Application of SPSS in the Analysis of Ways to Promote Employees’
Work Engagement
Chunlan Hou
1,2
, Lili Song
1,2
and Yong Wang
1,2,*
1
Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
2
Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Keywords: SPSS Statistical Analysis, Inclusive Leadership, Psychological Capital, Power Distance Orientation, Work
Engagement.
Abstract: As an effective tool for data analysis, SPSS (Statistical Product and Service Solutions) is an integrated
computer data processing software with powerful statistical functions and extremely large content, which has
been widely used in the fields of education, scientific research, communication, medical and commerce. In
this study, the correlation between inclusive leadership, employee work engagement, psychological capital,
and power distance orientation was analyzed through SPSS22.0 statistical software, and further quantitative
analysis was conducted through the plug-in Process embedded in SPSS, in order to verify the promotion role
of inclusive leadership in employee work engagement, the mediating role of psychological capital and the
moderating role of power distance orientation. The inclusive leadership scale, the work engagement scale, the
psychological capital questionnaire (PCQ-12, the short version of PCQ-24), and the power distance
orientation scale were used to measure 300 employees at three time points in this study. The results show that:
(1) Inclusive leadership significantly was positively related to employee’s work engagement; (2)
Psychological capital mediated the relationship between inclusive leadership and work engagement; (3)
Power distance orientation further moderated the indirect effect of psychological capital on inclusive
leadership and psychological capital. Specifically, with the increase of employees’ power distance orientation,
the role of inclusive leadership in promoting work engagement through psychological capital weakened. In
other words, inclusive leadership can promote work engagement by enhancing employees’ psychological
capital, which is more evident among employees with low power distance orientation.
1 INTRODUCTION
Interdisciplinary integration is an inevitable trend of
the development of science and education in the
world, as well as the current characteristics of the
times and the source of innovation. With the
economic growth and social progress, computer
technology has been widely used in many fields and
also played a significant role in promoting enterprise
management. The application and promotion of
computer technology are keeping pace with the times,
which demonstrates the development and progress of
the times, and provides great convenience for
enterprise management; in particular, the analysis and
processing of data by computer technology provides
an important basis for enterprise management
decisions and promotes the improvement of
efficiency (
Peng, Zou, 2017). As an integrated
computer data processing application analysis
software, SPSS belongs to an effective means of
current data analysis (
Wang 2018), and also meets the
increasingly urgent need for empirical quantitative
research support in enterprise management practice.
Therefore, in response to the trend of enterprise
management and multidisciplinary combination, this
study used the SPSS statistical software and its plug-
in Process to explore the ways to promote employees'
work engagement and the boundary conditions
(power distance orientation) under which inclusive
leadership promotes employee work engagement
through employees’ psychological capital, which is
of great significance to help us better understand
under what circumstances inclusive leadership can
improve employees' psychological capital, thus
promoting work engagement. By doing so, this study
also contributes to providing insights for enterprise
management.
Hou, C., Song, L. and Wang, Y.
Application of SPSS in the Analysis of Ways to Promote Employees’ Work Engagement.
DOI: 10.5220/0011195400003440
In Proceedings of the International Conference on Big Data Economy and Digital Management (BDEDM 2022), pages 605-615
ISBN: 978-989-758-593-7
Copyright
c
2022 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
605
Work engagement is defined as a positive,
fulfilling, work-related state of mind that is
characterized by vigor, dedication, and absorption
(Schaufeli, et al., 2002), and it is also defined as a
persistent state of psychological behavior that
includes positive emotional experiences, sensitive
cognition, and a highly aroused physical state when
an individual faces work (Hu, Wang, 2014). In the era
of economic globalization and increasingly complex
business environment, market demand is changing
rapidly, and enterprises are required to be more
flexible, faster, and more efficient; the degree of
workforce diversity is also enhanced with the
increase in cross-geographical mobility, and
differentiation in human capital such as employees’
job skills, values, and autonomy needs has gradually
emerged with the rise of a new generation of
employees (Mor Barak, 2014, Benson, Hardy, Eys,
2016). Especially in the era of a knowledge-based
economy, knowledge-based employees have an
increasing need for job autonomy and differentiation
(Gao, Sun, 2015), and organizations are facing
increasingly severe challenges in their daily
management. The report 2018 Trends in Global
Employee Engagement released by AON also shows
that global employee engagement reached 65% in
2017, an increase of 2% over 2016 and the same as
2015. It is evident that the overall work enthusiasm
and work engagement of global employees have not
yet reached a high level.
To deal with the management of diverse
employees, scholars have proposed the strategy of
inclusive management. Since “inclusive
development” was proposed at the 2011 annual
meeting of the Boao Forum for Asia (BFA), an
emerging leadership style, inclusive leadership, has
been gaining attention. According to Hollander
(Hollander 2009), an inclusive leader always supports
subordinates, cares about their welfare, emotions and
expectations, focuses on open communication, and
encourages and appreciates their innovative
contributions; under the “inclusive leadership”
relationship, the leaders and the subordinates aim to
achieve a win-win situation and accomplish tasks
together, which reflects that working with others is an
essential characteristic of inclusiveness; at the same
time, the two-way influence between leaders and
subordinates relies on mutual respect, recognition,
responsiveness, and responsibility. Related studies
have shown that inclusive leadership significantly
promotes employees’ Organizational Citizenship
Behavior (OCB) (Nembhard, Edmondson, 2006) and
that employees can obtain more emotional and
economic resources through interaction with
inclusive leaders, but they also need to undertake the
obligation to give back to leaders; therefore,
employees may be more likely to conduct behaviors
that facilitate the realization of organizational
performance goals for which the leader is accountable
(Choi, et al., 2017). According to Mohamed et al.
(2016), leaders who regularly care about their
employees’ work and life will influence their
employees’ work engagement through leadership
motivation. Support, respect, encouragement, and
recognition are important characteristics of inclusive
leadership, while Ceyde Maden found that leadership
empowerment and motivation can influence feedback
findings through work engagement (Ceyda Maden,
2015). To sum up, this study proposes the research
hypothesis H1: Inclusive leadership is positively
correlated with employees’ work engagement.
Being open, amiable, tolerant, and supportive, an
inclusive leader encourages differentiated individuals
to fully express themselves (Nembhard, Edmondson,
2006), deals with errors in a timely manner, improves
employees’ level of error competence, promotes
building an atmosphere of error management in the
organization (Li, Wang, 2018), and significantly
improves the psychological capital of employees
(Fang, Wang, 2016). Psychological capital is a
positive state of psychological development shown
by individuals in the process of growth and
development (Luthans, et al., 2007a), which is
specifically manifested in the following four aspects:
‘Self-efficacy’ -- an individual has the confidence and
makes necessary efforts to succeed in face of
challenges; ‘Optimism’ -- an individual has positive
attributions for present and future success and assigns
a positive interpretation to success; ‘Hope’ -- an
individual perseveres with his/her goal, adjusting
his/her approach when necessary in order to achieve
success; ‘Resilience’ -- an individual can persevere,
recover quickly and surpass when troubled and in
adversity, change the path of goal achievement
correctly when necessary, and adapt to the constant
change in order to succeed. Psychological capital is a
core positive psychological element that can be
effectively developed and managed and that has a
significant impact on individual performance
((Luthans, et al., 2007b) and positively predicts work
engagement(Liu, et al., 2013, Pan, et al, 2017, Lang,
Wang, Liu, 2019, Wang, et al., 2020). To this end, the
study shows that inclusive leadership is positively
correlated with employees psychological capital,
which in turn is positively correlated with employees’
work engagement. Therefore, this study proposes the
research hypothesis H2: Psychological capital plays a
BDEDM 2022 - The International Conference on Big Data Economy and Digital Management
606
mediating role in inclusive leadership and work
engagement.
Power distance orientation refers to the extent to
which individuals accept the unequal distribution of
power in institutions and organizations based on
power distance (Hofstede, 2001, Farh, et al., 2007).
Under the influence of traditional Confucianism
culture, China is a country with high power distance
(Hofstede 2001); in Chinese organizations, there is
always an insurmountable hierarchical relationship
between leaders and subordinates, the subordinates’
compliance with authority is fully reflected (Wang,
Zhang, 2012), and leaders also tend to adopt
paternalistic leadership (Fan, Zheng, 2000). Related
studies have found that the same type of leader and
leadership behaviors vary significantly in their
effectiveness in actual organizational management.
For example, open leadership makes subordinates
with low power distance orientation feel close and
recognized, whereas, for employees with high power
distance orientation, such behavior will make them
feel at a loss (Triandis 1996). Employees with high
power distance orientation pay more attention to the
hierarchical difference between them and their
leaders. They believe that the affable and humorous
behavior of leaders is inconsistent with the traditional
authoritarian leadership style and undermines their
image of leadership; they may even perceive such
leadership as weak and ineffective, and therefore they
do not believe that working under such a leader will
bring them the sense of accomplishment, and it is thus
difficult to drive their intrinsic motivation (Romero,
Cruthirds, 2006, Yang, et al., 2017). Employees with
high power distance orientation have difficulty
accepting positive behaviors from their leaders
because for them it is an attempt by the leader to draw
closer to employees (Zhang, Huai, 2012). However,
for employees with low power distance orientation,
inclusive and amicable leaders, who establish a
relaxed and open working relationship with
employees and weaken hierarchical differences, are
more likely to motivate them (Romero, Cruthirds,
2006, Yang, et al., 2017). In this regard, the higher
the power distance orientation, the weaker the
positive effect of inclusive leadership on employees’
inner psychological state, and the weaker the positive
effect on psychological capital, which is the fourth
major capital for corporate development in addition
to the three major capitals of finance, human and
social capital; accordingly, the contribution of
inclusive leadership to work engagement is
diminished by the indirect effect of psychological
capital. Therefore, this study proposes the research
hypothesis H3: Employees’ power distance
orientation negatively moderates the relationship
between inclusive leadership and psychological
capital.
Combining H2 and H3, H4 was further proposed
in this study: Power distance orientation negatively
moderates the mediating role of psychological capital
between inclusive leadership and work engagement.
The overall hypothetical model framework is shown
in Figure 1.
Figure 1: Hypothesized Model
2 RESEARCH OBJECTS AND
TOOLS
2.1 Participants and Procedures
In October 2020, the link to the online questionnaire
was distributed to employees. In order to increase the
return rate and accuracy of the questionnaire,
employees were rewarded with a bonus incentive and
free feedback containing career development advice
related to the results. Data were recovered in three
periods, with an interval of a month. In the first phase,
the respondents were asked to evaluate the style of
inclusive leadership of their immediate supervisors,
and demographic variables were collected; in the
second phase, the respondents evaluated their
psychological capital and power distance orientation;
in the third stage, the work engagement questionnaire
was completed. After the data of those respondents
who did not answer seriously, a total of 300 valid
matching samples of questionnaires were recovered
three times.
Inclusive
Leadership
Work
Engagement
Psychological
Capital
Power Distance
Orientation
+
+
Application of SPSS in the Analysis of Ways to Promote Employees’ Work Engagement
607
2.2 Measures
Inclusive leadership was measured using 16 items
by Hollander (2009). All items were measured on a
5-point scale ranging from “1” = “strongly disagree”
to “7” = “strongly agree”. Representative items
include “my immediate supervisor highly appreciates
my work contributions (support and recognize)”, “my
immediate supervisor treats everyone equally (fair
communication)”, and “my immediate supervisor
often makes uncomfortable comments (self-
disrespect, reverse scoring)”. The Cronbach’s ɑ
coefficient for this scale in the study was 0.74.
Work engagement was measured using the short
9-item Work Engagement Scale (Schaufeli et al.,
2006). All items were measured by the respondents
on a scale ranging from “0” = “never” to “6” =
“always”. The scale contains three dimensions: vigor,
dedication, and absorption. Representative items
include “I feel strong and energetic at work”, “I am
passionate about my work”, and “my work inspires
me. The Cronbachs ɑ coefficient for this scale in the
study was 0.92.
Psychological capital was measured using the
short version of the Psychological Capital
Questionnaire (PCQ-24), the PCQ-12 scale, by
Luthans et al. Among these, three items measure self-
efficacy, four items measure hope, two items measure
optimism, and three items measure resilience. There
were 12 items on a 6-point scale ranging from “1” =
“strongly disagree”, “2” = “disagree”, “3” = “slightly
disagree”, “4” = “slightly agree”, “5” = “agree”, and
“6” = “strongly agree”. Representative items include
“in meetings with management, I am confident in
presenting what is within my scope of work”, “I
believe I can contribute to the discussion of the
company’s strategy”, and “for now, I consider myself
quite successful at my work”. The Cronbach’s ɑ
coefficient for this scale in the study was 0.86.
Power distance orientation was developed by
Dorfman and Howell (1988), with 6 entries. All items
were measured on a 5-point scale ranging from “1” =
“strongly disagree” to “5” = “strongly agree”.
Representative items include “in interaction with
subordinates, it is necessary for managers to use their
power position frequently to exert pressure”, and
“employees should not disagree with managers’
decisions at work”. The Cronbach’s ɑ coefficient for
this scale in the study was 0.77.
Demographic variables were designed by the
researchers themselves and included gender, age, city
of residence, education level, marital status, job
status, job position, nature of unit, seniority, etc.
2.3 Statistical Analysis Methods and
Procedures
After the invalid questionnaires were eliminated, the
questionnaires were checked and organized in this
study, and numbered and analyzed using SPSS 22.0
statistical software and the Process plug-in embedded
in SPSS. The process is shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2 SPSS Analysis Flow Chart
3 RESULTS
3.1 Demographic Data and Variable
Correlation Analysis
Table 1 shows the basic demographic information
statistics of the samples in this study. The correlation
analysis revealed (see Table 2) that inclusive
leadership is positively correlated with work
engagement (r =0.
436, p < 0.01
), which initially
validated H1.
3.2 Regression Analysis
To further verify H1, the authors conducted
regression analysis with inclusive leadership as the
independent variable, work engagement as the
dependent variable, and gender, education level,
seniority, and nature of unit as control variables. The
results found that inclusive leadership positively
predicts work engagement B = 0.72, SE = 0.088, p <
0.001), so H1 holds true.
BDEDM 2022 - The International Conference on Big Data Economy and Digital Management
608
Table 1: Results for Demographic Data (N=300).
Basic Information
Frequency Percentage
Gender Male 137 45.70%
Female 163 54.30%
Age 20-29 98 32.70%
30-39 163 54.30%
40-49 33 11%
Above 50 6 2%
Education
Level
High
School/Vocational High
School/Junior High School
12 4%
Junior College 40 13.30%
Bachelor’s Degree 228 76%
Master’s Degree or Above 20 6.70%
Marital
Status
Single 52 17.33%
Married 239 79.67%
Cohabitation 7 2.33%
Divorced or Widowe
d
20.6%
Monthly
Salary
Below 3,000 6 2.00%
3000-5000 38 12.67%
5000-8000 79 26.33%
8000-10000 63 21.00%
10000-15000 89 29.67%
15000-20000 17 5.67%
Over 2,0000 8 2.67%
Job Category Ordinary Employee 104 34.67%
Junior Manage
r
110 36.67%
Middle Manager 71 23.67%
Senior Manage
r
15 5.00%
Nature of
Unit
Private Enterprise 173 57.67%
State-owned Enterprise 49 16.33%
Public Institutions 34 11.33%
Othe
r
s 44 14.67%
Seniority Below 1 Year 3 1.00%
1-3 32 10.67%
3-5 37
12.33%
5-10 121 40.33%
Above 10 107 35.67%
Table 2: Results of Variable Correlation Analysis (N=300).
Mean
SD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1. gende
r
1.54 0.5 1.00
2. Education
Level
3.85 0.58 0.02 1.00
3. Seniority 8.95 6.7 -0.13* -0.19** 1.00
4. Nature of
Unit
4.26 1.69 0.10 -0.04 0.05 1.00
5. Inclusive
Leadership T1
3.73 0.59 -0.11 0.11 -0.04 -0.08 1.00
6. Power
Distance
Orientation T2
2.36 0.74 -0.02 -0.01 -0.05 -0.02 -0.25** 1.00
7.
Psychological
Capital T2
4.6 0.67 -0.25** 0.12* 0.13* -0.14* 0.49** -0.06 1.00
8.Work
Engagement
T3
4.57 1.01 -0.18** 0.05 0.16** -0.14* 0.44** -0.13* 0.68**
Note: *p <0.05, **p < 0.01.
3.3 Validation of Mediating Effect
To validate H2, the authors used the Process
embedded in SPSS (Model, Hayes, 2017) for analysis
of the mediating role and confirmed the 95%
confidence interval for the mediating role using
Bootstrap sampling 5000 times. As shown in Table 3,
the results indicate that after gender, education level,
seniority and nature of unit are controlled, inclusive
leadership positively predicts psychological capital
(B = 0.524, SE = 0.056, p < 0.001), psychological
capital positively predicts work engagement (B =
Application of SPSS in the Analysis of Ways to Promote Employees’ Work Engagement
609
0.72, SE = 0.088, p < 0.001), and psychological
capital plays a partially mediating role in inclusive
leadership and work engagement (indirect effect
=0.4688, 95%CI = [0.3353,0.6213]), supporting H2.
Table 3: Analysis of Mediating Effect.
Psychological Capital T2 Work Engagement T3
B SE B SE
Gender -0.24 0.07 0.01 0.09
Education Level 0.11 0.06 -0.04 0.08
Seniority 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01
Nature of Unit -0.04 0.02 -0.03 0.03
Inclusive
Leadership T1
0.52*** 0.06 0.72*** 0.09
Psychological
Capital T2
1.00*** 0.07
R
2
0.31***
0.49***
Note: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
3.4 Validation of Moderating Effect
To validate H3, the authors used Process Macro
embedded in SPSS (Model, Hayes, 2017) for analysis
of the moderating effect. As shown in Table 4, the
results indicate that after gender, education level,
seniority, and nature of unit are controlled, the
interaction between inclusive leadership and power
distance orientation can marginally significantly and
negatively predict psychological capital (B = -0.12,
SE = 0.071, p =0.09).
Table 4: Analysis of Moderating Effect.
Psychological Capital
B SE
Gender
-0.24 0.07
Education Level
0.10 0.06
Seniority
0.01 0.01
Unit -0.04 0.02
Inclusive
Leadership T1
0.55*** 0.06
Power Distance
Orientation T2
0.06 0.05
Inclusive
Leadership T1 *
Power Distance
Orientation T2
-0.12† 0.07
R
2
0.25
Note: † p < 0.1, *p <0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Further simple slope analysis showed that when
power distance orientation is low, the predictive
effect of inclusive leadership on psychological capital
is B = 0.6437, SE = 0.0921, p < 0.001; when power
distance orientation is high, the predictive effect of
inclusive leadership on psychological capital is B =
0.4419, SE = 0.0967, p < 0.001, indicating that as
employees’ power distance orientation increases, the
predictive effect of inclusive leadership on
psychological capital tends to decrease gradually, as
shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3: Design Sketch of the Moderating Role of Power
Distance Orientation.
3.5 The Moderated Mediation Model
With inclusive leadership as the independent
variable, work engagement as the dependent variable,
psychological capital as the mediating variable,
power distance orientation as a moderating variable,
and gender, education, seniority, and nature of unit as
control variables, the authors used the Process Macro
embedded in SPSS (model, Hayes, 2017) for the
testing of the mediating role model with moderation.
The results indicate that power distance orientation
plays a borderline significant moderating role in the
indirect effect of psychological capital on inclusive
leadership and work engagement. This is shown by
the significant indirect effect of psychological capital
in inclusive leadership and work engagement when
the level of power orientation is low (-1 SD) (indirect
effect = 0.6437, 95%CI = [0.4639, 0.8247]), and the
declined indirect effect of psychological capital when
BDEDM 2022 - The International Conference on Big Data Economy and Digital Management
610
the level of power orientation is high (+1 SD)
(indirect effect =0.4419, 95%CI = [0.2718, 0.6472]).
The overall result model is shown in Figure 4.
Figure 4: Schematic Diagram of the Mediating Model with
Moderation.
4 DISCUSSIONS
4.1 Theoretical Implications
This study responds to the current trend of focusing
on inclusive leadership behaviors and
multidisciplinary integration and explores that the
relationship between inclusive leadership,
psychological capital, power distance orientation, and
work engagement empirically through SPSS data
analysis software and its embedded Process has some
theoretical implications.
First of all, there is a positive contribution of
inclusive leadership to job performance, work
engagement, and psychological capital. As argued by
Shore et al. (2011), inclusive leadership not only
improves employees’ organizational identity, but also
promotes their job satisfaction and enhances
organizational performance. The findings of Fang
Yangchun’s study showed that inclusive leadership
can also influence team performance by enhancing
employees’ self-efficacy (Fang 2014, Fang, Jin,
2014) and significantly increasing their psychological
capital (2016) (Fang, Wang, 2016). Psychological
capital is considered to be a core positive
psychological element that can be effectively
exploited and managed and can have a significant
impact on individual performance (Luthans, et al,
2007b) and has a positive predictive effect on work
engagement (Liu, et al., 2013, Pan, et al., 2017, Lang,
Wang, Liu, 2019, Wang, et al., 2020). This study also
found that inclusive leadership is significantly
correlated with psychological capital and work
engagement, and inclusive leadership has a
significant effect on work engagement. The effect of
inclusive leadership on psychological capital and the
effect of psychological capital on work engagement
are both significant. This is consistent with the
findings of many previous researchers.
Second, this study found that the effect of
inclusive leadership differs among employees with
different power distance orientations. Inclusive and
amicable leaders build relaxed and open working
relationships with employees, weakening
hierarchical differences; this type of leadership can
have a greater motivational effect on employees with
low power distance orientation (Romero E J,
Cruthirds, 2006, Yang, et al., 2017). However, open
leadership can make subordinates with low power
distance orientation feel close and identified while
also making employees with high power distance
orientation feel at a loss (Triandis 1996). Little is
known in previous studies about the boundary
conditions under which inclusive leadership
promotes employee work engagement through
employees’ psychological capital. Accordingly, the
moderating role of employee power distance
orientation is revealed in this study, which is a
theoretical contribution to the research in this field.
Thirdly, most previous studies on the mechanisms
and boundary conditions of the role of inclusive
leadership have been cross-sectional in nature. In
contrast, this study takes data in a time-phased
manner, which can, to some extent, avoid the bias of
a common approach and thus help to explore and
verify the relationship between variables in greater
depth.
Finally, the current research in various industries
requires a lot of data processing and analysis. In
particular, research in the direction of management
and psychology, which targets “people” and
“organizations”, requires a large amount of data and
empirical analysis. As an effective means of current
data analysis and an integrated computer data
processing application software, SPSS analysis
software can analyze the association between
different data in a more macroscopic manner, avoid
bias in empirical studies, and reveal the relationship
between different data in depth; in addition, SPSS can
effectively illustrate the relationships between
different data, explore the characteristics and inner
connections of the data, and allow the relevant
personnel to have an in-depth understanding of the
Work
Engagement
Psycholo
gical
Capital
Power Distance
Orientation
Application of SPSS in the Analysis of Ways to Promote Employees’ Work Engagement
611
events to judge whether the original data meet the
requirements of the application(Wang 2018).
SPSS combines the functions of
data organization,
analysis process, and output of results, including the
basic statistical module and some extension modules;
it can mainly perform basic statistical analysis, mean
comparison and test, analysis of variance, correlation
analysis, regression analysis, and non-parametric test
(Lu 2010). With the development of academic
research, the structures that researchers want to
explore are becoming more and more complex, so the
application of SPSS technology in empirical data
research needs to be constantly improved. Taking the
Process analysis module (e.g., Process, Hayes 2017)
as an example, it has greatly simplified the analysis
of mediating effects and also allows for a more
comprehensive presentation of results; at the same
time, it’s the automated processing of data prior to the
analysis of moderating effects also allows for the
processing of mediating and moderating effect
models with control variables. In particular, for
control variables, the Process is also specifically set
up by way of covariate processing. The process has
been greatly improved and enhanced in terms of data
analysis based on the original SPSS, which is of great
value and significance for empirical studies.
Therefore, the Process deserves more attention and
continuous improvement according to the needs,
thereby better meeting the higher requirements of
data analysis in the future.
4.2 Practical Implications
4.2.1 Organizational Teams Need to
Emphasize the Positive Role of
Inclusive Leadership
To motivate employee performance and other
organizational citizenship behaviors, it is necessary to
create an inclusive organizational culture that
encourages team leaders to manage their teams in an
“inclusive” manner. As the saying goes, “It’s easier
to recruit a thousand soldiers than to find a general to
command them”, it is important but challenging to
select the right team managers. In practice, it is found
that the best employees are not necessarily good
leaders, and an excellent leader may not play the same
role in every team. This is because there are
differences in leadership styles and organizational
climates required by different phases of the team,
varied types of tasks, or diverse characteristics of the
members. For example, when the power distance
orientation of team members is generally low, more
emphasis should be put on inclusive leadership; in the
early stages of teams and projects, due to unclear task
goals, unpredictable stress challenges, scarce
resources, and imperfect internal processes, the
inclusive and innovative team leaders may be more
likely to integrate the strengths of their teams and
achieve milestones. However, when a relatively
traditional or mature organization has clear operating
rules and process rules or a high-power distance
orientation of team members, the authoritative and
paternalistic leaders may be more likely to
communicate effectively and maintain good and
consistent team performance. What’s more, when
there are significant changes in milestones, team
development stages, and membership structure, it
may be necessary to adjust to a more appropriate
organizational leadership style in a timely manner. Of
course, in real organizations, the same team may also
have diverse employee forms or different sub-project
teams at different stages of development, which
requires leaders to apply targeted management styles
in front of the same organization and different types
of employees. This scenario is particularly common
in emerging industries and companies. This is why it
is important for current environments and
organizations to demand more and more from their
leaders. This is why the current environment and
organizations are increasingly demanding of leaders.
4.2.2 Organizations Need to Enhance the
Psychological Capital of Team
Members through Multiple
Perspectives
Research shows that psychological capital has a
positive effect on employees’ work attitudes,
performance, and organizational citizenship
behaviors; psychological capital is also dynamically
modifiable and is influenced not only by
demographic data dimensions, but also by
organizational climate, environment, leadership, and
personal experiences and even self-reinforcement
(
DEMEROUTI, et al, 2011, Cole, Daly, Mak, 2009). This
study also found a significant positive correlation
between psychological capital and work engagement.
Therefore, it is recommended to create a positive and
supportive organizational climate in the team
management process, to encourage employees to
draw positive strengths and resources from their past
life experiences and their own objective conditions
through developmental human resource management
and assessment, and to enhance their psychological
capital through continuous self-reinforcement.
BDEDM 2022 - The International Conference on Big Data Economy and Digital Management
612
5 LIMITATIONS AND FUTURE
RESEARCH DIRECTIONS
Sample distribution. In this study, questionnaires
were mainly distributed and collected through the
internet. Due to the short time period and personal
capacity limitation, the effective matching sample is
only 300, so the data reference is limited. Relatively
speaking, the questionnaire spans a wide range of
industries, and the sample size of each industry is
small, which is not conducive to the analysis of
differences in variables between industries. At the
same time, the remote online questionnaire has lots of
problems, including the poor state of participants,
uncontrollable factors and environmental
interference, lack of contractual sense, and high data
errors and losses. This is also an obvious shortcoming
of online research as a convenient research method.
In the future, the interest and engagement of
participants can be enhanced by combining online
and offline methods or adding more attractive
interactions.
Relevant studies have proposed that there are
some boundary conditions and individual influencing
factors between psychological capital and leadership
style, such as physical distance (STORY et al. 2013),
procedural fairness (Sui et al 2012), the traditionality
of employee (Zhong, LF, et al, 2013), personal
effectiveness training (DEMEROUTI E, et al, 2011).
as well as individual education, experience, economic
and social status (e.g., financial status, social
position, social contract, time pressure), etc. (Cole,
Daly, Mak 2009). All these influencing factors have
a corresponding effect on psychological capital,
which in turn affect the moderating effect of power
distance orientation and the relationship between
inclusive leadership and work engagement under the
mediating effect of psychological capital. At present,
there are few studies on the degree and stability of
these influences, which can be used as a follow-up
research direction in order to provide more theoretical
reference and practical guidance for accurately
judging the influence of relevant dimensions.
The results of previous studies have shown that
the positive psychological state of work engagement
can also be transmitted to the individual’s life domain
and infect others. The positive emotions of work
engagement can be transmitted not only in the work
domain but also in the family domain (Rothbard
2001, Bakker, et al, 2005). Family factors, as well as
positive emotions in the organizational
environmental climate, can in turn positively
influence employees’ work engagement and
psychological capital, ultimately contributing to
improved performance and increased organizational
citizenship behavior and promoting a virtuous cycle
of family relationships and mutual reinforcement.
Therefore, the overflow and intersection of
employees’ positive state and organizational
citizenship behavior can also be used as the direction
of follow-up research, so as to enrich the relevant
research results, make them closer to the real
situation, and provide more practical guidance.
6 CONCLUSIONS
This study examined the relations among inclusive
leadership, power distance orientation, psychological
capital and employees' work engagement, revealing
that inclusive leadership significantly was positively
related to employee s work engagement,
psychological capital mediated the relationship
between inclusive leadership and work engagement
and power distance orientation further moderated the
indirect effect of psychological capital on inclusive
leadership and psychological capital. Specifically,
with the increase of employees power distance
orientation, the role of inclusive leadership in
promoting work engagement through psychological
capital weakened. That is to say, inclusive leadership
can promote work engagement by enhancing
employees psychological capital, which is more
evident among employees with low power distance
orientation.
FUND PROJECT
Funded by National Natural Science Foundation of
China (NSFC71672186) and Institute of Psychology,
CAS (Y1CX193007)
REFERENCES
Bakker A B, Demerouti E, Schaufeli W B. (2005), The
crossover of burnout and work engagement among
working couples. Human Relations, 2005, 58(5): 661-
689.
Benson A.J., Hardy J., Eys M. (2016) Contextualizing
Leaders’ Interpretations of Proactive Followership[J],
Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2016, 37(7):949-
966.
Ceyda Maden. (2015), Linking high involvement human
resource practices to employee proactivity[J].
Personnel Review, 2015, 44(5): 720−738.
Application of SPSS in the Analysis of Ways to Promote Employees’ Work Engagement
613
Choi S B, Tran T B H, Kang S W. (2017), Inclusive
Leadership and Employee Well-Being: The Mediating
Role of Person-Job Fit[J]. Journal of Happiness
Studies. 2017, 18(6): 1-25.
Cole K, Daly A & Mak A. (2009) Good for the soul: The
relationship between work, wellbeing and
psychological capital. The Journal of Social-
Economics, 2009, 38 (3): 464-474.
DEMEROUTI E, VAN EEUWIJK E, SNELDER M, et al.
(2011), Assessing the effects of a “personal
effectiveness” training on psychological capital,
assertiveness, and self-awareness using self-other
agreement [J]. Career Development International,
2011, 16(1): 60-81.
Fan JL, Zheng BX. (2000), Patriarchal leadership of
Chinese organizations: an analysis of cultural
perspectives. Indigenous Psychological Research in
Chinese Societies, 2000, (13),127–180.
Fang YC, Jin HH, (2014) An Empirical Study on the
Influence of Inclusive Leader Style on the Performance
of University Scientific Research Teams[J].
Technology Economics, 2014, 33(4),53-57.
Fang YC, Wang MJ. (2016), The influence of inclusive
leadership style on employees' psychological capital[J].
Science Research Management, 2016, 37(11):135-141.
Fang YC. (2014), The influence of inclusive leadership
style on team performance——mediating role based on
employee self-efficacy[J]. Science Research
Management, 2014, 35(5):152-160.
Farh J L, Hackett R D, Liang J. (2007), Individual-level
cultural values as moderators of perceived
organizational support employee outcome
relationships in China: Comparing the effects of power
distance and traditionality[J]. Academy of
Management Journal, 2007, 50(3):715-729.
Gao JL, Sun MG. (2015), The Path of Inclusive Leadership
Based on Psychological Capital on Innovation
Behavior [J]. Soft Science. 2015, 29(04):100-103.
Hofstede, G. (2001), Culture’s consequences: Comparing
values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across
nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.2001.
Hollander E P. (2009), Inclusive leadership: The Essential
Leader-follower Relationship[M]. New York:
Routledge. 2009.
Hu SN, Wang Y. (2014), The concept, measurement,
antecedent, and aftereffect of work engagement.
Advances in Psychological Science 2014, 22, (12):
1975–1984.
Lang S, Wang J, Liu QQ. (2019), Analysis of the influence
of psychological capital and organizational support of
hemodialysis nurses on work engagement[J]. Chinese
Journal of Public Health, 2019, 35(4):478-479.
Li JT, Wang L. (2018), The impact of inclusive leadership
on business model innovation -- error management
atmosphere and mediating role of improvisation[J].
Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2018,
(2):128-135.
Liu CY, Song LP, Shang LP. (2013), Research on the status
and relationship between psychological capital and
nurses’ work engagement[J], Chinese Nursing
Management, 2013, 13(3): 39-41.
Lu WD. (2010), SPSS Statistical Analysis (4th Edition).
Beijing: Electronic Industry Press, 2010, 162~396.
Luthans, F., Youssef, C.M., & Avolio, B. J.(2007b)
Psychological Capital: Developing the Human
Competitive Edge[J]. Journal of Asian Economics,
2007, 8(2). Psychological Capital - Developing the
Human Competitive Edge (Translated by Li CP).
Beijing: China Light Industry Press.
Luthans, Fred, Youssef, Carolyn M, Avolio, Bruce
J.(2007a), Psychological capital: Developing the
human competitive edge[M]// Psychological capital:
developing the human competitive edge. Oxford
University Press, 2007, 315-332.
Mohamed Saeed AI Sahi AL, et al. (2016), Authentic
leadership, work engagement and organizational
citizenship behaviors in petroleum company[J].
International Journal of Productivity and Performance
Management, 2016, 65(6): 811−830.
Mor Barak M.E. (2014), Managing Diversity: Toward a
Globally Inclusive Workplace[M]. Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage 2014.
Nembhard I M, Edmondson A C. (2006), Making It Safe:
The Effects of Leader Inclusiveness and Professional
Status on Psychological Safety and Improvement
Efforts in Health Care Teams[J]. Journal of
Organizational Behaviour. 2006, (27):941-966.
Pan X, Mao T, Zhang J, et al. (2017), Psychological capital
mediate the association between nurses’ practice
environment and work engagement among Chinese
male nurses[J]. International Journal of Nursing
Sciences, 2017, 4(4):378-383.
Peng GJ, Zou JZ. (2017) The effective introduction of
computer technology in management strategies[J].
Electronic Technology & Software Engineering.2017,
(09):137-138.
Romero E J, Cruthirds K W. (2006), The use of humor in
the workplace[J]. The Academy of Management
Perspectives, 2006, 20(2): 58-69.
Rothbard NP. (2001), Enriching or depleting? The
dynamics of engagement in work and family roles[J].
Administrative Science Quarterly, 2001, 46 (4):655 -
684.
Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006),
The measurement of work engagement with a short
questionnaire a cross-national study. Educational &
Psychological Measurement, 2006, 66, 701-716.
Schaufeli, W. B., I. M. Martinez, A. Marques Pinto, M.
Salanova and A. B. Bakker. (2002), Burnout and
engagement in university students: A cross-national
study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2002,
33(5): 464-481.
Shore L.M., Randel A.E., Chung B.G., et al. (2011),
Inclusion and Diversity in Workgroups: A Review and
Model for Future Research[J]. Journal of Management,
2011, 37(4):1262-1289.
STORY J S, YOUSSEF C M, LUTHANS F, et al. (2013),
Contagion effect of global leaders' positive
psychological capital on followers: does distance and
BDEDM 2022 - The International Conference on Big Data Economy and Digital Management
614
quality of relationship matter? [J]. The International
Journal of Human Resource Management, 2013, 24
(13): 2534-2553.
Sui Y, Wang H, Yue YN. (2012), The impact of innovative
leadership on employee performance and satisfaction:
the mediating role of psychological capital and the
mediating role of procedural fairness [J]. Acta
Psychologica Sinica 2012, (9): 1217-1230.
Triandis HC. (1996), The psychological measurement of
cultural syndromes[J]. American psychologist, 1996,
51(4): 407-415.
Wang J, Liu WC, Mi J, Xiao MC, Zhao QH. (2020),
Research on the status of organizational support,
psychological capital and work engagement among
frontline nurses in the fight against COVID-19 in
Chongqing and their correlation, 2020, 17(34): 3068-
3073.
Wang J. (2018), Preliminary Study on the Application of
SPSS Technology in Statistical Analysis of Empirical
Research Data. [J] Modern Economic Information.
2018, (05):138.
Wang QJ, Zhang JC. (2012), Traditional Confucian Values
in the Workplace: Theory, Measurement, and Validity
Test. Nankai Business Review, 2012, 15(4):66–79.
Yang I, Kitchen P J., Bacouel-Jentjens S. (2017) How to
promote relationship-building leadership at work? A
comparative exploration of leader humor behavior
between North America and China[J]. The
International Journal of Human Resource Management,
2017, 28(10): 1454-1474.
Zhang Y and Huai MY. (2012), Research on the influence
of authoritarian leadership behavior on subordinates’
organizational citizenship behavior -- the regulating
effect of subordinate power distance. Business Review,
2012, 24(11):97-105.
Zhong LF, Wang Z, Li M, et al. (2013), Research on the
Impact of Innovative Leadership and Psychological
Capital on Employees’ Job Performance[J], Chinese
Journal of Management, 2013, (4): 536-544.
Application of SPSS in the Analysis of Ways to Promote Employees’ Work Engagement
615