Accounting for Transport and Logistics Hubs in Freight Demand
Models
Tatiana Tuneva and Yana Yaroslavtseva
Ural State University of Railway Transport, Ekaterinburg, Russia
Keywords: Cargo transportation, transport process modelling, transport and logistics hubs, demand, model.
Abstract: The importance of logistics and its impact on transport processes were considered when modeling the demand
for freight transport using new models that include several aspects. However, transport logistics hubs without
a storage function, which are mainly used for cargo transshipment, are not sufficiently accounted for in most
cargo models, although they are of great importance for cargo transportation. Currently, it is not clear which
models actually take into account transport and logistics hubs and how they do it. The purpose of this article
is to review the accounting of transport and logistics hubs in models of demand for cargo transportation.
1 INTRODUCTION
Until a few years ago, logistics elements were
considered incomplete or not considered at all in most
national models. This made it difficult to accurately
map freight transport and logistics as a factor
affecting imports. The following will provide an
overview of developments in freight transport
modeling related to logistics integration. It will
provide a general basis for the subsequent
presentation of various models that consider logistics
and transport logistics hubs in particular.
2 MATERIALS AND METHODS
Early attempts to integrate logistics aspects into
models can be found in the field of disaggregated
modeling, both related to method selection and
logistics selection.
There are various models that take logistics into
account. Although transport demand modeling in
relation to logistics issues has been greatly developed
in recent years, only a few models are currently used
that specifically include logistics aspects (Golubchik,
2020). Some examples can be found in the British
EUNET, in Dutch SMILE or in SLAM implemented
in SCENES the European model. A striking example
in this area is the national transport model system
implemented in Sweden and Norway (SAMGODS
and NEMO) (Mirotin, 2019).
Model applied to a region of Sweden named
SAMGODS, is a model of national resolution and
macroscopic scale analysis. From a certain point of
view, it can be considered as a mixed model, if we
talk about its depth of aggregation. The model is
based on several submodels that take into account the
development of the economy and trade, from which it
deduces the flow generation. The model takes into
account 35 product groups and offers 86 predefined
transport chains for transport processes through a
multimodal network. Permission for cargo size,
suitable routes and means of transportation is made
using the logistics module (Ushko, 2019).
The logistics module consists of three stages and
follows the "aggregated-disaggregated-aggregated"
structure. Flows of goods between places of
production and consumption are primarily provided
at the aggregate level. In order to assign them to
individual firms, they are disaggregated.
Consequently, firm’s logistics decisions (e.g.,
shipment size, use of collection and distribution
centers) can be modeled in this disaggregated part of
the model.
By selecting one of the predefined transport
chains, the logistics module sets the modes of
transport for each section and determines how
transportation is carried out (directly or through the
use of logistics nodes). The model also includes
transport and logistics hubs defined as cargo
transshipment and possible storage locations
(Gubanova, 2009). The logistics module consists of
subprograms that gradually develop solutions.
16
Tuneva, T. and Yaroslavtseva, Y.
Accounting for Transport and Logistics Hubs in Freight Demand Models.
DOI: 10.5220/0011576600003527
In Proceedings of the 1st International Scientific and Practical Conference on Transport: Logistics, Construction, Maintenance, Management (TLC2M 2022), pages 16-21
ISBN: 978-989-758-606-4
Copyright
c
2023 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. Under CC license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
Therefore, the available transport chains, including
optimal transfer points between transport sections, are
initially generated in the first subroutine. This is
followed by the second one, which selects transport
chains based on minimizing overall logistics costs,
shown in Figure 1.
NEMO is the national model used in Norway. Due
to its evolution (parallel toSAMGODS), NEMO
views logistics centers in a similar way to
SAMGODS. Thus, the model is an extension of the
Swedish model to the spatial domain of Norway (de
Jong G, 2007).
The Dutch SMILE model, which predicts traffic
flows at the national level, was one of the first models
to take logistics aspects into account.
SMILE models traffic flows by taking into
account economic events and linking the economy,
logistics, and transportation.
Figure 2 shows the combination of logistics
nodes, which in this case are represented by
distribution centers, becomes noticeable when
considering the characteristics of the nodes, as well as
the attributes of goods and their requirements in terms
of inventory, processing and transportation (Gruzdev,
2021).
Fi
g
ure 1: Inte
g
ration of lo
g
istics hubs in SAMGODS.
Figure 2: Node in SMILE.
Accounting for Transport and Logistics Hubs in Freight Demand Models
17
SLAM is integrated into the European SCENES
model. The main ideas and experience of the Dutch
SMILE model were used in the development SMILE
process. SLAM is designed to assess the impact of
changes in logistics and transport systems across
Europe. Therefore, one of the main applications is the
discovery and location of distribution centers in
Europe. The SLAM model takes into account
changes in distribution structures (for example, the
number and location of intermediate warehouses used
for distribution) and includes them in distribution
flows (Avramchikova, 2019).
SLAM obtains production and consumption flows
that integrate alternative distribution chains. In this
context, the distribution chain is defined as a set of
distribution centers and transport links for trade flows
between the producing region and the consumer.
Thus, the main function of the model is to consider
alternative distribution chains (production
distribution center – consumption). The model is
shown in Figure 3 (Musatov, 2019).
SLAM achieves a more accurate picture of traffic
flows by integrating distribution logistics nodes into
the transport system. SLAM does not go into details
about networks, since flows are strictly economically
rational and pass through an abstract distribution-
consumption network in the most cost-effective way
(de Jong G, 2007).
EUNET is a regional model developed in the UK.
It covers freight traffic in the central part of the UK,
as well as imports and exports from and to the region.
The purpose of the model is to predict the demand for
cargo transportation depending on economic
operations and cargo logistics (Rustamov, 2021).
Thus, there is a set of distribution channels
through a set of possible nodes, shown in Figure 4.
The LAMTA freight forecasting model is a
multimodal transportation demand model shown in
Figure 5.
While the model primarily focuses on road freight
transport (cargo transportation), it also includes a
multi-modal framework to support cargo
transportation solutions and logistics hubs.
GoodTrip is an urban freight transport model
used in the Netherlands. It is based on consumer
demand: it builds logistics chains, linking the
activities of consumers, supermarkets, hypermarkets,
distribution centers and manufacturers.
The four-component model (spatial organization
of activities, cargo flows, transport, and
infrastructure) calculates the volume of goods by
product group for each spatially defined zone. Thus,
the flow of goods between consumers and producers
is determined. Within this definition, product flows
are affected by both the spatial distribution of
activities, and the market share of each group of
activities (consumers). After that, the product groups
are classified and a matrix is created. At the final
stage, vehicle trips are generated and assigned to the
network (de Jong G, 2007).
Although the model takes into account logistics
aspects, transport logistics hubs are not fully covered
(loading facilities or similar objects). Approaches to
the concept of urban distribution centers can be
considered in various scenarios. One example here is
the scenarios for urban logistics distribution centers
shown in Figure 6.
Figure 3: Node in SLAM.
Fi
g
ure 4: Nodes in EUNET.
TLC2M 2022 - INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND PRACTICAL CONFERENCE TLC2M TRANSPORT: LOGISTICS,
CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, MANAGEMENT
18
However, the influence of logistics hubs in
general and transport logistics hubs in particular on
transport within the study area is ignored from a
large-scale point of view. To summarize the
understanding of various models, it can be stated that
there are various ways to integrate transport and
logistics nodes into modeling.
A fairly simple method is to integrate nodes as
sources and sinks in models. Thus, logistics nodes are
considered in a simple way as so-called special
generators or singular flow generators, the volume of
transport of which is supplied from outside.
Integration of transport logistics nodes using
logistics modules that choose between several
predefined transport chains is a more complex
method. The properties of shipments (for example,
goods, shipment size) have a decisive influence on the
consideration of nodes within logistics modules. Due
to the peculiarities of the nodes, there are often
restrictions in the handling of certain goods. If the
nodes are not suitable for handling certain loads, the
probability of transportation through these nodes will
be reduced. The result of this consideration are
various transport chains processed only through
certain nodes. Thus, the characteristics of nodes in
combination with the characteristics of transportation
determine the use and impact of nodes or transport
demand, respectively. Another aspect of the
integration of logistics nodes into the simulation is the
inclusion of additional characteristics of nodes that
exceed the characteristics (the ability to handle
certain loads). For example, integrating information
about differences in the technologies used in nodes
can be very useful if the technologies used differ
significantly. This method makes it possible to
examine the hubs in more detail if they differ in their
characteristics.
At the same time, it is necessary to understand
what data could help to achieve adequate integration
of transport logistics hubs in the modeling of
transport demand. Such data should contain
information about the characteristics of the node (for
example, total area, capacity, branches of customers),
as well as information about the transport process
Figure 6: Nodes in GoodTrip.
Fi
g
ure 5: Nodes in LAMTA.
Accounting for Transport and Logistics Hubs in Freight Demand Models
19
itself (for example, vehicles, transport facilities,
volume of traffic). This additional information will
improve the integration of transport and logistics hubs
(Table 1). The data is presented in table 1.
The use of new data containing the above
attributes will help to deduce key parameters in order
to identify correlations and dependencies between
certain node characteristics and the specific role of
nodes in the transport process.
3 RESULTS
The article examines the integration of transport and
logistics hubs in the model of demand for freight
transportation. It is revealed that the growing
relevance of logistics in freight transportation in
recent decades is taken into account in demand
modeling due to the greater integration of logistics
aspects into some models. This development was
important because models are relevant tools for
forecasting transport demand and supporting decision
makers through the evaluation of transport policy
measures. However, the analysis showed that,
although the demand models for freight transport
have undergone significant improvements in recent
decades, important logistical aspects have not yet
been sufficiently taken into account.
4 CONCLUSIONS
Within the framework of cargo transportation
processes, transport and logistics hubs have recently
become increasingly important empirically. This
implies a greater relevance of their consideration in
demand modeling. Nevertheless, the conducted
review showed that the accounting of transport and
logistics hubs when modeling the demand for freight
transportation differs significantly. Most of the
existing freight transport models do not integrate
transport and logistics hubs. Application models in
many cases focus on distribution logistics hubs, but
only a few integrate transport logistics hubs to some
extent.
Thus, the integration of transport and logistics
hubs differs in many ways. Firstly, not all types are
considered models. Secondly, the consideration
differs not only quantitatively, but also qualitatively.
There are also certain restrictions that prevent
node integration. The potential of many models is
limited due to the availability of data. More detailed
data is needed for node integration. The lack of
adequate and detailed data remains a serious problem.
To solve these problems and achieve greater
realism, transport logistics hubs should be
highlighted in the modelling of demand for freight
transportation, as well as in empiricism.
REFERENCES
Golubchik, A. M., 2020. Freight forwarding business:
creation, formation, management. TransLit.
Mirotin, L. B., Gudkov, V. A., Zyryanov, Z. Z., 2019.
Cargo flow management in transport and logistics
systems.
Ushko, A. U., 2019. Innovations of the economy of the
Russian Federation: urban agglomerations, territorial
production clusters, tourist and recreational zones and
transport and logistics hubs.
Gubanova, E. S., Selyakova, S. A., 2009. Questions urban
agglomeration development. Economic and social
changes in the region: facts, trends, forecast.
Gruzdev, A. I., 2021. Multimodal transportation and
transport hubs. History and prospects of transport
development in the North of Russia.
Avramchikova, N. T., Rozhnov, I. P., Zakharova, L. N.,
2019. Multimodal transport hubs: advantages and
prospects of development. Management of Social
economic systems.
Musatov, D. V., Kubareva, O. A., 2019. Transport hubs as
the basis of the country's transport and logistics
infrastructure. Education, science and technology:
problems and prospects: collection of scientific tr.
based on the materials of the II International Scientific
and Practical Conference.
Table 1: Opportunities for improving the integration of transport and logistics hubs.
Im
p
ortant attributes that characterize trans
p
ort and lo
g
istics hubs
Basic node data
(
e.
g
. area
)
Vehicles
Total area Transport facilities
Processing area Infrastructure connection
Bandwidth Customer branches
Number of tri
p
s Loadin
g
units and loadin
g
and unloadin
g
facilities
Number of vehicles Volume of traffic
Trans
p
ortation distance T
e of business
Network structure Empty trips and capacity utilization
TLC2M 2022 - INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND PRACTICAL CONFERENCE TLC2M TRANSPORT: LOGISTICS,
CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, MANAGEMENT
20
Rustamov, A. F., 2021. Transport hubs: development
prospects and digitalization. Transport: Science,
Education, Production.
de Jong, G., Ben-Akiva, M., 2007, Microsimulation model
of cargo size and transport chain selection.
Accounting for Transport and Logistics Hubs in Freight Demand Models
21