s technology, positioning technology, remote sensing
and GIS technology, the integration technology in the
integration of the concept of "digital earth", "digital
government" management decisions would be for the
government and e-government services provide
information query and government affairs open
platform to handle the data.
As early as 2001, some domestic scholars studied
the operation path and regulation of digital
government. Under the triple regulation of
technology, morality and system, "digital
government" carries out internal logical self-renewal
and gives consideration to efficiency and fairness in
the operation process. It was not until 2012 that some
scholars confirmed the feasibility of the combination
of digital government and Non-Governmental
organizations based on public value assessment, but
did not pay much attention to releasing the data
dividend of digital government itself and the
transformation and exploration of internal innovation
mechanism. Many scholars have defined the
connotation of data government .Some scholars
believe that can be called a digital government
electronic government (e-government) (Luna-Reye,
Gil-Garcia, 2014), there is also a domestic scholars
based on typical investigation of individual cases,
such as Shanghai (Tan, LIU, 2020), Zhejiang (Xu,
2020), Guangdong (Wu, 2020), in Guizhou digital
government construction started earlier, such as well-
developed province (city) government data operation
mechanism and innovation path of exploration and
research.
Most of the existing researches on the construction
of digital government are empirical studies to explore
the path of innovation performance of single case
digital government, and few pay attention to the
comparative analysis of provincial openness level and
path. This paper will focus on the governments of
Shanghai, Zhejiang and Guizhou, taking the
construction of digital governments in the three
regions as samples to conduct horizontal analysis of
several cases, and explore different paths of
government data opening system and release of digital
government welfare, so as to alleviate the
phenomenon of unbalanced and inadequate
development of digital government in China.
3 GOVERNMENT THEORY AND
CONSTRUCTION OF DIGITAL
GOVERNMENT IN THE
DIGITAL ERA
The information age and digital age have led to the
change of people's collective memory. Pachok
Dunleavy, the representative of digital governance
theory, tried to introduce the electronic and digital tool
platform into the process of government service and
government governance, thus catalyzed the birth of
digital governance theory. The first step, he said, is to
accelerate cross-sector integration. Break the
traditional bureaucratic administrative mode, flatten
government departments, and achieve cross-regional
and cross-department cooperation and integration.
Secondly, the relationship between government and
citizens should be reshaped to promote the
cooperative governance of diversified subjects. Let
citizens participate in the processing of government
affairs. Information technology transforms the
traditional civic participation into electronic
participation and realizes the new form of independent
choice and interaction between the government and
citizens. In addition, he also embedded technology
governance ideas. He believes that Internet and other
information technologies are an important force to
promote government reform.
According to the current situation of digital
government construction in the three places, the
construction of digital government in Shanghai takes
people's livelihood service as the main body, and is
committed to making data "taken from and used by the
people". Relying on the Shanghai Public data opening
platform, integrating people's livelihood resources, for
the first time explicitly including public data in water,
electricity, gas, communications, public transportation
and other fields into the open coverage, optimizing
distribution and use through information technology;
The difference between Zhejiang province and
Shanghai lies in that it adheres to the "data
government as a platform". From the perspective of
the motivation and opportunity of Zhejiang provincial
government reform, "running at most once" is the
product of local government's internal driving
innovation reform, and "the blade is inward", starting
from the government's own logic reform; Guizhou
province is a relatively underdeveloped region,
lacking Internet giants such as Alibaba. Therefore, in
the construction of digital government, the way of
"state-owned enterprises funded by the government"
is adopted to solve the technical problems.
This paper will be based on the core principles of
digital governance theory, expand the construction of
digital government research field of vision from the
horizontal, in Shanghai, Zhejiang, Guizhou samples
using the method of case analysis to explore more
places the development of digital government
differentiation, from integration, innovation and