structure (Abrams 2006). There are two broad types
of subjective belief structure to build, namely social
mobility and social change. The biggest difference
lies in which is beliefs whether the boundaries are
permeable or not. Social mobility reminds that
students with family economic difficulties should be
guided to realize that the boundaries between groups
are permeable, so that individuals can change the
current status quo through working diligently, and
they are expected to abandon the subordinate social
identity and its attached negative attributes. social
change reminds students to choose different
dimensions of comparison through social creativity.
That is, set excellent student examples in student
groups. As these students become examples is not
because of wealth but because of their achievement
through hard-working, students with family
economic difficulties are reminded of fighting to gain
a promising future.
In addition, students with family economic
difficulties may face different degrees of adaptation
problems in the whole college stage. Therefore, it is
necessary to grasp the law of adaptation and extend
the period of adaptation education, with freshman as
the key period, sophomore and junior as the
consolidation period, and senior as the extension
period. Adaptability education should be carried out
at each stage to promote the adaptation ability of
students with family economic difficulties. During
campus life, students should be informed of the close
relationship between individuals and nation, so that
students could understand that all personal ideals
must be placed in the category of the nation and
society needs.
5 CONCLUSION
The education of students with family economic
difficulties is a main point in university students'
management. The focus of the education for those
students is not only to reliving economic pressure, but
also to build mental health. Nevertheless, the reason
for students with family economic difficulties are
more likely to suffer from mental problems is that
poverty families is not only a difficulty, but also an
identity, which will take a lot of pressure on
individuals. Caused by bias and prejudice from other
students groups, inferiority feelings in students with
family economic difficulties involve a kind of
negative mental experience.
Hence, we choose to study the students with
family economic difficulties in adaptation period
from the perspective of identity, the purpose is to
reify students with family economic difficulties
students support mechanism. In the perspective of
identity, this article analyzes identity attributes and
the problems the students with family economic
difficulties meet in adapt- ing to the stage at the
university. In the university field, students with
family economic difficulties is an identity. It has
individual, group and social attributes. At the same
time, it involves economic capital, social capital and
cultural capital together but unevenly. The identity is
dynamic change and relative stability. Due to the
influence of social comparison, classification and
differentiation factors, students with family economic
difficulties have problems of identity insecurity,
identity valueless and identity escape, which all lay
hidden dangers for the follow-up problems of
students with family economic difficulties.
Universities should make use of freshmen orientation
and invite the senior students to share and exchange
experience to help students better understand
characteristics of university life. Chinese advanced
socialist culture should be inherited to inspire
intelligence, on which peer education plays an
important role in creating the harmonious atmosphere
in helping students build up confidence. As the
builders of nation in future, students should be
informed of the close relationship between
individuals and nation, so that they can clearly set
aims high and keep feet on the ground firmly, devote
themselves to China modernization.
REFERENCES
Abrams D, Hogg M A. Social identifications: A social
psychology of intergroup relations and group processes
[M]. Routledge, 2006.
Bourdieu P. Cultural capital and social alchemy [J].
Shanghai People’s Publishing House: Shanghai, China,
1997: 199.
Karl Marx/Friedrich Engels Collected Works, Volume 46
[M], Beijing: People's Publishing House, 1995.
Karl Marx/Friedrich Engels Collected Works, Volume 1
[M], Beijing: People's Publishing House, 1995.
Selected Works of Mao Tse-tung, Volume 1 [M], Beijing:
People's Publishing House, 1991.
Tajfel H. Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in
the Social Psychology of intergroup Relations [M].
London: Academic Press, 1978.
Tajfel H. Social psychology of intergroup relations [J].
Annual Review of Psychology, 1982.
Yuan Z. Defining Identity: Problems and Resolutions [J].
Foreign Language Education37 (4), 2016: 20-23.
Zhang Jie. Research on the Group Identity and Individual
Identity of Impoverished College Students [J]. Review
of Higher Education, 2019:85-90.