Table 3: Minor Head Losses Coefficients.
Pipe Accessories
K Value
Pipe Entrance 0.56
Gate Valve Fully opened 0.19
900 Pipe turn/ Elbows 1.5
Delivered water flow data was also used to calculate
the total headloss at the delivery pipe while the sum
of pumped water flow and the wastewater flow was
used to calculate the drive pipe total headloss. The
supply head is calculated by subtracting the static
supply head by the total headloss of the drive pipe,
while the delivery head was by adding the total
headloss to the static head measured.
Statistical analysis was carried out on the
experimental data to show how much influence the
waste valve tuning has on the efficiency of the
hydraulic ram pump, Statistical tests including a
simple Bivariate Correlation test and a partial
correlation test of Pearson Product moment as well as
a multiple correlation test, Microsoft Excel was used
to assist analytical calculations.
3 RESULT AND DISCUSSION
3.1 Presentation of Experimental Data
All experimental data were shorted and tabulated to
construct graphs that show the influence and
interaction between test variables as shown in fig. 6
and fig. 7.
From the experimental results, it turns out that the
pump is only able to operate on a part of the
combinations of weights and stroke lengths of the
waste valve, while in adjustments with certain
combinations the waste valve cannot close so that no
pumping step occurs, this is illustrated in Table 4. of
the pumping water flow measurement data where
empty cells are indicating the pump is not working, it
could happen when the waste valve stroke is set to be
long enough so the bottom side of the waste valve
reaches the large chamber inside the pump body as
shown in fig. 4, and then large open was created
reduce the lift force needed to push the valve upward
at waste valve shutting cycle.
Figure 6: Wastewater and delivered water flow results.
Table 4: Pumped Water flow data in liter/second.
As shown in fig.6 the wastewater flows tend to
increase when adding weight as well as adding the
length of valve stroke. For lengths longer than 25
millimeters, wastewater flows are likely to be more
constant while still highly changed under influence of
valve weight. In another hand, delivered water flow
showed more fluctuated data for most combinations
of waste valve weight and stroke length; the delivered
water flows increased until the ten-millimeter length
1kg 1.5 kg 2 kg 2.5 kg 3 kg 3.5 kg 4 kg 4.5 kg 5 kg 5.5 kg 6 kg
5mm 0,18 0,20 0,22 0,24 0,25 0,27 0,27 0,27 0,26 0,26 0,25
10mm 0,29 0,32 0,33 0,34 0,34 0,32 0,30 0,25 0,22 0,25 0,18
15mm 0,33 0,35 0,35 0,33 0,29 0,21 0,14
20mm 0,32 0,34 0,35 0,32 0,30 0,22 0,19
25mm 0,34 0,34 0,33 0,31 0,28 0,17
30mm 0,34 0,33 0,32 0,29 0,26 0,16
35mm 0,32 0,33 0,31 0,29 0,23 0,16
40mm 0,33 0,33 0,32 0,28 0,24 0,16
45mm 0,33 0,32 0,31 0,28 0,23 0,15
50mm 0,33 0,33 0,30 0,28 0,23 0,15
55mm 0,33 0,33 0,31 0,28 0,22
60mm 0,33 0,32 0,31 0,29 0,24
Waste valve stroke length
waste valve weight