Figure 5: Result of motor operation.
Figure 5 shows some results to verify the
performance of the failure diagnosis using neural
networks. It was obtained a correct diagnosis in 80%
of the cases corresponding to the motor in good
condition. On the other hand, a correct diagnosis was
obtained in 75% of the cases corresponding to the
eccentricity failure, whereas a correct diagnosis was
achieved in 100% of the cases of the short-circuit
failure. Regarding the dispersion among the operating
amplitudes of the motor, Table 2 shows that the
dispersion of H with respect to ECF and SC was
1.52% and 12.02%, respectively.
4 CONCLUSIONS
In this work, a classification deep neural network was
used in conjunction with the standard deviation as a
statistical tool to define percentages of dispersion of
the operating amplitudes of the motor, obtaining a
difference of only 1.52% between H and ECF and of
12.02% between H and SC; these data were used in
the diagnosis, both for the iq and id components, with
a mean accuracy of 100% for SC and a mean
classification error of 20% and 25% for H and ECF,
respectively. The aforementioned results were
obtained with the experimental modification of
attributes in a deep neural classification model
constituted by 5 features in the input layer, each with
1200 input data (iq or id), a hidden layer with 1000
neurons and 5 outputs as classes corresponding to the
inputs. In order to contribute with the intelligent
system for diagnosing failures in induction motors, it
is foreseen to improve the amplitude of the operating
dispersions of the motor, and to avoid overlapping
conflicts in the system, it is possible to improve the
ADC of the data acquisition system.
REFERENCES
Alberto, J., De Almeida, A. T., & Ferreira, F. J. T. E.
(2021). Experimental study on the external shaft
axial stray flux in squirrel-cage induction motors.
Proceedings - 2021 IEEE Workshop on Electrical
Machines Design, Control and Diagnosis,
WEMDCD 2021, 254–259.
https://doi.org/10.1109/WEMDCD51469.2021.942
5627
Asad, B., Vaimann, T., Belahcen, A., & Kallaste, A. (2018).
Broken rotor bar fault diagnostic of inverter fed
induction motor using FFT, Hilbert and Park’s
Vector approach. Proceedings - 2018 23rd
International Conference on Electrical Machines,
ICEM 2018, 2352–2358.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICELMACH.2018.8506957
Bessous, N. (2020). Reliability surveys of fault
distributions in rotating electrical machines : - Case
study of fault detections in IMS - Case s. CCSSP
2020 - 1st International Conference on
Communications, Control Systems and Signal
Processing, 535–543.
https://doi.org/10.1109/CCSSP49278.2020.9151672
Castellino, A., Donolo, P., de Angelo, C., & Bossio, G.
(2020). Análisis de las potencias instantáneas en
motores de inducción con excentricidad usando un
modelo con distribución sinusoidal. 2020 IEEE
Congreso Bienal de Argentina, ARGENCON 2020 -
2020 IEEE Biennial Congress of Argentina,
ARGENCON 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ARGENCON49523.2020.9
505533
Chanthakit, S., & Rattanapoka, C. (2018). Mqtt based air
quality monitoring system using node MCU and
node-red. Proceeding of 2018 7th ICT International
Student Project Conference, ICT-ISPC 2018, 3–7.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICT-ISPC.2018.8523891
Dhamal, S. S., & Bhatkar, M. V. (2019). Modelling and
simulation of three-phase induction motor to
diagnose the performance on inter-turn short circuit
fault in stator winding. 2018 International
Conference on Computing, Power and
Communication Technologies, GUCON 2018,
1166–1172.
https://doi.org/10.1109/GUCON.2018.8674900
García, J. (2018). Detección de fallas en motores trifásicos
de inducción utilizando análisis de componentes
independientes (ICA). 1–55.
Ghosh, A., Barman, P. K., & Das, S. (2020). Statistical
Feature Based Identification of Rotor Fault
Indicators for Three Phase Induction Motor.
Proceedings of 2020 IEEE-HYDCON International
Conference on Engineering in the 4th Industrial
Revolution, HYDCON 2020, 19–23.
https://doi.org/10.1109/HYDCON48903.2020.9242
691
Moreno Cerdà, F. (2018). Demostrador arquitectura
publish / subscribe con MQTT. 55.
Oñate, W., Gallardo, Y., Pérez, R., & Caiza, G. (2022).