regression model presents a strong correlation
between GDP and housing price, the data shows an
anomaly between the period from 2009 to 2012: GDP
recovered but housing prices continuously fall. To
explain this abnormality, the bubble of the US real
estate market since the beginning of 21th century and
the recession in 2008. In the article “The Great
American Housing Bubble: Re-Examining Cause and
Effect”, the author Robert Hardaway concludes that
“over-extended homeowners, greedy Wall Street
financiers and investment bankers, compromised
realtors, accountants, credit rating agencies, and
ineffective and inattentive regulators have all played”
in the housing bubble (Hardaway, 2009). In 2007, the
subprime mortgage industry collapsed and “At least
25 subprime lenders, which issue mortgages to
borrowers with poor credit histories, have exited the
business, declared bankruptcy, announced significant
losses, or put themselves up for sale.”(Hovanesian,
2007). After the burst of the housing bubble, the
Great Recession began. Based on the data, the GDP
obviously recovered in 2009, but the negative effect
of Great Recession on the real estate market still
existed. It is can be considered as a housing price
correction which means the price gradually and
eventually reaches the normal level. When the
housing price reached a comparatively low level, it
raised again accompanied by booming GDP.
Analyzing the recession effect on housing price, we
may primarily conclude that housing price has a
strong correlation with GDP, but when a housing
bubble exists and bursts, the price may not follow
with GDP since the moderation and recovering can
happen at the same time.
Nonetheless, the rate of home ownership cannot
predict the trend of housing prices on its own.
According to the linear regression model for only
house ownership and housing price index, the R-
value is only 0.202 and the p-value is 0.378 which is
not significant. A potential reason behind this is
house ownership rate does not directly reflect the
actual demand and supply on real estate market.
However, the multi regression model shows that
despite in the housing price correction period, when
the GDP increase, a higher house ownership rate
would lead to a more intensive increase, and a lower
house ownership rate may indicate a week increase in
housing price.
6 CONCLUSIONS
In the first regression model, we can see that the
resident population is the most important factor
affecting the housing price index, followed by the
residential ownership rate, followed by Gross
Domestic Product, and finally the per capita
disposable income. Due to the significance test,
resident population and per capita personal income
show low significance. After modifications, the
improved model of how the housing price index
relates to GDP and homeownership rate demonstrates
a strong and significant correlation. Based on the
model, we can conclude that at the situation of
economic growth (booming GDP) and high house
ownership rate (comparatively more residents own a
house), the housing price would continuously
increase. However, during recession and following
recovery period, the housing price would meet a large
correction to a balanced level even though GDP
increase. Moreover, although this model may help to
predict future housing price in New York or other
states with a metropolitan, its own limitations should
be considered. For example, the data is only based on
recent 20 years, which is a short time interval. Also,
the recession period from 2007 to 2009 may affect the
preciseness of the model, since recession is not a high
probability event and the whole economic situations
are different between recessions. More independent
variables, such as interest rate, housing tax, and
unemployment rate, should be added in future
research to build a model that is more likely to reveal
the truth.
REFERENCES
Ahmad, N., Taha, R., Endut, W. A., & Baatwah, S. R. A.
(2021). The effects of house price and taxation on
consumers’ burden: The case of Malaysia. Kasetsart
Journal of Social Sciences, 42(2), 281-286.
Ma, L., Liu, H., & Sing, M. (2021). Responsiveness of
residential construction-production progress to house
price dynamics. International Journal of Housing
Markets and Analysis.
Margo, R. A. (1996). The rental price of housing in New
York City, 1830–1860. The Journal of Economic
History, 56(3), 605-625.
Valadez, R. M. (2011). The housing bubble and the GDP:
A correlation perspective. Journal of Case Research in
Business and Economics, 3, 1.
Hardaway, R. (2009). "The Great American Housing
Bubble: Re-Examining Cause and Effect." University
of Dayton Law Review 35(1): 33-60.
Hovanesian, M. D. (2007). "The Mortgage Mess Spread."
from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2007-
03-07/the-mortgage-mess-spreadsbusinesswMeek-
business-news-stock-market-and-financial-advice.