Learning Behavior Analysis of MOOC Learners Based on
Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model
Yang Le
College of Computer and Information Engineering, Jiangxi Agriculture University, Nanchang, China
Keywords: Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model, MOOC, Behaviour Model, Learning Effectiveness, Influence.
Abstract: MOOC is promoting another innovation in human education, which realizes a broad increase in educational
participation. MOOC supports and facilitates learners’ autonomous personalized learning process and
learning outcomes, and MOOC learners have diversified learning behaviour patterns. Many studies have
pointed out that online learning behaviour patterns are highly correlated with learning outcomes. This study
proposes a learning behaviour analysis architecture for MOOC learners based on multivariate meta-analysis,
taking the "Web System Development and Design" course as an example, online learning behaviour data of
the MOOC learners are processed and analysed to obtain the desired result effect value, and merging all the
effect values by multivariate analysis, finally obtaining a valid conclusion. According to the results of data
analysis, relevant improvement strategies and suggestions are put forward for different stakeholders. By
discovering the problems hidden in the online learning process of MOOC learners, prompting and warnings
in a timely manner, and adjusting the teaching plan in a targeted manner.
1 INTRODUCTION
Since the outbreak of novel coronavirus pneumonia
(COVID-19) at the end of 2019, the development of
online learning has been greatly accelerated. As a
new form of education, MOOC has attracted much
attention for its large-scale, open, free learning
platform services and other characteristics. It
transcends the limitation of time and space and
realizes the wide participation of education. In the
context of "Internet +", big data is rapidly flooding
all walks of life, and the field of education is no
exception. With the development of learning
analysis and artificial intelligence technology, it has
become an irresistible trend to use online learning
behaviour data of student to evaluate students’
learning performance and provide better services for
students (Francisco, 2018; Tsai 2018; Gold 2020).
The online learning platform will record the basic
information of MOOC learners, the update of
teaching resources and the learning behaviour data
of learners, that is, the online learning platform
stores the learning behaviour data of MOOC learners
from the beginning to the end of learning. In the face
of massive data, how to collect, process and analyse
the data so as to truly understand MOOC learners’
course learning situation, value orientation and
psychological state of MOOC learners, making
MOOC teaching more attractive and spreadable, is
one of the key tasks to be completed urgently to
discover and use the value of online learning
behaviour data, and to provide strong data support,
method compliance and practical guidance for
promoting educational informatization to help
families, schools and society cooperate in educating
people
Jovanovic et al. used the K-means algorithm to
construct evaluation criteria to distinguish learners
into three categories: good, general and poor. On
this basis, they continued to use the cognitive
characteristics of learners collected by the scale and
made further analysis and exploration (Jovanovic
2012). Using the back propagation (BP) neural
network method, Wang et al. developed an English
learning system that matches the learner 's learning
situation. This system could recommend learning
resources suitable for each learner based on different
learner’s personality traits, gender, and learner
learning anxiety (Wang 2011). Rajendran et al.
comprehensively analyzed the relevant theories of
pedagogy and psychology, and they found that if
learners encounter difficulties in the process of
learning, the learners will be frustrated. Then, they
130
Le, Y.
Learning Behavior Analysis of MOOC Learners Based on Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model.
DOI: 10.5220/0011901400003613
In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on New Media Development and Modernized Education (NMDME 2022), pages 130-136
ISBN: 978-989-758-630-9
Copyright
c
2023 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. Under CC license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
analyzed the situation of learners using intelligent
auxiliary systems, collected the reasons for their
learning difficulties and established a linear model to
achieve the goal of judging the emotional state of
learners when using intelligent auxiliary systems,
and timely reminded teachers to resolve the
difficulties encountered by learners and changed the
current situation that learners are not conducive to
learning (Rajendran 2013). Aher et al. used the K-
means algorithm to cluster the basic situation of
learners, then, they used the Apriori algorithm to
analyze the correlation of learners in each category,
and obtained the course categories that learners like
to learn, so as to push their favorite learning content
to learners (Aher 2013). Chen implemented a multi-
label classification algorithm to classify tweets that
reflect student issues, selecting about 35,000 tweets
from Purdue University to train a problem detector,
demonstrating how informal social media data
provides insights into student experiences and
strategies (Chen 2014). Patil gathered information
about all engineering students' online interactions on
Twitter, analyzed problems such as heavy learning
burdens, negative emotions, lack of social
engagement, and drowsiness. At the same time, he
used Bayesian algorithms to process the data and
tried to solve this problem (Patil 2018). Guo
proposed a multiple learning behavior analysis
framework. Based on the perspective of multiple
frameworks, she systematically analyzed the
learning behavior of MOOC learners participating in
X course, and discussed the strategies for optimizing
the design of MOOC courses (Guo 2017). Shen et al.
obtained a lot of MOOC learners' learning behavior
data from relevant platforms, constructed a model of
students' online learning behavior and online
learning performance evaluation, and then they
conducted sampling stepwise regression to
understand the impact of students ' online learning
behavior on their academic performance (Shen
2020). Based on the perspective of network learning
resources, Zhao et al. empirically studied the
learning behavior pattern of online learners and its
influence on learning effectiveness, indicating that
the behavior pattern of accessing network learning
resources is related to learning effectiveness (Zhao
2019). Li focused on the learning behavior of
MOOC learners, explored the impact of MOOC
learners' learning behavior patterns on learning
effectiveness, and provided effective suggestions for
improving the learning effectiveness of MOOC
learners (Li 2020). Cheng et al. combined the course
of "Principles of Systems Engineering" on the
military vocational education platform to collect
online learning data for analyzing the learning
behavior of MOOC learners in military education,
and proposed the optimization method of MOOC
design in military education based on learning
behavior analysis (Cheng 2022).
These studies have systematically analysed the
learning behaviour data of MOOC learners, to a
certain extent; can effectively promote the learning
completion rate of MOOC courses. But based on the
perspective of multivariate meta-analysis to study
the learning behaviour of MOOC learners, there is
less involved. Therefore, this paper studies the
analysis of MOOC learners' online learning
behaviour data in the multivariate meta-analysis
environment, constructs the analysis framework of
MOOC learners' online learning behaviour based on
multivariate meta-analysis, and combines chapter
learning and video learning to empirically analyze
MOOC learners' online learning behaviour, so as to
provide operational opinions and suggestions for
improving MOOC learners ' learning effectiveness.
2 CONSTRUCT MULTIVARIATE
META-ANALYSIS
FRAMEWORK FOR MOOC
LEARNERS' LEARNING
BEHAVIOR
Taking MOOC learners who take the course of
"Web System Development and Design" as samples,
the system log data of MOOC platform and the basic
information of learners are collected to analyse the
preliminary influence relationship between MOOC
learners' learning behaviour and learning effect.
Firstly, the analysis framework of MOOC learners'
learning behaviour is designed, and MOOC learners'
learning behaviour is divided into five categories:
(1) Resource learning behaviour: such as the total
number of platform login, the total duration of
platform login, the total number of resource
learning, the total duration of resource learning,
resource learning completion rate, resource learning
interval, resource learning hops, whether learners
learn resources in order, resource learning repetition
rate and so on; (2) Homework learning behaviour:
such as job scoring rate, job completion rate, number
of repeated jobs, number of repeated submission
tests and so on; (3) Interactive learning behaviour:
such as the number of MOOC learners browsing
posts, the total number of posts, the total number of
replies, the number of posts, and the number of
replies and so on; (4) Learning time preference
Learning Behavior Analysis of MOOC Learners Based on Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model
131
behaviour: such as the number and time of morning
study, the number and time of afternoon study, the
number and time of evening study, the number and
time of study in the early hours of the morning and
so on; (5) Page access behaviour: such as course
announcement access times, courseware access
times, course scoring standard access times, other
page access times, etc.
Before the empirical analysis framework, this
study first used confirmatory factor analysis to
evaluate the various latent variables in the research
model, and used reliability analysis to measure the
adequacy of the model. Cronbach’s coefficient (
α
)
and composite reliability (CR) were used to evaluate
the reliability of the measurement model. It can be
seen from Table 1 that these two indicators are
greater than the critical value of 0.70 in each latent
variable, indicating that the measurement model of
each latent variable has good internal consistency, so
the MOOC learner learning behaviour analysis
framework of multivariate meta-analysis constructed
in this study has good reliability.
Table 1: Reliability analysis of Analysis framework.
Classification Average Standard deviation
α
CR
Resource learnin
g
behaviou
r
3.732 0.891 0.882 0.892
Homework learning
b
ehaviou
r
3.043 0.878 0.788 0.853
Interactive learning behaviou
r
2.987 0.868 0.796 0.782
Learning time preference
b
ehaviou
r
2.961 0.845 0.789 0.799
Page access behaviou
r
3.661 0.816 0.852 0.815
3 AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF
MOOC LEARNERS'
LEARNING BEHAVIOUR
3.1 MOOC Learner Learning
Behaviour Data Processing
The collected data of MOOC learners' online
learning behaviour are derived from the explicit
behaviour of “Web System Development and
Design” course. Firstly, all the data are desensitized
to ensure the personal privacy of MOOC learners.
Part of the MOOC learners' online learning
behaviour data collected is the personal basic
information of MOOC learners, including name,
education, major, etc. The other part is the explicit
behaviour data of MOOC learners, including the
number of course task points completed, audio and
video viewing details, discussion details, chapter
learning times, assignments, comprehensive grades,
etc. This paper will select the appropriate model
through the above data to explore MOOC learners'
online learning behaviour and the degree of mastery
of the course, understand the relationship between
course learning grades, and put forward
corresponding conclusions and problem-solving
measures for MOOC learners, teachers, teaching
designers and teaching managers. Firstly, based on
the idea of the distribution lag nonlinear model, the
nonlinear exposure-response relationship between
each explicit behaviour-performance was fitted
respectively. The natural cubic spline function was
used to control the confounding of audio and video,
discussion, the number of chapters learning and
grade. After the effect of single explicit behaviour
was obtained, the effect value of the result was
merged and analysed by multivariate Meta random
effect model.
3.2 MOOC Learner Learning
Behaviour Data Processing
There are many data in the analysis framework of
MOOC learners' learning behaviour, among which
chapter learning and video learning in resource
learning behaviour are the most representative,
which have the greatest impact on MOOC learners'
learning effectiveness. After processing the data of
MOOC learners' learning behaviour, the multivariate
Meta random effect model is used to fit the
relationship between the deviation of chapter
learning times and the comprehensive performance.
The main task of this stage is to estimate the effect
of individual explicit behaviour, construct Poisson
regression and correct the underestimation of
standard error. And then, the result effect value was
combined and analysed by using the random effect
model of multivariate meta-analysis after obtaining
the result effect value of a single class.
NMDME 2022 - The International Conference on New Media Development and Modernized Education
132
3.2.1 Multivariate Meta-Analysis of the
Number of Chapters and Grades
The number of chapters in the resource learning
behaviour can reflect the degree of completion and
enthusiasm of MOOC learners for course learning.
A multivariate meta-analysis of the number of
chapters and academic grades is conducted to know
the implicit influence between the two, understand
the inherent problems of MOOC learners' online
learning, and better improve the teaching of MOOC
courses. The number of chapters is shown in Table
2. The multivariate meta-analysis model is used to
process the compiled chapter learning data, and the
results are shown in Table 3 and Table 4.
Table 2 Statistics table of chapter learning times.
Chapter data
Sample size 8065
Minimum number of learning 1073
Maximum number of learnin
g
4077
Average
2503
Deviation 60
Table 3 Results Estimated effect coefficient of Chapter
Learning.
b
1
b
2
b
3
b
4
Estimate -0.3796 -0.4628 -0.7585 -0.0712
Std. Erro
0.0466 0.0447 0.0977 0.0268
z -8.1390 -10.3612 -7.7617 -2.6595
Pr
(
>
|
z
|)
0.000* 0.000* 0.000* 0.0078
95%ci.lb -0.4711 -0.5504 -0.9501 -0.1238
95%ci.ub -0.2882 -0.3753 -0.5670 -0.0187
Table 4 Variance components of Chapter Learning.
Std. Dev Cor
r
b
1 0.1368
b
1
b
2
b
3
b
2 0.1273 1.0000
b
3 0.2787 0.9955 0.9959
b
4 0.0590 0.9029 0.9029 0.8581
Table 5 Multivariate meta-analysis of online learning
behaviour data heterogeneity.
Multivariate Cochran Q test for heterogeneit
y
Q = 98.7166 (df = 36)
p
-value = 0.000*
I-s
q
uare statistic = 63.5%
The results of Table 3 showed that the
coefficients of the nonlinear result effect curves of
the number of chapter’s deviation are statistically
significant because the P values are less than 0.001
and the P values of b4 are less than 0.01, which can
promote MOOC learners to make further efforts in
learning. The heterogeneity analysis results of
multivariate meta-analysis of online learning
behaviour data are shown in Table 5, where
Q=98.7166, heterogeneity size I
2
=63.5%, and
P<0.001, it is explained that the heterogeneity of the
collected MOOC learner online learning behaviour
data can analyse whether there is a correlation
between different learning behaviour patterns and
learning outcomes of MOOC learners, and how
correlated they are, and promote the construction of
high-quality online learning resources and platforms.
3.2.2 Multivariate Meta-Analysis of Time to
View Learning Video and
Comprehensive Scores
For the explicit behaviour analysis of MOOC
learners' online learning behaviour, an important
indicator to judge the degree of course learning
completion and learning autonomy is the viewing
time of course video. A simple multivariate meta-
analysis using correlation fitting models to explore
the deeper relationship between the time to view
learning video and comprehensive scores is an
important part of online learning behaviour analysis.
Firstly, the collected MOOC learners' learning
behaviour data are summarized. According to the
characteristics of course video viewing time, the
data are sorted out to make simple descriptive
statistic, as shown in Table 6. The results showed
that MOOC learners have significant differences in
the total duration of course video viewing, and the
results of multivariate meta-analysis model are
shown in Table 7 and 8.
Table 6 Statistics table of learning video viewing time.
Video data
Sample size 9165
The shortest viewing time
minute
48.1
The lon
g
est viewin
g
time
(
minute
)
1027.8
Average (minute) 595.5
Deviation (minutes) 159.5
Table 7 Results Estimated effect coefficient of Video
learning.
b1 b2 b3 b4
Estimate -0.5908 -0.6150 -0.7517 -0.8004
Std. Error 0.0478 0.0381 0.0449 0.0409
z -12.3522 -16.1320 -16.7346 -19.5799
Pr (>|z|) 0.000* 0.000* 0.000* 0.000*
95%ci.lb -0.6845 -0.6897 -0.8387 -0.8806
95%ci.ub -0.4970 -0.5403 -0.6636 -0.7203
Learning Behavior Analysis of MOOC Learners Based on Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model
133
Table 8 Variance components of Video learning.
Std. Dev Cor
r
b
1 0.0917
b
1
b
2
b
3
b
2 0.0729 .9461
b
3 0.0905 0.9704 0.9963
b
4 0.0652 0.6983 0.8924 0.8505
Table 9 Heterogeneity of online learning behaviour data.
Multivariate Cochran Q test for hetero
g
eneit
y
Q = 103.2740
(
df = 45
)
p
-value = 0.000***
I-square statistic = 56.4%
The P values in Table 7 are all less than 0.001,
indicating that the coefficient of the nonlinear result
effect curve of learning video viewing time has
important analytical significance for improving the
stickiness of MOOC learners. In Table 9, Q =
103.2740, heterogeneity size I
2
= 56.4%, and P <
0.001, indicating that the heterogeneity of students'
online learning behaviour data collected can
promote the improvement of teaching video, attract
MOOC learners to learn courses, and is conducive to
the completion rate of MOOC courses.
4 IMPROVEMENT STRATEGIES
FOR MOOC LEARNING
According to the analysis framework of MOOC
learners' learning behaviour and the empirical
analysis experiment of MOOC learners' learning
behaviour, the problems faced by ordinary MOOC
learners in the process of learning MOOC courses
are revealed to some extent. Therefore, from the
perspective of different stakeholders, this paper puts
forward suggestions and strategies to optimize the
construction of MOOC courses and to benefit
MOOC learners ' learning.
(1) Diversified construction of MOOC learning
resources and balanced promotion of the application
of various resources.
The study found that the frequency of MOOC
learners using various types of learning resources is:
video learning resources, picture learning resources,
document learning resources, job resources and
interactive behaviour. The frequency of MOOC
learners browsing learning resources, the total length
of browsing and the total number of times determine
the learning efficiency of MOOC learners.
Therefore, it is suggested to make multi-dimensional
video learning resources to guide MOOC learners to
learn video in order and regularly. The balanced
development of various course learning resources
can promote MOOC learners to use and learn
various resources from multiple angles and
perspectives.
(2) Build a MOOC learning community and
enhance the activity of the platform.
The learning method of 'time and space
separation' causes MOOC learners to need more
social interaction, and MOOC learners from all over
the world gather through the MOOC platform with a
common goal. Building a MOOC learning
community can narrow the interaction distance of
social interaction and achieve effective learning.
MOOC learning community refers to a virtual
learning group composed of teachers and students in
the learning process of MOOC courses. Through
mutual help, mutual influence, communication and
discussion, cooperation and sharing with other, they
experience learning and jointly complete the
learning tasks of MOOC courses, which will help to
effectively improve the teaching effect of the course.
At the same time, we should encourage MOOC
learners to carry forward the spirit of 'co-creation
and sharing', build multi-participation and multi-win
network learning resources on the platform, and
jointly build rich and diverse curriculum learning
resources.
(3) Constructing diversified homework
assessment mode to embody knowledge transferable
skills.
Homework learning behaviour has a great
positive impact on MOOC learners' learning
performance, and the completion rate of homework
is obviously conducive to the improvement of final
grades. Therefore, in the process of MOOC
teaching, we should grasp the key factors that affect
the learning effect, that is, the proportion of
homework completion and the quality of homework
completion. There is a significant gap between this
influencing factor and other factors, and it is even
more important than other influencing factors.
Therefore, in order to fully reflect the professional
knowledge and skills of students, it should be
decided to abandon the simple scheme of using the
final exam results as the final score of the course,
and it is necessary to establish a scientific and
diversified assessment method to reflect the
knowledge transferability of MOOC learners. In the
process of MOOC teaching, teachers should pay
special attention to the design, submission,
evaluation and other aspects of the homework part,
and urge and ensure that MOOC learners complete
their homework on time and efficiently.
(4) Establishing MOOC teaching community to
improve course teaching interaction design.
NMDME 2022 - The International Conference on New Media Development and Modernized Education
134
Good curriculum teaching interaction design
effect will significantly affect MOOC learner
stickiness, and a diverse teaching team can ensure
the quality of curriculum teaching interaction design.
The purpose of forming the MOOC Teaching
Community is to strengthen cooperation, dialogue
and sharing among teachers, find effective practices
in the teaching process of MOOC courses, and
ensure the learning quality of MOOC learners.
Teachers need to frequently review the questions
raised by MOOC learners and solve problems
encountered in the teaching process of MOOC
courses. Teachers should lead MOOC learners to
discuss and answer questions in a timely manner,
and design more reasonable course teaching
interactions based on learner satisfaction (Yang
2020). The teaching community must strengthen the
cultivation of teachers' informatization ability and
strengthen the teaching design skills of MOOC
courses. Teachers can carry out a variety of
interactive activities (such as timely response,
instant communication, etc.), so that learners get a
higher sense of participation and enhance learners '
participation in generative resources.
(5) MOOC instructional design and instructional
administrators provide personalized learning support
services.
MOOC instructional design and teaching
management mechanism need to take some
measures to optimize the presentation of learning
activities, to provide MOOC learners with more
personalized learning support and services, thereby
enhancing the effectiveness of MOOC learners. For
different types of MOOC learners, the learning
situation of MOOC learners is predicted according
to MOOC big data, and an autonomous personalized
learning trajectory is recommended for MOOC
learners. MOOC learners independently select other
learning resources according to their own
preferences in the learning process, and formulate
appropriate learning strategies and learning plans
(Yang 2016). In the teaching design of MOOC
course, it provides learning resources that adapt to
the learning methods and habits of MOOC learners,
so as to improve the utilization of MOOC course
resources by MOOC learners, so as to improve the
learning effect of MOOC learners. The design of
learning activities is diversified, and the evaluation
method of learning effectiveness is more scientific
and reasonable, so as to achieve the goal of
enhancing the stickiness of MOOC courses.
5 CONCLUSIONS
MOOC learners with different goals, preferences
and learning motivations may show different levels
of participation and behaviour patterns in learning,
and different levels of participation and behaviour
patterns will in turn affect learning effectiveness.
This paper studies the data of MOOC learners '
learning behaviour, and conducts an empirical
analysis of MOOC learners ' chapter learning and
video learning based on the multivariate Meta
random effect model to explore learners ' different
behaviour patterns and the influence of different
behaviour patterns on learning effectiveness. It
provides useful information for MOOC instructional
designers, and then improves the existing
instructional design, teaching content arrangement
and online learning resource presentation. At the
same time, it can also guide MOOC instructional
designers to put forward instructional design
problems from the perspective of learning theory,
and provide a way to answer questions for
instructional design, and then develop a personalized
learning support system. Combined with the
empirical analysis of the results of MOOC learners '
online learning behaviour, it provides effective
strategies for improving the learning effectiveness of
MOOC learners, and provides reasonable
suggestions for the promotion and development of
MOOC in the future.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was supported by the 14th Five-years
Plan of Jiangxi science of education the key
Research topics (No. 22ZD014).
REFERENCES
Aher S B, Lobo LMRJ. Combination of machine learning
algorithms for recommendation of courses in E-
Learning System based on historical data[J].
Knowledge-Based Systems, 2013, 51(10):1-14.
Chen X, Vorvoreanu M, Madhavan K. Mining Social
Media Data for Understanding Students’ Learning
Experiences [J]. IEEE Transactions on Learning
Technologies, 2014, 7(3):246-259.
Cheng Zhijun, Peng Juan. Research on the Learning
Behavior and the Teaching Design of MOOCs for
Military Professional Education [J]. Journal of Higher
Education Research, 2022, 45(2):65-71.
Learning Behavior Analysis of MOOC Learners Based on Multivariate Meta-Analysis Model
135
Francisco J, García P, Ángel F B, et al. Anadaptive hybrid
MOOC model: Disrupting the MOOC concept in
higher education [J]. Telematics and Informatics,
2018, 35(4):1018-1030.
Gold R, Hemberg E, O’Reilly U M. Analyzing K-12
Blended MOOC Learning Behaviors [C]. Seventh
(2020) ACM Conference on Learning, 2020, 8: 12-14.
Guo Xinyue. Analyzing MOOC Learning Behavior under
A Multi-Analysis Framework [J]. Journal of Open
Learning, 2017, 22(4):21-28.
Jovanovic M, Vukicevic M, Milovanovic M, et al. Using
data mining on student behavior and cognitive style
data for improving e-learning systems: a case study
[J]. International Journal of Computational Intelligence
Systems, 2012, 5(3):597-610.
Li Min. A Study on the Influence of Learning Behavior
Patterns on Learning Effectiveness in MOOCs [D].
Wuhan: Central China Normal University, 2020.
Patil S, Kulkarni S. Mining Social Media Data for
Understanding Students’ Learning Experiences using
Memetic algorithm [J]. Materials Today Proceedings,
2018, 5(1):693-699.
Rajendran R, Iyer S, Murthy S, et al. A Theory-Driven
Approach to Predict Frustration in an ITS [J]. IEEE
Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2013,
6(4):378-388.
Shen Xinyi, Liu Meichen, Wu Jianwei, Dong Xianlei..
Towards a model for evaluating students online
learning behaviors and learning performance [J].
Distance education in China, 2020, (10),1-8,76.
Tsai Y H, Lin C H, Hong J C, et al. the effects of
metacognition on online learning interest and
continuance to learn with MOOCs[J]. Computers &
Education, 2018, 121:18-29.
Wang Y H, Liao H C.Data mining for adaptive learning in
a TESL-based e-learning system [J]. Expert Systems
with Applications, 2011,38(6):6480-6485.
Yang le. The Model of Social Interactions ’Influence on
the Stickiness of MOOC Learners [J]. Journal of
Jiangxi Radio & TV University, 2020,9:19-24.
Yang le. Modeling Personalized and Self-regulated in
MOOC [J]. Contemporary Educational Science,
2016(5):40-42.
Zhao Chengling, Li Min, Shu Fengfang, Huang Yan.
Research on Models of Participation in Online
Learning Resources and Learning Effectiveness [J].
Modern Distance Education, 2019(4):20-27.
NMDME 2022 - The International Conference on New Media Development and Modernized Education
136