4 DISCUSSION
Caudal block is commonly used in children’s inguinal
region surgery, urinary system surgery and lower limb
surgery, and it is combined with general anesthesia in
clinical practice. The anesthesia effect is exact, which can
reduce the number of general anesthetics during operation,
exert ideal muscle relaxation and analgesic effect,
effectively block the stress response induced by surgical
stimulation, reduce the use of opioid analgesics after the
operation, prolong the postoperative analgesia time,
promote postoperative recovery and further reduce the
average hospitalization days (Schloss 2015). Conventional
caudal block is a safe method, complications may be
observed especially in children. Complications such as
subcutaneous and intraosseous injection, local anesthetic
toxicity or spinal anesthesia are related to inaccurate
placement of the puncture needle (Afshan 1996). With the
improvement of high-resolution portable ultrasound
equipment and probe technology, ultrasound technology
has been more and more used in nerve block anesthesia,
which broadens the role of ultrasound in clinical anesthesia.
Ultrasound-guided caudal insert can see the sacral hiatus,
sacrococcygeal ligament and sacral lumen, and can observe
the liquid flow produced by the injected local anesthetic
drug in the sacral lumen in real-time. The sensitivity and
specificity of ultrasonic monitoring of the correct position
of puncture needle during ultrasound-guided caudal block
are 96% and 100%, which is feasible and practical for
clinical application (Schwartz 2008). Because the structure
of sacral hiatus and local anesthetic injection can be
observed in real-time under ultrasound, the drug injection
position can be accurately judged, the puncture difficulty
can be reduced, and the success rate of blocking can be
improved.
In this study, 0.2% ropivacaine was used for sacral
canal block, which had little toxicity, no local
anesthetic poisoning reaction or total spinal
anesthesia, and produced a good anesthetic effect.
The recovery time of Group C was shorter than that
of Group G and the CHIPPS score after PACU was
lower than that of Group G which indicated that the
sacral canal block under ultrasound guidance was
effective and the circulation was stable, which
reduced the dosage of opioid analgesics during
operation, effectively shortened the recovery time of
children, and provided perfect postoperative
analgesia, which was beneficial to rapid recovery and
early postoperative pain relief.
Emergence agitation refers to a mental state in
which children’s consciousness and behavior are
separated during the awakening period after general
anesthesia, which is characterized by stubbornness,
irritability and inability to comfort, even crying,
hands and feet moving and disorientation, etc., and it
is impossible to identify familiar people or things in
the past (Mihara 2015, Hijikate 2016). The incidence
of restlessness during the awakening period is mainly
related to factors such as operation type, unfamiliar
environment, urinary catheter, quick awakening after
anesthesia and postoperative pain degree (Kim 2013).
In this study, the incidence of emergence agitation in
Group C was significantly lower than that in Group
G. It is considered that caudal block can reduce the
stimulation of urinary catheter, improve the analgesia
and prolong the postoperative analgesia time, thus
reducing the circulation fluctuation caused by general
anesthesia drugs and pain induced emergence
agitation and reducing the incidence of nausea and
vomiting. Postoperative canal block has a good long-
term analgesic effect, which also has a good effect on
the operation and psychological recovery of children,
and improves the satisfaction of their families to the
operation, thus increasing the safety factor of
anesthesia (Wang 2015).
Our study has several obvious limitations. It may
be difficult to display the needle using the out-of-
plane technique in some children. We did not have a
comparative group with conventional caudal block,
so we cannot comment on the efficiency and success
rate of placement using ultrasound-guidance. In
addition, the incidence of complications may not be
correctly determined in groups with small sample
size. Therefore, studies should be conducted on
groups with larger sample sizes. Finally, this study
did not compare the analgesic effect and duration of
local anesthetics with different concentrations.
5 CONCLUSIONS
Ultrasound-guided caudal insert can see the sacral
hiatus, sacrococcygeal ligament and sacral lumen,
and can observe the liquid flow produced by the
injected local anesthetic drug in the sacral lumen in
real-time. Ultrasound-guided caudal block can
produce a good anesthetic effect. Compared with
general anesthesia alone, it reduces the dosage of
opioid analgesics, improves the quality of anesthesia
recovery and provides perfect postoperative
analgesia. Ultrasound-guided canal block in children
can achieve accurate positioning, reduce puncture
difficulty and the complications, improve the success
rate of a block. It is convenient to operate, has few
complications, is safe and effective, is satisfactory to
parents and children, and is worthy of clinical
application.