5 DISCUSSIONS
As shown in Figure 4 and 5, the analysis using the
Bonferroni method hardly showed significant change
across conditions. Therefore, Figure 6 and 7, which
shows the results of the Tukey test, is the subject of
the discussion.
5.1 Effect of Wearing the Assist Suit on
the Swing
The effect of wearing an assist suit on the swing is
examined by comparing the results of "No wear
(before)" and "Without assist". In all participants
except participant 6, there was no significant
difference in the amount of waist rotation between
"No wear (before)" and "Without assist". Therefore,
it can be said that wearing the assist suit had less
restriction on the lower body movement.
In addition, in participants 1 and 6, the racket
speed was significantly decreased in the comparison
between "Without assist" and "No wear (before)".
About this, participant 1 said there was a feeling that
the bag fixed on the back was misaligned. Based on
this opinion, in each experiment of participants 2-6,
the bag fixation was strengthened. In the result, a
significant decrease was not observed except
participant 6. Therefore, when the bag fixation was
strengthened, it is considered that wearing the assist
suit had little restriction of the upper body movement.
5.2 Support Effect for Waist Yaw
Angle
The support effect of the assist suit is examined by
comparing "With assist" and "No Wear (before)",
"With assist" and "Without assist".
In all participants except participant 6, the amount
of rotation of the waist increased significantly in the
comparison between "With assist" and "No wear
(before)". In addition, in all participants, the amount
of rotation of the waist increased significantly in the
comparison between "With assist" and "Without
assist". From this, it can be said that the purpose of
increasing the rotation of the lower body was
achieved with the developed suit.
Only in participant 6, there was no significant
difference in the amount of rotation of the waist with
the comparison between "With assist" and "No wear
(before)". In this regard, in participant 6, the amount
of rotation of the waist reduced in "No wear (after)".
So, there is a possibility that participant 6 generated
the opposite force against the support force of the
device.
5.3 Training Effect of Assist Suit
The training effect of the assist suit is examined by
comparing "No wear (before)" and "No wear (after)".
In the results of the comparison of waist rotation
amounts, there is no significant difference in
participants 1 and 4, but a significant increase in
participants 2 and 5, and a significant decrease in
participants 3 and 6.
In the results of the comparison of racket speed,
there is a significant decrease in participants 1 and 4,
a significant increase in participants 2 and 5, and no
significant difference in participants 3 and 6.
From the above, it can be said that the
improvement of the swing ability by training with the
assist suit was observed in participants 2 and 5, but
not observed in participants 1, 3, 4, and 6.
To identify whether there are any characteristics
specific to those who have benefited from the suit, the
difference between participants 2, 5 and other
participants is discussed. On considering about
difference, participant 1 whose bag on his back was
fixed weakly than other participants and participant 6
who was not able to get support with the assist suit
are excluded. In the comparison of the waist rotation
amounts of "Without assist" and "With assist", there
are significant increases in all four participants.
However, in the racket speed, there are significant
increases in participants 2 and 5. Therefore, it is
considered that participants 2 and 5 were able to
transmit the waist increase movement to the
racket.From the above, there is the possibility that this
assist suit gives a great effect to participants who are
able to coordinate the twisting motion of the waist and
the movement of the racket well.
Figure 8 shows each average of waist yaw angular
velocity in "No wear (before)" and "No wear (after)".
In participants 2 and 5 who had a training effect,
Waist yaw angular velocities of both "No wear
(before)" and "No wear (after)" were large. The same
character is also seen in participant 1. So, there is a
possibility that participant 1 got a positive training
effect if the method of fixing the bag was the same as
that of other participants. On the other hand, in
participants 1, 3 and 6, waist yaw angular velocities
of both "No wear (before)" and "No wear (after)"
were small. From this, training effect may be seen in
participants with large waist yaw angular velocities
before training. Also, increases of waist yaw angular
velocities is not seen for participants with small waist
yaw angular velocities before training.
From the above, there is a possibility that the
developed assist suit is effective by introducing a
mechanism which supports transmitting the increased