In the period from March 30, 2020 to July 2, 2020,
face-to-face visits to the park were prohibited. With
the lifting of quarantine and a gradual return to the
usual active life, the attendance of the museum
increased sharply (Fig. 9) and already in July of 2020
the number of visitors per month exceeded the
number of tourists before the pandemic.
In the reports received, as expected, there is
seasonality in visiting the territory, which is
associated with national holidays, vacations and
weather conditions. However, despite the difficult
epidemiological situation, the figures indicate the
interest in visiting, and, therefore, the social demand
for the complex.
The lack of convenient transport accessibility
with large settlements with a developed
infrastructure, as it seemed to us, was the reason for a
decrease in interest in visiting such a remote object.
Figure 9: The total attendance of the Museum-Reserve for
2020 and 2021 [from the archive of the Museum Kulikovo
Field].
However, after working through the materials, it
became clear that the facility was functioning
successfully and the erected low-floor guest houses
were booked six months in advance.
5 CONCLUSIONS
As a result of the study, the following conclusions are
offered:
- the combined mode of activity under quarantine
conditions using the example of the military theme
park Kulikovo Field showed the possibility of
sustainable operation of the facility during a
pandemic;
- the geographical location of public areas
(remoteness from big cities), makes us look for new
forms of “self-presentation” and namely the
development of Internet and VR technologies,
including online excursions;
- use of innovative technologies makes it possible,
in a pandemic, to visit museums remotely, which
develops the tourist potential in full-time visits during
the period of lifting restrictive measures.
REFERENCES
Nelsina, O., 2017. The basic patterns of development
historical and patriotic theme parks in Russia: a
comparative analysis of activity and prospects of
development. Cultural heritage of Russia, 4. pages 86-
92.
Afonina M., Aleksashina V., Skuridin M., 2020.
Stimulating the development of public territories by
creating theme parks on the example of Khodynskoe
park at the Moscow city. Biospheric compatibility:
human, region, technologies,. №3 (31). pages 68-79.
Maksimova, T., 2013. Virtual museums vs traditional
museums: virtual exhibits advantages. Scientific-
Theoretical and Applied Journal, 3-4 (30). pages 109-
111.
Afonina M., Vetrova N., 2019. Tubing facilities in the
system of recreational urban territories. E3S Web of
Conferences. 2018 Topical Problems of Architecture,
Civil Engineering and Environmental Economics,
TPACEE 2018: 05033.
Montusiewicz, J., Miłosz, M., Kęsik, J., Kayumov, R.,
2018. Multidisciplinary technologies for creating
virtual museums – a case of archaeological museum
development. INTED2018 Proceedings. pages 326-
336.
Ivanova, Z., Afonina, M., 2016. Setting objectives and
developing planning concepts as part of the process of
design of Russian urban recreation areas (the social
aspect). Procedia Engineering. 165. pages 1402-1409.
Jianghai, Zh., 2012. Designing Virtual Museum Using
Web3D Technology, 33. pages 1596-1602.
Barbieri, L, Fabio, B, Muzzapa, M., 2017. Virtual museum
system evaluation through user studies. Journal of
Cultural Heritage, 26. pages 101-108.
Styliani, S, Fotis, L, Kostas, K, Petros, P., 2009. Virtual
museums, a survey and some issues for consideration.
Journal of Cultural Heritage, 10. pages 520-528.