Descriptive Study toward Psychological Factors Affecting
Post-severely Injuried Athletes to Regain Peak Performance
Prima Aulia, Free Dirga Dwatra and Nur Hazizah
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education, Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia
Keywords: Psychological Factors, Peak Performance.
Abstract: This research aims to find out the psychological factors that affect the athletes to regain their peak
performance after severe injuries. This research’s result could become one of references in severe injury
athlete’s treatment to repossess their peak performance. This study is expected could became the first research
that led to further research connecting psychological factors with other variables and for further period it is
expected that this study could be continued with advanced research by adding psychological intervention
based on prior finding. The determined subject's criteria in this study are athletes who are encountering or
have encountered severe injury since severe injury requires more than a month for recovery. Data collection's
method that is been utilized is open questionnaire regarding the theme. Data analysis in this research is factor
analysis. The factor analysis is utilized to reveal psychological factors emerging in its impact toward the post-
severely injured athletes to regain peak performance. After conducting factor analysis, it found that
psychological factors affecting the athletes returning to their peak performance after encountering severe
injury are self-confident factors, training seriousness factor, following the trainer's advice factor, place/time
disoriented factor, and focus factor.
1 INTRODUCTION
Injury is one of many things that is frightened by
athletes, in sport the athletes are demanded to reach
achievement whether it is in region, national, or even
international level competitions, so injury is barely
unavoidable things. Garrison (2001) there are two
main predictors causing injury which are: (a) Internal
factors is covering the tissue infirmity, flexibility,
weight excessiveness, biomechanical error, lack of
adjustment, body size, performance capability, and
playing styles, (b) External factors is involving to:
inaccurate gear, other athletes, field surfaces,
weather.
Wibowo (1995) divided sport injuries as follows:
Light injury or level I, it is signed by a tear that only
can be seen beneath the microscope, with minimum
plaint and cannot barely interfere sportsman’s
performance such as, scuffed, bruise, light sprain.
Moderate injury or level II, it is signed by noticeable
tissue damage, painful, swollen, red-shaded and
heated, with real function disorder and could affect
athlete’s performance, for examples: muscle
widening and ligament tear. Severe injury or level III,
in this case, the muscle is completely teared, ligament
and fracture on the bones, which requires total rest,
intensive treatment, or even surgery. Those things
were also being strengthened by sport injury bulletin
report (2010) regarding injury classification in USA
that accounted 60,15% light injury that led to athlete’s
absence throughout a week, 26,17% for moderate
injury that caused to athlete’s absence throughout a
month, and 13,67% severe injury that obliged the
athlete to rest throughout more than a month. Those
numbers might be elevating increasingly due to
unregistered injured athletes, in the fact that there are
many injured athlete who are not being monitored.
All this time, injury treatment is only being more
focused to physical treatment whether through
physiotherapist or expert doctor, yet psychological
aspects are often being forgotten, and it affect to the
increasing amount of athletes who is not be able to
regain their peak performance after the injury. This
issue is similar to Ricardo Kaka's case where he was
the best football player in the world in 2007, after
experienced injury he was never be able to return to
his peak performance anymore, and in fact that he is
been knock out of his club (Gonsaka, 2007). The
same case was also experienced by Eduardo da Silva,
when he still played for Arsenal. Eduardo was
50
Aulia, P., Dwatra, F. and Hazizah, N.
Descriptive Study toward Psychological Factors Affecting Post-severely Injuried Athletes to Regain Peak Performance.
DOI: 10.5220/0011095000003368
In Proceedings of the International Conference of Mental Health (Icometh 2021), pages 50-53
ISBN: 978-989-758-586-9
Copyright
c
2022 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
encountered fibula fractures that caused to his
absence for recovery rest for a year. After recovered
from the injury, Eduardo’s performance was never be
as same as he played in his top performance (Pradana,
2018).
There are many athletes who cannot return to their
peak performance, however there are still some of
them who are still be able to regain their peak
performances after encountering severe injury. As
experienced by Boaz Solossa although he
encountered injury twice which were in 2004 and
2007, Boaz could still rose up and still became an ace
for Persipura and national team of Indonesia (Adnan,
2014). As same as, it is experienced by Sony Dwi
Kuncoro a Badminton’s athlete who possessed
bronze medal in Olympic 2004 and third player best
world ranking, who experienced setback of
achievement after encountered severe injury, and
even he was being taken out form 100 world best
ranking when he made his comeback after injury
recovery. Sony’s accomplishment only start to
improve when he was being trained and managed by
his wife. According to his wife there is no particular
formula for Sony’s improvement, it is just make him
enjoyed the game and training (Fajriningtyas, 2016).
2 THEORETICAL REVIEW
Based on those issues, researcher want to conduct
research with title “Descriptive Study toward
Psychological Factors Affecting Post-Severely
Injured Athletes to Regain Peak Performance”.
Before explaining the psychological factors, the
definition of psychological is originated from the
word of psychology which means behavior and
mental process, where behavior is anentity that able
to be observed and mental process encompasses
cognition, affection, and motivation (King, 2011).
Based on that definition, it can be concluded that
psychological factor is a factor that originate from
individual either it is observable which is behavior or
mental process such as cognition, affection, and
motivation.
The definition of sport’s injuries are all form of
injuries that occur either during the match or training
(National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal
and Skin Diseases, 2014). Semi- different definition
was explained by Congeni (2004, et.al Sukarmin &
Sumaryabti 2017) that sports injury is an injury that
occur at the time when somebody is committing an
activity such as fitness, training or sport’s
competition.
Wibowo (1995) classified sport’s injuries as
follows: Light injury or level I, it is signed by a tear
which only can be seen beneath the microscope, with
minimum plaint and cannot barely interfere
sportsman’s performance, for instance scuffed,
bruise, light sprain. Moderate injury or level II, it is
signed by noticeable tissue damage, painful, swollen,
red-shaded and heated, with real function disorder
and could affect to athlete’s performances, for
examples: muscle widening and ligament tear. Severe
injury or level III, in this case, the muscle is
completely teared, ligament and fracture on the
bones, which requires total rest, intensive treatment,
or even surgery.
Maslow (1968) introduced the peak
performance’s concept to illustrate when an
individual experienced a truly total feeling, core
strength, and as a whole has reached the highest stage
in the hierarchy of needs. Williams (1998) clarified
that peak performance is an exceptional drive when
an athlete be able to perform his skills maximally
either it is physical or mental. Then, Privette (1981, at
Cowen, Nesti, & Cheetham, 2015) defined peak
performance as a behavior that exceed what can be
done in normal situation.
Based on several expert’s explanation above, it
can be deduced that peak performance is an ambiance
of individual who feel the highest feeling, and he or
she is able to express his or her abilities maximally
either it is physic or mental.
3 METHODS
Research design that utilize in this research is
Descriptive research design. Azwar (2003) explained
that “descriptive research is a research purposing to
describe systematically and accurately the facts and
characteristic regarding population or a certain field.”
Population in this research are all athletes in West
Sumatera who establish in West Sumatera’s PPLP
which account 137 athletes. Purposive sampling
technique is the sampling method in this study, which
is drawing sample based on specific criteria that has
been arranged by researcher (Sugiyono, 2013). The
appointed criteria in this research are an experienced
severe injured athletes and he or she was able to
regain his or her peak performance. Based on
purposive sampling technique, it was gathered 78
samples successfully.
In this study, the utilized data collection’s
technique is psychology scale consisting
psychological factors that affect the athletes to return
to peak performance after severe injury. The
Descriptive Study toward Psychological Factors Affecting Post-severely Injuried Athletes to Regain Peak Performance
51
psychology scale is a list of questions that reveal
psychological attributes using behavior’s indicators
to trigger projective response and it is a projection of
individual’s personalities (Azwar, 2005).
The method that is used for data’s analyzing in
this research is descriptive statistical method.
Collected data are added or grouped according to
the form of utilized instrument (Arikunto, 2002). The
classification of data regarding psychological factors
in its influences toward athlete in order to return to
their peak performance is using factor analysis.
4 RESULT AND DISCUSSION
4.1 Result
This study aims to investigate what psychological
factors are affecting an athlete who could repossess
his or her peak performance. In order to find those
factors, it is been done factor analysis method. In term
of conducting factor analysis the phases that require
to be carried out include:
KMO’s test and Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity.
KMO and Bartlett's Test
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of
Sampling Adequacy. .649
Bartlett's
Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-
Square 588.
815
Df 276
Sig. .000
In KMO’s Tes table, it can be seen that KMO’s
score is 0,649 > 0,5 and the significance of Bartlett’s
Test of Sphericity has shown 0,00 standard, so it can
be continued to implement factor analysis.
Measure of Sampling Adequacy (MSA)’s Test
The MSA test purpose to find out which variables
are processable further way or being eliminated.
Based on the first MSA test, it was obtained 5 items
that possessed score< 0.5 so those 5 items had to
eliminate. After that, MSA test was conducted again
so it was found 1 another item that possessed <0,5
score, so that items had to excluded. After excluding
those 6 items, the MSA test was performed again and
it comes to result that all of the items had >0,5 scores,
so it was eligible to continue to the next analysis.
When all the variables had exceeding 0.5 score then
the next analysis is PCA test.
The outcome of the PCA test is shown by Eigen
score. The Eigen score exhibit the amount of variation
that relate to a certain factor. The factor that has Eigen
score equal or more than 1 will be held and the factor
that has Eigen score less than 1 will be not be included
in the model due to variable whose score is less than
1 is not better than the original variable (Supranto
2004).
Post conducting the PCA test, the variable in this
study was formed into 5 factors. In the Scree Plot
graphic, it is noticeable that the Eigen score was being
arranged through horizontal way. The amount of
factors in this criteria was determined based on the
reduction of the plot of Eigen scores. When the Scree
begins to level off or evenly distribute, and Eigen
scores is shown as above 1, this is where there is a
point of the termination of factor’s number extraction.
4.2 Discussion
Post-performed all of the phases from every factor
analysis, the following phase is naming the variables
that have been grouped. The naming process is
depend on the variables who formed it so this naming
process was done subjectively and there are no certain
regulations toward the process.
At the first place, this research had 24 variables
then it was formed into 12 which include into the 5
factors. The 5 factors include:
Factor 1
This factor consists of NF 1 variable, which is “I
relax when I entered the field”, PD 1 variable is “I am
confident with my skill”, FR 1 is “I think the pre-
game pressure is usual thing”, SI 1 is “I would rather
think about winning the match than becoming
champion”, TK 1 is “Host Supporter’s intimidation
will not be able to affect me”, PD 2 is “I believe I can
beat my opponent”, ET 2 is “I did what my coach told
me to. Form the seven variables that was formed, the
factor 1 is named as self-confident factor.
Factor 2
Factor 2 consists of FK 1 variable which is “I meet
all the schedules that have been regulated by coach”,
KE is “I have always rehears the technique that I am
poorly mastered”. Based on both variables that
formed, factor 2 is named as training seriousness
factor.
Factor 3
Factor 3 consists of FK 2 variables which is “I join
the championship because of coach’s advice”. Based
on this FK 2 variable, the factor 3 is named as the
factor of following the trainer's advice.
Icometh 2021 - International Conference of Mental Health
52
Factor 4
Factor 4 consists of DW 1 variable which isI felt
time is so fast when I am trained”. Based on this DW
1 variable, factor 4 is named as the Flow factor.
Factor 5
Factor 5 consists of DW 4 variable which is
“spectator yelling is not been heard anymore when I
start competing”. Based on this DW 4 variable, factor
5 is named as the focus factor.
5 CONCLUSIONS
Based on data analysis that have been done about
factor analysis in psychological factors identification
who affect the athletes to regain peak performance
post severe injury, it earned result that influencing
psychological factors is consisted of self-confident
factor, factor of training seriousness, factor of
following trainer’s advice, time/place disoriented
factor, and focus factor.
Suggestion
Based on the result of analysis and the discussion,
this study discuss and conduct factor analysis by
using principal component method, which means that
there are other methods which are may applicable to
conduct analysis factors, so that it could become other
references in term of performing factor analysis with
same variables.
The studied variable is the factor that affect the
athletes to regain their peak performance post severe
injury, it is mean that this study discuss about sports
generally. In the future, this study could be more
focus toward one particular type of sport in term of
conducting research regarding peak performance, or
conducting correlational research about peak
performance, so that peak performance can be
discussed and investigate in more detail.
REFERENCES
Adnas, R. M. (2014, June 1st). Today History 1st June Boaz
Solossa’s Severe Injury2007.Retrieved from:
https://www.goal.com/id/news/1387/nasional/2014/06/
01/4853268/sejarah-hari-ini-1- juni-cedera-berat-boaz-
solossa-2007.
Arikunto, S. (2002). Research Procedure a Practical
Approach (Revise Edition V). Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Azwar, S. (2003). Research Method. Yogyakarta: Pustaka
belajar.
Azwar, S. (2005). Drafting Psychology’s Scale.
Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Cowen, A., Nesti, M., & Cheetham, M. (2015). The
psychology of dynamic balance and peak performance
in sport: Correction theory. Quest, 66, 421-432.
Fajriningtyas. C. (2016, May 31th). Sony Dwi Kuncoro and
GadingSafitri’s Story: love from the edge of field.
Retrieved from: https://www.femina.co.id/true-
story/kisah-sony-dwi- kuncoro-gading-safitri-cinta-
dari-tepi-lapangan.
Garisson, S. J. (2001). Basic Therapy & Physical
Rehabilitation (Anton C. Widjaja. Terjemahan).
Jakarta: Hiprokrates.
Gonsaga, A. (2017, Desember 18th). Fakta tentang Ricardo
Kaka. Retrieved from:
https://bola.kompas.com/read/2017/12/18/20260078/fa
kta-tentang-ricardo-kaka
Descriptive Study toward Psychological Factors Affecting Post-severely Injuried Athletes to Regain Peak Performance
53