Management of Children’s Participation in Preschool Education
Aija Ozola
a
and Aina Strode
b
Faculty of Education, Languages and Design, Rezekne Academy of Technologies, Atbrivosanas al. 115, Rezekne, Latvia
Keywords: Children's Participation, Early Childhood Education, Educational Management, Children's Rights.
Abstract: Educational institutions are institutional frameworks, in which the child learns values and norms of the society,
learns to socialize. The phenomenon of the concept of children’s participation is its genesis in the political
framework set by the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, relatively less by scientific sources, thus
making the substance of the concept legally regulated from the very beginning. The topicality of the issue is
determined by the need in the management guidelines based on theoretical findings, setting out how to ensure
the implementation of children’s participation in practice in preschool education and thus contribute to closing
the gap between political decisions and educational practices. The aim of the article is to determine the
directions for the management of children's participation in early childhood education, based on scientific
theoretical knowledge of comprehension of the concept of children's participation and management theories
in the context of early childhood education, to conduct an empirical study of the situation and to give
suggestions for the management of children's participation in early childhood education.
1 INTRODUCTION
Inclusion of ever younger children in social life
activities outside the family has become a trend of the
modern society. A high proportion of children in
Latvia from their earliest years become participants
of the education systemlearners. Consequently, the
role and responsibility of the institutions, in the
context of the study preschool educational
institutions, in the upbringing of children from early
childhood increases, undertaking a large part of
functions that were previously traditionally attributed
to the family. At the same time educational
institutions are institutional frameworks, in which the
child learns values and norms of the society, learns to
socialize.
Latvia is also among the countries of the European
Union, where the child has a statutory right to
preschool education at an early age (OECD, 2016),
namely, from eighteen months of age (Saeima, 1999).
These factors particularly highlight the issues of
children’s participation in the formal institutional
context.
Participation means active, conscious and
voluntary involvement of persons in decision-making
and in the daily life of their community, which is one
a
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3751-0392
b
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9702-5834
of the basic preconditions of a democratic society
(Hart, 1992). The phenomenon of the concept of
children’s participation is its genesis in the political
framework set by the UN Convention on the Rights
of the Child, relatively less by scientific sources,
thus making the substance of the concept legally
regulated from the very beginning. Children’s
participation in the field of children’s rights is
inextricably linked to Article 12 of the UN
Convention on the Rights of the Child, which has
become as some sort of symbol of children’s
participation. The Convention on the Rights of the
Child (1989) highlights several aspects of children’s
participation: (1) the right of every child to freely
express his or her views, (2) the adult’s obligation to
pay due attention to the child’s views, (3) increasing
influence of the child’s views with age and maturity,
(4) the right of the child to express his or her views
freely, to receive and to share information.
The topicality of the issue is determined by the need
in the management guidelines based on theoretical
findings, setting out how to ensure the
implementation of children’s participation in practice
in preschool education and thus contribute to closing
the gap between political decisions and educational
practices.
Ozola, A. and Strode, A.
Management of Children’s Participation in Preschool Education.
DOI: 10.5220/0011359200003350
In Proceedings of the 5th International Scientific Congress Society of Ambient Intelligence (ISC SAI 2022) - Sustainable Development and Global Climate Change, pages 363-371
ISBN: 978-989-758-600-2
Copyright
c
2022 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
363
2 METHODOLOGIES
The aim of the study: based on the examination of the
concept of children’s participation, to determine the
directions for the management of children’s
participation in preschool education, to carry out
empirical study of the situation and to provide
recommendations for the management of children’s
participation in preschool education.
2.1 Methods
Study methods: theoretical: (1) analysis of scientific
theoretical literature; (2) analysis of documents.
Empirical: data acquisition method – survey. Data
processing and analysis methods: (1) descriptive
statistics, (2) correlation analysis (Pearson correlation
coefficient).
Empirical study objectives:
to develop a measurement instrument for the
study of children’s participation in preschool
education;
based on the preschool education teachers’
self-assessment data, to study the situation regarding
the implementation of children’s participation in
preschool education in Latvia;
to study the correlation of children’s
participation criteria and indicators with the
pedagogical work experience of preschool teachers,
the level of education and the number of children in
preschool education groups.
2.2 Instruments
A questionnaire for preschool education teachers was
developed based on the criteria and indicators set out
for children’s participation. The measurement
instrument includes nine statements that the
respondents evaluate according to the scale, as well
as demographic information about the respondents
gender, age, level of education, pedagogical work
experience in preschool education, as well as
information on the language of instruction of the
educational institution and the implemented
educational programme, the age range of the learners,
the number of children in preschool education groups.
The order of the statements in the questionnaire is
not grouped according to criteria, but they are
arranged randomly, in order not to make the
hierarchical nature of the indicators within each
criterion obvious and thus not to influence the
responses of the teachers. The Likert scale used in the
questionnaire is based on the evaluation of the
frequency of each statement and allows the
respondent to choose one of the levels: (1) almost
never, (2) rarely, (3) sometimes, (4) often, (5) almost
always.
2.3 Participants
The study included 129 teachers working in preschool
educational institutions in Riga (Latvia).
The method of descriptive statistics was applied
in the analysis of the survey sample. The age analysis
of the respondents was performed according to the
allocated conditional age groups. All age groups are
represented in the survey sample, the most significant
part of the respondents (33.3%) are teachers aged 35
to 44. The study involved teachers ranging in age
from 18 to 66 years. The majority of the respondents
are currently acquiring or have acquired higher
pedagogical education (93.8% in total), the
proportion of teachers with a master’s degree is small
8 respondents (6.2%), there are no teachers with a
doctor’s degree among the survey respondents.
The pedagogical work experience of the
respondents in preschool education ranges from 0 (the
teacher works less than one year) to 46 years. The
largest number of the respondents is in the groups
with less than one year of pedagogical work
experience in preschool education (32.6%) and 1-5
years of work experience (25.6%), while the smallest
number of respondents (5.4%) is in the group with 6
to 10 years of pedagogical work experience. The large
number of young teachers among the respondents is
not considered to be a characteristic trend in
preschool education in Riga, but rather follows from
the fact that a part of the questionnaires was obtained
not from the teachers in preschool education
institutions, but from the teachers in higher education
institution within preschool pedagogy study
programmes.
Teachers also indicated the number of children in
their preschool education groups. As the regulatory
enactments in Latvia do not set a strict number of
children in a group, it can vary greatly. The majority
of the respondents (57.4%) work in groups with 17 –
20 children.
3 RESULTS
Definition of Criteria and their Indicators for
Children’s Participation in Preschool Education.
The scientific theoretical findings accumulated in
the world in the period from 1990s, view children’s
participation as a multilevel and multidimensional
concept. In the scientific context, these models can
ISC SAI 2022 - V International Scientific Congress SOCIETY OF AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE
364
rather be considered as schematic representations of
the content of the children’s participation concept, as
they do not describe the scientifically justified
interrelationships of components in structural or
procedural aspects, but rather show attempts to
schematize the diversity of expressions in a simplified
way. One of the reasons for the above is the function
of developing the created models practical
applicability and comprehensibility for practitioners
of different levels, whose activities are related to
ensuring the rights of the child.
One of the first attempts to describe and structure
the content of the children’s participation concept is
the ladder of participation (Fig.1) by Roger Hart
(1992).
8. Child-initiated, shared
decisions with adults
Degrees of
participation
7. Child-initiated and
directe
d
6. Adult-initiated, shared
decisions with children
5. Consulte
d
an
d
informe
d
4. Assigne
d
b
ut informe
d
3. Tokenis
m
Non-
participation
2. Decoration
1. Manipulation
Figure 1: Ladder of participation (Hart, 1992).
Describing the ways in which children interact
with adults, R. Hart (1992) views children’s
participation as a multilevel formation, where
decision-making is the central element. From a
scientific point of view, the efforts of the critics to
exclude levels that do not correspond to the essence
of participation seem logical, however, given the
initial applicability of the concept mostly in the social
and political field only, the wish of R. Hart to outline
a broader context that would allow to distinguish the
real participation of children from the formal one in
the discussion of artificially-created children’s
participation and decision-making is understandable.
Fill Treseder (1997) offers a representation of the
participation levels, which clearly follows from the
idea of the ladder of participation of R. Hart. F.
Treseder has not included R. Hart’s levels of non-
participation in his development, and has refused to
use the hierarchical arrangement of levels, thus
showing that children’s participation does not have to
be developed level by level in a certain order and not
always it must be sought to achieve the highest degree
of participation. Rather the level of participation that
best suits the needs of the situation must be chosen in
each situation.
Harry Shier’s (2001) development Pathways to
Participation includes five levels: (1) Children are
listened to; (2) Children are supported in expressing
their views; (3) Children’s views are taken into
account; (4) Children are involved in decision-
making processes; (5) Children share power and
responsibility for decision-making. H. Shier offers
not only a theoretical concept, but also a practical
assessment of each level of participation, adding
questions that allow to identify three “O’s”
Openings, Opportunities, and Obligations. For
example, at Level 1 “Children are listed to” the
following questions are asked:
Openings Are you ready to listen to
children?
Opportunities Do you work in a way that
enables you to listen to children?
Obligations Is it a policy requirement that
children must be listened to?
Another theoretical development that should be
highlighted in the preschool context is the model of
participation developed by Laura Lundy (2007)
(Fig.2).
Figure 2: Model of participation (adapted from Lundy,
2007).
According to L. Lundy (2007), “voice is not
enough” in children’s participation, thus in addition
to “Voice” there are three other categories“Space”,
“Audience” and “Influence”: the child can express his
or her opinion (voice), a favourable environment
(space) is created for the child’s participation, adults
listen to the child’s views (audience), the child’s
views are taken into account (influence).
The first step in the conscious implementation of
children’s participation is to study the situation in the
external and internal environment of the educational
institution. A useful instrument in the assessment of
the external environment of the educational
institution is the Child Participation Assessment Tool
provided by the Council of Europe (2016), the
applicability of which is most important at the
municipal level. While the assessment of the situation
in the internal environment of the educational
PA
E
VO
I
C
E
INFLUENCE
AUDIENCE
Right to express
aview
Right to have views
given due weight
Article 12
Management of Children’s Participation in Preschool Education
365
institution shall be carried out in accordance with
certain criteria and indicators.
Based on the analysis of the content of the
Preschool Education Guidelines (Regulations of the
Cabinet of Ministers No. 716, 2018), three areas are
the most important in preschool education: (1)
children’s participation in the creation of educational
content, (2) children’s participation in the creation of
learning and play environment, (3) communication
encouraging children’s participation. The identified
areas were set as the criteria for the assessment of
children’s participation. While the development of
eligible children’s participation indicators was based
on the previously analysed schematic developments
of children’s participation (Hart, 1992; Lundy, 2007;
Shier, 2001; Treseder, 1997).
Firstly, the characteristics of participation levels
from different schemes were synthesized into a single
five-step structure, creating a new hierarchy of
children’s participation levels in the context of
preschool education (Table 1), then three of the
participation levels were transformed into indicators
in each criterion.
Table 1: Children’s participation levels in preschool
education and their genesis.
No
.
Children's
participation
levels
Models of children's
participation
Hart,
1992
Trese
der,
1997
Shier,
2001
Lund
y,
1. Children are
heard and
supported in
expressing their
views
2. Children are
involved in the
discussion
3. Children's views
are taken into
account in the
decision-making
process
4. Children initiate
and manage their
activities
5. Children make
their own
decisions and are
responsible for
them
The last two levels of participation were
interpreted as less relevant in the formal context of
preschool education and, thus, were not included in
the development of the indicators.
It is essential that the hierarchy of levels, similarly
as emphasized by F. Tresseder (1997), does not have
to be understood as the need to consecutively
implement all five levels. The hierarchy in the
structure is expressed only in the gradually increasing
influence of children’s views on the decision-making
process.
At the same time, it should be noted that in the
informal context, children undeniably initiate
“projects” themselves and make independent
decisions from an early age, first of all – in their play,
as pointed out also by R. Hart (2008).
Therefore, for the implementation of children’s
participation in preschool education, three criteria and
three indicators for each of the criteria were set out
formulating the characteristics of participation,
according to the content of the certain criterion (Table
2).
Table 2: Children’s participation criteria and their
indicators.
Criteria Indicators
Children's
participation in
curriculum
development
The opinions of children are taken into
account in the development of the
curriculum, children together with
adults are involved in making decisions
about the curriculum
Children are involved in discussing the
planned curriculum
Children are heard and supported in
expressing their views on the content of
learning
Children's
participation in
creating a
learning and
play
environment
Children's opinions are taken into
account in creating a learning and play
environment, children are involved in
making decisions about the learning and
play environment together with adults
Children are involved in discussing the
improvement of the learning and play
environment
Children are heard and supported in
expressing their views on the learning
and play environment
Communication
that encourages
children's
participation
Children's opinions are taken into
account when planning daily activities,
children are involved in daily decision-
making together with adults
Children are involved in discussing
their own and other children's work
Children are heard and supported in
expressing their opinions on a daily
basis
ISC SAI 2022 - V International Scientific Congress SOCIETY OF AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE
366
The developed criteria and their indicators were
applied in the course of further study as a theoretical
basis for the development of the teachers’
questionnaire. The theoretical and practical
development of the study can also serve as a useful
support for the development of teachers’ self-
assessment questionnaires in preschool educational
institutions.
Already at the stage of identifying the situation, it
is important to assess the awareness of the
educational institution employees of the issue of
children’s rights in general. Although, in accordance
with the requirements of the regulatory enactments,
every teacher and employee of an educational
institution acquires a certain amount of professional
development programme in the protection of
children’s rights, it is important to assess the situation
in reality, not relying solely on the fulfilment of
formal requirements.
As education practice of several countries shows,
successful implementation of legislative provisions
crucially depends on its inclusion in the regulatory
enactments of a particular level of education
(Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research,
2005, 2006; Compulsory School, 2018) that provides
an opportunity to express and adapt the legislative
provisions to the special characteristics of the specific
level of education, the age of children, as well as to
raise the issue in a certain target group of teachers.
3.1 Analysis of Frequency of Survey
Responses
The absolute (N) and relative frequency (%) of the
responses provided within the questionnaire were
analysed. It was identified, which responses show the
highest frequency indicators, and the high response
indicators were identified in the category
“Sometimes”.
A conditional limit of frequency of responses
25%, was chosen for the frequency analysis, and the
results above 25% were considered high. The analysis
shows that more than 25% of the respondents rate all
the statements with the answer “Often”, while four
statements have a high number of answers “Almost
always”. The highest result in terms of frequency of
responses (50.4%) is for the statement “I encourage
children to express their opinions and accept different
opinions”, moreover, in the highest range “Almost
always”. Also, summing up the answers in the ranges
“Often” and “Almost always”, the highest result
(88.4%) is observed regarding this same statement.
It can be concluded that participatory work forms
and methods dominate in teachers’ pedagogical work,
they are often used in the creation of educational
content and preschool group environment, as well as
in the daily communication of children and teachers.
A large group of the respondents, who have
provided a relatively neutral response “Sometimes”
to a question, can be considered as a potential group
to increase participation rates. A neutral, yet
affirmative response may indicate a sufficiently
positive attitude (i.e., activities of the said type exist
in the teacher’s work) and also some reasons, why
these activities do not occur more often (i.e., occur
only sometimes). The aim to obtain qualitative data
for further study of the causes was not set out in the
study, however, a high number of respondents in the
range “Sometimes” in one of the statements may be
the basis for identifying the direction of participation
management with a potentially high efficiency. The
frequency analysis showed that the frequency of the
response “Sometimes” exceeds 25% in five
statements, three of which meet the criterion of
“Children’s participation in the creation of learning
and play environment”, other two criteria have one
statement each. Thus, the frequency analysis shows
that the promotion of children’s participation in the
creation of the learning and play environment is the
direction of participation management with the
highest potential efficiency.
Grouping the responses based on the criteria (1)
Children’s participation in the creation of educational
content, (2) Children’s participation in the creation of
learning and play environment, (3) Communication
encouraging children’s participation, assessing the
distribution of responses, the response “Often”
dominates in each of the criteria.
3.2 Analysis of Statistical Indicators of
the Central Tendency
In the course of further study, the indicator of the
central tendency – the arithmetic mean was studied.
The answers were coded: almost never 1, rarely – 2,
sometimes 3, often 4, almost always 5. As a
result, the central tendency indicators of the responses
provided in each question were obtained (Tab. 3),
which showed the highest frequency tendency in
three statements, each related to its own criterion.
Similar to the response frequency analysis, the
highest arithmetic mean (4.36) is in the statement “I
encourage children to express their opinions and
accept different opinions”. It is possible that the high
results are determined by the applicability of the
statement to all areas of preschool activities,
describing a very general communication principle.
Management of Children’s Participation in Preschool Education
367
Table 3: Statistical indicators of the central tendency of the
provided responses (arithmetic mean).
Statement
Indicator
of
the central
tren
d
I take children's suggestions into
account when creating the
curriculum.
4.18
I encourage children to express
their thoughts on what they are
learning an
d
listen to them.
3.78
I encourage children to evaluate
what they and other children
have done.
3.60
I invite children to express their
views on the environment and
listen to them.
3.24
When creating an environment, I
take into account children's
suggestions, for example, about
decorating rooms, choosing toys
an
d
g
ames.
3.64
I encourage children to make
suggestions on how to improve
the environment in the room.
4.32
When planning the daily life, I
take children's suggestions into
account.
3.87
I encourage children to discuss
the content of the planned
learnin
g
.
3.89
I encourage children to express
their views and accept different
views.
4.36
3.3 Analysis of Variable Correlations
In the course of the study, a correlation study of three
variables (Pearson correlation coefficient) was
performed with each of the criteria. Selected variables
teachers’ pedagogical work experience (length of
service), level of education and number of children in
the group. Although high statistical indicators were
predicted, weak statistically significant results were
obtained only in the correlation of teachers’
pedagogical work experience with two of the criteria,
i.e., “Children’s participation in the creation of
educational content” and “Communication
encouraging children’s participation” (Tab. 4).
It can be considered that the obtained results of the
analysis of variable correlations are not relevant in the
context of participation management, but require
further studying in order to draw general conclusions.
Table 4: Correlation of teachers’ pedagogical work
experience with children’s participation criteria.
Children's
participation
in
curriculum
development
Children's
participation
in creating a
learning and
play
environment
Communi-
cation that
e
ncourages
children's
participa-
tion
Teachers'
experience
in
pedagogical
work
r 190* .014 .264**
p .031 .878 .002
** Significant correlation (bilateral) at the significance
level p = 0.01
* Significant correlation (bilateral) at the significance level
p = 0.05
Summarizing the results of the empirical study, it can
be concluded that:
according to the self-assessment of preschool
teachers, children’s participation is characterized by high
implementation rates in the field of educational content,
environment and communication;
the results obtained allow to identify the
promotion of children’s participation in the
creation of learning and play environment as a
direction of participation management with
potentially the highest efficiency, but the
reliability of the results is not high, considering
the result of low internal coherence of the scale of
the criterion “Children’s participation in creation
of learning and play environment” (ɑ = 0.543);
the results obtained in the study are not sufficient
for conclusions on the correlation of the
implementation of children’s participation with
the number of children in the group, the teachers
pedagogical work experience and the level of
education.
4 DISCUSSIONS
Comparing the studies on the opinions of preschool
teachers carried out in Greece, Slovenia, Finland,
Turkey and Latvia (Akyol & Erdem, 2021; Avgitidou
et al., 2006; Zorec, 2015; Kangas et al., 2016;
Turnšek, 2009; Turnšek & Pekkarinen, 2009), it is
possible to draw general conclusions, as each study
uses a different measurement instrument. However,
taken as a whole, a similar tendency is observed,
which confirms a positive attitude of teachers
regarding the awareness and implementation of
children’s participation, as the finding that decision-
ISC SAI 2022 - V International Scientific Congress SOCIETY OF AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE
368
making has a positive effect on children’s social and
emotional development is dominant.
The authors of the article do not have information
on the research on children’s participation in the
context of preschool management, but some studies
(Akyol & Erdem, 2021) also confirm the need to
continue the research, engaging the administrations of
the institutions to develop mentoring programmes
that would support participation-related teachers’
practice in classroom. In surveys, the teachers assess
the need of the children’s participation mostly
positive, but in practice it is not always given the
attention it requires.
The interrelationship of children’s participation
with other important areas in preschool education
practice are identified in the theoretical findings as
interrelationships and adult roles (Bae, 2009). The
potential risks, when implementing children’s
participation in the preschool context are also
identified, mainly noting excessive attention on
formal expressions of democracy such as meetings,
voting (Bae, 2009), schoolification of preschool
education, approximation to methods of democracy
and organizational forms characteristic of school
(Clausen, 2015). It is stressed that the child in
preschool should experience “moments of
participation” rather than a constant involvement in
participatory activities (Bae, 2009).
In the context of the children’s participation, the
skill to separate the adult’s view, driven by the desire
to act in the best interests of the child, and the child’s
own views becomes relevant in the teacher’s work
(Sommer et al., 2013). Adults, considering
themselves to be more competent, often take on the
role of interpreting the children’s needs without
consulting the children themselves, and, guided by
positive intentions, are acting seemingly in the best
interests of the children. These views are deeply
rooted in normative pedagogy, and even in today’s
postmodern world, the attitude towards the child as a
subject of education and cooperation partner is not
exactly clear neither in scientific theoretical findings,
nor in educational practice. Therefore, there is a
serious risk that only seeming participation is
implemented in preschool education, namely,
“child’s participation on the conditions of the adults”
(Sandberg & Eriksson, 2010).
Considering the relevance of the studied issue in
preschool educational institutions in Latvia, in 2021,
the Ministry of Education and Science carried out
monitoring “Children’s Participation in Preschool
Education”, identifying the teachers’ self-assessment
of competences (Bērnu līdzdalība pirmsskolas
izglītībā, 2021). 2419 respondents participated in the
survey, representing 741 educational institutions or
82.89% of educational institutions that implement
preschool education programmes for 5-6 years old
children (in Latvia a total of 894 educational
institutions). The author of the article, A. Ozola, also
participated in the development of the questionnaire,
supplementing the criteria with more detailed
indicators, which, to a certain extent, provide
instructions for teacher’s activities in communication
with children, in organization of the psychological
and physical environment. The results of the
monitoring show that children’s participation in
preschool education in Latvia is generally
implemented consistently. Greater attention must be
paid to addressing children’s suggestions and
complaints and empathy regarding the child’s views
expressed non-verbally, including in creative work.
In general, it must be acknowledged that the teacher
has the key role in the implementation of children’s
participation.
5 CONCLUSIONS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
Summarizing the findings obtained as a result of
scientific theoretical and empirical study on
children’s participation and its management in
preschool education, conclusions have been obtained
on what can serve as practical recommendations for
the implementation of children’s participation and its
management in preschool education.
Children’s participation shall cover all the
activities and processes in daily life of a child in a
preschool educational institution, but the most
important tasks of children’s participation
management at the preschool level are to promote
children’s participation in creation of educational
content, in creation of learning and play
environment and to ensure communication
encouraging children’s participation in an
educational institution.
Successful implementation of children’s
participation in preschool education is ensured by
the management, based on the rights of the
children:
- purposefully promoting awareness of
children’s participation in society among
children, teachers, parents, as well as all the
parties interested at the level of the state,
local governments and educational
institutions;
Management of Children’s Participation in Preschool Education
369
- raising the issue of children’s participation
in the state-level regulatory enactments in
the field of preschool education and in
strategic education policy documents, as
well as in internal regulatory enactments of
preschool education institutions;
- creating preconditions for children’s
participation in creation of educational
content, creation of preschool learning and
play environment;
- promoting an in-depth understanding of the
principles of participatory communication
between teachers and children by the
management team and teachers of the
educational institutions and the engagement
of children in the decision-making process.
REFERENCES
Akyol, T., Erdem, H. (2021). Children’s participation from
the perspective of Teachers. Journal of Pedagogical
Research, 5(1), 188-202.
http://dx.doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2021167549
Avgitidou, S., Pnematikos, D., & Likomitrou, S. (2013).
Preservice teachers' beliefs about childhood:
Challenges for a participatory early childhood
education? Journal of Early Childhood Teacher
Education, 34(4), 390-404. doi:
10.1080/10901027.2013.845633
Bae, B. (2009). Children's right to participate: Challenges
in everyday interactions. European Early Childhood
Education Research Journal, 17(3), 391-406. doi:
10.1080/13502930903101594
Batistič Zorec, M. (2015). Children's participation in
Slovene preschools: The teachers' viewpoints and
practice. European Education, 47(2), 154-168. doi:
10.1080/10564934.2015.1039878
Bērnu līdzdalība pirmsskolas izglītībā: IZM 2021. gada
aprīļa aptaujas par bērnu līdzdalību rezultāti
[Children's participation in pre-school education:
results of the April 2021 MES survey on children's
participation] (2021).
https://www.izm.gov.lv/lv/media/11609/download
Brogaard Clausen, S. (2015). Schoolification or early years
democracy? A cross-curricular perspective from
Denmark and England. Contemporary issues in Early
Childhood, 16(4), 355-373. doi:
10.1177/1463949115616327
Compulsory School (2018). Curriculum for the compulsory
school, preschool class and school-age educare.
Stockholm: Skolverket.
Convention on the rights of the child (1989). Treaty no.
27531. United Nations Treaty Series, 1577, pp. 3-178.
https://treaties.un.org/doc/Treaties/1990/09/19900902
%2003-14%20AM/Ch_IV_11p.pdf.
Council of Europe (2016). Child Participation Assessment
Tool. https://www.coe.int/en/web/children/child-
participation-assessment-tool.
Hart, R. A. (1992). Children's participation: From tokenism
to citizenship. Florence: UNICEF International Child
Development Centre.
Kangas, J., Venninen, T., & Ojala, M. (2016). Educators’
perceptions of facilitating children’s participation in
early childhood education. Australasian Journal of
Early Childhood, 41(2), 85–94.
Lundy, L. (2007). Voice is not enough: Conceptualising
Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the
Rights of the Child. British Education Research
Journal, 33(6), 927–942.
Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research (2005). Act
No. 64 of 17 June 2005 relating to Kindergartens (the
Kindergarten Act).
https://www.regjeringen.no/globalassets/upload/kd/ve
dlegg/barnehager/engelsk/act_no_64_of_june_2005_w
eb.pdf
Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research (2006).
Framework plan for the content and tasks of
kindergartens.
https://www.regjeringen.no/globalassets/upload/KD/V
edlegg/Barnehager/engelsk/FrameworkPlanfortheCont
entandTasksofKindergartens.pdf
OECD (2016). Reviews of national policies for education:
Education in Latvia. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:
10.1787/9789264250628-en
Regulations of the Cabinet of Ministers No. 716. (2018).
Regulations on State Pre-school Education Guidelines
and Sample Pre-school Education Programs.
https://docs.exupery.lv/bin/view/Latvian%20Laws%2
0%26%20Rules/Regulations%20on%20State%20Pre-
school%20Education%20Guidelines%20and%20Sam
ple%20Pre-school%20Education%20Programs/
Saeima (1999). Vispārējās izglītības likums [General
Education Law]. https://likumi.lv/doc.php?id=20243
Sandberg, A., & Eriksson, A. (2010). Children's
participation in preschool on the conditions of the
adults? Preschool staff's concepts of children's
participation in preschool everyday life. Early Child
Development and Care, 180(5), 619-631. doi:
10.1080/03004430802181759
Shier, H. (2001). Pathways to participation: openings,
opportunities and obligations: A new model for
enhancing children's participation in decision-making,
in line with Article 12.1 of United Nations Covention
on the Rights of the Child. Children & Society, 15, 107-
117. doi: 10.1002/CHI.617
Sommer, D., Pramling Samuelsson, I., & Hundeide, K.
(2013). Early childhood care and education: A child
perspective paradigm. European Early Childhood
Education Research Journal, 21(4), 459-475. doi:
10.1080/1350293X.2013.845436
Treseder, P. (1997). Empowering children and young
people: Promoting involvement in decision-making.
London: Save the Children.
ISC SAI 2022 - V International Scientific Congress SOCIETY OF AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE
370
Turnšek, N. (2016). Teachers' implicit theories on child
participation in preschool. Athens Journal of
Education, 3(1), 7-18.
Turnšek, N., & Pekkarinen, A. (2009). Democratisation of
early childhood education in the attitudes of Slovene
and Finnish teachers. European Early Childhood
Education Research Journal, 17(1), 23-42. doi:
10.1080/13502930802688998.
Management of Children’s Participation in Preschool Education
371