water for 2 to 3 hours, while the self-sealing bags are
washed 2 to 3 times, stirring intermittently with a
glass rod during the soaking process and brushing the
leaves lightly with a soft brush.
The leaves were taken out with tweezers to dry
and the beaker of the dip was filtered, the inside of the
flask was washed with distilled water using a dropper
during the extraction process, the filter paper used had
been dried and weighed and was padded with 2 layers
to prevent the dip from penetrating the filter paper.
The filtered filter paper was put into an oven at 65
°C for 24 hours, after which the dried filter paper was
weighed on a balance and the difference between the
two filter papers before and after was the total dust
retention.
3 RESULTS AND ANALYSIS
3.1 Conductivity Analysis
Numerous studies have proven that the first thing
affected in plants subjected to environmental
pollution is the cell membrane, and that the disruption
of the permeability of the cell membrane leads to the
extravasation of electrolytes, mainly potassium ions
in large quantities, thus causing the conductivity of
the leaf extravasate to increase in varying degrees
with the degree of pollution. The greater the degree
of injury to the cell membrane, the more serious the
contamination of the area (Fig.1).
The relative conductivity of C. nodosa is
significantly higher than that of S. campanulata and
C. camphora. The Cassia Nodosa is in a more
polluted environment, and the fact that it has the
largest relative conductivity value means that it is less
resistant to pollution. Conversely, the smallest
relative conductivity of the three plants was that of C.
camphora, reflecting its relatively greater resistance
to pollution than that of C. nodosa, and more than that
of S. campanulata.
3.2 Chlorophyll Content
It has been shown that both chlorophyll a and
chlorophyll b are damaged in the presence of
atmospheric pollution (Gao 2003, Du 2007).
Chlorophyll b plays an auxiliary and protective role,
because chlorophyll b tends to break down when
exposed to environmental pollution, so that in both
types of plants in heavily polluted and less polluted
locations, the more polluted plants will have greater
chlorophyll a/b values (Yang 1983). The combined
results chlorophyll content depends on the pollution
the plants are subjected to. As can be seen from Fig.2
below, there is no significant difference between the
chlorophyll a/b content and the total content of the
three plants selected here (P>0.05) (Fig.2-3).
3.3 Dust Retention
Although there is no significant difference in the
amount of dust retained on the three plants, S.
campanulata has a higher dust retention capacity
(0.12 g/cm2>P>0.10 g/cm2). Possibly on the one
hand, the plant itself, which has sunken veins like S.
campanulata, and a fine-tomentose leaf surface, a
structure that tends to trap dust, and the relatively
smooth, leathery leaf surface of C. camphora, which
has no tufts, and therefore does not tend to trap dust
(Fig.4).
The canopy of plants has the effect of reducing
wind speed, the large particles of dust carried in the
wind will sink and fall onto the leaves of the trees or
the ground, which produces a stagnant dust effect.
Some garden plants have more fluff on the leaf
surface, and some plant leaves also secrete sticky
grease and sap, etc., so that they can absorb large
amounts of dustfall. The dust retention capacity of
tree species varies, with the strongest trees being S.
campanulata, Ficus religiosa L. and Ficus altissima
Blume, and studies have shown that after 12 d of
accumulated dust retention in street trees, S.
campanulata and Ficus religiosa L. have the best dust
retention capacity per unit leaf area, while Terminalia
neotaliala Capuron and Khaya senegalensis (Desr.)
A. Juss. have the worst. The difference in the dust
retention capacity of different species of street trees
was related to the structure of the leaves. The dorsal
and ventral surfaces of the leaves of S. campanulata
and Ficus religiosa L. were densely packed with
hairs, which had a high dust retention capacity,
whereas the leaf surfaces of Terminalia neotaliala
Capuron, Khaya senegalensis (Desr.) A. Juss. and C.
camphora were waxy, and the leaf surfaces were not
deeply veined, had few folds and were smooth, which
had a poor dust retention capacity. In another study,
similar conclusions were made for S. campanulata,
what can be used as a green belt and barrier for
highways, railways, embankments and river slopes as
well as a fast mulching plant for slope protection and
sand sealing due to its advantages of dust retention
and noise reduction, resistance to rough management
and strong soil fixation to improve the environment
efficiently. The difference in dust retention between
the three plants in this study was not significant.