Figure 10: Output Voltage Response Graph With Close
Loop Battery SOC.
In Figure 10, there are outputs, namely constant
voltage testing and battery load testing in a loop,
whether the control is working as expected. While in
Figure 9. there is an output voltage response using a
battery load. At the same time, the control value is set
in the PI-control ABC by setting the Kp value so that
the output is constant at 14.4 Volts. This is in
accordance with the working principle of the charging
system where the output voltage is constant because
it uses a constant voltage method while the current
decreases. Figure 11 is a graph of the output current
response with the battery SOC.
Figure 11: Output Current Response Graph With Close
Loop Battery SOC.
In Figure 11. there is an output of the working
principle of the charging system where the output
current is against the SOC. In the graph it can be
analyzed that when the SOC of the battery is close to
100% (in full condition) with the control set in the
ABC control-PI it can be analyzed that the current
value of charging the battery (battery) will approach
0, according to the results of the battery close loop
simulation test data. using PSIM in table I, when the
initial SOC of charging the battery was recorded at
5.32 A, the parameter after the battery was full with
100% SOC recorded a current of 0.323 A. From the
graph of the output current response to the SOC of the
battery, it can be said that it is in accordance with the
characteristics of battery charging in general.
5 CONCLUSIONS
After carrying out the testing planning process and
analysis as well as comparing with supporting
theories, it can be concluded that: Controlling the
ABC-PI as a zeta converter output voltage controller
is able to have a value of set points (14.4 volts). The
average efficiency of taking Close loop data in
simulation with PSIM software can reach 94.6%.
When the system is given the influence of non-linear
photovoltaic characteristics, the system can control it
according to the set point, so it can be said that the
ABC-PI control can work well.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I express my deepest gratitude to all parties who have
helped in completing this paper, especially P3M
PENS and all members in this research.
REFERENCES
Ahana Malhotra, Shitiz Vij, Dr. Prerna Gaur, Charvi
Malhotra. (2016). “Design, Analysis and Performance
of Zeta Converter in Renewable Energy Systems”,
International Conference on Computing for Sustainable
Global Development (INDIACom), (IEEE).
Antonio M. S. S. Andrade, Luciano Schuch, Mário L. da S.
Martins.(2015).”Design and Simulation of Fuzzybased
DC-DC Interleaved Zeta Converter for Photovoltaic
Applications,”. In Federal University of Santa Maria,
UFSM (IEEE 2015), 978-1-4673-7554-2.
D. Pilakkat, S.Kanthalakshmi.(2018). " Artificial Bee
Colony Algorithm for Peak Power Point Tracking of a
Photovoltaic System under Partial Shading Condition,"
in Conf. Current Trends toward Converging
Technologies, Coimbatore, India.
D. W . Hart.(2011). “Power Electronics”, New York:
McGraw-Hill,.
David, Linden and Reddy, Thomas B. (2001), Handbook
Of Batteries, 3
rd
Edition, The McGraw-Hill Companies
Hilmi Zenk, Atilgan Altinkok. (2017).“Output Voltage
Control of PI And Fuzzy Logic Based Zeta Converter”
Department of Electrical Electronics Engineering,
Giresun University in Turkey (IJERA 2013),vol.
12,Issue 6, PP.2692-2696. Dec, 2017
Indra ferdiansyah,Ony Asrarul Qudsi,Fandi setiawan.
(2020). “Design of Baterry Charging System as Supply
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
0 20406080100
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 20406080100
Battery SOC – Output Voltage (V)
Output Voltage (V)
SOC(%)
Battery SOC – Output Current (A)
Output Current (A)
SOC(%)