available to consumers at the time of purchase, which
means it is necessary to deliver information and
marketing campaigns in such a way that a potential
buyer knows everything about the benefits of an
organic product.
4 CONCLUSIONS
Thus, the organic products industry in Kazakhstan
has been evolving almost since 2012, but has not yet
achieved big results. The industry is quite new and
specific, so the mechanism of interacting with both
potential producers and consumers has not yet been
clearly developed.
Product awareness has not yet been shaped.
Residents of Kazakhstan learn about most of the
benefits of organic products from the Internet, with
the consumer failing to understand the difference
between "organic", "organic products", "BIO",
"GMO-free", "eco-products", "natural product",
unaware of strict requirements for the production and
labeling of organic products. For some, all organic
products are just a sales pitch.
Hence, the issue of certification and labeling
becomes relevant. After all, only the “organic” label
and a conformity mark give 100% confidence to the
consumer about the natural origin of raw materials,
and the high quality of the product without the use of
any chemicals, preservatives, GMOs, etc. (Blagoyev,
2020). Moreover, a large proportion of consumers in
Kazakhstan are unaware of the labels of organic
products incorporating a special conformity mark. In
most cases, consumers will read the information on
the packaging that this food product complies with
the established GOST.
Kazakhstan does not have a unified certification
system in accordance with an international certificate,
while it is expensive to undergo certification with an
international certification authority. This is why it
will be unrealistic for a local producer to enter the
international marker without state support.
Therefore, without the support of the state, it is
simply unrealistic for a commodity producer to enter
the international market. Crop rotation, purchasing
certified seeds, getting certified, storing and
transporting organic products properly according to
standards are all costly aspects of organic farming.
Therefore, at the initial stage, small farmers who
begin to engage in organic farming cannot do without
the help of the state. Measures of state support for
agricultural entrepreneurship in the field of organic
agriculture have not yet been formed. In fact, the state
does not provide financial, informational or
investment support for organic agriculture. There is
no system for collecting information on the number
of producers, certified land, market size and other
components, on the basis of which further forecasts
for its development are built. Roles are not distributed
between public authorities, ministries and market
entities in the form of manufacturers, consumers,
suppliers, traders. Thus, it is necessary to create a
functioning institutional structure that implements the
policy of organic agriculture development.
REFERENCES
FiBL& IFOAM -The World of Organic Agriculture -
Statistics and Emerging Trends 2019.
https://ciaorganico.net/documypublic/486_2020-
organic-world-2019.pdf.
FiBL& IFOAM – Organic International (2020) - FiBL
survey 2021 "The World of Organic Agriculture, 2021
edition published". https://www.organic-
world.net/yearbook/yearbook-2021.html.
The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO).
http://www.fao.org/organicag/oa-faq/oa-faq2/en/.
Life Quality Bulletin, March 2014 / Statistics Committee of
the Ministry of National Economy.
https://www.unicef.org/kazakhstan/media/671/file/%D
0%9F%D1%83%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%
BA%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F%20.pdf.
State Program for the Development of the Agro-Industrial
Complex of the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2017-2021.
http://extwprlegs1.fao.org/docs/pdf/kaz200797.pdf.
Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 423-V dated NOV,
27, 2015 "On Production of Organic Products”.
http://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/Z1500000423/info.
Prospects of Development of Organic Farming: research by
SBS CONSULTING. 2019. p. 30. https://www.sbs-
consulting.ru/upload/iblock/c6e/c6ef149756246940a3
c6992984e25c4e.pdf.
Basha, M., Mason, C., Shamsudin, M., Hussain, H., Salem,
M., 2015, Consumers attitude towards organic food.
Procedia Econ. Finance. 31. pp. 444–452.
Costa, J., Morgado, C., Fernandes, A., Guerra, M.,
Brandão, C., 2020. Profile and Motivations of
Consumers of Organic Products. INCREaSE.
Illukpitiya, P., Khanal, P., 2016. Consumer Perception of
Organic Food and Product Marketing. Organic Farming
for Sustainable Agriculture. Sustainable Development
and Biodiversity. 9. pp. 15-23.
Shafi, F. A., Rennie D., 2012. Consumer Perceptions
towards Organic Food, Procedia Social and Behavioral
Sciences. 49. pp. 360–367.
Mann, S., 2018. Agricultural Markets, Socioeconomics of
Agriculture. pp. 41-64.
Wilier, H., Lernoud, J., 2016. The World of Organic
Agriculture. Statistics and Emerging Trends, Research
Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Frick, and
IFOAM. pp. 45-54.