Humanitarian Resistance in Russian Higher School during the
Pandemic: The Case of Journalism Education
Sergey G. Korkonosenko
1a
and Marina A. Berezhnaia
2b
1
Department of the Theory of Journalism and Mass Communications, Saint Petersburg State University,
7/9, Universitetskaya naberezhnaya, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
2
Department of the TV & Radio Journalism, Saint Petersburg State University,
7/9, Universitetskaya naberezhnaya, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
Keywords: University, Humanitarian Resistance, Technocracy, Commercialization, Journalistic Education.
Abstract: The article examines a relatively new phenomenon of humanitarian resistance, which is becoming widespread
in higher education. It represents an intellectual and practical pedagogical reaction to the expansion of
technocracy, digitalization and commercialization at universities. These trends have intensified in the context
of the pandemic. The case of journalistic education in Russia has been selected for the actual study. The main
material for observations was obtained through expert interviews with leading teachers of a number of
universities; to verify the conclusions, the authors use theoretical works and discussions in the pedagogical
community. As a result of the analysis, it turns out that teachers mostly vote for the spiritual and cultural
values of education and consider it essentially important to conduct active interpersonal communication
within traditional forms of classes. In this regard, their position coincides with the mood of the students’
parents, as sociological surveys revealed.
1 INTRODUCTION
Currently, the practice of educational institutions is
experiencing the modifying effect of several factors
that interact and mutually reinforce each other. In
particular, this relates to the COVID-19 pandemic
and the explosive development of digital information
technologies. Obeying the dictates of the pandemic,
education is moving to a remote format, and this
entails the use of digital remote communications.
Based on the experience of recent months, a
significant part of parents of schoolchildren are
opposed to replacing direct communication with the
teacher with computer dialogues. So, according to a
survey of residents of 20 cities in Russia, most parents
are confident that this will negatively affect the health
and psyche of their children, the assimilation of
educational materials and communication skills with
peers (Solodovnikov, 2021). In turn, teachers of the
Russian higher school say that with the transition to
the distance format, they have less free time and
increased workload, they do not consider the distance
a
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2331-2133
b
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5179-2111
format comfortable for themselves and for students;
87.8% of teachers surveyed believe that it is better to
conduct classes in full-time format (Shtykhno,
Konstantinova and Gagiev, 2020, p. 76).
Meanwhile, higher school teachers express
concern about another trend that has an international
character. The dean of the Faculty of Social Sciences
from University of Helsinki Hannu Nieminen writes:
“Both scholars and policymakers largely agree that in
the last 20 years European higher education policy
has turned from policy based on democracy and
culture towards policy driven by market-based
ideals” (Nieminen, 2018, p. 73). Thus, at the initiative
of the management bodies of educational system and
specific universities, a change in strategic guidelines
is added to medical and technological factors. The
Russian pedagogical community identifies this
danger and responds to it intellectually. Pedagogical
community has generated a concept of humanitarian
resistance to reduction of the humanitarian
component in education in favor of technologization
and client-oriented relations. The pandemic context
Korkonosenko, S. and Berezhnaia, M.
Humanitarian Resistance in Russian Higher School during the Pandemic: The Case of Journalism Education.
DOI: 10.5220/0011110500003439
In Proceedings of the 2nd International Scientific and Practical Conference "COVID-19: Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals" (RTCOV 2021), pages 55-59
ISBN: 978-989-758-617-0
Copyright
c
2023 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
55
has strengthened such sentiments and teachers began
to perceive digitalization "not so much as
technological modernization, but ... as the loss of a
meaningful component of life in favor of mechanical
... algorithms and standards" (Murzina, 2020, p. 107).
Since we are considering the case of journalism
education, it must be said that in this area there is also
a conjunctural pressure from the pandemic and
digitalization in their alliance. It is characteristic that
in 2021 World Journalism Education Congress and
European Journalism Training Association changed
the former title of their joint conference to
“Journalism education in the era of social networks
and artificial intelligence: digital technologies and
ethical values” (https://ejta.susu.ru/programme/). In a
research practice, the authors of the latest empirical
projects propose a related formulation of the question:
computer technology required a new organization of
the journalists' labour, and the coronavirus pandemic
forced educational institutions to switch to distance
learning (Grabelnikov, 2020, p. 715).
However, it is difficult to agree that only
technological innovations, medical conditions and
commercial reasons determine the essence, forms and
trends of the university journalism training. For
example, it can be viewed in the light of national and
cultural traditions in spiritual life, as well as in a broad
system of academic activity and as an established
practice that has its own internal integrity, a set of
working means and methods, a hierarchy of
intellectual and ethical priorities, etc. Undoubtedly,
experienced mentors from Russian universities have
mixed opinions regarding the impact of conjunctural
and stable factors on the state and prospects of the
journalism school. The purpose of this article is to
identify their positions towards the preservation of the
humanitarian basis of education, in particular, in the
conditions of the coronavirus pandemic.
2 METHODS
The main method used was expert interviews with
heads of departments and well-known teachers from
different cities and universities of Russia. The
interview scenario included different topics besides
technologies and COVID but the humanitarian
background of education turned out to be the leading
idea of the conversations. In turn, the expert
interviews were an integral part of the comprehensive
research project "Theoretical and Pedagogical
Schools of Journalism in Russia" (2019-2021)
performed at the Department of the Theory of
Journalism and Mass Communications of St.
Petersburg State University with participation of
many other departments and universities in Russia
and abroad. The project has been described in
previous publications (Berezhnaya and
Korkonosenko, 2021). A total of 10 semi-structured
interviews with a video recording were conducted in
2020-2021, with average length of 40 minutes each.
Deans of journalism faculties, heads of departments
and professors of specialized faculties, as well as
organizers of non-university professional educational
projects became our experts. Additionally, the
methodology includes a comparison of the collected
data with concepts and assessments offered by
Russian and international scholarly and pedagogical
corporations.
3 RESULTS
First of all, the interlocutors speak in solidarity in
support of the humanitarian basis of journalistic
education, for example, in such forms:
"Without the humanitarian component of our
education, including philological one, you can't teach
journalism (not media communication). One of the
main skills is a competent, expressive presentation of
non-banal thoughts about what is happening
around."
"Philosophy, cultural studies, economics must
necessarily be. As a result, widely educated people
appear who can't write carelessly, for it is not
interesting for them to write this way. An educated
person has a deeper and more diverse understanding
of life."
"We must understand that a journalist not only
has basic skills, but he is a socialized person, he
understands what is happening, can compare,
analyze. And there is the humanitarian side of
education, even the philosophical one."
"I am for fundamental humanitarian learning to
be in the first place. For example, we have a good
department of stylistics and literary editing, we pay a
lot of attention to literature. Not only because we
ourselves grew out of the philological faculty and
many of us became candidates and doctors of
philology. But also, because, after all, the word is the
main thing in journalism."
The experts see a journalist primarily in the roles
of analyst, critic, and a thoughtful observer of the
processes in the world around him. In this respect, the
Russian paradigm of education differs significantly
from foreign ones.
RTCOV 2021 - II International Scientific and Practical Conference " COVID-19: Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals
(RTCOV )
56
“Our journalism is originally publicistic, that is,
solving the eternal problems of life with the help of
journalistic articles.”
“The American and Scandinavian traditions
suggest separating practical journalism from theory
of journalism. I think such a separation does not help
foreign colleagues. The more I look at what is
happening today, the more I am convinced of it.
Critical thinking, which a journalist needs, is formed
fragmentally and only at the level of pragmatics, and
not at the level of a systemic vision of the world.”.
At the same time, anxiety about the future of the
journalism school regularly arises during the
interview process. It is not an easy task to divide the
experts' statements into separate questions
concerning threats to the humanitarian nature of
education, since in spontaneous speech different
topics are intertwined with each other. For example,
as noted above, technocratic concepts and
innovations are closely related to the circumstances
introduced by the pandemic. Teachers see the most
concrete manifestation of this connection in the
spread of distance education online.
"The experience of working in isolation, at a
distance showed how teachers and students long for
direct communication. Apparently, distance learning
is both useful and necessary as an additional tool,
especially if we are talking about some kind of
courses that cannot be studied in any other way. But
distance cannot be a substitute for direct
communication. Particularly when it comes to
journalistic education."
"The leading universities included in the top
global rankings offer their online classes.
Globalization is globalization, but people always live
in a particular place and study at a particular
university. And, probably, we need to talk about
glocalization. But despite this, students are still
striving for a real place, for real teachers, not virtual
ones. They strive for communication. The experience
of teaching in self-isolation has shown this once
again."
There is reason to worry that the use of distance
learning instead of real communication will increase.
For instance, at St. Petersburg State University, since
2017, both basic and optional disciplines
(Philosophy, History of Russia, Fundamentals of
University Life) have been included in the curricula
of the Bachelor of Journalism in electronic format.
The list of them in master's programs is expanding, in
2020 the number of online courses ranged from 10 to
15 percent of the total number of courses and cover
all university-wide disciplines, including elective
blocks, and after the choice of elective courses online
disciplines take up to 30 percent in the schedule of
students. Qualified teachers in no way deny technical
progress, they realistically assess and accept the need
for changes, including personnel renewal.
"It is important for us that a teacher being a
practitioner is able to work in new conditions. It is
important to be ready to keep up with the times. There
are many experienced journalists of the old formation
who find no strength to step over their old habits and
learn to work using new tools."
“Traditionally, we are very text-centric, but at the
same time we must be technological, understand new
technologies, somehow fit them into our traditions.”
Opposition is being caused by attempts to use
progressive technologies to unify knowledge and
competencies, which inevitably arises as soon as the
diversity of personalities in the educational process is
lost and the direct interaction of the student with the
teacher is reduced. Actually, the humanitarization of
education is provided primarily by the interaction of
human individuals within it.
"Unification is a bad future. The unification in
humanitarian university education is, you know, just
the death of education completely."
Surely, the damage from the unification
orientation in education increases significantly when
it is coupled with similar requests from the industry.
Universities face such requests for simplified
qualification.
"The labor market is beginning to demand: we
need the identical specialists with the identical set of
technological skills, the identical understanding of
their duties for those editorial offices that earn money."
On the other hand, a purely commercial
interpretation of journalistic work in business echoes
commercialization and pragmatization in
arrangement of production processes at universities.
Journalism teachers see these trends no less clearly
than representatives of other fields of education.
"The commercialization of education leads to that
we accept everyone. I do not know how to teach in
these conditions. We must close our eyes to the fact
that there is a swamp. And the function of upbringing
goes away completely."
“We accept a large number of first-year students,
this happens simultaneously with the reduction of the
teaching staff. There is less and less time for
individual work”.
Humanitarian Resistance in Russian Higher School during the Pandemic: The Case of Journalism Education
57
Thus, the entrepreneurial strategy of the
universities’ functioning and development comes into
conflict with the humanitarian mission of education.
This conclusion clearly follows from the interview
participants' speeches.
4 DISCUSSION
It should be said, firstly, that none of the interlocutors
used the notion of "humanitarian resistance",
however, secondly, that their attitudes and views
correspond to this concept in essence. This
correspondence is manifested in the very
understanding of the humanitarian nature of
education. According to the researchers of the
modern higher school, “the humanitarization of
education can be defined as a directed pedagogical
process that takes into account the features of the
emergence and creative development of the
individual … ensuring the development of a
humanitarian orientation of an individual, capable of
self-determination and self-realization in the
contemporary sociocultural space” (Elkanova, 2017).
It was these areas of training and graduate qualities
that the interview participants emphasized.
Moreover, the special kind of activity of a journalist
strengthens the accents, since the profession
encourages him express himself openly in the
environment of social communication.
Russian professors declare the priority importance
of the socio-cultural component in journalistic
education. According to them, “contemporary
journalism requires professionals, whose education is
based on three basic pillars: knowledge of the society
and its culture, knowledge of the nature of journalism,
and knowledge of professional skills. Two pillars
were present in the USSR already, and have been
transformed into a new post-Socialist and digital
reality of the Russian journalism education
(Vartanova, 2017, p. 22). There are also proposals to
strengthen the cultural content of curricula, for
example, to increase the role of aesthetics in the
structure of professional qualification. “The
combination of aesthetic and functional components
in professional training meets the challenges of the
modern media market, expands the range of
professional practices, gives hope for humanistic
perspectives of the industry” (Berezhnaia, 2019, p.
207).
Some foreign researchers also emphasize that it is
impossible to limit educational programs to utilitarian
instrumental training: “The role of the university is to
prepare students not only to be employed but also to
participate effectively and critically in the democratic
community” (Reese and Cohen, 2000, p. 214).
However, the ideas of Russian colleagues go far
beyond democracy, they operate with categories of
humanistic philosophy and humanitarian priorities of
the profession. Particularly, these motives are clearly
heard while discussing pedagogical strategies: "The
education of future professional journalists on the
samples of a great worldview style,
anthropocosmism, is seen as a promising educational
strategy" (Poelueva, Indrikov and Belyatskaya, 2016,
p. 13).
Let us emphasize that we are talking about the
Russian model of journalistic activity and related
education, whereas other national systems may have
other guidelines. Alignment according to some
universal international model not only does not
promise achievements and advantages, but it is also
impossible for deep reasons of civilizational
differences. Broadly speaking, “Russia is often
considered a civilization of its own” and in this
connection, social science in Russia is not
internationally “convertible” (Shirokanova, 2012, p.
269). Some Western scholars accentuate cultural and
civilizational differences in relation to the journalistic
school: “Entrenched ideological beliefs about
totalitarian control over the academia prevented
Western scholars from readily examining the broader
historical and cultural context in which university
journalism education developed in Russia”
(Antonova, Shafer and Freedman, 2011, p. 140). In
this context, Russian scientists reasonably advocate
continuity in the functioning of domestic journalism
schools and their development on their own
methodological basis, which has humanitarian design
(Blokhin, Korkonosenko and Khubetsova, 2015, p.
108).
Comparing the content of expert interviews with
theoretical ideas and assessments shows that they
have common vectors of thought movement.
Education is considered in the coordinates of
fundamental academic training saturated with
cultural, socio-moral and, in general, humanitarian
meanings. Naturally, these pedagogical attitudes
resist technocratic and entrepreneurial intentions, the
intensive spread of which is provoked by the
conditions of the COVID-19 pandemic.
5 CONCLUSIONS
Humanitarian resistance in higher education is not a
local special case, but a widespread phenomenon, at
the level of views, moods and practical pedagogical
RTCOV 2021 - II International Scientific and Practical Conference " COVID-19: Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals
(RTCOV )
58
activity. It is directed against excessive
technicalization (primarily digitalization) and
commercialization of university life, in defence of the
values of enlightenment, interpersonal interaction and
the qualitative diversity of educational practice. The
COVID-19 pandemic generates a favourable
environment for the growth of negative trends, which
is most clearly manifested in the expansion of online
distance learning. Based on the material of
journalistic education in Russia, it is clear that the
teaching community for the most part adheres to the
humanistic pedagogical ideology and strives to
implement it in current work.
REFERENCES
Antonova, S., Shafer, R., Freedman, E., 2011. Journalism
education in Russia: Contemporary trends in a
historical context. Journal of Global Mass
Communication, 4(1-4). pages 133-151.
Berezhnaia, M.A., 2019. Aesthetic criteria in journalism in
the aspect of professional education. Media Education
(Mediaobrazovanie), 59(2). pages 207-215.
Berezhnaya, M.A., Korkonosenko, S.G., 2021. Journalism
schools in Russia: Professional expertise experience.
Theoretical and Practical Issues of Journalism, 10(3).
pages 404-421.
Blokhin, I.N., Korkonosenko, S.G., Khubetsova, Z.F.,
2015. Journalistic education: Conceptualization and
media competences. Mediterranean Journal of Social
Sciences, 6(3). Supplement 3. pages 107-114.
Elkanova, T.M., 2017. On the question of the interpretation
of the term "humanitarization of education". Modern
Problems of Science and Education, 4.
Grabelnikov, A.A., Gegelova, N.S., Osipovskaya, E.A.,
Ott, V.S., 2020. Journalism education in the context of
COVID-19 pandemic: Pros and cons. Theoretical and
Practical Issues of Journalism, 9(4). pages 713-726.
Nieminen, H., 2018. In defence of European universities:
Scholars and activists, unite! In L. Peja, N. Carpentier,
F. Colombo, et al. (Eds.). Current perspectives on
communication and media research. Bremen: Editions
Lumiere. pages 73–82.
Poelueva, L.A., Indrikov, A.A., Belyatskaya, A.A., 2016.
“Mind upbringing” vs “technological progress”: The
“great style” of thinking and linguoculture in the
professional mass media education. In O.E. Kokhanaya
(Ed.). Higher education for the XXI Century: XIII
International Scientific Conference. Moscow,
December 8-10, 2016: Reports and materials. Round
table discussion. Professional training in the field of
mass media. Part 1. Moscow: Moscow University for
the Humanities. pages 8-15.
Reese, S.D., Cohen, J., 2000. Educating for journalism: The
professionalism of scholarship. Journalism Studies, 1
(2). pages 213-227.
Shirokanova, A.A., 2012. Inter-civilizational dynamics of
scientific knowledge creation between zones of
intellectual stagnation and creativity. The Journal of
Sociology and Social Anthropology, 15(6(65)). Pages
67-275.
Shtykhno, D.A., Konstantinova, L.V. and Gagiev, N.N.,
2020. Transition of universities to distance mode during
the pandemic: Problems and possible risks. Open
Education, 24(5). Pages 72-81.
Solodovnikov, V., 2021. “Distance for the poor, a living
teacher for the rich?” – parents are against the digital
experiment. FederalCity.ru, 6 Oct. URL:
https://federalcity.ru/index.php?newsid=11695.
Humanitarian Resistance in Russian Higher School during the Pandemic: The Case of Journalism Education
59