Only the eutrophication sludge deposited over the 
mineral  sludge  is  extracted  from  the  bottom  of  the 
lake.  The  aspirated  sludge  is  introduced  into  a 
compaction system (noted 7) to remove excess water 
(Step 3). Compaction is done by a screw system that 
rotates in a conical portion of the suction pipe. The 
sludge is then deposited in a fiberglass tank (noted 3) 
with  a  capacity  of  approximately  0.6  m
3
 (Step 5), 
placed on the pontoon under PV-s. 
The  fiberglass  tank  has  small  holes  in  its  upper 
part to allow the release of a quantity of the extracted 
and decanted water. It also ensures proper storage of 
the extracted sludge. Mud is collected until the level 
and weight sensors stop the pontoon from moving and 
supplying it with sludge (Step 6).  
From  this  point  on,  the  sludge  is  partially  dried 
through  a  system  of  thin  pipes  through  which  hot 
water  flows,  placed  on  the  bottom  of  the  fiberglass 
tank (note 7). When the weight of the sludge is about 
60-70% of its initial value, it is considered partially 
dry, (Step 7) and it is discharged (Step 8). This sludge 
partially s dried sludge is stored in special places until 
final drying is ensured. After emptying the fiberglass 
tank, a new cycle can begin. The control system of the 
pontoon  motion,  automation  that  stops  the  pontoon 
when  the  fiberglass  tank  is  sufficiently  filled  with 
mud,  automation  system  that  coordinates  the  entire 
cycle  and  finally  the  system  of  power  supply  from 
photovoltaic panels or storage of energy in batteries 
when  the  model  do  not  function  are  designed 
separately.  
5  CONCLUSIONS 
The prototype can be moved on request in different 
areas  of  the  lake,  the  rest  remaining  completely 
unaffected. Being a quiet system, it does not disturb 
the life of the birds. Functioning without using classic 
fuel  and  therefore  without  producing  an  unpleasant 
odor, the installation can be used in nature reserves. 
Being mobile, it can move in areas where there are no 
bird nests, thus maintaining the biological ecosystem. 
The extracted sludge is a natural fertilizer, full of 
nutrients.  It  can  be  used  on  agricultural  lands  to 
restore their optimal properties and characteristics, in 
order  to  improve  the  obtained  quantities  of 
agricultural crops.  
By additional drying of the sludge, the time until 
its utilization is shortened.  
Thus, this solution has a double benefit. First of 
all,  the  sludge  produced  by  eutrophication  is 
extracted,  restoring  the  chemical  balance  of  the 
therapeutic sludge in the places where the prototype 
is implemented. Secondly, an efficient consumption 
of the extracted sludge is ensured, as a fertilizer in the 
salty soils of Dobrogea.  
In the last years of implementation, by collecting 
the eutrophication sludge, the surface from which the 
therapeutic  sludge  could  be  collected  increased  by 
about 8%.  
The solution implemented in 2018 does not affect 
the life, reproduction and nesting of birds. Many birds 
were spotted near the pontoon, eating and resting in 
the sun. 
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 
Thanks to the National Company "Romanian Waters" 
which  highlighted  the  problems  from  these  Nature 
Reserves.  They  also  supported  the  team  during  the 
measurements regarding the quality of the water and 
the  sedimentary  material,  during  4  years.  They 
partially financed the realization of the prototype and 
allowed its implementation in the Techirghiol Lake, 
which is under their management. 
REFERENCES 
Fioravanti, A., et all, 2014. Short- and long-term effects of 
mud-bath treatment on hand osteoarthritis: a 
randomized clinical trial,  In  Journal  Biometeorology, 
vol. 58, issue 1. doi: 10.1007/s00484-012-0627-6.  
Romanian  Environmental  Strategy,  2013-2030. 
http://www.mmediu.ro/beta/domenii/dezvoltaredurabil
a/strategia-nationala-a-romaniei/. 
Selman, A., 2007. Eutrophication an Overview of Status, 
Trends, Policies, Strategies. World Resources Institute. 
Schinler,  David,  W,  2012.  The dilemma of controlling 
cultural eutrophication of lakes, In Biological Science, 
The  Royal  Society.  vol.  279,  issue  1746,  ISSN: 
14712954, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.1032. 
Pullin,  I.,  Andrew  S.,  2012.  Eutrophication of Lakes and 
Rivers,  Wiley  Online  Library.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ 
9780470015902.a0003249.pub2. 
Mathew,  M.M,  et  all,  2020.  Sustainable and eco-friendly 
strategies for shrimp shell valorization, Environmental 
Pollution, Elsevier. vol. 267, issue 115656.  
O.U.G. 57, 2007. Government Emergency Ordinance on 
Protected Natural Areas.  
Radulescu,  V.,  2019.  A pilot station using renewable 
resources to rehabilitate the inefficient small-hydro 
power plants, IOP Conference, vol. 564, issue 012138.