Indonesia has claimed to implement the Conditional
Cash Assistance Program (BTB), known as the
Family Hope Program (PKH).
The Family Hope Program (PKH) was
implemented on a household basis, then turned into a
family basis. This change is because it is based on the
condition of the eyes of the Indonesian people, where
in a matter of one household, it is possible for several
families to gather. In addition, initially, the Family
Hope Program (PKH) assistance as an incentive to
change the actions and behaviors required of
recipients of assistance, has not directly touched the
focus of poverty alleviation although in its
implementation, PKH has other impacts besides that,
namely a gradual reduction in the poverty rate,
although not yet significant (Yusriadi, et al 2020).
The main objective of PKH is to increase
accessibility to education, health, and social welfare
services to support the achievement of quality of life
for poor families. PKH is expected to reduce the
burden of spending on poor families in the short term
and break the poverty chain in the long term. The
target recipients of PKH are Poor Families (KM) who
meet at least one of the criteria consisting of children
0-21 years, pregnant/postpartum mothers, elderly
over 70 years and Severe Disabilities. PKH
beneficiaries are mothers or women who take care of
children in the household in question (if there is no
mother, then grandmother, aunt, aunt, or older sister
can become beneficiaries).
The implementation of PKH is a solution from the
government to fix education and health problems.
This hopes to have implications for poverty reduction
so that every family has the freedom to reach
resources such as education and health (Brown &
James, 2020). However, there are many research
findings related to the implementation of the Family
Hope Program (PKH) policy, there are still many
problems, even though the family of hope program
has a positive relationship to poverty alleviation. This
is because, in the implementation process, there are
sometimes imbalances in the distribution of PKH
funds, both by officers and recipients who are not on
target. This is because the management system
carried out by PKH organizers is not optimal, one of
which is poor management, so that PKH recipients
are not on target. With management, all activities will
be directed and can minimize the risk of errors and
can maximize the agreed plan (Usman, 2014).
As we know, there are currently many recipients
of aid that are not targeted, some people claim that
they are not capable even though they are able and do
not deserve to receive social assistance but participate
in registering as candidates for PKH members.
Incidents like this often occur in the implementation
of the Family Hope program policy. Although the
criteria for 9 PKH recipients have been determined,
many are said to be able to become one of the PKH
recipients. This causes a lot of data on the poor that
are still in doubt so that it will have an impact on the
inappropriate targeting of PKH funds for people who
are entitled. So that it is no longer the poor who
receive and even other people can receive PKH.
2 DISCUSSIONS
2.1 The Legal Basis of the Family Hope
Program in Poverty Alleviation
The Family Hope Program, which is abbreviated as
PKH, is a program of providing social assistance to
families/or someone who is categorized as poor and
vulnerable with the conditions according to the
components and obligations in the program, and the
beneficiaries are registered in the official system,
namely the Integrated Social Welfare Data. (DTKS)
program for handling the poor, which is managed by
the Center for Social Welfare Data and Information
and then designated as the recipient family of the
PKH program.
The Family Hope Program (PKH) is one of the
government's efforts in accelerating poverty
alleviation and specifically aims to break the
intergenerational poverty chain. This program is
known internationally as Conditional Cash Transfers
(CCT). Since its launch in 2007, PKH has contributed
to reducing poverty and encouraging the
independence of social assistance recipients,
hereinafter referred to as Beneficiary Families
(KPM).
The legal basis for providing family hope
programs is Law Number 40 of 2004 concerning the
Social Security System, Law Number 13 of 2011
concerning Handling the Poor, Presidential
Regulation Number 15 of 2010 concerning the
Acceleration of Poverty Reduction, Presidential
Instruction Number 3 of 2010 concerning equitable
development programs, Appendix 46 on the
transparency of the distribution of Conditional Direct
Cash Assistance for Very Poor Families (KSM) as
participants in the Family Hope Program (PKH).
The basis for implementing the family of hope
program is the decision of the coordinating minister
for poverty, No. 31/KEP/MENKO/KESRA/IX//2007
concerning the "control team for the family program
of hope" dated September 21, 2007. Decree of the
Minister of Social Affairs of the Republic of