one in quantity and the total number of vehicles
intended to be produced in the respective planning
interval.
3 PROBABILISTIC NETWORKS
The domain and expert knowledge in this application
about installation rates can be formally represented by
a probability distribution
over the set of relevant item
families or attributes. Conditional independences are
used to decompose this distribution into lower
dimensional distributions. Since it is possible to
connect the concepts of conditional independence
with the separation concept in graphs, graphical
models turn out to be extremely helpful for the
problem of item set planning. Two well-know models
are Bayesian networks and Markov networks
(Borgelt 2009).
A Bayesian networks is a directed acyclic graph
(DAG’s), representing a set of random variables and
the dependencies between these random variables. A
Markov network is an undirected conditional
independence graph G = (V,E) of a probability
distribution together with a family of conditional
probabilities of the factorization induced by the
graph.
Probabilistic graphical models allow for an
efficient knowledge representation as well as an
integration of new evidence via conditioning. The
basic idea is to distribute (propagate) the evidence
through the network to reach all attributes.
Probabilistic graphical models can also be learned
from given data. Classical statistical techniques for
parameters learning as well as other methods for
learning the network structure are useful (Drton
2017). Approaches for learning graphical models
typically fall into one of two categories: score-based
approaches and constraint-based approaches. Score-
based approaches consist of two elements: a score
function to evaluate how well graph candidates fit the
database, and some search heuristic (possibly guided
by the scores) to traverse the set of graphs. The goal
of constraint-based approaches is to use conditional
(in)dependence tests to construct a graphical model
which is a perfect map (or independence map) of the
data-generating distribution. Several efficient and
user-friendly commercial tools such as Hugin
(HuginExpert 2022) are available for this task.
In practice, however, there is also a need to revise
the probability distribution represented by a graphical
model in such a way that it satisfies the given
framework conditions, for example given marginal
distributions. Pure evidence propagation methods
such as join tree propagation and bucket elimination
are unsuitable for this task. We present a knowledge-
based probabilistic formalization and solution of the
fundamental revision problem for Markov networks,
constrained to a set of unconstrained single-variable
boundary conditions (Gebhardt 2005). This
probabilistic approach avoids all concepts offered by
calculi with deviating semantic foundations, for
example to minimize probabilistic difference
measures that could be inherited from information
theory. From multivariate statistics, iterative
proportional fitting gives a convenient algorithm to fit
the marginal distributions of a given joint distribution
to desired values.
4 CONCLUSIONS
The probabilistic graphical network approach has
proven to be very successful for assistance systems.,
Thousands of Markov networks for different planning
scenarios and different model groups are in use every
day for item set planning.
The methodology used for item set planning can
be easily transferred to other areas. In the monograph
(Kruse 2022) a tutorial introduction to this type of
knowledge representation, updating, revision and
learning is given.
In the item planning project we have mainly
benefited from the decomposition aspect of
probabilistic graphical networks. We are convinced
that the concept of causality (Pearl 2018) will play a
central role in many future applications.
REFERENCES
Borgelt, C., Steinbrecher, M., Kruse, R. (2009) Graphical
Models, Representations for Learning, Reasoning and
Data Mining, Wiley, Chichester, 2
nd
edition
Drton, M., Maathuis M. (2017) Structure Learning in
Graphical Modeling, Annual Review of Statistics and
its Application Vol.4, 365-393
Gebhardt, J., Kruse, R. (2005). Knowledge-Based
Operations for Graphical Models in Planning. In
ECSQARU 2005, Springer LNAI 3571, pp 3-14.
HuginExpert (2022), Bayesian network software,
http://www.hugin.com
Kruse, R., et al (2022). Computational Intelligence, A
Methodological Introduction, Springer, London, 3
rd
edition.
Pearl, J., Mackenzie, D. (2018), The book of why: the new
science of cause and effect, Basic Books, New York.