decrease but increases (Lee, Park, Klassen, 2015).
Other scholars believe that carbon information not
only meets the needs of investors for non-financial
information and solves the problem of information
asymmetry, but also helps to show the enterprise's
awareness of environmental responsibility, establish a
good image and improve the recognition (Wen, Zhou,
2017), so as to obtain a lower financing cost. Other
scholars believe that due to the influence of enterprise
life cycle (Ma, Gai, 2019) and environmental
regulatory pressure (Yang, Zhang, et al., 2020), there
is an inverted "U" relationship between carbon
information disclosure level and financing cost.
Therefore, this paper intends to explore the
connotation of the new economy formed by the
integration of internal and external circulation and
green low-carbon, integrate this connotation into the
carbon information disclosure index system, build a
new evaluation system, study the relationship between
enterprise carbon information disclosure and
financing cost, and consider the intermediary role of
organizational reputation, This paper studies whether
enterprises can improve the awareness and level of
carbon disclosure and realize the coordinated
development of enterprises, society and environment
by obtaining lower financing cost.
The research value of this paper lies in: (1) when
constructing the carbon information disclosure
system, innovatively excavate the relevant domestic
and international carbon information disclosed by
enterprises in the social responsibility report by
integrating the connotation of the new economic
background, so as to more comprehensively measure
the level of carbon information disclosure. (2) When
analyzing the relationship between carbon
information disclosure level and financing cost,
consider the intangible asset of organizational
reputation, and enrich the research on the influence
mechanism between carbon information disclosure
level and financing cost from the perspective of
resources
2 MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1 Theoretical Analysis and Research
Assumptions
2.1.1 Relationship between Carbon
Information Disclosure Level and
Enterprise Financing Cost
According to the stakeholder theory, the stakeholders
of enterprises include shareholders, creditors, the
public and so on. Shareholders, as equity holders,
attach importance to the long-term development of
enterprises. Carbon disclosure can prevent
punishment for failing to comply with carbon
emission requirements, which will affect long-term
development. Therefore, shareholders expect to
reduce risks and require lower return on investment.
As the supplier of funds, creditors can evaluate the
environmental legitimacy and measure the future
repayment ability of enterprises through carbon
information disclosure. When the creditor's loan
collection risk is reduced, the required capital income
also decreases. As product buyers, the public's low-
carbon business information will increase their
positive judgment on high-quality and environmental
protection of products, so as to expand consumer
demand, improve corporate cash flow, reduce
external borrowing, and indirectly reduce financing
costs (Zhou, Zhou, et al, 2018).
H1: the higher the level of carbon information
disclosure, the lower the financing cost of enterprises.
2.1.2 The Relationship Between Carbon
Information Disclosure Level and
Organizational Reputation
Information asymmetry theory holds that there is
information asymmetry between enterprises and
investors. In order to reduce the adverse effects of
information asymmetry before and after the event,
enterprises actively transmit internal information to
the outside world to improve their reputation. On the
one hand, by disclosing relevant information such as
carbon emission reduction strategy, carbon emission
reduction measures and carbon emission reduction
results, enterprises fill the gaps in investors' efforts
and achievements for low-carbon environmental
protection, so as to effectively alleviate information
asymmetry(Mei, Ge, et al, 2020), avoid value
discount and improve enterprise reputation; On the
other hand, the higher the level of carbon information
disclosure, which reflects the higher cultural
conservation and moral standards of the enterprise.
The interest motivation of the management to conceal
bad news is relatively low, and the transparency level
of corporate governance is high, so as to establish a
good image of enterprise integrity and responsibility
and improve the reputation of the enterprise.
Accordingly, hypothesis 2 is put forward.
H2: the higher the level of carbon information
disclosure, the better the reputation of the
organization.