if the subjects get the opportunity to find out the
questions in which mistakes are made, to realize them
and pass the test again. This is demonstrated by
examples in (Author, 2019), (Kunturova, 2019), and
in (Author, 2017), a test control system adapted for
small screens is described, i.e. allowing to conduct a
testing session in a regular classroom using
smartphones.
Numerous studies have shown that closed tests
(multiple choice tests) are educational in nature no
less than open ones, since they not only improve the
memorization of correct information, but also make it
easier to remember information related to incorrect
alternatives (Little, 2012). Multiple choice tests
(closed tests) are very effective if the number of
answer options contains a corresponding number of
plausible incorrect alternatives. Wherein, studies
have shown that test tasks in which none of the listed
answer options is correct are “distracting” in nature
and do not solve the goal set for using the testing
technology.
Similarly, tests in math disciplines are useless if
multiple answers are correct. Although, tests in the
humanities, it is sometimes advisable to form tests
with several correct answer options, differing in
completeness, generalization and level of
understanding, as described in (Little, 2012).
2.3.3 Regular Test Management Function
The main function of testing is not to control
knowledge, but to assess its quality, on the basis of
which the educational process is controlled by the
teacher and students' self-government. Regular
(ongoing) testing allows the teacher to manage the
learning process, i.e. correct it in accordance with the
obtained test results:
it is possible to consider again in more detail
some sections of the passed topic;
adaptively, depending on the results for the
whole group, present further material;
refer some sections of the educational material
with a shortage of time and a sufficiently high
level of assimilation of the material of the
educational group for independent study, and etc.
In more detail, the issues of management of the
educational process are investigated in the paper
(Author, 2020).
2.3.4 Test Control Format
Modern computer technologies allow testing sessions
in three directions:
- as a personal monitoring of students through
the testing system;
- to carry out control testing in the mode off line
in the "paper version";
- to conduct control testing online using
electronic means.
Personal monitoring of students, as a rule, is
carried out through a testing program built into an
electronic training course (ETC) designed for self-
study. The need to include an element of personal
monitoring in the ETC is discussed in the paper
(Petrovic-Dzerdz, 2019). "The typical student usually
does not close the textbook after studying, but
voluntarily answers the questions posed at the end of
each chapter." Studies show that he/she
conscientiously participates in self-tests in order to
know about the state of his/her knowledge level." If
testing is carried out solely to assess the knowledge
gained by the subjects, then there is a temptation to
look for alternative ways in order to earn a good
grade. An effective personal monitoring system built
into the ETC is demonstrated by examples in (Author,
2014, 2017, 2019).
Off line mode testing system does not require a
computer class, it can be carried out in any auditorium
or online through the conference. The advantage of
testing in the of line system is the ability to use open
tests when developing test tasks, which is not always
possible when testing through a computer program.
Wherein, computer technologies are used only to
form a test base (a pool of questions) and form tests
from it at a client request.
Testing in online format requires the development
of a testing program. It is possible to develop such a
program based on platforms: Drupal (Author, 2014),
Moodle (Medvedeva, 2002), Sakai (Author, 2015),
Blackboard, and etc. However, they all have limited
application, especially for mathematical tests
associated with a large number of formulas integrated
into the program. It is much more efficient to develop
your own shell designed for testing control.
The original shell will take into account all the
requirements that correspond to the set goal, include
all the necessary options. If at the same time the test
base is well structured and based on modern data
storage technologies, then it is easy to automate the
formation of test tasks and announcement of test
results. The widespread use of the testing program in
the educational process requires a convenient,
accessible to any user, method of replenishing and
updating the database of test questions – “a database
adds what we call delivery time flexibility”
(Brusilovsky, 1999). Only its own original shell will
make it possible to develop new tests based on it
and/or update and replenish the test base