The Politization of Identity Politics in Medan Mayor Election 2020
Saipul Bahri and Heri Kusmanto
a
Departement Political Science, FISIP Universitas Sumatera Utara, Indonesia
Keywords: Politicization of Politics, Elections, Competition.
Abstract: This article discusses the politicization that occurred in the electoral competition in the 2020 Regional Head
Election of Medan City. In the midst of the euphoria of democracy, the post-conflict local election was faced
with the COVID-19 pandemic, political polarization occurred in the midst of the people of Medan City.
Polarization in electoral politics in Medan City in 2020, which in many aspects is largely determined by media
framing and the interaction of actors in social media. Since 2014, the 2017 and 2019 DKI Jakarta post-conflict
local elections, Indonesia has experienced the politicization of identity politics to an alarming degree
whenever there is an election for executive leadership at the national, provincial and district/city levels. This
identity politicization tends to have not received adequate attention in political studies. This paper presents
preliminary observations about the politicization of political identity in Medan City. The results of this study
found that national issues, such as cases of religious blasphemy, radicalism, became the primacy of candidates
as political instruments. This article concludes that identity politics in the 2020 Medan City post-conflict local
election takes the form of national issues rather than the identity of the local context. With qualitative research
methods using interviews and observation.
1 INTRODUCTION
The Medan City General Election which gave birth to
two pairs of candidates Bobby-Aulia and Akhyar-
Salman gave a signal to the strengthening of political
entities in Medan City. Identity politics in Indonesia
has long been an interesting topic of discussion
among social scientists. The issue of identity is very
influential and becomes the dominant thing in
determining people's choices in general elections
(elections) in Indonesia, there is a polarization whose
priorities are based on ethnicity and religion. Geertz
(1963) in his writings on "primordial sentiment"
states that the study of identity politics will continue
to receive attention, especially with regard to ethnic
identity, religion, gender, indigenous peoples
(indigenous communities), and local communities (in
Buchari)., 2014).
Identity politicization is defined as an attempt to
use, exploit, or manipulate identity, whether based on
religion, ethnicity, gender or adherents of a certain
ideology to generate opinion or stigma from the
public with the aim of political interests. Identity is
then used to achieve certain interests of the group or
a
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1370-7876
individual (Burke, 2003). Democracy provides space
for each individual and identity group in order to win
the electoral competition. However, the politicization
of identity also has the opportunity to weaken
democratic values so that it can lead to political
instability (Herdiansah, 2017).
Identity politicization also shows an attitude of
political priority or special behavior to a group of
people who come from a certain region, ethnicity or
race. The process of recruiting leaders in the regions
tends to be based on primordial parameters, which
facilitates the development of regional and tribal
spirit (Jumadi and Yaakop, 2013). The politicization
of identity based on primordial is not only displayed
by candidates for leaders or candidates for regional
heads, but for voters it becomes one of the important
considerations in the political behavior of voters.
When identity politics is manipulated by the interests
of the political elite, there are several risks that can
threaten the life of democracy. Moreover, in a state of
ethnic heterogeneity which is often an obstacle to
democratic consolidation (Birnir, 2007).
After the reform of identity politics, they are faced
with several problems such as identity crises,
74
Bahri, S. and Kusmanto, H.
The Politization of Identity Politics in Medan Mayor Election 2020.
DOI: 10.5220/0011511600003460
In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Social and Political Development (ICOSOP 2022) - Human Security and Agile Government, pages 74-78
ISBN: 978-989-758-618-7; ISSN: 2975-8300
Copyright
c
2023 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. Under CC license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
horizontal conflicts, multicultural conflicts, national
disintegration, political instability, violence and
crime as symptoms of a multidimensional crisis. The
other most crucial thing is the fading of national
values and the nation's cultural values. Plurality in the
fields of culture, race, ethnicity, religion, language,
and resources is a challenge for Indonesia's national
identity. If it can be managed properly, then pluralism
will bring prosperity and strengthen unity and
integrity. However, if it cannot be managed properly,
pluralism has the potential to cause national
disintegration. One important note relates to the 2020
Medan City post-conflict local election that the issue
of primordial identity related to the two major
religions has a very strong influence in determining
candidate pairs (Negong, 2017). The election of the
Mayor and Deputy Mayor of Medan in 2020 which
was attended by 2 (two) pairs of candidates, namely
Bobby Nasution-Aulia Rahman and Akhyar
Nasution-Salman Alfarisi which was won by the
Bobby-Aulia pair (Medan KPUD Data, 2020).
Bobby-Aulia's victory in 15 (fifteen) sub-districts
(Medan Kota, Medan Sunggal, Medan Helvetia,
Medan Denai, West Medan, Medan Deli, Medan
Tuntungan, Medan Belawan, Medan Amplas, Medan
Area, Medan Johor, Medan Marelan, Medan
Labuhan, Medan Tembung, Medan Polonia) is very
interesting because the previous victories in these 15
sub-districts have always been won by the Prosperous
Justice Party (PKS).
This shows that there is a degradation of political
support in the 2020 Medan City election, in which the
candidate for Mayor Bobby Nasution with the
surname Nasution, while the political behavior of
choosing the people of Medan City is still very much
influenced by the issue of primordial identity based
on religion and ethnicity. The Bobby-Aulia pair
before becoming a candidate for Mayor of Medan
determined by the Medan City Regional General
Election Commission (KPUD) were young people
who had never entered the political arena. Bobby
Nasution's presence in the political arena cannot be
separated from national issues.
Unwittingly, national issues also affect the
contestation of the 2020 Medan City General
Election. The influence of national issues such as the
Ahok case (Ahok effect) which was developed
because it was politicized based on primordial use by
politicians in DKI Jakarta as a result gave birth to
identity-based primordial sentiments among the
people of Medan City. especially religious
sentiments, the majority of which are 90% Muslim,
Bobby Nasution, who is supported by the PDIP party,
which is connoted as a blasphemy party. The rise of
this primordial sentiment since the Ahok issue in the
2017 DKI Jakarta gubernatorial election was used by
politicians in the city of Medan to gain victory by
using various primordial-based identity issues as a
political campaign tool to achieve victory. Research
on identity politics in a democratic country in
Indonesia has been carried out by many researchers
and the academic community. However, research
related to the use of identity issues carried out by
Bobby-Aulia in an effort to win the 2020 post-conflict
local election has not been done much. Based on the
foregoing, the authors focus on the research on
politicization of politics in the Regional Head General
Election of Medan City and the winning team in
managing identity issues to strengthen their political
discourse, recruitment of community leaders,
socialization of political safaris and campaigns as
well as identity issues capitalized in planning for the
win, namely analyze how the use of identity issues as
a winning effort by Bobby-Aulia.
2 METHOD
This study uses a qualitative method with primary
data obtained from each individual or group /
Winning Team or institution that has a role in the
victory of candidate Bobby-Aulia in the use of
identity issues as an effort to win in the 2020 Medan
City election. also supported from secondary data
sources such as books, journals, statistical data, mass
media reports relevant to research studies, general
guidelines, study results from various literatures and
previous studies relevant to the research theme to
sharpen the credibility of the research. The data
obtained were then verified and analyzed by
descriptive analysis method. Data verification is
carried out through triangulation techniques, namely
comparing the data obtained so that they come to the
belief that the data obtained are valid.
3 RESULT AND DISSCUSION
The political configuration of the Medan City post-
conflict local election is closely related to the
composition of the population of Medan City, the
majority of whom are Moslems reaching 80%
consisting of Catholics amounting to 8%, Protestants
7%, Hindus 3% and Buddhists 2% (BPS City Medan,
2019). Islam is the majority in several sub-districts
including Denai District, Johor, Medan City, Medan
Helvetia, Medan Baru, Medan Selayang, Medan
The Politization of Identity Politics in Medan Mayor Election 2020
75
Belawan, West Medan, East Medan, Medan Amplas,
Medan Marelan, Medan Area, Medan Maimun,
Medan Deli, Medan Labuhan, Medan Struggle and
Medan Polonia. The picture above shows the
geographical conditions of Medan City which affect
the sociological conditions and consequently gives
rise to political practices in making combinations
between regions that represent matters of religious
and ethnic ethnicity, especially in the Medan Mayor
Election.
The practice of religion-based identity politics is
quite common in Medan City which is based on
political parties. During the three elections for Mayor
of Medan after post-reformation, ethnic and religious
factors had a very strong influence in determining
candidates at the level of political parties and people's
choices. However, religious identity politics and
political parties in Medan City, where the majority of
the population is Muslim as a basis, are difficult to
detect in large-scale political activities such as the
Jokowi grand political campaign in Medan on April
10, 2019. Generally, the exploitation of identity
politics based on religion and political parties occurs
in small-scale and local campaign activities that
escape media coverage. The importance of identity in
turn encourages political parties to look for
candidates for mayor of Medan City without giving
up the image of representing the identity of the
majority regions such as ethnicity and religion as a
way of transformation in various political strategies.
Ethnic combinations such as Batak and Malay and
Javanese are associated with the majority religion in
Medan, namely Islam. The simultaneous regional
elections in 2020 will be held simultaneously on
December 9, 2020. The results of the 2020 Medan
Mayor Election were won by candidate pair number
2 Bobby-Aulia getting 393,327 votes with a vote
percentage of 53.5%. Akhyar-Salman's vote gain was
only 46.5% (Medan City KPUD Data, 2020).
4 IDENTITY
INSTRUMENTALISM
The results obtained by Bobby-Aulia have shown that
the strategies carried out by the candidates,
supporting parties, and campaign teams in their
efforts to win the 2020 Medan City election were
quite successful. Supporting parties such as PDIP,
Golkar, NasDem, Golkar, Gerindra, PSI, PAN, PPP
and Hanura contributed a lot. These eight parties
work together in a joint winning team. The purpose
of the merger is to make the program implementation
more focused, in accordance with the strategy of the
candidate pair that has been mutually agreed with the
Bobby-Aulia Winning Team in an effort to achieve
victory.
Based on the results of the research, the Bobby-
Aulia candidate pair strategy has two strategies,
namely conventional and specific winning planning.
The conventional winning planning strategy includes
the recruitment of candidate pairs and political
socialization, strengthening the vision and mission
discourse, forming a winning team and volunteer
team as well as the use of mass media and social
media in promoting candidate pairs. Meanwhile, the
strategy of the candidate pair Bobby-Aulia which
made a major contribution was the use of religious
identity issues from national issues which were
capitalized by the candidate pairs in conducting
political socialization and campaigning.
The use of identity issues such as the Ahok case
(Ahok effect), the 212 Movement, the issue of the
establishment of a Khilafah State, and the issue of the
Jakarta Charter. The strategy of this candidate pair
became the strength of the candidate pair Bobby-
Aulia in achieving victory (Tolo, 2019). In the 2020
Medan Mayor Election, of the two pairs of
candidates, geographically Akhyar-Salman is a
representation of the City of Medan. Akhyar Nasution
as the incumbent and Salman who has a background
as a member of the Medan DPRD and was elected as
Deputy Chair of the North Sumatra Provincial DPRD
from the Electoral District of Medan City. The
recruitment of candidate pairs who appear in the 2020
Medan City election in this study does represent a mix
of ethnicity and religion. Ethnic combinations such as
the Batak and Malay ethnicities which are then
combined with religion continue to color the entire
process of recruiting candidates for the Mayor of
Medan so far after the reform period (Medan KPUD
Data, 2020).
The winning team from the PDIP Party said that
if the Gerindra party supports the Bobby-Aulia
package, the combined number of seats for the
coalition parties and will be included in the
nomination requirements is at least 79%. Many of
these considerations made Aulia Rahman chosen to
accompany Bobby Nasution, one of which was based
on primordial considerations as a strategy and the
main contribution of strategy in an effort to achieve
victory from the Medan Malays. The phenomenon of
combining candidate pairs based on primordial
considerations is part of a winning planning strategy
that can still be called identity politics. This is a
benchmark for the use of identity politics because the
voting community in Medan City still chooses
ICOSOP 2022 - International Conference on Social and Political Development 4
76
candidates based on primordial factors. For example,
the representation of the candidate pair must be
Muslim because the majority of the religion in Medan
City is Islam, therefore the image that is built has a
representation of the majority Muslim voice.
Automatically has an effect on boosting the
electability of the candidate pair's package. And vice
versa in North Medan and South Medan. Voters
prefer to see figures based on ethnic similarities and
that often happened in the previous elections for the
Mayor of Medan.
This is as stated by Heriansyah (2020) that the
process of recruiting leaders in the regions tends to be
based on the parameters of primordialism, which
facilitates the spirit of regionalism and ethnicity.
Theoretically, the primordial approach suggests that
the individual interests of religious members are
made to support the interests of the group and
leadership to strengthen the religious base as a source
of social power. Political socialization of the
candidate pair Bobby-Aulia in the form of religious
and ethnic approaches when conducting a political
safari around the city of Medan, sometimes using the
attributes or idioms of the local culture visited.
According to the researcher, political
socialization activities that are wrapped in the
politicization of identity are a natural thing,
happening anywhere because of respect for local
culture. The most important thing is not to harm
society in general by violating cultural norms or
conducting black campaigns against other candidates
(Negong, 2017). The use of cultural and religious
idioms that the Bobby-Aulia candidate pair
accidentally uses has a positive nuance for the
common interest between the community and the
Bobby-Aulia candidate pair to erode the issue of
national sentiment that gives a message of unity in
diversity. In the process of selecting regional heads,
the politicization of identity cannot be avoided. The
most important thing is to be aware that there is a
platform that Pancasila and the democratic system are
final, compatible with the Indonesian nation, which
consists of various ethnicities.
If you violate the law, you are against the state.
When a candidate pair accidentally uses symbols of
local religion and culture, then the community feels
that their values, norms, and cultural symbols are
respected and feel proud because the candidate pair
who conducts the campaign and socialization is a
representation of them (Negong, 2017). Every area in
Medan City has a variety of unique dances that are
usually used as a pick-up ritual or a symbol of
receiving guests. This dance is usually played by
several male and female dancers with very typical
Deli Malay movements. This dance is often
performed at various events such as welcoming
important guests, cultural festivals and performing
arts. Likewise, ikat weaving is a cultural artifact that
binds people in a strong inner bond of brotherhood.
Weaving is not just an inanimate object that doesn't
communicate anything.
However, ikat weaving has become a medium of
communication for humanity, which is so often
involved in intertwining the kinship of the community
in general in the city of Medan. Ikat cloth also has an
extraordinary dimension of respect for others who
usually welcome guests, especially regional or central
officials. The use of traditional and cultural idioms
that occurred in addition to that, the 2020 Medan
Mayor candidate Bobby-Aulia was welcomed by the
Deli Malay traditional dance by the community in the
form of regional language narratives by
representatives of traditional leaders. For example,
the Malay King wore oversized clothes to Bobby-
Aulia, who had just been named a young Medan
Malay figure. Bobby-Aulia was also given a souvenir
in the form of a sandalwood statue which is the result
of the natural wealth of the area as a symbol of the
bond that remains strong and strong as a leader who
prioritizes the needs of the community.
In relation to the instrumentalism approach, in the
2020 Medan Mayor election. Actually, the
politicization of religion-based identity in Medan
City is difficult to detect in large-scale political
activities. Generally, the exploitation of religion-
based identity politics occurs on a small scale and
escapes media coverage. Based on the results of
interviews with all the winning teams, especially in
the 2020 Medan Mayor election, the winning team
acknowledged that the politicization of identity
occurs anywhere, intentionally or unintentionally,
even though it only uses religious and ethnic
attributes or symbols, theoretically politics can also
be said to be politicized. identity. This religion-based
identity politics in Medan City is used by several
parties, especially politicians, to reap their economics
and political interests. As stated by Brown (1989) that
ethnicity is a form of association used by individuals
in pursuing their interests related to economic and
political gain.
The phenomenon of the use of identity politics in
the form of identity issues based on religion, clan and
ethnicity used during the 2020 Medan Mayoral
election is a link in the movement carried out in
Jakarta in 2016, known as the "212 Movement". The
212 movement was also encouraged by one of the
Islamic Defenders Front Organizations (FPI) and they
are affiliated with Anis-Sandi. The aim of the 212
The Politization of Identity Politics in Medan Mayor Election 2020
77
Movement is to demand the non-active Governor of
DKI Jakarta, Basuki Tjahaja Purnama (Ahok), to
honorably resign from his position as Governor of
DKI Jakarta in 2017 (Tolo, 2019). The Ahok effect
and the 212 Movement had a significant influence on
the electability of the candidate pairs Bobby-Aulia
and Akhyar-Salman in Medan City. The Akhyar-
Salman campaign was greatly assisted by the strength
of the issue of the DKI effect, especially when
Akhyar-Salman presented Ustadz Abdul Somad.
In the 2020 Medan Mayor election, religion-based
identity politicization is difficult to detect in large-
scale political activities. Generally, the exploitation
of religion-based identity politics is prominent but
occurs on a small scale. The prominent religious
factor is not at the domestic/local level in Medan City,
but the prominent religious factor is more universal at
the national level, namely, overall it alludes to the
Muslims of the '212 Movement, the Jakarta Charter,
and the Establishment of a Khilafah State'. Based on
the results of interviews with all the winning teams,
especially in the 2020 Medan City Mayor election,
the winning team acknowledged that the
politicization of identity occurs anywhere,
intentionally or unintentionally, even though it only
uses religious and ethnic attributes or symbols,
theoretically it can also be said as identity
politicization (Tolo, 2019).
5 CONCLUSIONS
Through the perspective of the instrumentalism
approach, the Bobby-Aulia winning team saw a good
opportunity to increase Bobby-Aulia's electability.
Utilization of the management of religious identity
issues was involved as a political strategy of victory
manipulated by the winning team because of national
problems such as the Ahok case (Ahok effect) and the
'212 Movement' which had the potential to create
national disintegration. This is very influential
because the people of Medan City, who are
predominantly Muslim and the candidates who are
presented at the Medan City election are assumed to
be very close to blasphemers and parties supporting
religious blasphemers. The politics of religious and
ethnic identity in the 2020 Medan Mayor election is
not prominent at the domestic/local level in Medan
City but is more prominent at the national/universal
level. The politicization of religion-based identity and
ethnicity at the local identity level did not have a
major effect on increasing Akhyar-Salman's
electability, only when the combination of candidate
pairs recruited based on religious identity according
to the representation of the majority of the people of
Medan City, although in the end it was won by the
Bobby-Aulia pair.
REFERENCES
Birnir, J. K. 2007. Ethnicity and Electoral Politics.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
BPS Medan City 2020.
Brown D. 1989. Ethnic revival: Perspectives on state and
society. Journal Third World Quarterly,11(4).
Buchari, S. A. 2014. Kebangkitan Etnis Menuju Politik
Identitas. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Burke, P. J. 2003. Introduction. In P. J. Burke, T. Owens,
R.T. Serpe, & P. A. Thoits (Eds.), Advance in Identity
Theory and Research. New York: Plenum Publisher.
Geertz, C. 1963. The Integrative Revolution: Primordial
Sentiments and Civil Politics in the New States. In C.
Geertz, Old Societies and New States. New York: The
Free Press.
Herdiansah, A.G. 2017. Politisasi Identitas Dalam
Kompetisi Pemilu di Indonesia Pasca 2014. Jurnal
Bawaslu, 3 (2): 169-183.
Jumadi & Yaakop, M. 2013. Keterwakilan Etnis dalam
Kepemimpinan Politik Pasca Orde Baru. Jurnal
Demokrasi & Otonomi Daerah, 2 (11): 81-90.
KPUD Medan City 2020.
Negong, Y. 2017. Politik Identitas dalam Pemilihan
Gubernur Nusa Tenggara Timur 2013 di Kota Kupang.
ISSN 2502-776X. Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 8(2).
Tolo, E. Y. S. 2019. Di Bawah Bayang-bayang Ahok:
Politik Identitas dalam Pemilu di NTT 30 April 2019.
Tersedia: https://tirto.id/di-bawah-bayang-bayang-
ahok-politik-identitas-dalam- pemilu-di-ntt-dniM
diunduh pada 02 November 2021.
Tolo, E. Y. S. 2019. Pemilu 2019 dan Politik Identitas
Berbasis Agama Nasrani di NTT, wajah Islam progresif
Indonesia, 13 Agustus 2019. Tersedia:
https://islambergerak.com/2019/04/pemilu-2019-dan-
politik-identitas-berbasis-agama-nasrani-di-ntt/
diunduh pada 02 November 2019.
ICOSOP 2022 - International Conference on Social and Political Development 4
78