3.5 Ideology
The concept of ideology is a scary word to hear and
learn during the New Order government, because at
that time there was no ideology other than Pancasila.
Basically ideology comes from Latin which consists
of two words, yaki ideo means thought; logical means
logic, science, knowledge. It can be concluded that
ideology is the science of beliefs and ideals (Prasetya,
2011). According to Steger (in Prasetya, 2011)
ideology is a system of spreading ideas, beliefs that
form a system of values and norms and ideal rules that
are accepted as fact and truth by certain groups.
Political ideology deals with the question of who
will be the leader? How were they chosen, and by
what principles did they lead? This will be related to
what kind of leader is worthy to lead the community
at large, whether considering the issue of religiosity,
social spirit, wealth, academic ability, physical or
appearance, ethnicity or ethnicity, male or female.
Ideology contains many arguments for persuasion or
against (counter) opposing ideas and greatly affects
various aspects of human life, starting from economic
aspects, education, health, and welfare.
3.6 Power
According to Kebung (2018), the concept of power
constructed by Foucault cannot be viewed in black
and white or negative and positive terms. Power is not
an institution or structure, not a power possessed, but
power is a term used to describe complex strategic
situations in a group of people. The pattern that
develops in every Pileg campaign is mostly done by
mobilizing ethnicity-based masses, where the elites of
the association measure the fanaticism and loyalty of
the legislative candidates through the ideological
struggle of the association.
PSMTI is more about integration, CORE is more
about assimilation. PSMTI adheres to ethnicity and
ancestral traditions with strong roots going back to
China, as was the ideology of the CHH association
during the Dutch colonial era. The INTI is a Chinese
association with strong national principles, by
opening membership to indigenous people, as was the
ideology of the PTI association during the Dutch
colonial era.
In the author's observation, the awareness of the
ethnic Chinese also tends to be manipulated. Either
through direct domination, namely through the orders
and rules of the association, or through hegemony,
namely through ideological discourse that is
distributed to normalize the perspective of this ethnic
group. The goal is to gain electoral benefits in every
election. The ethnic Chinese community eventually
continued to experience symbolic violence.
3.7 Imagined Communities
In an association, of course, it cannot be separated
from what is called the elite of the association. This
elite attitude is also associated with the meaning of
nationality that forms and binds them as imagined
communities. Imagined Communities are socially
constructed communities, imagined by people who
see themselves as part of the group. (Anderson,
1983).
Benedict Anderson's concept is to understand the
meaning of nationalism in Chinese ethnic groups in
Indonesia and the Philippines. Therefore, discussing
imagination, according to the author, cannot be
separated from the discussion about space.
Imagination is something that fills the inner space of
man.
4 DISCUSSIONS
The power relations built by the elites of Chinese
associations will be seen from various perspectives.
How PSMTI and INTI unite perceptions of national
identity, and what are the efforts of these two
associations in breaking the long conflict of
hegemony and ideological power over the ethnic
Chinese that has been rooted since the days of the
Dutch East Indies. The hegemony and power
relations that are constructed with the ideological ties
of the association become the theoretical framework
used by the author to portray the chain of correlation
of the ethnic Chinese citizens with the interests of
China as their ancestral country.
Here, according to the author, the problem lies in
the public space which has been arranged in such a
way that it creates not only physical separation
between the two communities, Chinese and non-
Chinese, but deeper than that, this separation also
encourages the emergence of a "wild" imagination
that cannot be verified by each other. This separation
then becomes stronger and the walls become thicker
when negative prejudices, bitter experiences and
wounds that have arisen during the history of the
"limited" relationship between the two divided
communities become a tool for measuring the whole
community.