2020. 100 cases were selected as the research objects 
in  this  study  who  were  randomly  grouped  into 
experimental group and control group and given 
different treatment methods. There are 59 patients in 
the  experimental  group.  The  number  of  males  and 
females are 34 and 16 respectively. The minimum age 
of the patients is 48 years old, the maximum age is 78 
years old, and the average age is (62.10±5.30) years 
old. The patient's course of disease was 0-3 years, and 
the average course of disease was (1.20±0.49) years. 
3.2  Research Methods 
The  treatment  method  of  the  control  group  was 
conventional  western  medicine.  In  the  specific 
implementation  process,  amlodipine  was  mainly 
applied. The drug was taken orally, with a dosage of 
5  mg,  with  intervention  once  a  day,  mainly  in  the 
early  morning.  It  needs  to  adjust  the  drug  dosage 
according  to  the  patient's  medication  situation.  For 
patients with poor therapeutic effect, the dosage can 
be increased by 5mg every night. It should be noted 
that the maximum dosage for patients is 10mg. 
Patients in the experimental group were treated 
with  Banxia  Baizhu  Tianma  Decoction  and 
Huanglian  Wendan  Decoction.  The  prescriptions 
included 15g of Pinellia, 15g of Atractylodes, 6g of 
Coptis, 30g of Wild Gastrodia, 15g of Poria, 15g of 
Zhuru, 30g of Danshen, 10g of Tangerine Peel, and 
12g of Citrus aurantium, 30g of Shichangpu, 10g of 
Polygala, 10g of Tangerine peel, 15g of Chuanqiong, 
10g  of  Turmeric,  15g  of  Stiff  silkworm,  6g  of 
Scorpion and 15g of Chrysanthemum. All medicines 
are soaked in water. The soaking time is 30 minutes, 
and  the  decocting  time  is  30  minutes. After  taking 
out 150ml of liquid medicine, add water and decoct 
again,  and also take out 150ml  of  liquid  medicine. 
Taking the combined liquid one dose per day, twice 
a day. 
3.3  Observation Indicators 
The  treatment  effects of the  two  groups  of  patients 
were  observed  and  compared,  including  markedly 
effective,  effective  and  ineffective.  It  is  marked 
effective  if  after  treatment,  the  patient's  dizziness 
disappeared, and  the blood  pressure dropped above 
20mmHg.  It  is  effective  if  after  treatment,  the 
patient’s  dizziness  symptoms  improved  and  the 
patient’s blood pressure drops above 10mmHg. It is 
ineffective if patients have no clinical improvement 
before and  after treatment, and their blood pressure 
does  not  change  much  and  still  in  hypertension. 
Excluding  inefficiency  is  the  total  effective  rate  of 
this study. 
The  systolic  blood  pressure  and  diastolic  blood 
pressure of the two groups of patients before and after 
treatment were observed and compared.   
The adverse reactions during the treatment of the 
two groups of patients were observed and calculated. 
3.4  Statistical Methods 
Making statistics on the data, the software SPSS20.0 
is  used,  in  which  the  analysis  of  measurement  data 
(
x ±s) is verified by the t value, and the calculation 
and comparison of the count data (n, %) is verified by 
the X
2
 value. When the result is expressed as P<0.05, 
it  means  that  the  comparison  of  this  study  is 
statistically meaningful (Wu 2015). 
4  RESULTS 
4.1  Therapeutic Effect 
The effective number of patients in the experimental 
group and control group were 46 and 37 respectively, 
and  the  corresponding  clinical  treatment  effective 
rates  were  92.00%  and  74.00%  respectively.  The 
corresponding  data  difference  between  the  groups 
was large and statistically significant. 
Table  1:  Comparison  of  the  treatment  effect  of  the  two 
groups of patients [n (%)]. 
Group 
Marked 
effective 
Effectiv
e 
Ineffecti
ve 
Effectiv
e rate 
Experim
ental 
group 
(n=50) 
33 
(66.00) 
13 
(26.00) 
4 (8.00) 
46 
(92.00) 
Control 
group 
(n=50) 
18 
(36.00) 
19 
(38.00) 
13 
(26.00) 
37 
(74.00) 
X
2
        10.395 
P        <0.05 
4.2  Changes in Blood Pressure 
Before  treatment,  the  diastolic  and  systolic  blood 
pressure levels of the two groups of patients were not 
significantly  different,  P>0.05.  After  treatment 
intervention, the  blood pressure of the  patients was 
reduced. In contrast, the diastolic and systolic blood 
pressure  of  the  experimental  group  was  lower.  The 
data  difference  between  the  groups  increased, 
P<0.05, which is meaningful.