Resolution adopted by the UN General Assembly on
September 25, 2015, “Transforming our world: the
2030 sustainable development agenda.” The strategic
aspects of sustainable development in the relationship
between ecology and the economy in the modern
world are clearly shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1: Structural aspects of sustainable development in
the modern world.
In recent years, the category of "green" economy
has been added to the general context of the
sustainable development of civilization as a direction
in economic science based on the recognition of the
economy as a dependent structural component of the
natural environment. The actual application of this
concept in practice requires the adoption of
comprehensive organizational, managerial, legal,
technological, financial and economic measures to
green the economy and reduce its pressure on the
environment. The solution of this problem can be
achieved primarily at the micro level by ensuring the
sustainable development of individual enterprises
(Kalner, 2019).
The term "green" economy was borrowed from
the report of the same name by British economists in
1989, while the start of the formulation of the
corresponding policy dates back 20 years later and
coincides with the global crisis of 2008. It was within
the framework of overcoming this crisis that the
concept of a “green” economy was finalized and
approved at the level of the G7 (G7) and G20 (G20)
summits.
Since far from the last cause of the crisis was the
exhaustion of the meanings of economic
development, since individual material consumption
ceased to be its engine, the global economy needed
legitimate grounds for investing in some alternative.
The "green" economy was chosen for the role of such,
especially since the state became the main investor in
the new post-crisis reality, supporting the economy
with its investments.
As international environmental studies show, over
the past 50 years, humanity has been steadily
widening the gap between the demand for
environmental resources and the ability of nature to
satisfy it. At the same time, developed countries leave
the largest “ecological footprint”, demonstrating a
high level of consumption of resources and end
products. At the same time, the level of negative
anthropological burden is always parabolically
dependent on progressive economic growth: at the
initial stages, the acceleration of economic
development entails a deterioration in the
environmental situation, but after key needs are met,
a public demand for a favorable environment arises,
provided through environmental measures and
prohibitions.
In the broad sense of the word, the "green"
economy is a direction in economic science based on
the recognition of the economy as a dependent
structural component of the natural environment. The
adoption of this paradigm requires the adoption of
comprehensive organizational, managerial, legal,
technological, financial and economic measures to
green the economy and reduce its pressure on the
environment.
It should be noted that in the scientific community
there is no unified approach to interpreting the
essence of the "green" economy. There are two
discourses in its definition. One of the approaches
emphasizes its evolutionary-technological nature as a
fundamental principle, while the second approach has
a social basis and appeals to the idea of justice.
The representative of the first of these approaches
can be called the German economist R. Fuchs, who
believed that the "green" economy "is characterized
by a productive synthesis of biological evolution and
technology, growth along with nature" (Fuks, 2016).
Russian researcher Yashalova N.N. characterizes the
"green" economy as an economic system
"with low
carbon emissions, which efficiently uses resources
and meets the interests of the whole society"
(Yashalova, 2019). Thus, within the framework of
this discourse, it is implied that economic growth
opposes the conservation of biodiversity, and the way
out of the dilemma and the criterion for action is
precisely the “green” economy.