Personnel Current in Service Companies under COVID-19
Distribution on the Example of Russian Post JSC
Vladlena V. Grikhno
1a
, Marina V. Simonova
2b
and Sergey A. Kolesnikov
2c
1
Samara State Economic University, Samara, St. Soviet Army, 141, Russia
2
Samara State Technical University,
Samara, 194 Molodogvardeyskaya Str., Russia
Keywords: Personnel Adaptation, Personnel Turnover, Personnel Training, Personnel, Staff, Personnel Management,
Pandemic, Covid 19.
Abstract:
During the period of coronavirus restrictions, the issue of staff stability is of particular importance, and, as a
consequence, the management of staff turnover. In the difficult economic situation caused by the pandemic,
employers need not only to keep the team, not allowing massive layoffs, but also to retain valuable workers.
We conducted a survey among the quitting employees in the branches of the Volga Macroregion of the
Russian Post JSC. Based on the data obtained, the reasons for dismissal were analyzed during the period of
restrictive government measures in connection with the spread of COVID-19 and immediately after the lifting
of severe restrictions. The main trends in changes in the behavior of employees during a pandemic and their
impact on staff turnover have been identified. In the course of the study, the following conclusions were made:
- employees of the organization, in the context of instability in the country caused by COVID-19, are less
likely to decide on layoffs, but they still occur, even in such a difficult period of a pandemic and rising
unemployment and increase sharply after the lifting of severe restrictions; - the main reasons for dismissal
are still "insufficient wages" and "high intensity of work, heavy physical activity", while the reasons of a
domestic nature that can be endured are fading into the background. Thus, an employee makes a decision to
dismiss if he/she is not satisfied with materially significant working conditions; - due to the peculiarities of
the age structure of the organization, the change in the turnover rate, both during severe restrictions and after
their relaxation, is not affected by the number of employees leaving due to retirement, which changes
insignificantly from month to month.
1 INTRODUCTION
In modern conditions, when the country and the world
are constantly undergoing economic changes caused
by the influence of restrictions associated with
COVID-19, organizations are forced to use their
resources more and more economically (Avdeeva,
Emcova, 2020). The personnel have always been one
of the main competitive advantages that ensure the
sustainable operation and development of the
organization (Grihno, Simonova, 2018). However, it
was during the period of coronavirus restrictions that
the question of the presence of the employees
themselves in the workplace arose, and, therefore, the
issues of the principle of the organization's
a
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7426-2308
b
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9662-9820
c
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5607-5373
functioning (Mitrofanova, Mitrofanova, Margarov,
2021). Under the new conditions, the employer needs
not only to retain the personnel, preventing its
reduction, but also to retain valuable employees
(Elsafty, Ragheb, 2020).
Personnel turnover management (Simonova,
Sankova, Mirzabalaeva, 2021) can be defined as a
system of measures aimed at researching, preventing
and reducing personnel turnover to maintain the
effective functioning of the organization and ensure
the achievement of the set goals and objectives
(Cymbal, Litvak, Wilder, Burns, 2021).
However, before taking measures to reduce
turnover in the organization, it is necessary to identify
its causes (Brusencova, Sheina, Mashkova. 2020). All
36
Grikhno, V., Simonova, M. and Kolesnikov, S.
Personnel Current in Service Companies under COVID-19 Distribution on the Example of Russian Post JSC.
DOI: 10.5220/0011110200003439
In Proceedings of the 2nd International Scientific and Practical Conference "COVID-19: Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals" (RTCOV 2021), pages 36-42
ISBN: 978-989-758-617-0
Copyright
c
2023 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
Table 1: Personnel turnover rate, %. Source – developed by the authors on the basis of public data of Russian Post JSC.
YEAR 2017 2018 2019 3-year average
Actual value 34.83 34.84 33.73 34.47
Distribution of fluidity by age
up to 30 years old
(inclusive)
8.54 8.54 9 8.69
from 31 to 40 years 8.13 8.14 8.18 8.15
from 41 to 50 years old 7.01 7.01 6.85 6.96
from 51 to 55 years old 3.7 3.7 3.45 3.61
over 55 years old 7.44 7.45 6.26 7.05
Sex distribution of fluidity
Men 8.08 8.04 8.01 8.04
Women 26.75 26.8 25.72 26.42
dismissals can be conditionally divided into three
categories: dismissals that can be avoided, dismissals
that are inevitable (for example, for family or
personal reasons), and desirable dismissals
concerning employees that are not quite suitable for
the enterprise.
Based on the data on turnover (Table 1) and the
data obtained as a result of a sociological study
among the leaving employees in the branches of the
Volga Macroregion of Russian Post JSC, we will
analyze the reasons for dismissal during the period of
coronavirus restrictions and immediately after the
removal of severe restrictions
Over the 3 years under study, the personnel
turnover of the Russian Post has decreased slightly,
but represents very high values, since according to the
results of numerous studies (Petrova, M., Koval, V.,
Tepavicharova, M., Zerkal, A., Radchenko, A.,
Bondarchuk, N., 2020), the normal level of turnover
shall be 3-5 %.
According to the operational study, the turnover
rate in 2020 remained almost the same as in the period
from 2017 to 2019. This situation negatively affects
many production indicators and entails additional
costs for the organization to find, train and adapt new
employees. In addition, due to the fact that highly
qualified specialists are distracted by training
newcomers who are slowly getting into the business
and are not yet able to fulfill their duties at the level
of already experienced employees, labor productivity
decreases, and, accordingly, the enterprise does not
receive possible profit.
Despite anti-epidemiological measures and an
increase in unemployment, personnel turnover at the
Russian Post has decreased slightly. It is of scientific
and practical interest to study the reasons for
dismissals, which could not be influenced by the
growth of unemployment and the unstable economic
situation in the country.
We used the following study methods: the method
of theoretical analysis, the method of statistical
analysis, the method of analogy, the analytical
method, as well as questionnaires, comparison and
generalization of data.
2 RESULTS
The results of the survey are of interest for identifying
the reasons for dismissal (Lata, L., Mohamed Zainal,
S. R., Jan, G., Memon, U., 2021). Let's consider in
more detail the results of the survey. Data on the
reasons for dismissal are shown in Table 2. The table
contains the calculation of the number and proportion
of respondents choosing one or another reason for
dismissal from the total number of interviewed
employees. The sample is representative, since during
the period of the survey, 896 and 1100 employees left
the organization, 672 and 800 people were
interviewed, respectively, which is 75 % and 73 % of
the total number of employees who quit.
Personnel Current in Service Companies under COVID-19 Distribution on the Example of Russian Post JSC
37
Table 2: Reasons for dismissing employees. Macroregion Volga of Russian Post JSC during the period of coronavirus
restrictions and immediately after the lifting of severe restrictions. Source - developed by the authors.
Reasons for dismissal
for 1 month during
the period of
corona-virus
restrictions,
p
ers.
Proportion,
%
1 month after the
removal of strict
corona-viral
restrictions,
p
eo
p
le
Share, %
Insufficient salar
y
245 36.5 % 288 36.0 %
High work intensity, heavy
p
hysical activit
y
73 10.9 % 67 8.4 %
It is necessary to sell goods
and services
47 7.0 % 61 7.6 %
Inconvenient work schedule
31 4.6 % 37 4.6 %
I had a different idea of what
to do
20 3.0 % 35 4.4 %
Poor living conditions (lack
of renovation, old furniture,
and etc.)
24 3.6 % 18 2.3 %
Difficult working conditions
(hot, cold, dusty, stuffy,
cram
p
ed, etc.
)
10 1.5% 32 4.0%
Long working hours,
overtime
7 1.0% 13 1.6 %
Gettin
g
far to wor
k
7 1.0% 7 0.9 %
Unfair payroll syste
m
4 0.6 % 11 1.4 %
Lack of special clothes and
other supplies (paper,
stationer
, etc.
4 0.6 % 5 0.6 %
Incomprehensible payroll
s
y
stem
1 0.1 % 7 0.9 %
Arm
y
3 0.4 % 8 1.0%
Pension
61 9.1 % 63 7.9 %
Disease of close relatives
21 3.1 % 43 5.4 %
Changing of the living place
54 8.0 % 49 6.1 %
Health proble
m
60 8.9 % 56 7.0 %
Excessive red ta
p
e
0 0.0 % 0 0.0 %
Conflict with the leader,
prejudiced attitude of the
leade
r
0 0.0 % 0 0.0 %
Conflict with colleagues
0 0.0 % 0 0.0 %
Total
672 100 % 800 100 %
As before the pandemic, the main reason for
changing jobs during the pandemic was “insufficient
wages” - 245 employees (36.5 %) out of 672
respondents, after the restrictions were removed, 288
employees (36 %) out of 800 employees indicated it.
In second place is the reason for dismissal - "high
work intensity, heavy physical activity", it is chosen
more often during a pandemic - 74 employees (11.5
%), versus 67 people (8.4 %) after the restrictions
were removed.
In the third place in the reasons for dismissal there
are various living conditions. For example, only 10
employees chose the item "difficult working
conditions" during the pandemic, while after the
restrictions were removed, 32 employees noted this
item. Also, the item “long working hours” was chosen
less.
RTCOV 2021 - II International Scientific and Practical Conference " COVID-19: Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals
(RTCOV )
38
Table 3: Analysis of the reason for dismissal "Retirement". Source - developed by the authors.
Work experience of employees in
the organization with the reason
for dismissal
"Retirement"
for 1 month during the
period of coronavirus
restrictions, people
1 month after the removing
the strict coronavirus
restrictions, people
Up to 1 month 0 0
Up to 3 months 0 1
From 3 months to 1
y
ea
r
3 5
From 1
y
ear to 3
y
ears 12 11
From 3
y
ears and more 46 46
Total 61 63
Thus, analyzing the reasons for dismissal, we can
conclude that during a pandemic, an employee makes
a decision to dismiss if the reason for dismissal
significantly affects his working conditions (Tsareva,
N.A., Tyugaev, А.R., 2020). At the same time, the
employee is ready to wait for more favorable
conditions for changing jobs, if the reason is
insignificant at this stage. However, after the
stabilization of the situation and the removal of time
constraints in connection with the pandemic, we see
an increase in turnover, including for various
domestic reasons for dismissal.
The reason "Retirement" is chosen by almost the
same number of leaving employees, 61 and 63,
respectively. Analyzing the data shown in Table 3, we
can conclude that this category of employees in most
cases has been working in the organization for more
than 3 years, adjusting the length of service to the
retirement age. Pre-retirees are not inclined to make a
decision on dismissal for other objective or subjective
reasons, since, despite the state policy and pension
reform, it is difficult for employees of this age
category to get a qualified job (Brusencova, L.S.,
Sheina. A.YU., Mashkova. A.M., 2020). During the
period of coronavirus restrictions, difficulties in
finding and applying for a new job were also largely
associated with the use of online technologies by
organizations, in which workers of pre-retirement age
are poorly oriented (Bueno-Sánchez, L., Martínez-
Molina, S., Marqués de Almeida, S., Garcés-Ferrer,
J., Pérez, D., Quílez, M., 2019).
The increase in dismissals is alarming as the
length of service in the organization increases,
especially those who have worked for more than three
years, that is, people who have undergone adaptation,
who were taught to work, are quit, most likely,
training was carried out, that is, the organization
carries not only direct, but also indirect losses.
The structure of those leaving the company given
in Table 2 corresponds to the structure of the number
of employees of the organization by age. Comparing
the data on the structure of personnel by age as a
whole for the enterprise Russian Post JSC for 2017-
2019, in Table 4, it is possible to see almost complete
correspondence. The table shows the actual number
of employees in the specified period, breaks down the
number of employees by age categories, calculates
the ratio of the number of employees year to year as
a percentage, displays the average age of personnel
and the number of working pensioners.
Analyzing the organization's statistical data on
this indicator, one can draw attention to the fact that,
despite the fact that the number of employees in the
pre-retirement age category from 51 to 55 years old
decreases by an average of 4 % from year to year, the
average age of the organization's employees has
grown from 43.4 years in 2017 to 43.6 and 43.9 years
in 2018 and 2019, respectively. The share of working
pensioners at the enterprise is 16-17 %.
This indicator, in our opinion, was influenced by
the current pension reform in the country to increase
the age of pensioners retiring. This is confirmed by
the statistics of the organization. In the category of
employees over 55, there is an increase in 2019 from
64,028 people. up to 65,696 people, i.e. by 2.61 %.
Wherein, the number of working pensioners
decreased from 55,847 people up to 53,615 people,
which amounted to -4 %.
It shall also be noted that Russian Post JSC takes
part in implementation of the national project
Demography, within the framework of which, in
order to provide systematic support and improve the
quality of life of older citizens, this category of
employees of the organization is trained. Participation
in the programs made it possible to present¬ for
drivers of the target audience to get and develop a
computer¬ tendencies demanded by the Russian Post
and applied in modern production and business
processes. When implementing the project together
with the centers of population employment¬ and
WorldSkills Russia in 2019 about¬ 1,055 employees
were trained. Of these, 631 employees passed
advanced training, 332 employees professional¬
training – professional,¬ 72 employees – retraining,
20 employees – vocational training.
Personnel Current in Service Companies under COVID-19 Distribution on the Example of Russian Post JSC
39
Table 4: Personnel structure by age, people. Source - developed by the author based on public data. Russian Post JSC.
YEAR December 31, 2017 December 31, 2018 December 31, 2019
Russian Post JSC
Actual
number
Share of
the total
number,
people
Actual
number
Share of
the total
number,
people
Headc
ount
ratio
2018/
2017
Actual
number
Share of
the total
number,
people
Headco
unt ratio
2019/
2018
Headco
unt ratio
2019/
2017
340,772 100 % 335,921 100 %
331,011 100 %
-2.86%
up to 30 years old
(inclusive)
60,780 17.8 % 55,986 16.7 %
-
7.89 %
51,929 15.7 % -7.25 % -14.56 %
from 31 to 40 years 83,854 24.6 % 84,483 25.1 % 0.75 % 83,575 25.2 % -1.07 % -0.33 %
from 41 to 50 years old 86,047 25.3 % 86,713 25.8 % 0.77 % 86,625 26.2 % -0.10 % 0.67 %
from 51 to 55 years old 46,834 13.7 % 44,711 13.3 %
-
4.53 %
43,186 13.0 % -3.41 % -7.79 %
over 55 years old 63,257 18.6 % 64,028 19.1 % 1.22 % 65,696 19.8 % 2.61 % 3.86 %
Average age of
employees
43.4
43.6
43.9
Working pensioners 59,399 17.4 % 55,847 16.6 %
-
5.98 %
53,615 16.2 % -4.00 % -9.74 %
Table 5: Analysis of the reasons for dismissal "Disease of close relatives." Source - developed by the authors.
Work experience of employees
in the organization with the
reason for dismissal "Disease of
close relatives"
for 1 month during the
period of coronavirus
restrictions, people
1 month after the
removing the strict
coronavirus restrictions,
p
eople
Up to 1 month 0 6
Up to 3 months 3 11
From 3 months to 1
y
ea
r
6 9
From 1
y
ear to 3
y
ears 4 6
From 3 years and more 8 11
Total 21 43
Continuing to analyze the data obtained in the
course of a sociological survey of quitting employees,
special attention shall be paid to the item “illness of
close relatives”. With the increase in the COVID-19
incidence rate in the regions, for this reason, they
began to quit almost 2 times more often – 21
employees per month of severe coronavirus
restrictions and already 43 employees after. Wherein,
as we can see from the data given in Table 5, this
reason for dismissal is indicated by employees,
regardless of the length of service in the organization.
Therefore, it can be assumed that this reason is
significant for the decision to dismiss.
The items of the questionnaire “conflict with
colleagues”, “conflict with the manager, "biased
attitude of the manager”, “excessive bureaucracy”
were not chosen by the dismissing employees. From
which we can conclude that both during the period of
severe coronavirus restrictions, and in the period after
their removal, the psychological characteristics of
interaction in the team are not a significant reason for
dismissal.
When analyzing the reasons for the turnover, one
can also draw a conclusion about the quality of staff
recruitment. The item of the questionnaire “I had a
different idea of what would need to be done” speaks
just about the quality of filling vacancies in the
organization. During a pandemic, this item was
chosen by 20 respondents (3 %), after the restrictions
were removed - by 35 people (4.4 %). The growth of
this category of quitting shows that when hiring the
candidate was not informed about the essence of the
forthcoming functions or was not fully
communicated. .
RTCOV 2021 - II International Scientific and Practical Conference " COVID-19: Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals
(RTCOV )
40
Table 6: Work experience in the company of dismissed employees. Source - developed by the authors.
Work experience in the
company
Those who quit within 1
month during the period
of corona-virus
restrictions, people
Proportion,
%
Those who quit within 1
month after the removing
the strict corona-viral
restrictions, people
Proportion,
%
Up to 1 month 64 9.6 % 100 12.6 %
Up to 3 months 90 13.5 % 97 12.2 %
From 3 months to 1
y
ea
r
171 25.6 % 202 25.4 %
From 1
y
ear to 3
y
ears 123 18.4 % 159 20.0 %
From 3
y
ears and more 223 33.3 % 242 30.3 %
Total 672 100 % 800 100 %
The quality of personnel selection, adaptation and
training of employees is evidenced by the analysis of
the length of service in the company of dismissed
employees (Lata, L., Mohamed Zainal, S. R., Jan, G.,
Memon, U., 2021). The largest percentage of quitting
employees, as a rule, are “newcomers”, that is, those
who came to the organization less than one month, 3
months or less than a year ago (Grihno, V.V.
Simonova, M.V., 2018), which is confirmed by our
data and calculations (Table 6). The total share of
these categories is 48.7 % of the total number of
people leaving. The issue of the formation or
improvement of the existing personnel adaptation
management system as one of the tools for reducing
personnel turnover is acquiring particular relevance.
During the pandemic, 64 employees working less
than 1 month and 90 employees working less than 3
months made a decision to dismiss. After the
restrictions were removed, there were 100 and 97
such employees, respectively. That is, even the
increase in unemployment during the pandemic does
not stop people from dismissing, and after the
removal of severe restrictions on the work of the
service sectors and holding public events, the increase
in the share of dismissals in the segment of employees
with little work experience in the organization
increased.
The most stable group of employees in an
organization is those who work from 1 to 3 years.
During the period of coronavirus restrictions, only
123 people quit (18.4 %), after the removal of strict
restrictions - 159 people (20 %). It is necessary to pay
attention to a group of employees working for 3 years
or more. In comparison with the previous group,
layoffs occur almost 2 times more often. The decision
to dismiss was made by 33.3 % (223 people) and 30.2
% (242 people), respectively. The assumption that
this group includes employees who have been
working at the enterprise for a long time and have
reached retirement age is confirmed by the analysis
of statistics due to dismissal “Retirement”, broken
down by length of service. The data was shown
earlier in Table 3.
3 CONCLUSIONS
According to the results of the study of the reasons
for the dismissal of employees during the period of
severe coronavirus restrictions and immediately after
the removal of severe restrictions, using the example
of branches of the Volga Macroregion of the Russian
Post JSC, it was revealed that employees in an
unstable situation in the country rarely make
decisions about changing jobs, however, layoffs
occur even in such a difficult period of growth in
unemployment, which, after the removing the severe
restrictions, begin to grow. If such a decision is
nevertheless made by the employee, then most often
for reasons that significantly affect his/her working
conditions. The most common reasons for dismissal
in the respondents' questionnaires are:
- Insufficient salary
- High work intensity, heavy physical activity
- It is necessary to sell goods and services
During a pandemic, the reasons for dismissal,
which are of an everyday nature, and which can be
endured until a more stable time, go into the
background.
An analysis of the structure of personnel by age
was carried out, which made it possible to identify
significant age characteristics of an organization in
which a large number of employees of pre-retirement
age work. The number of people retiring per month,
regardless of the coronavirus restrictions, is almost
the same. In addition, due to the fact that the country
is currently undergoing a pension reform to increase
the retirement age, it can be concluded that the share
of older employees is growing at the enterprise. In the
future, this may lead to a delayed effect of increased
personnel turnover due to the achievement of
retirement age by such employees. Wherein, the share
of working pensioners at the enterprise is currently
Personnel Current in Service Companies under COVID-19 Distribution on the Example of Russian Post JSC
41
quite high and amounts to 16 %, which is also
reflected in the statistics. As a rule, these employees
are devoted to the organization and have been
working in it for more than 3 years. However, this age
group is more susceptible to morbidity and is suitable
for restrictive measures in connection with COVID-
19, which also affects the decision of workers to leave
due to "Retirement".
When analyzing the reason for dismissal "Disease
of close relatives", it was revealed that this reason for
dismissal during the spread of coronavirus infection
began to be chosen 2 times more often. Wherein, the
choice of this reason as a decision to dismiss is not
influenced by the length of service in the
organization.
In order to study more detailed the reasons for
staff turnover during the period of coronavirus
restrictions, we plan to conduct a more detailed study
of the organization's motivation program, and it is
also necessary to analyze the quality of personnel
recruitment and training.
REFERENCES
Avdeeva, E.A., Emcova, T.A., 2020. Izmenenie modelej
potrebleniya i proizvodstva v sovremennyh usloviyah.
Cifrovaya i otraslevaya ekonomika, 2 (19). pages 69-74.
Brusencova, L.S., Sheina. A.Yu., Mashkova. A.M., 2020.
Upravlenie tekuchest'yu personala banka s uchetom
pokolencheskih osobennostej. Vestnik BIST
(Bashkirskogo instituta social'nyh tekhnologij), 4 (49).
pages 67-73.
Bueno-Sánchez, L., Martínez-Molina, S., Marqués de
Almeida, S., Garcés-Ferrer, J., Pérez, D., & Quílez, M.,
2019. Digital inclusion of senior collectives through
participatory processes of co-creation of digital tools:
design of a mooc. In edulearn19 Proceedings,Vol. 1,
pages 9295–9298.
Mitrofanova, E. A., Mitrofanova, A. E., & Margarov, G. I.,
2021. Organizational and Economic Mechanism of Staff
Turnover Management. In Lecture Notes in Networks
and Systems. Vol. 161 LNNS, pages 590–598.
Elsafty, A., Ragheb, M., 2020. The Role of Human
Resource Management Towards Employees Retention
During Covid-19 Pandemic in Medical Supplies Sector
- Egypt. Business and Management Studies, 6(2), 50.
Grihno, V.V. Simonova, M.V., 2018. Vliyanie trudovogo
povedeniya molodezhi na tekuchest' personala. V
sbornike: Innovacii v nauke i praktike. Sbornik statej po
materialam XIII mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-
prakticheskoj konferencii, Ufa. pages 109-115.
Lata, L., Mohamed Zainal, S. R., Jan, G., Memon, U., 2021.
The nexus of physical, cognitive, and emotional
engagement with academic staff turnover intention:
The moderating role of organizational politics. Global
Business and Organizational Excellence, 40(3). pages
36–49.
Petrova, M., Koval, V., Tepavicharova, M., Zerkal, A.,
Radchenko, A., & Bondarchuk, N., 2020. The
interaction between the human resources motivation
and the commitment to the organization. Journal of
Security and Sustainability Issues, 9(3). pages 897–907.
HRM policies play critical role workers in reducing staff
turnover in Chinese hotels, 2020. Human Resource
Management International Digest, 28(6). pages 29–30.
Simonova, M. V., Sankova, L. V., & Mirzabalaeva, F. I.,
2021. Decent Work During the Pandemic: Indication
and Profiling Matters. SHS Web of Conferences, 91,
01020.
Udodova, E. P., Kolesnikov, A. V., 2021. The problem of
staff turnover and ways to solve it. Normirovanie i
Oplata Truda v Promyshlennosti (Rationing and
Remuneration of Labor in Industry), (2). pages 56–60.
Tsareva, N.A., Tyugaev, А.R., 2020. Creation of staff
involvement as part of the strategic human resource
management in a company. Laplage em revista, vol. 6,
no.Extra-B. pages 256-260.
Cymbal, D. J., Litvak, S., Wilder, D. A., & Burns, G. N.,
2021. An Examination of Variables that Predict
Turnover, Staff and Caregiver Satisfaction in Behavior-
analytic Organizations. Journal of Organizational
Behavior Management.
RTCOV 2021 - II International Scientific and Practical Conference " COVID-19: Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals
(RTCOV )
42