income of households. Finally, social factors in
ethnic areas can promote the increase of household
economic income of farmers through inter-regional
coordination and mutual synergy (Tokila, 2011). At
the theoretical level, social factors in ethnic areas
affect farm household income from the above three
aspects, but the effect of their influence still needs to
be tested empirically. In this paper, we will take the
coordinated development of Tibet and Tibet-related
regions in four provinces as the goal, analyze the
influence of social factors in ethnic regions on
farmers' household economic income through
multiple regression and PSM models, explore the
impact-related points that can be coordinated
between Tibet and Tibet-related regions in four
provinces, and further explore the path of
coordinated and coordinated development of Tibetan
society and economy in Tibet-related regions in four
provinces (Chen, 2008).
3 DATA FOUNDATION AND
MODEL BUILDING
3.1 Data Sources
The data used in this paper come from micro
household data from field research in Tibetan-
related areas in four provinces and Tibet, as well as
macro data from the Sichuan Statistical Yearbook
2020, Qinghai Statistical Yearbook 2020, Gansu
Statistical Yearbook 2020, Yunnan Statistical
Yearbook 2020, and the 2020 National Economic
and Social Development Statistical Bulletin of
representative cities and Tibetan autonomous
prefectures. Among them, the research data
specifically include Hongyuan County, Ganzi
County, Ruoerge County, Markang County, Dafu
County, and Danba County in Tibet-related areas of
Sichuan; Diebe County, Zhuoni County, and Xiahe
County in Tibetan areas of Gansu; Deqin County,
Shangri-La County, and Weixi County in Tibetan
areas of Yunnan; GuiDe County and Duran County
in Tibetan areas of Qinghai and Lhasa City in Tibet
Autonomous Region. A total of 480 questionnaires
were distributed in the survey in Tibet-related areas
of the four provinces, with 454 valid questionnaires
and an actual recovery rate of 94.58%; a total of 780
questionnaires were distributed in the survey in
Lhasa, with 745 valid questionnaires and an actual
recovery rate of 95.5% (Jiang, 2012).
3.2 Explanatory Variables
3.2.1 For Author/S of Only One Affiliation
(Heading 3): To Change the Default,
Adjust the Template as Follows
In this paper, the economic income of farm
households was selected as the explanatory variable,
and the raw data were standardized in order to
eliminate the effects of differences in the average
income levels of different villages and the
measurement unit scale. The formula is:
𝑎 =
𝑎
−𝑎
𝑠
(1)
where, i denotes the states, a denotes the indicator to
be standardized, denotes the mean of this indicator
in Tibetan areas or Tibet-related areas in four
provinces, and s denotes the standard deviation.
3.2.2 Core Explanatory Variables
In this paper, social factors related to farm
households were selected as the core explanatory
variables, firstly, telecommunication network
situation included whether telecommunication was
connected (1=connected, 0=not connected) and
source of electricity (1=powered by national grid,
0=self-generated); education situation was selected
as the core explanatory variable for education level
(1=uneducated, 2=not attended school but could
read and write, 3=graduated from elementary school,
4=graduated from junior high school, 5=general
high school, 6= secondary school, vocational high
school, 7=college undergraduate, 8=university
undergraduate, 9=graduate and above), and
transportation status was selected as the core
explanatory variables (1=yes, 0=no).
3.2.3 Control variables
In this paper, health status (1=very bad, 2=bad,
3=fair, 4=good, 5=very good), ethnicity (1=Tibetan,
2=other), number of laborers, number of household
yaks, employment status, and agricultural insurance
coverage (1=insured, 2=uninsured) were selected as
control variables.
3.3 Model Establishment
In order to avoid the problem of multicollinearity
and eliminate the effects caused by differences in
magnitudes, a multiple linear regression model (1)
was established after standardizing some of the
variables. Further, an OLS+ robust standard error
model (2) was established to deal with the
ICPDI 2022 - International Conference on Public Management, Digital Economy and Internet Technology