Analysis of AI Immersive Interpretation Teaching Evaluation Based
on Data Mining
Siying He
a
Foreign Language Department, Sichuan University Jinjiang College, Meishan, Sichuan, 62080, China
Keywords: VR, AR, Immersive Teaching, Embodied Cognition, Data Mining.
Abstract: The rapid development of China has led to an urgent demand for qualified English interpreters. However,
the interpretation classes in universities fail to build immersive teaching spaces as well as corresponding
teaching resources and evaluation systems, which makes it difficult to meet the demand. Upon the trend of
intelligentization of foreign language education. This study introduces the operating mechanism and
characteristics of AR and VR, constructs an AI immersive interpretation teaching evaluation model, and
uses data mining technology to mine and analyze teaching-related data. Based on the theory of embodied
and immersive teaching, five- dimensional evaluation index is established to accurately reflect the learning
effect of students. This paper focuses on the application of data mining technology in AI immersive
interpretation teaching evaluation, which can promote the quality of school teaching and has great
significance for AI immersive interpretation teaching evaluation.
a
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9078-6064
1 INTRODUCTION
With the rapid development of emerging
technologies such as AI, 5G, virtual reality (VR),
internet of things and big data, human society has
entered an era of intelligence. Among them, the
massive use of extended reality (XR) and
holographic technology is creating lifelike virtual
environments, providing people with new immersive
experience. “The Action Plan of Education
Informatization 2.0” by Ministry of Education
(2018) clearly proposes to “carry out the reform of
education mode with new technology support and
accelerate the construction of intelligent learning
spaces with virtual simulation experimental teaching
projects”. Upon this policy, AI technologies have
led to significant changes in language teaching
industry. Meanwhile, with the implementation of
such new national initiatives as “One Belt, One
Road”, “Building a Shared Future of Human Being”
and “Telling the Chinese Story”, China is in an
urgent need of qualified interpreters with specialized
abilities and cross-cultural awareness. In “Teaching
Guidelines for Undergraduate Foreign Language and
Literature Majors in General Higher Education
Institutions”, Ministry of Education (2020) proposed
that modern technologies should be integrated into
interpretation teaching. Thus, it can be seen that
actively introducing AI technologies to improve or
innovate teaching mode is an effective way to
reconstruct interpretation education ecology and
successfully cultivate high-quality interpreters for
foreign trade and cultural communication of China.
Data mining is mainly cloud architecture
computing technology, and cloud architecture
computing is the development and integration of
distributed computing, Internet technology and
large-scale resource management technology. Its
applications and research include resource
virtualization, information security, and massive
data processing (Luo, and Li, 2014). The structure of
the data mining system is shown in Table 1.
192
He, S.
Analysis of AI Immersive Interpretation Teaching Evaluation Based on Data Mining.
DOI: 10.5220/0011908900003613
In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on New Media Development and Modernized Education (NMDME 2022), pages 192-196
ISBN: 978-989-758-630-9
Copyright
c
2023 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. Under CC license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
Table 1 Structural Diagram of Data Mining System
2 AI TECHNOLOGIES
APPLICABLE IN IMMERSIVE
TEACHING OF
INTERPRETATION
Based on the embodiment-based immersive teaching
theory, we choose the following AI technologies to
empower the practice of the theory.
VR, AR and other XR technology are the core
for creating immersive teaching environments. VR
technology mainly includes dynamic environment
modeling, 3D graphics generation. Based on
computer technology and various display devices,
combined with generation, multi-sensing interaction
and display technologies, VR technology allows
users to interact with each other and the
environment in 3D space in real time. AR
technology, on the other hand, mainly includes 3D
registration, human-computer interaction. AR
technology provides users with holographic glasses
and other devices to perceive information and the
environment. Mixed Reality technology is a fusion
of VR and AR.
All three work logically by first inputting audio
and image signals and then using computers,
smartphones and other devices to present a
simulated environment. Then, through voice
recognition, voice interaction, and human-computer
dialogue, users can interact with the virtual world
and reality through the computer. They construct a
“real” learning context, and enhance the “sense of
presence” of learners. In general, XR technologies
provide experience and contextual support for
immersive teaching.
Table 2 The Working Mechanism for VR, AR and XR
3 CONSTRUCTION OF AN
EVALUATION MODEL FOR AI
IMMERSION
INTERPRETATION TEACHING
3.1 Establishment of Five Dimensions
Evaluation Index
The curriculum of “AI immersive interpretation
teaching” is selected as the action research sample.
This study combines process evaluation and
summative evaluation and constructs a
five-dimensional evaluation model for blended
learning from three aspects: learning process,
learning effect and learning attitude. Among them,
the learning process evaluation mainly investigates
the students’ participation and interaction of online
courses; The evaluation of learning results is
realized by the effectiveness degree. The evaluation
of learning attitude was calculated by the
questionnaire of adaptability and satisfaction.
(1) Participation
As an example, students must participate in the
entire course from task design to implementation
(Song, and Chen, 2018). In this study, only students’
online participation was calculated, which mainly
includes login times (Q1), times of entering courses
(Q2), times of submitting course assignments (Q3),
times of participating in course questionnaires (Q4)
and online hours (Q5).
Analysis of AI Immersive Interpretation Teaching Evaluation Based on Data Mining
193
For ease of calculation, this study uses a
five-point Likert scale to calculate each dimension
of the evaluation model. Assume that participation
Q=Q1+Q2+Q3+Q4+Q5, each of which counts for 1
point to simplify the calculationAssuming that the
actual value of the above items is Qi (i=1,2,3,4,5),
the theoretical value is Q'i, n is the number of
parameters, and the total number of people is N,
then the participation can be calculated as follows:
Q=
Q
Q
×N
n=5

1
Qi/N is the actual average value of a parameter,
and Qi/(N×Q' i) is the actual value/theoretical value,
that is, the degree of completion of the theoretical
value. If Qi/(Q' i×N)≥1, the value of this item is 1,
and the theoretical goal is achieved If Qi/(Q'
i×N)<1, the theoretical goal is not achieved. The
value of n will also increase with the iteration of
THEOL platform, and the formula (1) from this
study can also be applied.
(2) Interaction
Due to the unavailability of data from real-time
interactive classroom, but only network interaction,
this study mainly include the number of reading
teaching materials (J1), the number of class
discussion topic (J2), group discussion area (J3),
according to the number of palindrome course
discussion is palindrome number (J4) and the
number of reading course notice (J5).
J=
J
J
×N
n=5

(2)
Ji/S is the actual average value of a parameter,
and Ji/(N×D 'i) is the actual value/theoretical value,
that is, the degree of completion of the theoretical
value. If Ji/(J 'i ×N)1, then the value is 1, and the
theoretical goal is achieved. If Ji/(J' i×N)<1, the
theoretical goal is not achieved.
(3) Adaptability
Since students have different levels of
knowledge and experience, the adaptability of
blended learning will be different. The adaptability
of blended learning mainly examines students’
recognition of the new learning style (R1), task
difficulty (R2), teamwork (R3), re-engagement (R4)
and recommendation index (R5).
R=
R
R
×N
n=5

3
Ri/N is the actual average value of a parameter,
and Ri/ (N×R' i) is the actual value/theoretical value,
that is, the degree of completion of the theoretical
value. If Ri/(R 'i ×N)1, then the value is 1, which
achieves the theoretical goal. If Ri/(R' i×N)<1, the
theoretical goal is not achieved.
(4) Satisfaction
In distance training, student satisfaction is
usually used to evaluate student response. Trainees’
response to the training theme, online training
course, online tutor, and online training organization
make up the main aspects of online training.
(5) Effect
This study proposes that the effectiveness
evaluation of students’ learning effects of blended
learning mainly includes two parts: the
evaluation of students' experimental results is carried
out by combining teachers' evaluation and students'
mutual evaluation; The students' mastery of
thematic skills was investigated by questionnaire.
(Yin, and Qiao, 2017)
3.2 SVM Algorithm for Evaluating
Teaching
A Quadratic programming will be used to solve the
support vector machine (SVM) algorithm. (Zhang,
Li , and Fu, et al. 2005) In the case of the existing
samples, assuming that ωx + b=0 on the sample
set defines two classes. Which training
sets
x
,yi
,x
∈Ry
C−
−1,+1
i=1,n then
have a hyperplane can make two types of samples
and its distance can reach the maximum, then the
plane as the hyperplane, and hyperplane calculation
formula is:
m
1
2
w
+C
ξ

,
ξ0,i=1, ,2,n
4
f
x
=sgnα
y
k
x
,
y

+b
5
To sum up, this study evaluated students’
blended learning in online courses from five
dimensions, including participation, interaction,
effect, adaptability and satisfaction, and expected to
improve the blended teaching design through the
NMDME 2022 - The International Conference on New Media Development and Modernized Education
194
evaluation results, so as to provide a basis for the
next teaching practice. (Zhao, Shi, and Wang, 2006)
4 AI INTERPRETATION
TEACHING QUALITY
EVALUATION DATA ANALYSIS
AND DISCUSSION
Students’ participation, satisfaction, and effect
degree of online courses are relatively high based on
the results of the five-dimensional evaluation model
(Table 4)One semester of study showed good
adaptation to blended learning, but poor interaction
with it. The results also show that hybrid learning
has achieved obvious results. (Romdhani S, Torr P,
Scholkopf B, et al. 2004). In particular, it has
achieved remarkable results in enhancing students
participation enthusiasm, strengthening operation
consciousness and exercising knowledge and skills.
In the classroom, the simulated environment
integrates various factors of context, text and
situation in the interpretation through VR and AR.
In traditional interpretation training, students only
need to complete the basic task of language
conversion. In the virtual classroom, students have
to face all kinds of challenges in the virtual world,
and accidents may happen at any time. Using the
five-dimensional evaluation model, the interaction
of students on the network platform is mediocre. As
a result, not only is there no student interaction on
the network platform, but the hybrid teaching
practice also suffers from poor interaction design.
Table 3 Learning Evaluation Results
Projec
t
Participatio
n
Interactio
n
Adaptabilit
y
Averag
e
A1 3 5 3 3.7
B2 4 4 3 3.7
C3 3 4 4 3.7
D4 4 4 3 3.7
E5 5 4 3 4.0
F6 4 4 4 4.0
G7 5 2 4 3.7
H8 4 3 5 4.0
I9 3 4 2 3.0
J1 4 3 4 3.7
Table 4 Learning Evaluation Results of the Evaluation
Model
5 CONCLUSION
The immersive learning environment provides
interpreters with visually, audibly and emotionally
interactive experience through AI technologies. In
other words, it is an environment where the
physical, the social, the cultural, and the
psychological situation are simulated. It enables
learners to input and input language scientifically
and efficiently with the support of the environment
so as to realize the internalization of language
ability. More importantly, in the environment, an
interpreter’s meta-cognitive level can be enhanced,
which in turn promotes the role of their
non-intellectual factors and enhances their learning
effectiveness. On the other hand, the dynamic and
open nature of the immersive embodied teaching
environment makes the time and space of teaching
more diversified and the relationship between
teachers and students more equal.
This study expects to improve the
five-dimensional evaluation model of mixed
learning through teaching practice. Based on three
aspects: learning attitude, learning process, and
learning effect, this study constructs a
five-dimensional evaluation model for blended
learning. In this study, the blended learning model is
Analysis of AI Immersive Interpretation Teaching Evaluation Based on Data Mining
195
used as a framework to guide immersive
interpretation teaching. Finally, through data
collection and questionnaire survey, students were
evaluated from five dimensions of participation,
interactivity, adaptability, satisfaction and
effectiveness, and the design of blended learning
was constantly fed back and adjusted. In addition to
improving the learning effect of students, the
five-dimensional evaluation model verifies the
effectiveness of the model and its positive incentive
effect.
REFERENCES
Chen Guang-xi, Xu Jian, Cheng Yan. (2009). Cluster
method of support vector machine to solve large-scale
data set classification. J. Computer Science.3,
184-188.
Luo Xiao, Li Shan. (2014). Construction of research-based
Teaching evaluation System for Statistics Major
Curriculum. J. Curriculum Education Research. 7,
240-241.
Ministry of Education. (2018). Education
Informatization 2.0 Action Plan. [online] available at
<http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A16/s3342/201804/t2
0180425_334188.html>[Accessed 18 April 2018].
Ministry of Education. (2020). Teaching Guide for
Undergraduate Foreign Language and Literature
Majors in Ordinary Colleges and Universities (I) -
Teaching Guide for English Majors. N. Foreign
Language Teaching and Research Press.
Romdhani S, Torr P, Scholkopf B, et al. (2004). Efficient
face detection by a cascaded support-vector machine
expansion. J. Pattern Recognition. 62-70.
Song Cheng, Chen Xiao. (2018). Empirical Research on
the Learning Effect of online Open Courses for Higher
Vocational Students. J. Shaanxi Education (Higher
Education).11, 5-56+69.
Yin Yang, Qiao Ailing. (2017). Analysis and Design of
Flipped Classroom Learning Evaluation based on
MOOC platform. J. Information Technology
Education in primary and secondary schools. 5, 38-42.
Zhang Min, Li Wuping, Fu Jufang, et al. (2005).
Application of clinical nursing teaching quality
evaluation database in clinical practice management.
J. Nursing Research.19, 1773-1774.
Zhao Xiu-feng, Shi Ke-Xue, Wang Chuan-long. (2006).
Design and Implementation of College Teaching
Quality Evaluation System Based on ASP and Web
Database. J. Educational Information Technology. 13,
54-55.
NMDME 2022 - The International Conference on New Media Development and Modernized Education
196