The step of capturing the electro-optic image may
occur at a time different from the time that the infra-
red image is captured. For example, the electro-optic
image may be captured during daylight hours so that
the object to be imaged is adequately illuminated to
create a high resolution, low noise image having read-
ily identifiable edges. The corresponding infrared im-
age may be captured during periods of low light when
the electro-optic detector is not effective.
The step of transforming the IR image may occur
in any of several ways, either alone or in combination.
For example, the IR image may be transformed by ap-
plying an inverse filter using a Fourier transform
based on the theoretical point spread function ("PSF")
of the infrared detector. The IR image transformation
may be based on the measured, rather than theoreti-
cal, point spread function for the infrared imaging
system. The inverse filtering process utilizing either
the theoretical or measured point spread function of
the IR imaging system reduces the noise in the image
and makes the transformed infrared image look
“sharper” than the original one. The IR image may be
filtered by applying the Wiener filter as an alternative
to transform the IR image if noise is not neglectable.
The inverse filter is a special case of the more general
Wiener filter.
The step of edge detection of the EO image in-
volves applying an edge detection algorithm to the
EO image. The resulting edge-detected image com-
prises the detected edges. The step of registering the
transformed IR image and the edge-detected EO im-
age may be as simple or as complex as the data re-
quire and involves the identification and matching of
corresponding features on the IR and EO images. The
step of blending the edge-detected EO image and the
transformed IR image involves overlaying the de-
tected edges on the corresponding locations of the
transformed IR image. The blending step may include
blending of the original, un-transformed IR image
with the transformed IR image and the detected
edges.
2.2 B. Second Innovative Method
The method of the method can generate images of im-
proved resolution when only an IR image and no cor-
responding EO image is available. In this second
method, the steps include (a) capturing an IR image,
(b) transforming the IR image by applying a Wiener
filter or an inverse filter using a Fourier transform
based on either a theoretical point spread function or
a measured point spread function of the infrared im-
age, (c) applying an edge detection algorithm to de-
tect the edges in the IR image, and (d) blending the
edge-detected IR image, the original IR image and the
transformed IR image to form a fused IR image.
3 METHOD DESCRIPTION
Figs. 1 and 2 are schematic diagrams illustrating the
first method of the method. Fig. 1 shows the flow of
information in the first method while Fig. 2 shows the
method of the first method. As shown by Figs. 1 and
2, an EO sensor captures an EO image. An IR sensor
captures an IO image, either at the same or at a differ-
ent time from the capture of the EO image. The IR
and EO images are registered to match features of the
IR and EO images for use in blending the processed
images. The EO image is analyzed using an edge de-
tection algorithm to detect differences in hue, color or
intensity that may indicate an edge of an object. The
result of the edge detection is an edge-detected EO
image comprising the detected edges. The other in-
formation in the original image generally is omitted
in the edge-detected EO image. As indicated by Fig.
7, the edgedetected EO image may be further pro-
cessed by applying a small-size low pass filter to the
edgedetected image. The IR image is transformed us-
ing either a Wiener filter or an inverse filter based on
the point spread function of the IR sensor. The inverse
filter is a particular application of the Wiener filter
and comprises transforming the IR image using the
point spread function of the IR sensor. The selection
of either the Wiener filter or the inverse filter may de-
pend upon the noise level in the original IR image. If
the original IR image has a high noise level, then the
Wiener filter will be adopted to reduce that noise
level. If the original IR image has little or no noise,
then the inverse filter is the filter of choice. The
method of the method may be configured to select the
appropriate filter based on the noise level of the orig-
inal IR image. The point spread function of the IR
sensor applied in either the Wiener filter or the in-
verse filter may be either a theoretical point spread
function or a point spread function determined by
measurement. As an optional step, the transformed IR
image and the edge-detected image may be registered
to match the detected edges in the edge-detected im-
age to the edges shown by the transformed IR image.
The edge-detected EO image, the transformed IR
image, and the original, un-transformed IR image