with a detrimental effect on the development of
democracy and increased the opportunities for a "left
turn" [6]. The authors of the article agree with this
statement.
It is important to note that the specificity of the
socio-economic policy of Russia was manifested
during the period of the spread of coronavirus
infection. COVID-19 has forever changed the lives of
people around the world, including in Russia. This
situation prompted the state and society to form and
implement different approaches to public
administration and regulation in the socio-economic
and political spheres, to strive for a common constant
desired future. The measures of social and economic
support for Russians are of a large-scale and
unprecedented nature. Currently, a search for new
views on political leadership and public
administration is underway, considering the negative
results of the pandemic, this follows from the
experience of the new management paradigms that
will subsequently allow to effectively cope with
unpredictable and rapidly changing crisis conditions,
complex and ambiguous.
In the context of the crisis and the search for a
balance of systemic social measures implemented by
the state on an ongoing basis, the need for organizing
new models of safe life for citizens, teleworking,
communication, business communications, as well as
building new organizational foundations of health
care that will be able to withstand the challenges of
the pandemic and other potential threats to the life and
health of citizens. Wherein, striving for an effective
result, without causing the development of social
dependency in society.
In a pandemic, many countries are hesitant to
adopt aggressive methods and methods to contain the
spread of coronavirus, believing that this will cause
significant damage to their national economies. A
dilemma arises between saving lives and economic
development. The analysis shows that, nevertheless,
the tough measures of the governments make it
possible to effectively cope with the unfavorable
situation. Enhanced border and entry controls, travel
control throughout the country are among them. Such
measures can negatively affect the stock market, on
the other hand, other restrictions practically do not
affect the stock market return. Therefore, public
policy can be very effective in the fight against
coronavirus. It is therefore important to strike a
balance between tough tackling the pandemic and
economic development.
Therefore, governments in low-income countries
generally find it difficult to cope with the increased
demand for health services, requiring rapid
government and policy decisions to protect the most
vulnerable social groups and affected sectors of the
economy. The analysis of models of socio-economic
assistance to citizens and regions as complex systems
and structures, their modification during a pandemic
is in demand. It is necessary to build a system of
indicators for measuring the effectiveness of the fight
against coronavirus infection in nation states,
describing them using socio-political and
macroeconomic indicators (GDP, government
spending, inequality, infrastructure formation, and
etc.).
5 CONCLUSIONS
Therefore, the analysis showed that insufficient study
and, as a result, the lack of harmonious formation and
implementation of measures to minimize the socio-
economic consequences of the spread of COVID-19
can lead to impoverishment of the population
(poverty) and environmental degradation. It is
necessary to have a clear conceptual framework for
understanding the main problems of sustainable
development in developing and developed countries.
It is necessary to use interdisciplinary and holistic
approaches to assessing the interdependencies
between pandemic threats, industrial activities,
economic risk, poverty and social vulnerability to
facilitate the development and adoption of effective
socio-political decisions in the context of ensuring
political stability actually while minimizing the
socio-economic consequences of the spread of
COVID-19.
The peculiarity of the situation with the
coronavirus infection pandemic lies in the uniqueness
of the actions of the governments of different
countries, which in turn predetermines the wealth of
crisis management experience that shall be studied.
The actions of political leaders and political
institutions were transformed, a new awareness of
cross-border threats emerged, which spread to health
care, economic and socio-political systems.
Therefore, it is necessary to investigate new
mechanisms of the state's socio-economic policy in
the current crisis situation in the context of ensuring
political stability.
The global pandemic affects the social sphere of
an individual's life. It demonstrated that for all the
coverage of the disease, the response to it is local in
nature, as a rule, within one state. In this regard,
effective response methods depend on the level of
development of public administration, the political
situation, use of social technologies and innovations,