market monopolization and structural imbalances.
According to some authors, all transaction costs can
be derived from information costs.
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
In the modern world, internationalization is an actual
trend in world economic development, by the middle
of the 90s of the twentieth century. reached an
unprecedented level. As an illustration of this
phenomenon, the educational literature presents a
huge number of diagrams demonstrating how the
parts of one of the most ordinary cars are assembled
in several dozen countries (Molchanova, 2019). In the
middle of the 20th century, in the context of rapidly
growing trade between countries and the creation of
transnational corporations, it became necessary to
create new concepts that would explain the
prerequisites for the transition from the simplest form
of internationalization, i.e. exports to more complex
and mature forms, such as licensing, opening
production units in foreign markets, creating joint
ventures, etc. The American economist R. Vernon
was one of the founders of the theory of
internationalization and modern theories of
international production. But before the publication
of his works, there were already attempts to explain
the principles of the development of international
production and trade. Such theories include the
classical theories of international trade (for example,
the mercantilism of T. Man and V. Petty, the theory
of absolute advantages of A. Smith, the theory of
comparative advantages of D. Ricardo), as well as the
neoclassical theory of international capital movement
developed by Swedish scientists E. Heckscher and B.
Olin, developed by the followers of the theory and
formed in line with the neoclassical theory of
international trade. The Japanese school was close to
the main conclusions of R. Vernon's theory (Egorova,
2020). Among the founders, we single out K. Kojima
and T. Ozawa, who outlined the advantages of
companies in the conditions of international capital
mobility (the theory of “flying geese of
development”). Scientists have proven that
companies can contribute to the economic
development of the host country, while pursuing their
corporate goals. When choosing a location for
locating production facilities, company management
relies on two factors: location of production near end
users (i.e. outside customs barriers) and access to
resources to reduce production costs. J. Dunning in a
series of his works (1980, 1981, 1988, 1992)
published an eclectic theory of OLI-advantages,
called the “eclectic paradigm of international
production”, or Dunning's eclectic paradigm (Eclectic
paradigm, or OLI paradigm). Dunning's theory is
based on a set of OLI-advantages, that is, an investor
makes a decision on foreign direct investment based
on an assessment of three components (advantages):
- Ownership / property (O advantages, or specific
advantages of ownership). The volume of foreign FDI
is explained by the nature and set of competitive
advantages of foreign investors in comparison with
domestic investors (possession of a unique
technology or patent, a wide range of goods and
services, a good reputation, a recognizable brand); -
Location / location (L advantages, or specific location
advantages). The advantage is determined by the
peculiarities of the markets offered to foreign
investors by individual countries in comparison with
other countries (significant market capacity, low
transport and labor costs, cheap raw materials); -
Internationalization / Internationalization (I
advantages, or advantages of internationalization).
Benefits from the implementation of intra-company
transactions (between branches of TNCs, companies
of the same holding, etc.) in comparison with the
execution of such transactions between independent
entities in the market (Meckling, 2020). Advantages
are also determined by the degree to which a company
can internationalize, i.e. control its own competitive
advantages, and not transfer or offer them to foreign
companies, for example, through export or licensing
(i.e., benefits from own use of assets, and not from
transferring third party). The term
“internationalization” is multifaceted. In the scientific
works of foreign and domestic researchers of the
second half of the XX - early XXI centuries. This
concept is considered from different points of view.
First of all, the question of the relationship between
the concepts of “internationalization” and “economic
globalization” remains debatable: some scientists
consider globalization as the final stage of
internationalization, the highest stage of
internationalization of economic activity (Hibbard,
2019) (therefore, it is understandable why they give
the same definition to these concepts), and some - as
a fundamentally new stage in the development of the
world economy. However, if we look at the problem
of measurement, then the assessment of globalization
includes political, economic, cultural, environmental
and other components, while internationalization
includes only economic ones. Globalization is
comprehensive and affects all aspects of life, not just
the economic. We share the view of scholars that
internationalization is the economic dimension of
globalization.