Thus, the entrepreneurial strategy of the
universities’ functioning and development comes into
conflict with the humanitarian mission of education.
This conclusion clearly follows from the interview
participants' speeches.
4 DISCUSSION
It should be said, firstly, that none of the interlocutors
used the notion of "humanitarian resistance",
however, secondly, that their attitudes and views
correspond to this concept in essence. This
correspondence is manifested in the very
understanding of the humanitarian nature of
education. According to the researchers of the
modern higher school, “the humanitarization of
education can be defined as a directed pedagogical
process that takes into account the features of the
emergence and creative development of the
individual … ensuring the development of a
humanitarian orientation of an individual, capable of
self-determination and self-realization in the
contemporary sociocultural space” (Elkanova, 2017).
It was these areas of training and graduate qualities
that the interview participants emphasized.
Moreover, the special kind of activity of a journalist
strengthens the accents, since the profession
encourages him express himself openly in the
environment of social communication.
Russian professors declare the priority importance
of the socio-cultural component in journalistic
education. According to them, “contemporary
journalism requires professionals, whose education is
based on three basic pillars: knowledge of the society
and its culture, knowledge of the nature of journalism,
and knowledge of professional skills. Two pillars
were present in the USSR already, and have been
transformed into a new post-Socialist and digital
reality of the Russian journalism education”
(Vartanova, 2017, p. 22). There are also proposals to
strengthen the cultural content of curricula, for
example, to increase the role of aesthetics in the
structure of professional qualification. “The
combination of aesthetic and functional components
in professional training meets the challenges of the
modern media market, expands the range of
professional practices, gives hope for humanistic
perspectives of the industry” (Berezhnaia, 2019, p.
207).
Some foreign researchers also emphasize that it is
impossible to limit educational programs to utilitarian
instrumental training: “The role of the university is to
prepare students not only to be employed but also to
participate effectively and critically in the democratic
community” (Reese and Cohen, 2000, p. 214).
However, the ideas of Russian colleagues go far
beyond democracy, they operate with categories of
humanistic philosophy and humanitarian priorities of
the profession. Particularly, these motives are clearly
heard while discussing pedagogical strategies: "The
education of future professional journalists on the
samples of a great worldview style,
anthropocosmism, is seen as a promising educational
strategy" (Poelueva, Indrikov and Belyatskaya, 2016,
p. 13).
Let us emphasize that we are talking about the
Russian model of journalistic activity and related
education, whereas other national systems may have
other guidelines. Alignment according to some
universal international model not only does not
promise achievements and advantages, but it is also
impossible for deep reasons of civilizational
differences. Broadly speaking, “Russia is often
considered a civilization of its own” and in this
connection, social science in Russia is not
internationally “convertible” (Shirokanova, 2012, p.
269). Some Western scholars accentuate cultural and
civilizational differences in relation to the journalistic
school: “Entrenched ideological beliefs about
totalitarian control over the academia prevented
Western scholars from readily examining the broader
historical and cultural context in which university
journalism education developed in Russia”
(Antonova, Shafer and Freedman, 2011, p. 140). In
this context, Russian scientists reasonably advocate
continuity in the functioning of domestic journalism
schools and their development on their own
methodological basis, which has humanitarian design
(Blokhin, Korkonosenko and Khubetsova, 2015, p.
108).
Comparing the content of expert interviews with
theoretical ideas and assessments shows that they
have common vectors of thought movement.
Education is considered in the coordinates of
fundamental academic training saturated with
cultural, socio-moral and, in general, humanitarian
meanings. Naturally, these pedagogical attitudes
resist technocratic and entrepreneurial intentions, the
intensive spread of which is provoked by the
conditions of the COVID-19 pandemic.
5 CONCLUSIONS
Humanitarian resistance in higher education is not a
local special case, but a widespread phenomenon, at
the level of views, moods and practical pedagogical