Sociological Analysis of Population Anxiety in the Covid-19
Pandemic Era
M. S. Gotovkina
a
and A. A. Solonenko
b
Dmitrovsky branch of the Astrakhan State Technical University, Rybnoe, Russia
Keywords: Pandemic, Covid 19, Coronavirus, Anxiety, Depression, Vaccination.
Abstract: The article analyzes the level of anxiety of the population. The sociological survey took place in October of
2021. The study method was anonymous questioning on the Internet using specially created tools in Google
forms. N = 107 respondents were interviewed in the study. The findings were compared with data from a
similar study a year ago. As a result of a comparative analysis, the main factors that increase the risk of
occurrence and development of anxiety and depression were identified. The study provides a correlation
between the level of anxiety of respondents and their attitude to vaccination. The attitude of respondents to
compliance with the norms of personal protection and prevention of COVID-19 was also determined. A
correlation was found between the level of anxiety of respondents and their interest in studying the flow of
media information about the coronavirus.
1 INTRODUCTION
More than a year ago, the whole world plunged into
the era of the global crisis associated with the
pandemic of the new unknown virus COVID-19. The
consequences of the spread of a new type of disease
are still not fully understood. Of course, the pandemic
has had a significant impact and continues to strongly
affect all systems of society: from the economy to
health care. As noted by A.N. Kuryukin, COVID-19
continues to kill people and bring suffering to people,
it changes the life of society as a whole so much that
what is happening becomes something more than just
a public health or national health crisis, it is an
economic, humanitarian and social crisis. The
ongoing pandemic has a particularly negative impact
on the mental health of the population. A constant
increase in morbidity, an increase in mortality,
imposed social restrictions lead to an increase in the
level of anxiety among the population.
Scientists consider psychopathological
manifestations of anxiety in the era of a pandemic to
be such symptoms as increased nervousness with a
sense of imminent impending danger, irritation and
anger, nightmares and insomnia, including
heterothematic fears such as getting sick and dying.
a
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5615-5261
b
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3857-9516
An analysis of empirical data shows that the problem
of anxiety has become one of the key ones in an
epidemic situation, since among the many challenges
that people face in a new social context, the main
thing was the maintenance of calm and absence of
panic. To date, the factors affecting the level of
anxiety of the population in the era of a pandemic,
including vaccination of the population against the
COVID-19 virus, have not been sufficiently studied.
Empirical studies regarding vaccination have not yet
been carried out.
2 STUDY METHODS
In order to determine the level of anxiety of the
population, an anonymous survey was conducted on
the Internet using Google-forms. study Instrument -
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
developed in 1983 by А. Siegmond and R. Snight. It
is known that this scale has a high level of
discriminant validity in determining the level of
depression and anxiety. The toolkit also included
questions about the attitude to vaccination,
compliance with hygiene and sanitary standards, and
others. N = 107 respondents took part in the survey.
Gotovkina, M. and Solonenko, A.
Sociological Analysis of Population Anxiety in the Covid-19 Pandemic Era.
DOI: 10.5220/0011118700003439
In Proceedings of the 2nd International Scientific and Practical Conference "COVID-19: Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals" (RTCOV 2021), pages 249-253
ISBN: 978-989-758-617-0
Copyright
c
2023 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
249
The survey was conducted in October of 2021. There
were no age or gender restrictions. The data obtained
during the questionnaire were analyzed using
statistical methods, the confidence interval with the
determination of average values. Wherein, p <0.05
was taken as the level of statistical significance.
3 STUDY RESULTS
As a result of the analysis of the obtained data on the
HADS scale, it became obvious that the interviewed
respondents feel rather calm. The average value of the
level of anxiety is 5.75, and the level of depression is
4.07. It shall be noted that overestimated indicators of
anxiety were identified only in 15 % of all
respondents who participated in the survey, and
depression was identified only in 7 % of cases.
Wherein, none of the interviewed respondents had
clinically expressed anxiety or depression. This is a
fairly good indicator in comparison with similar data
of the last year. Therefore, the level of anxiety
decreased by 2 points, and depression by 2.3. Such
a decrease indicates the continuing mental adaptation
of the population to the peculiarities of life in the era
of the coronavirus pandemic. In this regard, one
cannot but agree with scientists who believe that an
emotionally stressful situation that has existed for a
long time has led to the fact that people with a normal
and high level of adaptation began to perceive this
situation as "familiar", which can explain the gradual
decrease in anxiety.
On average, respondents rated their fear of
contracting a new coronavirus infection at 5.5 points
on a ten-point scale. This indicator is slightly higher
than a year ago (4.86 points). Moreover, among those
who are afraid of getting sick, there are more
representatives of the middle age group (from 35 to
55 years old). This increase is due to an increase in
the incidence in general and, accordingly, an increase
in the number of patients in the social environment of
the respondents.
The level of anxiety of the population is
undoubtedly influenced by the media, providing more
and more reports on the number of cases and deaths,
new restrictions, and etc. So, according to the results
of the survey, only 9.3 % (10 people) are “not at all
interested” in media information about the
coronavirus, 42.1 % (45 people) are practically not
interested”. Fully interested in all aspects of the
pandemic 18.7 % (20 people) and "sufficiently
interested" 29.9 % (32 people). Therefore, interest in
media reports regarding the COVID-19 pandemic
was almost evenly distributed. Wherein, respondents
interested in media information on this topic showed
more pronounced anxiety and anxiety, and among
respondents who avoid news about COVID-19, the
percentage of respondents with a normal level of
anxiety/depression is higher. The researchers note
that the increase in anxiety and mental disorders is
influenced by the excessive emphasis by the media on
pandemics and the inconsistency of information from
different sources, which, in turn, provokes people's
mistrust of its reliability.
Of course, the level of citizens' anxiety is also
affected by the drop in their incomes, which, together
with growing inflation, leads to a significant decrease
in the level and quality of life of the population. So,
only 35 % (38 people) do not notice a change in their
financial situation in connection with the pandemic.
Almost the same number of respondents, 34.6 % (37
people), noted that their situation has become worse
due to the pandemic. Another 26 % (28 people) of the
respondents had a much lower income. Therefore,
most of the respondents are experiencing financial
difficulties in connection with the pandemic.
Wherein, there is a correlation between the level of
anxiety and financial situation. So, 79 % of those who
have it worse during the pandemic have a high level
of anxiety.
The respondents were also asked about their
assessment of the level of anxiety in society as a
whole in connection with the pandemic. Therefore,
21.5 % of respondents (23 people) noted a very high
level of social anxiety, 38.3 % (41 people) indicated
a fairly high level. A moderate level of anxiety was
indicated by 29.9 % of respondents (32 people). The
data obtained demonstrate the correlation between the
level of one's own anxiety and the subjective
assessment of the psychoemotional state of the people
around. On average, the presence of sick people
among the close environment (and there cannot be
such, given the significant increase in the incidence)
increases the perception of COVID-19 as a real threat
and more often leads to greater control over the
spread of the pandemic and, accordingly, an increase
in anxiety. Wherein, when the respondents were
asked to rate their fear of contracting a new
coronavirus infection, 10.3 % (11 people) answered
that they were afraid of this "more than anything
else", and 15.9 % (17 people) absolutely not be afraid
that this happen. Wherein, a significant part of the
respondents — 21.5 % (23 people) — rated their
level of fear as medium (by five points), and in
general, opinions were equally divided between high
and low levels of fear of getting sick. This distribution
also indicates an increase in the mental adaptation of
the population to living conditions in the era of
RTCOV 2021 - II International Scientific and Practical Conference " COVID-19: Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals
(RTCOV )
250
pandemic.
Another factor causing an increased level of
anxiety among the population is the risk of
introducing quarantine measures associated with self-
isolation. Self-isolation is considered a forced and
necessary measure by 39.3 % of the respondents
(42 people). 31.8 % of respondents (34 people)
perceive self-isolation as an opportunity to usefully
spend time at home. 29 % of respondents (31 people)
answered that this is an unjustified measure. As the
researchers note, the greatest anxiety during the
period of self-isolation is caused in descending order:
limited opportunities for entertainment, inability to
spend time with friends; difficulties with playing
sports and hobbies; restrictions in study/work.
It is undeniable that one of the most significant,
but least studied anxiety factors in the era of a
pandemic is the campaign to vaccinate the
population. 63.6 % (68 people) noted the legitimacy
of the introduction of measures for compulsory
vaccination of the population against the new type of
virus COVID-19. The survey also asked about the
health safety of the vaccine. Here a paradox can be
noted: the majority, 59.8 % (64 respondents), of the
respondents answered that did not consider
vaccination safe for themselves.
Wherein, the level of anxiety is higher among
those surveyed who believe that vaccination
measures are necessary than among those who do not.
In the responses of the respondents, there is a
correlation between the unsafe vaccination and the
level of anxiety. Wherein, respondents who consider
vaccination unsafe for their health note its necessity.
It shall also be noted that the majority of
respondents tend to follow all the recommendations
of Rospotrebnadzor. 50.5 % of the respondents
(54 people) named compliance with all sanitary
standards as their priority, and said that they do not
always adhere to the standards, but from "case to
case" — 46.7% of the respondents (50 people).
4 RESULT DISCUSSION
In general, anxiety in the psychological dictionary is
defined as "an individual psychological feature that
manifests itself in a person's tendency to frequent and
intense experiences of anxiety, as well as in a low
threshold for its occurrence". As I.N. Tartakovskaya
rightly noted, the social situation in the era of a
pandemic is characterized by a high level of
uncertainty, i.e. “Situations with an unknown
outcome”. This circumstance also leads to the
accumulation of stress among citizens.
Sociologists who have studied the consequences
of the spread of COVID-19 point to a number of
popular complaints from citizens: emotional
problems, fear, anxiety, depression, sleep
disturbances, feelings of helplessness, depression and
apathy. In the population of countries in which the
number of infected is especially high, there is a surge
in mental disorders, including symptoms of post-
traumatic stress: a feeling of loneliness, anxiety,
severe emotional destabilization, exacerbation of pre-
existing fears and the emergence of new ones.
As noted, public anxiety is influenced by the
campaign to vaccinate the population. According to
the GOGOV website, at the beginning of this
campaign, the number of vaccinated people was quite
small, which indicates a low level of public
confidence in the vaccine at the time of its creation.
Moreover, it is paradoxical that at the beginning of
vaccination the registration of those wishing to be
vaccinated with the domestic vaccine "Sputnik" in
paid clinics for 1,850 rubles was much denser than in
the state polyclinic, where the same vaccine was
administered free of charge.
The graph shows that the peak of vaccination fell
on the summer of this year, when there was a
significant increase in cases. This, in the first place,
was facilitated by a wide media campaign to promote
vaccination. Currently, the number of vaccinated
people is less than half compared to the summer
period, although autumn is traditionally considered
the peak of acute respiratory viral infections. Such
statistics indicate a low level of public confidence in
the vaccine. This is confirmed by the survey data,
where the majority spoke in favor of the need for
vaccination, however, at the same time indicated its
unsafe for their health. However, the increase in the
number of vaccinated citizens suggests that
vaccination is becoming a part of social reality.
Beyond vaccinations, COVID-19 tests are
becoming a reality as well. So, one of the recent issues
of The British Journal of Sociology was completely
devoted to a new direction in the study of society —
the sociology of the test [12]. Scientists point out that
although testing is an established social form, its role
in society and everyday life is expanding. In the
current pandemic situation, the test has literally
become an integral part of social reality. One of the
authors of the magazine Jonathan Bach called testing
an element of social management. The possibility of
receiving certain social benefits only with a COVID-
19 test is also an additional risk that increases the
level of anxiety among the population. In general, the
factors influencing the attitude towards vaccination,
as well as the problems of the sociology of the test in
connection with the coronavirus, are of significant
interest for future scientific research.
Sociological Analysis of Population Anxiety in the Covid-19 Pandemic Era
251
Figure 1: Pace of COVID-19 Vaccination Campaign.
5 CONCLUSIONS
In the era of a pandemic humanity faced with a deep
crisis of all systems, which had an impact on the
mental health of the population. According to the
results of the conducted study, the level of anxiety
and other mental disorders in society has increased.
At the beginning of the pandemic, the level of
anxiety and stress in the population was higher than
at present, which indicates an adaptation period of
stress in the population in general. However, there are
slightly more people feeling fear for their health in the
face of the pandemic than a year ago.
An additional factor contributing to increased
levels of anxiety is media coverage of the pandemic.
The majority of the respondents noted that the society
as a whole is quite alarmed by the current events.
In the course of the study, it was determined that
half of the respondents surveyed had a worsening
financial situation during a pandemic, which, in turn,
contributed to the accumulation of stress and an
increase in anxiety. However, self-isolation does not
frighten the respondents, the majority considers it a
forced and necessary measure. Wherein, the majority
of respondents reported strict adherence to all norms
recommended by Rospotrebnadzor for the prevention
of coronavirus infection.
During the study, it became obvious that the
population is distrustful of the vaccination campaign,
as they consider the vaccine unsafe for their health.
However, it also supports universal vaccination
measures.
REFERENCES
Grechko, T.Yu., Ponomareva, D.A., Nomokonova, E.O.,
2021. Izmeneniya urovnya trevozhnosti u naseleniya v
period pandemii COVID-19: faktory, vliyayushchie na
dinamiku trevozhnosti. Nauchno-medicinskij vestnik
Central'nogo CHernozem'ya, 84: 13–20.
Kostinov, M.P., SHmit'ko, A.D., Polishchuk, V.B.,
Hromova, E.A., 2020. Sovremennye predstavleniya o
novom koronaviruse i zabolevanii, vyzvannom SARS-
COV-2. Infekcionnye bolezni: novosti, mneniya,
obuchenie, 9(2): 33–42.
Kuryukin, A.N., 2020. COVID-19 kak vyzov ekonomike,
sociumu, politike. MIR, 11(3): 250–265.
Medvedev, V. E., Dogotar', O.A., 2020. COVID-19 i psihi-
cheskoe zdorov'e: vyzovy i pervye vyvody. Nevrologiya,
nejropsihiatriya, psihosomatika, 12(6): 4–10.
Tartakovskaya, I. N., 2021. Doverie pered licom pandemii: v
poiskah tochki opory. Sociologicheskij zhurnal, 27:68–89.
Holodova, Y.B., 2020. Osobennosti perezhivaniya trevogi v
period pandemii COVID-19 predstavitelyami raznyh
vozrastnyh grupp. Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal mediciny i
psihologii, 3(2): 114—117.
Yaremchuk, S. V., Bakina, A.V., 2021. Sub"ektivnoe
blagopoluchie molodezhi i ego vzaimosvyaz' s
psihologicheskoj distanciej do ob"ektov social'no-
psihologicheskogo prostranstva lichnosti v usloviyah
pandemii COVID-19. Social'naya psihologiya i
obshchestvo, 12(1): 26–43.
Rӧhr, S. et al., 2020. Psychosocial Impact of Quarantine
Measures during Serious Coronavirus Outbreaks: A
Rapid Review. Psychiatrische Praxis, 47(4): 179–189.
Rajkumar, R.Ph. 2020. COVID-19 and Mental Health: A
Review of the Existing Literature. Asian Journal of
Psychiatry, 52. Special Issue: Put to the Test. The
Sociology of Testing, 71(3).
RTCOV 2021 - II International Scientific and Practical Conference " COVID-19: Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals
(RTCOV )
252
Xiang, T. et al., 2020. Timely mental health care for the
2019 novel coronavirus outbreak is urgently needed.
The Lancet Psychiatry, 7(3): 228–229.
Liang, L. et al., 2020. The Effect of COVID-19 on Youth
Mental Health. Psychiatric Quarterly, 91(3): 841–852.
Brooks, S.K. et al., 2020. The psychological impact of
quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the
evidence. The Lancet, 395(10227): 912–920.
Sociological Analysis of Population Anxiety in the Covid-19 Pandemic Era
253