  technology  of  specific 
location  associated  with  the  increased 
competence.  The  results  of  this  study  were 
strengthened by Atrisiandy  (2015), which stated 
that technology could also help the course of an 
agricultural  extension.  Nowadays,  there  was  no 
activities without using technology. 
k.  Government policy (X
11
) had an influence on the 
competence  with  a  regression  coefficient  of 
1.630.  It  means  that  the  government  policy 
variable  had  an  influence  on  the  competence  if 
the  government  policy  variable  increased  by  1 
unit,  then  the  competency  would  increase  by 
1.630 and vice versa. Partial test by comparing t-
count  and  t-table  was  obtained  for  the 
government policy t-count =  22.323 > t-table = 
AICOSH 2021 - The Annual International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities (AICOSH) “Life After Pandemic: Perspectives,